EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 425 (2024) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 425 (2024) 20 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 425, 2024
Riparian ecology and management
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2024017
Published online 16 October 2024
  • Acolas ML, Roussel JM, Lebel JM, Baglinière JL. 2007. Laboratory experiment on survival, growth and tag retention following PIT injection into the body cavity of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Fish Res 86: 280–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Adriaenssens B, Johnsson JI. 2011. Learning and context-specific exploration behaviour in hatchery and wild brown trout. Appl Anim Behav Sci 132: 90–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baras E, Malbrouck C, Houbart M, Kestemont P, Mélard C. 2000. The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture 185: 159–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77: 771–783. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bolland JD, Cowx IG, Lucas MC. 2009. Evaluation of VIE and PIT tagging methods for juvenile cyprinid fishes. J Appl Ichthyol 25: 381–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown R, Cooke S, Anderson G, McKinley R. 1999. Evidence to Challenge the “2% Rule” for Biotelemetry. North Am J Fish Manag 19: 867–871. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Midwood JD, Thiem JD, Klimley P, Lucas MC, Thorstad EB, Eiler J, Holbrook C, Ebner BC. 2013. Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future. Anim Biotelemetry 1: 5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crivelli AJ. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Zingel asper. IUCN Red List Threat Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/en (accessed January 4, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • ECP, INRA. 2018. ECP, INRA,;1; 2018. The Ecology and Fish Population Biology Facility (doi:10.15454/1.5572402068944548E12) [Google Scholar]
  • Fuiman LA, Rose KA, Cowan JH, Smith EP. 2006. Survival skills required for predator evasion by fish larvae and their relation to laboratory measures of performance. Anim Behav 71: 1389–1399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudin P. 2001. Habitat shifts in juvenile riverine fish. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl. 135: 393–408. [Google Scholar]
  • Georget M. 2021. Plan national d'actions 2020-2030: En faveur de l'apron du Rhône Zingel asper. DREAL AURA, Conservatoire d'espaces naturels Rhône-Alpes. [Google Scholar]
  • Hopko M, Zakęś Z, Kowalska A, Partyka K. 2010. Impact of intraperitoneal and intramuscular PIT tags on survival, growth, and tag retention in juvenile pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.). Fish Aquat Life 18: 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoskonen P, Pirhonen J. 2006. Effects of repeated handling, with or without anaesthesia, on feed intake and growth in juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Aquac Res 37: 409–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jepsen N, Schreck C, Clements S, Thorstad EB. 2005. A brief discussion of the 2% tag/bodymass rule. Aquatic telemetry: advances and applications. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Fish Telemetry held in Europe., Spedicato, M.T., Lembo, G., Marmulla, G., Ustica, Italy., 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  • Keith P, Poulet N, Denys G, Changeux T, Feunteun E, Persat H. 2020. Les poissons d'eau douce de France, Paris, 704 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Knaepkens G, Maerten E, Tudorache C, De Boeck G, Eens M. 2007. Evaluation of passive integrated transponder tags for marking the bullhead (Cottus gobio), a small benthic freshwater fish: effects on survival, growth and swimming capacity. Ecol Freshw Fish 16: 404–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koeck B, Gudefin A, Romans P, Loubet J, Lenfant P. 2013. Effects of intracoelomic tagging procedure on white seabream (Diplodus sargus) behavior and survival. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 440: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Labonne J. 2002. Contribution à la Conservation de l'Apron du Rhône (Zingel asper): Dynamique des Populations, Sélection de l'Habitat et Modélisation. Université Claude Bernard − Lyon I −, Lyon. [Google Scholar]
  • Labonne J, Gaudin P. 2005. Exploring population dynamics patterns in a rare fish, Zingel asper, through capture-mark-recapture methods. Conserv Biol 19: 463–472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lieggi C, Kalueff AV, Lawrence C, Collymore C. 2020. The influence of behavioral, social, and environmental factors on reproducibility and replicability in aquatic animal models. ILAR J 60: 270–288. [Google Scholar]
  • Monnet G, Corse E, Archambaud-Suard G, Grenier R, Chappaz R, Dubut V. 2022. Growth variation in the endangered fish Zingel asper: contribution of substrate quality, hydraulics, prey abundance, and water temperature. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 32: 1156–1170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Musselman WC, Worthington TA, Mouser J, Williams DM, Brewer SK. 2017. Passive integrated transponder tags: review of studies on warmwater fishes with notes on additional species. J Fish Wildl Manag 8: 353364. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petersson E, Järvi T. 2006. Anti-predator response in wild and sea-ranched brown trout and their crosses. Aquaculture 253: 218–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PTJ, Kidd KA, MacCormack TJ, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, Smol JP, Taylor WW, Tockner K, Vermaire JC, Dudgeon D, Cooke SJ. 2019. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 94: 849–873. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Richard A, O'Rourke J, Caudron A, Cattanéo F. 2013. Effects of passive integrated transponder tagging methods on survival, tag retention and growth of age-0 brown trout. Fish Res 145: 37–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skov C, Brodersen J, Brönmark C, Hansson L-A., Hertonsson P, Nilsson PA. 2005. Evaluation of PIT-tagging in cyprinids. J Fish Biol 67: 1195–1201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skov C, Hansen JH, Baktoft H, Brönmark C, Brodersen J, Chapman BB, Hansson L-A., Hulthén K, Nilsson PA. 2020. A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging. J Fish Biol 96: 1055–1059. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Šmejkal M, Blabolil P, Bartoň D, Duras J, Vejřík L, Sajdlová Z, Kočvara L, Kubečka J. 2019. Sex-specific probability of PIT tag retention in a cyprinid fish. Fish Res 219: 105325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smircich MG, Kelly JT. 2014. Extending the 2% rule: the effects of heavy internal tags on stress physiology, swimming performance, and growth in brook trout. Anim Biotelemetry 2: 16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spedicato MT, Lembo G, Gerd M. 2005. Aquatic Telemetry: Advances and Applications: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Fish Telemetry Held in Europe, Ustica, Italy, 9–13 June 2003, Food & Agriculture Org., 314 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoffel MA, Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2017. rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 8: 1639–1644. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Su G, Logez M, Xu J, Tao S, Villéger S, Brosse S. 2021. Human impacts on global freshwater fish biodiversity. Science 371: 835–838. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Swarr TR, Myrick CA, Fitzpatrick RM. 2022. Tag retention in and effects of passive integrated transponder tagging on survival and swimming performance of a small-bodied darter. J Fish Biol 100: 705–714. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tang L, Jacquin L, Lek S, Liu H, Li Z, Liu J, Zhang T. 2017. Differences in anti-predator behavior and survival rate between hatchery-reared and wild grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Ann Limnol − Int J Limnol 53: 361–367. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tudorache C, Viaene P, Blust R, Vereecken H, Boeck GD. 2008. A comparison of swimming capacity and energy use in seven European freshwater fish species. Ecol Freshw Fish 17: 284–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vollset KW, Lennox RJ, Thorstad EB, Auer S, Bär K, Larsen MH, Mahlum S, Näslund J, Stryhn H, Dohoo I. 2020. Systematic review and meta-analysis of PIT tagging effects on mortality and growth of juvenile salmonids. Rev Fish Biol Fish 30: 553–568. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watson JR, Goodrich HR, Cramp RL, Gordos MA, Franklin CE. 2019. Assessment of the effects of microPIT tags on the swimming performance of small-bodied and juvenile fish. Fish Res 218: 22–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winter JD. 1983. Underwater biotelemetry. Fisheries techniques. Am Fish Soc 371–395. [Google Scholar]
  • Závorka L, Brijs J, Wengström N, Lovén Wallerius M, Näslund J, Koeck B, Aldvén D, Lassus R, Höjesjö J, Johnsson J, Cucherousset J. 2019. Laboratory captivity can affect scores of metabolic rates and activity in wild brown trout. J Zool 307: 249–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Závorka L, Koeck B, Armstrong TA, Soğanci M, Crespel A, Killen SS. 2020. Reduced exploration capacity despite brain volume increase in warm-acclimated common minnow. J Exp Biol 223: jeb 223453. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.