Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 402, 2011
Eco-Hydro 2010
SER 2010
Article Number 07
Number of page(s) 17
Section Eco-Hydro 2010
Published online 25 November 2011
  • Andronikova I.N., 1996. Structural-functional organization of zooplankton in lakes’ ecosystem of different trophic types, Nauka, St. Petersburg, 189 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Auniņš E.A., 1963. Calculation of ionic-salt run-off and the agrgression of water in the Daugava River. In: Kumsare A.J. (ed.), Hydrobiology and ichthyology of inland waterbodies in the Baltic states, Latvian SSR Academy of Sciences, Riga, 31–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Bakaeva E.N. and Nikanorov A.M., 2006. Hydrobionts for the assessment of water quality, Institute of Water Problems, RAS, Nauka, Moscow, 239 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Beach NW., 1960. A study of the planktonic rotifers of the Presque Isle County, Michigan. Ecol. Monogr., 30, 339–357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borutsky E.V., 1960. Key to identification of wild freshwater crawfish of the USSR and contiguous countries from fragments in fish intestines, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, 218 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bothár A., 1988. Results of long-term zooplankton investigations in the River Danube, Hungary. Verhandlung Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie, 23, 1340–1343. [Google Scholar]
  • Briede A., Kļaviņš M., Rodinovs V. and Kokorīte I., 2001. Seasonal and long-term discharge changes in Latvian rivers. Geographical Articles, 9, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Briede A., Kaviņš M., Rodinovs V. and Lizuma L., 2004. Ice regime in Latvian rivers. Geographical Articles, 12, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Cimdiņš P., Druvietis I., Liepa R., Parele E., Urtane L. and Urtans A., 1995. Latvian catalogue of indicator species of freshwater saprobity. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci., 1/2, 122–133. [Google Scholar]
  • Deksne R., Škute A. and Paidere J., 2010. Changes in structure of zooplankton communities in the middle Daugava (western Dvina) over the last five decades. Acta Zool. Litua., 20, 190–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demenik AL., 1988. Turners as a component of zooplankton communities of rivers’ ecosystems, VINITI, Minsk, 54 p [Google Scholar]
  • Demenik A.L., 1990. Sedimentation and mineralization of suspended substances in turners’ communities in the Neman River. In: Materials of III international conference, Institute of zoology, Leningrad, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Escribano R. and Hidalgo P., 2000. Spatial distribution Spatial distribution of copepods in the north of the Humboldt Current region off Chile during coastal upwelling. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K., 80, 283–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferdous Z. and Muktadir A.K.M., 2009. A Review: Potentiality of Zooplankton as Bioindicator. Applied Sciences, 6, 1815–1819. [Google Scholar]
  • Gruberts D., 2007. Effect of floods on phytoplankton communities in aspect of river monitoring: a case of the Middle Daugava River (South-east Latvia). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161, 487–510. [Google Scholar]
  • Gruberts D., 2009. The long-termed changes of climate and Daugava stream in Daugavpils. In: LU 67th Scientific conference, Climate changes and water, Works collection, University of Latvia, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  • Gulyas P., 1994. Studies on the rotatorian and crustacean plankton in the Hungarian section of the Danube between 1848.4 and 1659.0 river kilometer. Limnologie Aktuel, l2, 2–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Hauer F.R., Baron J.S., Campbell D.H., Fausch K.D., Hostetler S.W., Leavesley G.H., Leavitt P.R., Mcknight D.M. and Stanford J., 1997. Assessment of climate change and freshwater ecosystems of the rocky mountains, USA and Canada. Hydrol. Proc., 11, 903–924. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hill M.O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54, 427–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanova M.B., 1976a. Influence of pollution on planktonic crustaceans and the possibility of using them for determination of the river pollution. In: Skarlato O.A. (ed.), Methods of bilogical analysis of wreshwaters, Institute of Zoology, Leningrad, 68–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanova M.B., 1976b. Experience of participation of planktonic creatures in selfpurifying processes (on the example of zooplankton from the shores of the Izhora River). In: Skarlato O.A. (ed.), Hydrobilogical bases of water selfpurifying, Institute of Zoology, Leningrad, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Kavacs G., 1994. Encyclopaedia of Latvia’s Nature, Latvian encyclopaedia publishers, Riga, 255 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kļaviņš M., Nikodemus O., Segliņš V., Melecis V., Vircavs M. and bolia K., 2008. Invironmental science, LU Ācademical publishing house, Riga, 599 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Klimowicz H., 1981. The plankton of the River Vistula in the region of Warsaw in the years 1977–1979 Acta Hydrobiologica, 23, 47–67. [Google Scholar]
  • Kokorīte I., 2007. Chemical content of Latvian overground waters and its influential factors, promotion work’s summary, University of Latvia Geographical and ground science faculty, Environmental science department, Riga, 27 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirk K.L. and Gilbert J.J., 1990. Suspended clay and the population dynamics of planktonic rotifers and cladocerans. Ecology, 71, 1741–1755. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs J.C., 1999. Ecological Methodology, 2nd ed., Addison Wesley Longman, Melno Park, California, USA, 620 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krylov A.V., 2005. Zooplankton in plain rivers, Nauka, Moscow, 263 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krylov AV., 2006. The changes in trophical structure of zooplankton water flow due to environmental factors. In: Rumjancev V.A. and Trifonova I.S. (eds.), Report Thesis in the International Conference Bioindication in Monitoring of Freshwaters’ ecosystems, St. Petersburg, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumsare AJ., 1967. Hydrobiology of the Daugava River, Science, Riga, 186 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kurss V. and Stinkule A., 1997. Latvia’s minerals, Zvaigzne, Riga, 200 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kutikova LA., 1970. Rotifera of the USSR fauna. Key to fauna of the USSR, Nauka, Leningrad, 744 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kutikova L.A., 1976. Water planktons’ turners as the indicator of water quality. In: Kutikova L.A. (ed.), Methods of water biological analysis, Nauka, Leningrad, 80–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Laganovska R., 1963. Zooplankton of the river Daugava and peculiarities of its development in connection with hydrological regime and pollution of the river, 10th Freshwater in Baltic Scientific conference Minsk, 139 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre. Available from 27710.html (accessed 8 September 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • Lazareva VI., 2010. Zooplankton Structure and Dynamics in the Rybinsk Reservoir, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., Moscow, 183 p. [Google Scholar]
  • LU agency “LU Institute of Biology”, 2007. The evaluation of ecological situation of the Daugava River, University of Latvia Salaspils, 58 p. [Google Scholar]
  • MacArthur R.H., 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biol. Rev., 40 510–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manuilova E.F., 1964. Cladocera of the USSR fauna, Nauka, Moscow-Leningrad, 327 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Marneffe Y., Descy J.P. and Thomé J.P., 1996. The zooplankton of the lower river Meuse, Belgium: seasonal changes and impact of industrial and municipal discharges. Hydrobiologia, 319 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mathivanan V., Vijayan P., Sabhanayakam S. and Jeyachitra O., 2007. An assessment of plankton population of Cauvery river with reference to pollution. Environ. Biol., 28, 523–526. [Google Scholar]
  • Matisone M., 1965. Biogenic run-off of the Daugava River. In: Kumsare A.J. (ed.), Fishery of the inland warbodies in the Latvian SSR, Science, Riga, 365–379. [Google Scholar]
  • Mulani S.K., Mule M.B. and Patil S.U., 2009. Studies on water quality and zooplankton community of the Panchganga river in Kolhapur city. Environ. Biol., 30, 455–459. [Google Scholar]
  • Semenova A.N., 2010. Indicating role of zooplankton in the assessement of the ecological condition of Kurshskij Gulf, Autoreport, Borok, 21 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon C.E., 1948. Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal., 27, 379–423 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • , 623–656. [Google Scholar]
  • Sprinģe G., Briede A., Druvietis I., Parele E., Rodinovs V. and Urtāne L., 1999. Investigations of biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems of Latvia. In: Naimovičiene Ž, Raudiene L. and Virbickas T. (eds.), Hydrobiological research in the Baltic countries, Part I, The rivers and lakes, Institute of Ecology, Vilnius, 232–272. [Google Scholar]
  • Škute R.J., 1971. Zooplankton of the River Daugava and its role in the productivity and biological evaluating of the river. Dissertation, Tartu University, Tartu, 233 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Škute R.J., 1976. Regionalism of the Daugava River according to zooplankton. In: Škute R.J. (ed.), Ecological and Biological Investigations of Water Animals, Zvaigzne, Riga, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Škute R.J. and Škute A.O., 1984. Sanitary characteristic of the middle part of the river Daugava. In: Škute R. J. (ed.), Sanitary Characteristic of the River Daugava, DPI, Daugavpils, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  • The Ministry of Environment, 2009. available from preses_relizes/?doc\special {::tag lxir empty(formule){id=949} {content==}}\global \advance \xTagcount by 1\relax 954715.09.2009 (accessed 17 December 2009). [Google Scholar]
  • The monitoring of upper waters on the territory of the Republic of Belarus, 2008. Results of the investigation 2008, Department of Hydrology of the Belarus SSR, Belarus, 37 p. [Google Scholar]
  • The summary of overground waters’ quality, 2003. Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre (on line), available from (accessed 3 February 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • VadadiFülöp C.S., 2009. Zooplankton (Cladocera, Copepoda) dynamics in the River Danube upstream and downstream of Budapest, Hungary. Opusc. Zool. Budapest, 40, 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandish O.I., 2000. Zooplankton as indicator of lake ecosystems’ conditions (on the example of subartcical lake Imandra). Water Resour., 27, 364–371. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanjare AI., Padhye SM. and Pai K., 2010. Zooplankton from a polluted river, Mula (India), with record of Brachionus rubens (Ehrenberg, 1838) epizoic on Moina macrocopa (Straus, 1820). Opusc. Zool. Budapest., 41, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitton B.A. (ed.), 1975. River Ecology. Studies in Ecology, Volume 2, Blackwell Scientific Publications, US distributors, University of California Press, Berkeley, Oxford, 725 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.