EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 401 (2011) Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 401 (2011) 11 References
Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 401, 2011
European Crayfish: food, flagships and ecosystem services
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2011025
Published online 18 May 2011
  • Ahern D., England J. and Ellis A., 2008. The virile crayfish, Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae), identified in the UK. Aquat. Inv., 3, 102–104. [Google Scholar]
  • Armstrong K.F. and Ball S.L., 2005. DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 360, 1813–1823. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbaresi S., Gherardi F., Mengoni A. and Souty-Grosset C., 2007. Genetics and invasion biology in fresh waters: a pilot study of Procambarus clarkii in Europe. In: Gherardi F. (ed.), Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats, Invading Nature: Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, Springer, Dordrecht, 381–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Bickford D., Lohman D.J., Sodhi N.S., Ng P.K.L., Meier R., Winker K., Ingram K.K. and Das I., 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 148–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Briski E., Cristescu M.E., Bailey S.A. and MacIsaac H.J., 2010. Use of DNA barcoding to detect invertebrate invasive species from diapausing eggs. Biol. Inv., doi: 10.1007/s10530-010-9892-7. [Google Scholar]
  • Buhay J.E., 2009. “COI-like” sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. J. Crustacean Biol., 29, 96–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C., 2006. Konkurrenz zwischen zwei Neozoen: Verdrängungs-Mechanismen zwischen Kamberkrebs (Orconectes limosus, Crustacea: Decapoda) und Kalikokrebs (O. immunis). [Competition between two Neozoans: Mechanisms of exclusion between spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus, Crustacea: Decapoda) and calico crayfish (O. immunis)]. MSc. thesis, Ulm University, Ulm, 97 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. and Daudey T., 2008. First record of Orconectes juvenilis (Hagen, 1870) in eastern France: update to the species identity of a recently introduced orconectid crayfish (Crustacea: Astacida). Aquat. Inv., 3, 105–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. and Pfeiffer M., 2010. First evidence for an established Marmorkrebs (Decapoda, Astacida, Cambaridae) population in Southwestern Germany, in syntopic occurrence with Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817). Aquat. Inv., 5, 405–412. [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C., Stich H.B. and Maier G., 2008. Aggressive interactions and competition for shelter between a recently introduced and an established invasive crayfish: Orconectes immunis vs. O. limosus. Fund. Appl. Limnol., 172, 27–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dasmahapatra K.K., Elias M., Hill R.I., Hoffman J.I. and Mallet J., 2009. Mitochondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real, and some that are not. Mol. Ecol. Res., 10, 264–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daudey T., 2006. Diagnostic des peuplements astacicoles de la vallée du Dessoubre. Master thesis QTEBV, Université de Franche-Comté, Fédération de Pêche du Doubs, 65 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dehus P., Phillipson S., Bohl E., Oidtmann B., Keller M. and Lechleiter S., 1999. German conservation strategies for native crayfish species with regard to alien species. In: Gherardi F. and Holdich D.M. (eds.), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation?, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 149–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Dillman C.D., Wagner B.K. and Wood R.M., 2010. Phylogenetic estimation of species limits in dwarf crayfishes from the Ozarks: Orconectes macrus and Orconectes nana (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Southeast. Nat., 9, 185–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dussling U. and Hoffmann C., 1998. First discovery of a population of Orconectes immunis in Germany. IAA Newsletter – Crayfish News, 20, 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Fetzner J.W. Jr., Sheehan R.J. and Seeb L.W., 1997. Genetic implications of broodstock selection for crayfish aquaculture in the Midwestern United States. Aquaculture, 154, 39–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Filipová L., Kozubíková E. and Petrusek A., 2009. Allozyme variation in Czech populations of the invasive spiny-cheek crayfish Orconectes limosus (Cambaridae). Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394-395, 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Filipová L., Holdich D.M., Lesobre J., Grandjean F. and Petrusek A., 2010. Cryptic diversity within the invasive virile crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870) species complex: new lineages recorded in both native and introduced ranges. Biol. Inv., 12, 983–989. [Google Scholar]
  • Floyd R., Lima J., de Waard J., Humble L. and Hanner R., 2010. Common goals: policy implications of DNA barcoding as a protocol for identification of arthropod pests. Biol. Inv., 12, 2947–2954. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R. and Vrijenhoek R., 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol., 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  • Gelmar C., Pätzold F., Grabow K. and Martens A., 2006. The calico crayfish Orconectes immunis at the northern Upper Rhine: a newly introduced American crayfish is spreading rapidly in Central Europe (Crustacea: Cambaridae). Lauterbornia, 56, 15–25 (in German with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F. and Holdich D.M. (eds.), 1999. Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation?, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield, 299 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Grandjean F. and Souty-Grosset C., 1997. Preliminary results on the genetic variability of mitochondrial DNA in the signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. C. R. Acad. Sci. III, 320, 551–556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hebert P.D.N., Ratnasingham S. and deWaard J.R., 2003. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.), 270, S96–S99. [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs H.H. Jr., 1972. Biota of Freshwater Ecosystems: Identification Manual No. 9, Crayfishes (Astacidea) of North and Middle America, For the Environmental Protection Agency, Project # 18050 ELD. Available at: http://iz.carnegiemnh.org/crayfish/Keys/index2.htm (accessed on 29th December 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs H.H. Jr., 1989. An illustrated checklist of the American crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smiths. Contrib. Zool., 480, 236 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs H.H. III, Jass J.P. and Huner J.V., 1989. A review of global crayfish introductions with particular emphasis on two North American species (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 56, 299–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., 2003. Crayfish in Europe – an overview of taxonomy, legislation, distribution, and crayfish plague outbreaks. In: Holdich D.M. and Sibley P.J. (eds.), Management and Conservation of Crayfish, Proceedings of a conference held on 7th November 2002 at the Nottingham Forest Football Club, Nottingham, UK, Environment Agency, Bristol, 15–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M. and Reeve I.D., 1988. Functional morphology and anatomy. In: Holdich D.M. and Lowery R.S. (eds.), Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation, London, Chapman and Hall, 11–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., Reynolds J.D., Souty-Grosset C. and Sibley P.J., 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394-395, 11. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulák M., Kašpar V., Kozák P., Filipová L. and Petrusek A., 2010. Cross-species amplification of microsatellite markers in the invasive spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus): assessment and application. J. Appl. Genet., 51, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Humble L.M., DeWaard J.R. and Quinn M., 2009. Delayed recognition of the European poplar shoot borer, Gypsonoma aceriana (Duponchel) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in Canada. J. Entomol. Soc. Brit. Columbia, 106, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Huner J.V., Moody M. and Thune R., 1994. Cultivation of freshwater crayfishes in North America. In: Huner J.V. (ed.), Freshwater crayfish aquaculture in North America, Europe, and Australia, Families Astacidae, Cambaridae, Parastacidae, Food Product Press, New York, 5–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones J.P., Rasamy J.R., Harvey A., Toon A., Oidtmann B., Randrianarison M.H., Raminosoa N. and Ravoahangimalala O.R., 2009. The perfect invader: a parthenogenetic crayfish poses a new threat to Madagascar’s freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Inv., 11, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar]
  • Kossakowski J., 1966. Raki [Crayfish]. Panstwowe wydawnictwo rolnicke i lesne, Warszawa, 292 p. (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P., Dorn N.J., Kawai T., van der Heiden C. and Scholtz G., 2010a. The enigmatic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) is the parthenogenetic form of Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870). Contrib. Zool., 79, 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P., Shen H., Füllner G. and Scholtz G., 2010b. The first record of the parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (Decapoda, Astacida, Cambaridae) in the wild in Saxony (Germany) raises the question of its actual threat to European freshwater ecosystems. Aquat. Inv., 5, 397–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Marzano F.N., Scalici M., Chiesa S., Gherardi F., Piccinini A. and Gibertini G., 2009. The first record of the marbled crayfish adds further threats to fresh waters in Italy. Aquat. Inv., 4, 401–404. [Google Scholar]
  • Mathews L.M., Adams L., Anderson E., Basile M., Gottardi E. and Buckholt M.A., 2008. Genetic and morphological evidence for substantial hidden biodiversity in a freshwater crayfish species complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 48, 126–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nylander J.A.A., 2004. MrModeltest 2.3. Program distributed by the author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. [Google Scholar]
  • Pöckl M., Holdich D.M. and Pennerstorfer J., 2006. Identifying native and alien crayfish species in Europe, European Project CRAYNET, 47 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Romaire R.P., McClain W.R., Shirley M.G. and Lutz C.G., 2005. Crawfish aquaculture – marketing, Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, SRAC Publication, 2402, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Ronquist F. and Huelsenbeck J.P., 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saunders G.W., 2009. Routine DNA barcoding of Canadian Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) reveals the invasive species Gracilaria vermiculophylla in British Columbia. Mol. Ecol. Res., 9, 140–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M., Chiesa S., Gherardi F., Ruffini M., Gibertini G. and Marzano F.N., 2009. The new threat to Italian inland waters from the alien crayfish “gang”: the Australian Cherax destructor Clark, 1936. Hydrobiologia, 632, 341–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scholtz G., Braband A., Tolley L., Reimann A., Mittmann B., Lukhaup C., Steuerwald F. and Vogt G., 2003. Parthenogenesis in an outsider crayfish. Nature, 421, 806. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soes D.M. and van Eekelen R., 2006. Rivierkreeften, een oprukkend probleem? [Are exotic crayfish becoming a problem?]. De Levende Natuur, 107, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C., Holdich D.M., Noël P.Y., Reynolds J.D. and Haffner P., 2006. Atlas of crayfish in Europe. In: Patrimoines naturels, 64, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M. and Kumar S., 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor C.A., 2000. Systematic studies of the Orconectes juvenilis complex (Decapoda: Cambaridae), with descriptions of two new species. J. Crustacean Biol., 20, 132–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor C.A. and Hardman M., 2002. Phylogenetics of the crayfish subgenus Crockerinus, genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Cambaridae), based on cytochrome oxidase I. J. Crustacean Biol., 22, 874–881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor C.A. and Knouft J.H., 2006. Historical influences on genital morphology among sympatric species: gonopod evolution and reproductive isolation in the crayfish genus Orconectes (Cambaridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 89, 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trontelj P., Machino Y. and Sket B., 2005. Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in the crayfish genus Austropotamobius inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 34, 212–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Van de Wiel C.C.M., Van der Schoot J., Van Valkenburg J.L.C.H., Duistermaat H. and Smulders M.J.M., 2009. DNA barcoding discriminates the noxious invasive plant species, floating pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides L.f.), from non-invasive relatives. Mol. Ecol. Res., 9, 1086–1091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K., 2002. Alien crayfish in Europe: negative and positive impacts and interactions with native crayfish. In: Leppäkoski E., Gollasch S. and Olenin S. (eds.), Invasive aquatic species of Europe, Distribution, impacts and management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, 76–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitworth T.L., Dawson R.D., Magalon H. and Baudry E., 2007. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proc. R. Soc. B, 274, 1731–1739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.