Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 423, 2022
Anthropogenic impact on freshwater habitats, communities and ecosystem functioning
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 17 January 2022
  • Aksamit CK, Carolli M, Vanzo D, Weber C, Schmid M. 2021. Macroinvertebrate recovery to varying hydropeaking frequency: a small hydropower plant experiment. Front Environ Sci 8: 602374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnes JB, Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ. 2013. Reappraising the effects of habitat structure on river macroinvertebrates. Freshw Biol 58: 2154–2167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beisel JN, Usseglio-Polatera P, Thomas S, Moreteau JC. 1998. Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia 389: 73–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bisson PA, Montgomery DR, Buffington JM. 2017. Valley segments, stream reaches, and channel units. In: Lamberti GA, Hauer FR ed. Methods in Stream Ecology, Academic Press, Volume 1, pp. 21–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buendia C, Gibbins CN, Vericat D, Lopez-Tarazon JA, Batalla RJ. 2011. Influence of naturally high fine sediment loads on aquatic insect larvae in a montane river. Scot Geogr J 127: 315–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buendia C, Gibbins CN, Vericat D, Batalla RJ, Douglas A. 2013. Detecting the structural and functional impacts of fine sediment on stream invertebrates. Ecol Indic 25: 184–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Erba S. 2007. Intercalibrazione e classificazione di qualità ecologica dei fiumi per la 2000/60/EC (WFD): l'indice STAR-ICMi. IRSA-CNR Notiziario dei metodi analitici 1: 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  • Buss DF, Carlisle DM, Chon TS, et al. 2015. Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: a comparison of large-scale programs. Environ Monit Assess 187: 1–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciesielka IK, Bailey RC. 2001. Scale-specific effects of sediment burial on benthic macroinvertebrate communities. J Freshw Ecol 16: 73–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Couceiro SRM, Hamada N, Forsberg BR, Padovesi-Fonseca C. 2010. Effects of anthropogenic silt on aquatic macroinvertebrates and abiotic variables in streams in the Brazilian Amazon. J Soil Sediment 10: 89–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crosa G, Castelli E, Gentili G, Espa P. 2010. Effects of suspended sediments from reservoir flushing on fish and macroinvertebrates in an alpine stream. Aquat Sci 72: 85–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • de Castro Vasconcelos M, Melo AS. 2008. An experimental test of the effects of inorganic sediment addition on benthic macroinvertebrates of a subtropical stream. Hydrobiologia 610: 321–329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Pauw N, Gabriels W, Goethals PL. 2006. River monitoring and assessment methods based on macroinvertebrates. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Son, Ltd., pp. 113–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Doretto A, Piano E, Bona F, Fenoglio S. 2018a. How to assess the impact of fine sediments on the macroinvertebrate communities of alpine streams? A selection of the best metrics. Ecol Indic 84: 60–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Doretto A, Piano E, Falasco E, Fenoglio S, Bruno MC, Bona F. 2018b. Investigating the role of refuges and drift on the resilience of macroinvertebrate communities to drying conditions: an experiment in artificial streams. River Res Appl 34: 777–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doretto A, Bo T, Bona F, Apostolo M, Bonetto D, Fenoglio S. 2019. Effectiveness of artificial floods for benthic community recovery after sediment flushing from a dam. Environ Monit Assess 191: 88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doretto A, Bo T, Bona F, Fenoglio S. 2020. Efficiency of Surber net under different substrate and flow conditions: insights for macroinvertebrates sampling and river biomonitoring. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecol 421: 10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Doretto A, Piano E, Fenoglio S, et al. 2021. Beta-diversity and stressor specific index reveal patterns of macroinvertebrate community response to sediment flushing. Ecol Indic 122: 107256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Espa P, Castelli E, Crosa G, Gentili G. 2013. Environmental effects of storage preservation practices: controlled flushing of fine sediment from a small hydropower reservoir. Environ Manage 52: 261–276. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Espa P, Crosa G, Gentili G, Quadroni S, Petts G. 2015. Downstream ecological impacts of controlled sediment flushing in an Alpine valley river: a case study. River Res Appl 31: 931–942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Espa P, Brignoli ML, Crosa G, Gentili G, Quadroni S. 2016. Controlled sediment flushing at the Cancano Reservoir (Italian Alps): management of the operation and downstream environmental impact. J Environ Manag 182: 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Espa P, Batalla RJ, Brignoli ML, Crosa G, Gentili G, Quadroni S. 2019. Tackling reservoir siltation by controlled sediment flushing: impact on downstream fauna and related management issues. Plos One 14: e0218822. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Folegot S, Bruno MC, Larsen S, et al. 2021. The effects of a sediment flushing on Alpine macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Friberg N, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Pedersen ML, Skriver J. 2005. The new Danish stream monitoring programme (NOVANA) − preparing monitoring activities for the water framework directive era. Environ Monit Assess 111: 27–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbins C, Vericat D, Batalla RJ. 2007. When is stream invertebrate drift catastrophic? The role of hydraulics and sediment transport in initiating drift during flood events. Freshw Biol 52: 2369–2384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbins C, Batalla RJ, Vericat D. 2010. Invertebrate drift and benthic exhaustion during disturbance: response of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to increasing shear stress and riverbed instability. River Res Appl 26: 499–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gieswein A, Hering D, Lorenz AW. 2019. Development and validation of a macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring tool to assess fine sediment impact in small mountain streams. Sci Total Environ 652: 1290–301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Nathan RJ. 2004. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Halwas KL, Church M, Richardson JS. 2005. Benthic assemblage variation among channel units in high-gradient streams on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. J N Am Benthol Soc 24: 478–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen JF, Hayes DB. 2012. Long-term implications of dam removal for macroinvertebrate communities in Michigan and Wisconsin rivers, United States: macroinvertebrate response to dam removal. River Res Appl 28: 1540–1550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herbst DB, Cooper SD, Medhurst RB, Wiseman SW, Hunsaker CT. 2018. A comparison of the taxonomic and trait structure of macroinvertebrate communities between the riffles and pools of montane headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 820: 115–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hitchman SM, Mather ME, Smith JM, Fencl JS. 2018. Identifying keystone habitats with a mosaic approach can improve biodiversity conservation in disturbed ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 24: 308–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kondolf GM, Gao Y, Annandale GW, et al. 2014. Sustainable sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers: experiences from five continents. Earth's Future 2: 256–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mathers KL, Wood PJ. 2016. Fine sediment deposition and interstitial flow effects on macroinvertebrate community composition within riffle heads and tails. Hydrobiologia 776: 147–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al. 2015. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2. 2–1. [Google Scholar]
  • Owens PN, Batalla RJ, Collins AJ, et al. 2005. Fine-grained sediment in river systems: environmental significance and management issues. River Res Appl 21: 693–717. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quadroni S, Brignoli ML, Crosa G, et al. 2016. Effects of sediment flushing from a small Alpine reservoir on downstream aquatic fauna. Ecohydrology 9: 1276–1288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quadroni S, Crosa G, Gentili G, Espa P. 2017. Response of stream benthic macroinvertebrates to current water management in Alpine catchments massively developed for hydropower. Sci Total Environ 609: 484–496. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg DM, Resh VH. 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates (No. 504. 4 FRE). New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Salmaso F, Espa P, Crosa G, Quadroni S. 2021. Impacts of fine sediment input on river macroinvertebrates: the role of the abiotic characteristics at mesohabitat scale. Hydrobiologia 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva DR, Ligeiro R, Hughes RM, Callisto M. 2014. Visually determined stream mesohabitats influence benthic macroinvertebrate assessments in headwater streams. Environ Monit Assess 186: 5479–5488. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner B. 2011. Mineral grains in caddisfly pupal cases and streambed sediments: assessing resource use and its limitation across various river types. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 47: 103–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Usseglio-Polatera P, Bournaud M, Richoux P, Tachet H. 2000. Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshw Biol 43: 175–205. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.