Open Access

This article has an erratum: [erratum]

Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 405, 2012
Article Number 08
Number of page(s) 18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2012014
Published online 06 July 2012
  • Agrell I., 1948. The shell morphology of some Swedish unionids as affected by ecological conditions. Arkiv för Zoologi, 41A, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Alcamo J., Flörke M. and Märker M., 2007. Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socioeconomic and climatic change. Hydrol. Sci. J., 52, 247–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Araujo R., Gomez I. and Machordom A., 2005. The identity and biology of Unio mancus (Lamarck, 1819) (= U. elongatulus) (Bivalvia : Unionidae) in the Iberian Peninsula. J. Mollus. Stud., 71, 25–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Araujo R., Toledo C. and Machordom A., 2009a. Redescription of Unio gibbus (Spengler, 1793), a west palaearctic freshwater mussel with hookless glochidia. Malacologia, 51, 131–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Araujo R., Toledo C., Van Damme D., Ghamizi M., and Machordom A., 2009b. Margaritifera marocana (Pallary, 1918) : A valid species inhabiting Moroccan rivers. J. Mollus. Stud., 75, 95–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Araujo R., Reis J., Machordom A., Toledo C., Madeira M.J., Gómez I., Velasco J.C., Morales J., Barea J.M., Ondina P. and Ayala I., 2009c. Las náiades de la península ibérica. Iberus, 27, 7–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Bodon M., Favilli L., Giusti F. and Manganelli G., 1995. Gastropoda Pulmonata. In : Minelli A., Ruffo S. and La Posta S. (eds.), Checklist delle specie della fauna italiana, Bologna (Calderini), 14, 1–160. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouchet P., 2002. Mollusques terrestres et aquatiques de France : un nouveau référentiel taxonomique, un nouveau départ, de nouvelles perspectives. In : Falkner G., Ripken T.E.J. and Falkner M. (eds.), Mollusques continentaux de France : Liste de Référence annotée et Bibliographie. Patrimoines Naturels, 52, 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouchet P., Falkner G. and Seddon M., 1999. Lists of protected land and freshwater molluscs in the Bern Convention and European Habitats Directive : are they relevant to conservation? Biol. Conserv., 90, 21–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cappelletti C., Cianfanelli S., Beltrami M.E. and Ciutti F., 2009. Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) (Bivalvia : Unionidae) : A new non-indigenous species in lake Garda (Italy). Aquat. Invas., 4, 685–688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuttelod A., Seddon M. and Neubert E., 2011. European Red List of Non-marine Molluscs, IUCN, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 97 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Falkner G., 1994. Systematik vorderorientalischer Najaden als Vorstudie zur Bearbeitung archäologischer Funde. In : Kokabi M. and Wahl J. (eds.), Beiträge zur archäozoologie und prähistorischen Anthropologie, Forschungen und Bearbeitung archäologischer Funde, Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart (K. Theiss), 53, 135–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Falkner G., Ripken T.E.J. and Falkner M., 2002. Mollusques continentaux de France, Liste de référence annotée et bibliographie. Patrimoines Naturels, 52, 350 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R. and Vrijenhoek R., 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit i from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gavetti E., Birindelli S., Bodon M. and Manganelli G., 2008. Molluschi terrestri e d’acqua dolce della Valle di Susa Monografie di Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino, Beinasco, 44, 274 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J. and Kuehn R., 2005. Genetic diversity and differentiation of central European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) populations : Implications for conservation and management. Mol. Ecol., 14, 425–439. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Germain L., 1931. Mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles, Faune de France, Paris (Lechevalier), 477 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., Bertolino S., Bodon M., Casellato S., Cianfanelli S., Ferraguti M., Lori E., Mura G., Nocita A., Riccardi N., Rossetti G., Rota E., Scalera R., Zerunian S. and Tricarico E. 2008. Animal xenodiversity in Italian inland waters : Distribution, modes of arrival, and pathways. Biol. Invas., 10, 435–454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Glöer P. and Zettler M.L., 2005. Kommentierte Artenliste der Süßwassermollusken Deutschlands. Malakologische Abhandlungen, 23, 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Haas F., 1969. Superfamilia Unionacea, Das Tierreich, 88, 663 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall T.A., 1999. BioEdit : a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. and Hall B., 2001. Mrbayes : Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17, 754–755. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • IFEN 2006. Les pesticides dans les eaux, données 2003 et 2004. In : Nirascou F. (ed.), Les Dossiers de l’IFEN Institut Français de l’Environnement, Orléans, 38 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Keith P., Persat H., Feunteun E. and Allardy J. (eds.), 2011. Les poissons d’eau douce de France, Editions Biotope-Mèze and MNHN-Paris, 552 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Khalloufi N., Toledo C., Machordom A., Boumaïza M. and Araujo R., 2011. The unionids of Tunisia : Taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships, with redescription of Unio ravoisieri (Deshayes, 1847) and U. durieui (Deshayes, 1847). J. Mollus. Stud., 77, 103–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M. and Freyhof J., 2007. Handbook of European freshwater fishes, Published by the authors, 666 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lydeard C., Cowie R.H., Ponder W.F., Bogan A.E., Bouchet P., Clark S.A., Cumming K.S., Frest T.J., Gargominy O., Herbert D.G., Hershler R., Perez K.E., Roth B., Seddon M., Strong E.E and Thompson F.G., 2004. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. BioScience, 54, 321–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mace G.M., 2004. The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 359, 711–719. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Machordom A., Araujo R., Erpenbeck D. and Ramos M.A., 2003. Phylogeography and conservation genetics of endangered European Margaritiferidae (Bivalvia : Unionoidea). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 78, 235–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Master L.L., Stein B.A., Kutner L.S. and Hammerson G.A., 2000. Vanishing assets : Conservation status of U.S. Species. In : Stein B.A., Kutner L.S. and Adams J.S. (eds.), Precious heritage : The status of biodiversity in the United States New York, Oxford University Press, 93–118. [Google Scholar]
  • May R., 1990. Taxonomy as destiny. Nature, 347, 129–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McMurray S.E., Schuster G.A. and Ramey B.A., 1999. Recruitment in a freshwater unionid (Mollusca : Bivalvia) community downstream of Cave Run Lake in the Licking River, Kentucky. Amer. Malac. Bull., 15, 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Morrison W.R., Lohr J.L., Duchen P., Wilches R., Trujillo D., Mair M. and Renner S.S., 2009. The impact of taxonomic change on conservation : Does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant? Biol. Conserv., 142, 3201–3206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel K.O., 1992. Das Schalenwachstum dreier Muschelarten (Bivalvia : Unionidae) in der Schwalm, einem nordhessischen Mittelgebirgsfluβ. Decheniana, 145, 165–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel K.O., 2000. Testing hypotheses on the dispersal and evolutionary history of freshwater mussels (Mollusca : Bivalvia : Unionidae). J. Evol. Biol., 13, 854–865. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel K.O. and Badino G., 2001. Population genetics and systematics of the European Unionidae. In : Bauer G. and Wächtler K. (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionidae, Ecol. Stud., 1454, 51–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Ortmann A.E., 1920. Correlation of shape and station in freshwater mussels (Naiades). Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 59, 268–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Payraudeau B.-C., 1826. Catalogue descriptif et méthodique des Annélides et des Mollusques de l’île de Corse. Bechet, Levrault, Paschoud, Treuttel and Wurtz, Paris, 218 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Persat H. and Keith P., 2011. Biogéographie et historique de la mise en place des peuplements ichtyologiques de France métropolitaine. In : Keith P., Persat H., Feunteun E. and Allardy J. (eds.), Les poissons d’eau douce de France, Editions Biotope-Mèze and MNHN-Paris, 552 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Posada D., 2008. jModelTest : Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol., 25, 1253–1256 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Prié V., 2012. Les sous-espèces de la Mulette méridionale mancus (Lamarck 1819) (Bivalvia, Unionidea) en France : descriptions originales et matériel topotypique. MalaCo, 8, 428–446. [Google Scholar]
  • Ravera O., Frediani A. and Riccardi N., 2007. Seasonal variations in population dynamics and biomass of two Unio pictorum mancus (Mollusca, Unionidae) populations from two lakes of different trophic state. J. Limnol., 66 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Reis J. and Araujo R., 2009. Redescription of Unio tumidiformis (Castro, 1885) (Bivalvia, Unionidae), an endemism from the south-western Iberian peninsula. J. Nat. Hist., 43, 1929–1945. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sabater S., 2008. Alteration of the global water cycle and their effects on river structure, function and services. Freshwater Reviews, 1, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Sabater S. and Tockner K., 2009. Effects of hydrologic alterations on the ecological quality of river ecosystems. In : Sabater S. and Barcelo D. (eds.), Water scarcity in the Mediterranean : Perspectives under global change Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 15–39 [Google Scholar]
  • Schonewald-Cox C.M., Chambers S.M., Macbryde B. and Thomas L., 1983. Genetics and conservation, Menlo Park, Benjamin/Cummings, California, 722 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Soroka M., 2010. Characteristics of mitochondrial DNA of unionid bivalves (Mollusca : Bivalvia : Unionidae). I. Detection and characteristic of double uniparental inheritance (DUI) of unionid mitochondrial DNA. Folia Malacologica, 18, 147–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer D.L., 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 25, 271–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. and Kumar S., 2011. MEGA5 : molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum Parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol., 28, 2731–2739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K., Pusch M., Borchardt D. and Lorang M.S., 2010. Multiple stressors in coupled river-floodplain ecosystems. Freshwater Biol., 55, 135–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watters G.T., 1994. Form and function of unionoidean shell sculpture and shape (Bivalvia). Amer. Malacol. Bull., 11, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Zieritz A. and Aldridge D.C., 2009. Identification of ecophenotypic trends within three European freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia : Unionoida) using traditional and modern morphometric techniques. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 98, 814–825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zieritz A., Hoffman J.I., Amos W. and Aldridge D.C., 2010. Phenotypic plasticity and genetic isolation-by-distance in the freshwater mussel Unio pictorum (Mollusca : Unionoida). Evol. Ecol., 24, 923–938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.