Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 403, 2011
Article Number 01
Number of page(s) 19
Published online 02 September 2011
  • Agence de l’Eau Rhin-Meuse, 2005. Qualité du milieu physique du Muhlbach de Gertsheim - campagne 2004–2005. 24 p. + annexes.
  • Agence de l’Eau Rhin-Meuse, 2006. Outil d’évaluation de la qualité du milieu physique. Metz.
  • Allan J.D., 2004a. Influence of land use and landscape setting on the ecological status of rivers. Limnetica, 23, 187–198.
  • Allan J.D., 2004b. Landscape and riverscapes: The influence of land use in stream ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol Evol. S., 35, 257–284. [CrossRef]
  • Allan J.D., Erickson D.L. and Fay J., 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol., 37, 149–161. [CrossRef]
  • Buffagni A., Casalegno C. and Erba S., 2009. Hydromorphology and land use at different spatial scales: expectations in a changing climate scenario for medium-sized rivers of the Western Italian Alps. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 174, 7–25. [CrossRef]
  • Breiman L., 2001a. Random Forests. Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32. [CrossRef]
  • Breiman L., 2001b. Statistical modeling: The two cultures. Stat. Sci., 16, 199–215. [CrossRef]
  • Carlisle D.W., Skalski J.R., Batker J.E., Thomas J.M. and Cullinan V.I., 1989. Determination of ecological scale. Landscape Ecol., 2, 203–213. [CrossRef]
  • Carlisle D.M., Falcone J. and Meador M.R., 2009. Predicting the biological conditions of streams: use of geospatial indicators of natural and anthropogenic characteristics of watersheds. Environ. Monit. Assess., 151, 143–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Cutler D.R., Edwards T.C.K., Beard H, Cutler A. and Hess K.T., 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology source. Ecology, 88, 2783–2792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • De’ath, G., 2007. Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction. Ecology, 88, 243–251. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Delacoste M., Baran P., Lek S. and Lascaux J.M., 1995. Classification et clé de détermination des faciès d’écoulement en rivières de montagne. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 337-339, 149–156. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Ecogea and Geodiga, 2007. Recensement des cours d’eau et des milieux aquatiques à “caratère patrimonial” sur le basin Adour-Garonne. Cours d’eau remarquables. Rapport final novembre 2007. Agence de l’Eau Adour-Garonne. 12 p. + annexes.
  • Environment Agency, 2003. River Habitat Survey in Britain and Ireland. Field survey guidance manual: version 2003. 136 p.
  • European Community. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official journal of the European Communities 2000; L 327, 22.12.2000: 1–72.
  • Feld C.K., 2004. Identification and measure of hydromorphological degradation in Central European lowland streams. Hydrobiologia, 516, 69–90. [CrossRef]
  • Frissell C.A., Liss W.J., Warren C.E. and Hurley M.D., 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ. Manage., 10, 199–214. [CrossRef]
  • Gergel S.E., Turner M.G., Miller J.R., Melack J.M. and Stanley E.H., 2002. Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquat. Sci., 64, 118–128. [CrossRef]
  • Goldstein R.M., Carlisle D.M., Meador M.R. and Short T.M., 2007. Can basin land use effects on physical characteristics of streams be determined at broad geographic scale? Environ. Monit. Assess., 130, 495–510. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Hamza M. and Larocque D., 2005. An empirical comparison of ensemble methods based on classification trees. J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 75, 629–643. [CrossRef]
  • Harvey D.W., 1967. Pattern, process, and the scale problem in geographical research. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 45, 71–78.
  • Hawkins C.J., Kerschner J.L., Bisson P.A., Bryant M.D., Decker L.M., Gregory S.V., McCoullough D.A., Overton C.K., Reeves G.H., Steedman R.J. and Young M.K., 1993. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features. Fisheries, 18, 3–11. [CrossRef]
  • Hitt N.P. and Broberg L.E., 2002. A river integrity assessment for the western Montana. Final report.
  • Hürlimann J., Elber F. and Niederberg K., 1999. Use of algae for monitoring rivers: an overview of the current situation and recent developments in Switzerland. In: Prygiel J., Witton B.A., Bukowska J. (eds.), Use of Algae for monitoring rivers III, Agence de l’Eau Artois- Picardie, Douai, France, 39–56.
  • Hynes H.B.N., 1975. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte. Limnologie, 19, 1–15.
  • Johnson L.B., Richards C., Host G.E. and Arthur J.W., 1997. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biol., 37, 193–208. [CrossRef]
  • Kail J., Jahnig S.C. and Hering D., 2009. Relation between floodplain land use and river hydromorphology on different spatial scales - a case study from two lower-mountain catchments in Germany. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 174, 63–73. [CrossRef]
  • Kohavi R., 1995. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1137–1143.
  • Lammert M. and Allan J.D., 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: Effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover on habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environ. Manage., 23, 257–270. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Leopold L.B. and Wolman M.G., 1957. River Patterns: Braided, Meandering and Straight. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-B, 51 p.
  • Levin S., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73 1943–1967. [CrossRef]
  • Liaw A. and Wiener M., 2002. Classification and regression by Random Forests. R News. 2/3:18–22. [online] URL http:// Little EL. 1971. Atlas of United States trees.
  • Malavoi J.R. and Souchon Y., 2002. Description standardisée des principaux faciès d’écoulement observables en rivière : clé de détermination qualitative et mesures physiques. Notes techniques. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 365, 366, 357–372. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Mielke P.W. and Berry K.L., 1976. Multiresponse permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Communications in Statistics, A5, 1409–1424.
  • Molnar P., Burlando P. and Ruf W., 2002. Integrated catchment assessment of riverine landscape dynamics. Aquat. Sci., 64, 129–140. [CrossRef]
  • Olden J.D. and Jackson D.A., 2000. Torturing data for the sake of generality: how valid are our regression models? Ecoscience, 7, 501–510.
  • Orr H.G., Large A.R.G., Newson M.D. and Walsh C.L., 2008. A predictive typology for characterising hydromorphology. Geomorphology, 100, 32–40. [CrossRef]
  • Penning-Rowsell E.C. and Townshend J.R.G., 1978. The influence of scale on the factors affecting stream channel slope. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., New Series, 3, 395–415. [CrossRef]
  • Peters J., De Baets B., Verhoest N.E.C., Samson R., Degroeve S., De Becker P. and Huybrechts W., 2007. Random Forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modeling. Ecol. Model., 304–318.
  • Pinto B.C.T., Araujo F.G. and Hughes R.M., 2006. Effects of landscape and riparian condition on a fish index of biotic integrity in a large southeastern Brazil river. Hydrobiologia, 556, 69–83. [CrossRef]
  • Pollard K. and van der Laan M., 2002. A method to identify significant clusters in gene expression data. In Sixth World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 318–325.
  • Poulain P., 2000. Le volet “poissons migrateurs du SDAGE Adour-Garonne”. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 357/358: 311–322.
  • R Development Core Team. R, 2004. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Roth N.E., Allan J.D. and Erickson D.E., 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol., 11, 141–156. [CrossRef]
  • Sandin L., 2009. The relationship between land-use, hydromorphology and river biota at different spatial and temporal scales: a synthesis of seven case studies. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 174, 1–5. [CrossRef]
  • Sandin L. and Verdonschot P., 2006. Stream and river typologies-major results and conclusion from the STAR project. Hydrobiologia, 566, 33–37. [CrossRef]
  • Strahler A.N., 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. In: Ven Te Chow (ed.), Section 4-2, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  • Tison J., Giraudel J.L., Coste M., Delmas F. and Park Y-S., 2004. Use of the unsupervised neural network for ecoregional zoning of hydrosystems through diatom communities: case study of Adour-Garonne watershed (France). Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 159, 409–422. [CrossRef]
  • Vaughan I.P., Diamond M., Gurnell A.M., Hall K.A., Jenkins A., Milner N.J., Naylor L.A., Sear D.A., Woddward G. and Ormerod S.J., 2009. Integrating ecology with hydromophology: a priority for river science and management. Aquat. Conserv., 19, 113–125. [CrossRef]
  • Verdonschot P.F.M. and Nijboer R.C., 2004. Testing the European stream typology of the Water Framework Directive for macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia, 516, 35–54. [CrossRef]
  • Vondracek B., Blann B., Cox C. B., Nerbonne J.F., Mumford K.F., Nerbonne B.A., Sovell L.A. and Zimmermann J.K.H., 2005. Land use, spatial scale, and stream systems: lessons from an agricultural region. Environ. Manage., 36, 775–791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Wasson J.-G., Chandesris A., Pella H. and Souchon Y., 2001. Definition of the French hydroecoregions. Methodology for determining reference conditions according to the Framework Directive for water management (Définition des hydroécorégions françaises. Méthodologie de détermination des conditions de référence au sens de la Directive cadre pour la gestion des eaux). Rapport de phase 1. Ministère de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Environnement, Cemagref, France.
  • Wasson J.-G., Chandesris A., Pella H. and Blanc L., 2002. Les Hydro-écorégions de France métropolitaine. Approche régionale de la typologie des eaux courantes et éléments pour la définition des peuplements de référence d’invertébrés. Cemagref, Lyon, France.
  • Wiens J.A., 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biol., 47, 501–515. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.