Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 407, 2012
Article Number 03
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 27 February 2013
  • Alstad D.N., 1987. Particle size, resource concentration and the distribution of the net spinning caddisflies. Oecologia, 71, 525–531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson T. and Klubnes R., 1983. The life histories of Hydropsyche siltalai (Dohler, 1963) and Hydropsyche pellucidula (Curtis, 1834) (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae) in a west Novergian river. Aquatic Insects, 5, 51–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderwald P.H., 1996. A qualitative description of the life cycle and density regulation of Brachycentrus subnubilus in the Austrian Danube. Archive fur Hydrobiologie, Supplementband, 10, 417–424. [Google Scholar]
  • Basguren A. and Orive E., 1990. The relationship between water quality and caddisfly assemblage structure in fast running rivers. The River Cadagua basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 15, 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker G., 1987. Net building behavior, tolerance and development of two caddisfly larvae from the river Rhine (Hydropsyche contubernalis and H .pellucidula) in relation to oxygen content. Oecologia, 73, 242–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Birks H.J.B., Line J.M., Juggins S., Stevenson A.C. and ter Braak C.J.F., 1990. Diatoms and pH reconstruction. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 327, 263–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonada N., Munoz-Zamora C., Rierdevall M. and Prat N., 2004. Ecological profiles of caddisfly larvae in Mediterranean streams: implications for bioassement methods. Environmental Pollution, 132, 509–521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonada N., Munoz-Zamora C., Rierdevall M. and Prat N., 2005. Ecological and historical filters constraining spatial caddisfly distribution in Mediterranean rivers. Fresh. Biol., 50, 781–797. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boon P.J., 1979. Studies on the spatial and temporal distribution of larval Hydropsychidae in the north Tyne River system (Northern England). Arch. Hydrobiol., 85, 336–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Camargo J.A., Gonzalo C. and Alonso Á., 2011. Assessing trout farm pollution by biological metrics and indices based on aquatic macrophytes and benthic macroinvertebrates: A case study. Ecological Indicators, 11, 911–917. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Castillo L.E., Martínez E., Ruepert C., Savage C., Gilek M., Pinnock M. and Solis E., 2006. Water quality and macroinvertebrate community response following pesticide applications in a banana plantation, Limon, Costa Rica. Science of The Total Environment, 367, 418–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cupža D., Covaciu-Marcov S.D., Sucea F. and Hercuþ R., 2010. Using macrozoobenthic invertebrates to asses the quality of some aquatic habitats from Jiului Gorge National Park (Gorj County, Romania). Biharean Biologist, 4, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Dohet A., 2002. Are caddisflies an ideal group for the biological assessment of water quality in streams? Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Trichoptera. [Google Scholar]
  • Dumbravã-Dodoacã M. and Petrovici M., 2010. The influence of the anthropic activities on the benthonic macroinvertebrates community existing in the Jiu and Jiul de Vest rivers, south west of Romania. AACL Bioflux, 3, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  • Edington J.M., 1968. Habitat preferences in net-spinning caddish larvae with special reference to the influence of water velocity. J. Animal Ecology, 37, 675–692. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fairchild M.P. and Holomuzki J.R., 2002. Spatial variability and assemblage structure of stream hydropschid caddisflies. J. North American Benthological Society, 21, 576–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frieberg N. and Jacobsen D., 1999. Variation in growth of the detritivore shredder Sericostoma personatum (Trichoptera). Fresh. Biol., 42, 625–635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia A.R., Herrera A.F.G. and Romero-Ferreras A., 2006. Distribution of Trichoptera communities in the Hargargonta catchments (Los Alcornocales, Natural Park, SW Spain). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 91, 781–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gislason G.M., 1978. Life cycle of Limnephilus affinis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Iceland and in Northumberland, England. Verrhsung Intern.Verein. Limnol., 20, 2622–2629. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunn R.J.M., 1985. The biology of Brachycentrus subnubilus Curtis (Trichoptera) in River Frome. Hydrobiologia, 3, 133–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D., 2001. Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Hildrew A., 1986. Aquatic insects: patterns in life history, environment and community structure. Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress of Entomology. Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Hildrew A. and Edington J.M., 1979. Factors facilitating the coexistence of hydropsychid caddis larvae (Trichoptera) in the same river system. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 557–576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Illies J. and Botosaneanu L., 1963. Problemes et metodes de la classification et de la zonation ecologiques des eaux courantes, considerees surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitteilungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur Teoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 12, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Iversen T.M., 1974. Ingestion and growth in Sericostoma personatum (Trichoptera) in relation to the nitrogen content of ingested leaves. Oikos, 25, 278–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Iversen T.M., 1979. Laboratory energetic of larvae of Sericostoma personatum (Trichoptera). Ecography, 2, 1–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MacCausland A. and McTammany M.E., 2007. The impact of episodic coal mine drainage pollution on benthic macroinvertebrates in streams in the Anthracite region of Pennsylvania. Environ. Pollut., 149, 216–226. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mackay R.J., 1984. Life History patterns of Hydropsyche bronta and Hydropsyche morosa (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in summer warm rivers of southern Ontario. Can. J. Zool., 62, 271–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Malas D. and Wallace J.B., 1977. Strategies of coexistence in three species of net-spinning caddisfly (Trichoptera) in second order southern Appalachian streams. Can. J. Zool., 55, 1829–1840. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy J.H., Giller P.S. and Horan M.A., 1998. Spatial scale and the aggregation of stream macroinvertebrates associated with leaf packs. Fresh. Biol., 39, 325–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Resh V.H., 1992. Recent trends in the use of Trichoptera in water quality monitoring. Proceedings of the seventh International Symposium on Trichoptera. [Google Scholar]
  • Resh V.H., Brown A.V., Covich A.P., Gurtz M.E., Li H.W., Minshall G.W., Reice S.R., Sheldon A.L., Wallace J.B. and Wissmar R., 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7, 433–455. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruse L.P. and Hermann S.J., 2000. Plecoptera and Trichoptera species distribution related to environmental characteristics of the metal-polluted Arkansas river, Colorado. American Naturalist, 60, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Shaw PJ., 2003. Principal Component Analysis. Multivariate statistics for the Environmental Sciences. In: Arnold H. (ed.) Oxford University Press Ink, New York, 92–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Shiels D.R., 2010. Implementing landscape indices to predict stream water quality in an agricultural setting: An assessment of the Lake and River Enhancement (LARE) protocol in the Mississinewa River watershed, East-Central Indiana. Ecological Indicators, 10, 1102–1110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teague S.A., Knight A.W. and Teague B.N., 1985. Stream macrohabitat selectivity, resource partitioning and niche shifts in grazing caddishfly larvae. Hydrobiologia, 128, 3–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Barendregt L.G., 1986. Weighted averaging of species indicator values: its efficiency in environmental calibration. Mathematical Biosciences, 78, 57–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C. and Hildrew A., 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat template for river system. Fresh. Biol., 31, 265–275. [Google Scholar]
  • Townsend C.R., Scarbrook M.R. and Doledec S., 1997. Quantifying disturbance in streams: alternative measures of disturbance in relation to macroinvertebrate species traits and species richness. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 531–544. [Google Scholar]
  • Usseglio-Polaterra P., Bournaud M., Richoux P. and Tachet H., 2000. Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates : relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Fresh. Biol., 43, 175–205. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cumins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. J. Fishery Aquatic Sciences, 37, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Vuori K.M., 1993. Influence of water quality and feeding habits on the whole body metal concentrations in lotic trichopteran larvae. Limnologica, 23, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace J.B. and Merritt R.W., 1980. Filter feeding ecology of aquatic insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 25, 103–132. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace I.D., Wallace B., Philipson G.N., 2003. Case-bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland, Freshwater Biological Association, UK, 70 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Waringer J. and Graf W., 1997. Atlas der Österreichischen Köcherfliegenlarven. Facultas Universitätsverlag, Wien, 120 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wildsmith M.D., Rose T.H., Potter I.C., Warwick R.M. and Clarke K.R., 2011. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of environmental deterioration in a large microtidal estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 525–538. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright J.F., Sutcliffe D.W. and Furse M., 2000. Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters. RIVPACS and other techniques, Freshwater Biological Association, UK, 356 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.