Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 394-395, 2009
Regional European Crayfish Workshop: Future of Native Crayfish in Europe
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2010006
Published online 24 February 2010
  • Abrahamsson S., 1965. A method of marking crayfish Astacus astacus Linné in population studies. Oikos, 16, 228–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Addadi L., Raz S. and Weiner S., 2003. Taking advantage of disorder: amorphous calcium carbonate and its roles in biomineralization. Adv. Mater., 15, 959–970. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahearn G.A., Mandal P.K. and Mandal A., 2004. Calcium regulation in crustaceans during the molt cycle: a review and update. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 137, 247–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aiken D.E. and Waddy S.L., 1992. The growth process in crayfish. Rev. Aquat. Sci., 6, 335–381. [Google Scholar]
  • Belchier M., Edsman L., Sheehy M.R.J. and Shelton P.M.J., 1998. Estimating age and growth in long-lived temperate freshwater crayfish using lipofuscin. Freshw. Biol., 39, 439–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brewis J.M. and Bowler K., 1982. The growth of the freshwater crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Northumbria. Freshw. Biol., 12, 187–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bubb D.H., Lucas M.C., Thom T.J. and Rycroft P., 2002. The potential use of PIT telemetry for identifying and tracking crayfish in their natural environment. Hydrobiologia, 483, 225–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burič M., Kozák P. and Vích P., 2008. Evaluation of different marking methods for spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus). Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 389, 02. [Google Scholar]
  • Cadrin S.X., Friedland K.D. and Waldman J.R., 2005. Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, 736 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Drach P. and Tchernigovtzeff C., 1967. Sur la méthode de détermination des stades d’intermue et son application générale aux crustacés. Vie Milieu, 18, 595–610. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., Cenni F., Crudele G. and Mori M., 2002. Infestation rate of branchiobdellids in Austropotamobius pallipes italicus from a stream of Central Italy: Preliminary results. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 367, 785–792. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartnoll R.G., 1982. Growth. In: Abele L.G. (ed.), The Biology of Crustacea, Academic Press, New York, 111–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Jerry D.R., Stewart T., Purvis I.W. and Piper L.R., 2001. Evaluation of visual implant elastomer and alphanumeric internal tags as a method to identify juveniles of the freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor. Aquaculture, 193, 149–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Partanen P. and Penttinen A., 1995. Spatial mark-recapture method in the estimation of crayfish population size. Biom. J., 37, 979–994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavey C.R. and Fielder D.R., 1990. Use of gastrolith development in molt staging the fresh-water crayfish Cherax cuspidatus Riek, 1969. Crustaceana, 59, 101–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds J.D., 2002. Growth and reproduction. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, London, 151–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M. and Gibertini G., to appear. Reproductive cycle of the threatened crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet, 1858) in a Mediterranean stream. Ital. J. Zool., submitted. [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M., Belluscio A. and Gibertini G., 2008. Understanding the population structure and dynamics in threatened crayfish. J. Zool. (Lond.), 275, 160–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M., Macale D., Schiavone F., Gherardi F. and Gibertini G., 2008. Effects of urban isolation on the river crab growth. Fundam. Appl. Limnol. (Arch. Hydrobiol.), 172, 167–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M., Chiesa S. and Gibertini G., 2010a. Progress in understanding population structure and dynamics in inland water macrodecapods for biomonitoring programs. Atti del “IX Colloquium Crustacea Decapoda Mediterranea”, Torino (Italy), 2–6 Settembre 2008, to appear. [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M., Di Giulio A. and Gibertini G., 2010b. Biological and morphological aspects of Branchiobdella italica (Annelida: Clitellata) in a native crayfish population of central Italy. Ital. J. Zool., to appear. [Google Scholar]
  • Shechter A., Berman A., Singer A., Freiman A., Grinstein M., Erez J., Aflalo E.D. and Sagi A., 2008. Reciprocal changes in calcification of the gastrolith and cuticle during the molt cycle of the red claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Biol. Bull., 214, 122–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Suko T., 1968. Histological study on the gastrolith formation in Procambarus clarkii (Girard). Sci. Rep. Saitana Univ. Biol. Earth Sci., 5, 139–141. [Google Scholar]
  • Travis D.F., 1960. The decomposition of skeletal structures in the Crustacea. I. The histology of the gastrolith skeletal tissue complex and the gastrolith in the crayfish Orconectes (Cambarus) virilis Hagen – Decapoda. Biol. Bull., 118, 137–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Travis D.F. and Friberg U., 1963. The deposition of skeletal structures in the Crustacea. IV. Microradiographic studies of the gastrolith of the crayfish Orconectes virilis Hagen. J. Ultrastruct. Res., 8, 48–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiles P.R. and Guan R.Z., 1993. Studies on a new method for permanently tagging crayfish with microchip implants. Freshwater Crayfish, 9, 419–425. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.