Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 421, 2020
Topical issue on Crayfish
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2020035
Published online 23 November 2020
  • Acosta CA, Perry SA. 2000. Differential growth of crayfish Procambarus alleni in relation to hydrological conditions in marl prairie wetlands of Everglades National Park, USA. Aquat Ecol 34: 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  • Acosta CA, Perry SA. 2001. Impact of hydropattern disturbance on crayfish population dynamics in the seasonal wetlands of Everglades National Park, USA. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 11: 45–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Acosta CA, Perry SA. 2002. Spatio-temporal variation in crayfish production in disturbed marl prairie marshes of the Florida Everglades. J Freshw Ecol 17: 641–650. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bláha M, Patoka J, Japoshvili B, Let M, Kouba A, Buřič M, Mumladze L. 2020. Genetic diversity, phylogenetic position and morphometric analysis of Astacus colchicus (Decapoda, Astacidae): a new insight into Eastern European crayfish fauna. Integr Zool, doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12493. [Google Scholar]
  • Bláha M, Patoka J, Kozák P, Kouba A. 2016. Unrecognized diversity in New Guinean crayfish species (Decapoda, Parastacidae): The evidence from molecular data. Integr Zool 11: 447–458. [Google Scholar]
  • Bláha M, Uzhytchak M, Bondarenko V, Policar T. 2017. The least known European native crayfish Astacus pachypus (Rathke, 1837) revealed its phylogenetic position. Zoologischer Anzeiger 267: 151–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M, Hulák M, Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2011. A successful crayfish invader is capable of facultative parthenogenesis: a novel reproductive mode in decapod crustaceans. Plos One 6: e20281. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M, Kouba A, Kozak P. 2013. Reproductive plasticity in freshwater invader: from long-term sperm storage to parthenogenesis. Plos One 8: e77597. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Conover M, Reid GK. 1972. A study of Procambarus alleni in the Everglades. Everglades National Park, unpublished report from the University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Crandal KA, Buhay JE. 2008. Global diversity of crayfish (Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae-Decapoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  • Crandal KA, De Grave S. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. J Crustacean Biol 37: 615–653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crandal KA, Fitzpatrick Jr J. 1996. Crayfish molecular systematics: using a combination of procedures to estimate phylogeny. System Biol 45: 1–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chucholl C. 2013. Invaders for sale: trade and determinants of introduction of ornamental freshwater crayfish. Biol Invas 15: 125–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorn NJ, Trexler JC. 2007. Crayfish assemblage shifts in a large drought‐prone wetland: the roles of hydrology and competition. Freshw Biol 52: 2399–2411. [Google Scholar]
  • Dorn NJ, Volin JC. 2009. Resistance of crayfish (Procambarus spp.) populations to wetland drying depends on species and substrate. J North Am Bentholog Soc 28: 766–777. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolut 7: 214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eprilurahman R. 2014. Molecular taxonomy and evolution of freshwater crayfish of the genus Cherax (Decapoda: Parastacidae) from northern Australia and New Guinea. Charles Darwin University, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods: 154. [Google Scholar]
  • EU. 2014. Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Offic J Eur Union 57: 35. [Google Scholar]
  • EU. 2016. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 of 13 July 2016 adopting a list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Offic J Eur Union 189: 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2009. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC); Guidance document n.o 7. Monitoring under the Water Framework Directive; circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/63f7715f-0f45-4955-b7cb-58ca305e42a8/Guidance%20No%207%20-%20Monitoring%20(WG%202.7).pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2015a. The global trade in crayfish as pets. Crustacean Res 44: 75–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Faulkes Z. 2015b. Marmorkrebs (Procambarus fallax f. virginalis) are the most popular crayfish in the North American pet trade. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 416: 20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3: 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG. 2013. Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. System Biol 62: 707–724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gál B, Gábris V, Csányi B, Cser B, Danyik T, Farkas A, Farkas J, Gebauer R, Répás E, Szajbert B, Kouba A, Patoka J, Weiperth A. 2018. A vörös mocsárrák Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) jelenlegi elterjedése és hatása a Duna egyes magyarországi befolyóinak halfaunájára [Present distribution of the invasive red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) and its effects on the fish fauna assemblages in some tributaries of the Hungarian section of the River Danube]. Pisces Hungarici 12: 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F, Acquistapace P. 2007. Invasive crayfish in Europe: the impact of Procambarus clarkii on the littoral community of a Mediterranean lake. Freshw Biol 52: 1249–1259. [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F, Aquiloni L, Dieguez-Uribeondo J, Tricarico E. 2011. Managing invasive crayfish: is there a hope? Aquat Sci 73: 185–200. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabicova K, Grabic R, Blaha M, Kumar V, Cerveny D, Fedorova G, Randak T. 2015. Presence of pharmaceuticals in benthic fauna living in a small stream affected by effluent from a municipal sewage treatment plant. Water Res 72: 145–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Groß H, Burk C, Hil A. 2008. Die Flusskrebsfauna in NRW. Nat NRW 4: 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Györe K, Józsa V, Gál D. 2013. The distribution of crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae) population in Cris and Mures rivers crossing the Romanian-Hungarian border. Aquacult Aquar Conserv Legisl 6: 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Hendrix AN, Loftus WF. 2000. Distribution and relative abundance of the crayfishes Procambarus alleni (Faxon) and P. fallax (Hagen) in southern Florida. Wetlands 20: 194–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hendrix Jr N, Loftus WF, Armstrong D. 1999. Life history, ecology, and interactions of Everglades crayfishes in response to hydrological restoration. US Geological Survey Program on the South Florida Ecosystem, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Herrman A, Schnabler A, Martens A. 2018. Phenology of overland dispersal in the invasive crayfish Faxonius immunis (Hagen) at the Upper Rhine River area. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 419: 30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs HH. 1942. The crayfishes of Florida. University of Florida under the auspices of the Committee on University Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM. 2002. Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich DM, Reynolds JD, Souty-Grosset C, Sibley PJ. 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 394-395: 11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hossain, MS, Patoka J, Kouba A, Buřič M. 2018. Clonal crayfish as biological model: a review on marbled crayfish. Biologia 73: 841–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson MC. 2015. Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96: 2035–2041. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson MC, Jones T, Milligan M, Sheath D, Taylor J, Ellis A, England J, Grey J. 2014. Niche differentiation among invasive crayfish and their impacts on ecosystem structure and functioning. Freshw Biol 59: 1123–1135. [Google Scholar]
  • Jaklič M, Vrezec A. 2011. The first tropical alien crayfish species in European waters: the redclaw Cherax quadricarinatus (Von Martens, 1868) (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Crustaceana 84: 651–665. [Google Scholar]
  • Jelić M, Klobučar GI, Grandjean F, Puillandre N, Franjević D, Futo M, Amouret J, Maguire I. 2016. Insights into the molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the white-clawed crayfish (Decapoda, Astacidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 103: 26–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan F, DeLeon CJ, McCreary AC. 1996. Predation, habitat complexity, and distribution of the crayfish Procambarus alleni within a wetland habitat mosaic. Wetlands 16: 452–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klobučar GIV, Podnar M, Jelić M, Franjević D, Faller M, Štambuk A, Gottstein S, Simić V, Maguire I. 2013. Role of the Dinaric Karst (western Balkans) in shaping the phylogeographic structure of the threatened crayfish Austropotamobius torrentium . Freshw Biol 58: 1089–1105. [Google Scholar]
  • Kotovska G, Khrystenko D, Patoka J, Kouba A. 2016. East European crayfish stocks at risk: arrival of non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 37. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Petrusek A, Kozák P. 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 413: 5. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A, Tíkal J, Císař P, Veselý L, Fořt M, Příborský J, Patoka J, Buřič M. 2016. The significance of droughts for hyporheic dwellers: evidence from freshwater crayfish. Sci Rep 6: 26569. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kovács K, Nagy P, Mayer R. 2015. Adatok a tízlábú rákok (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae) északnyugat‐magyarországi előfordulásához. Egy Procambarus faj első előkerülése természetes élőhelyéről Magyarországon [Contribution to the Decapoda (Astacidae, Cambaridae) fauna of Northwestern Hungary. The first occurrence of a Procambarus species]. Acta Biol Debrec Oecolog Hungarica 33: 177–186. [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P, Buřič M, Policar T. 2006. The fecundity, time of egg development and juvenile production in spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus) under controlled conditions. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 380-381: 1171–1182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P, Hulák M, Policar T, Tichý F. 2007. Studies of annual gonadal development and gonadal ultrastructure in spiny-cheek crayfish (Orconectes limosus). Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 384: 15–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar V, Johnson, AC, Trubiroha A, Tumová J, Ihara M, Grabic R, Kloas W, Tanaka H, Kroupová HK. 2015. The challenge presented by progestins in ecotoxicological research: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 49: 2625–2638. [Google Scholar]
  • Kushlan JA, Kushlan MS. 1979. Observations on crayfish in the Everglades, Florida, USA. Crustaceana. Supplement 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Lipták B, Mojžišová M, Gruľa D, Christophoryová J, Jablonski D, Bláha M, Petrusek A, Kouba A. 2017. Slovak section of the Danube has its well-established breeding ground of marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis . Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418: 40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lipták B, Vitázková B. 2015. Beautiful, but also potentially invasive. Ekológia (Bratislava) 34: 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge DM, Deines A, Gherardi F, Yeo DCJ., Arcella T, Baldridge AK, Barnes MA, Chadderton WL, Feder JL, Gantz CA, Howard GW, Jerde CL, Peters BW, Peters JA, Sargent LW, Turner CR, Wittman ME, Zeng Y. 2012. Global Introductions of Crayfishes: Evaluating the Impact of Species Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43: 449–472. [Google Scholar]
  • Lodge DM, Taylor CA, Holdich DM, Skurdal J. 2000. Nonindigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity: Lessons from Europe. Fisheries 25: 7–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lőkkös A, Müller T, Kovács K, Várkonyi L, Specziár A, Martin P. 2016. The alien, parthenogenetic marbled crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) is entering Kis-Balaton (Hungary), one of Europe's most important wetland biotopes. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 417: 16. [Google Scholar]
  • Lovrenčić L, Bonassin L, Boštjančić LL, Podnar M, Jelić M, Klobučar G, Jaklič M, Slavevska-Stamenković V, Hinić J, Maguire I. 2020. New insights into the genetic diversity of the stone crayfish: taxonomic and conservation implications. BMC Evolutionary Biology 20: 146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ludányi M, Peeters EE, Kis B, Roessink I. 2016. Distribution of crayfish species in Hungarian waters. Glob Ecol Conserv 8: 254–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukhaup C. 2015. Cherax (Astaconephrops) pulcher, a new species of freshwater crayfish (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) Peninsula, Irian Jaya (West Papua), Indonesia. ZooKeys 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukhaup C, Eprilurahman R, von Rintelen T. 2017. Cherax warsamsonicus, a new species of crayfish from the Kepala Burung (Vogelkop) peninsula in West Papua, Indonesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae). ZooKeys 151–167. [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire I, Podnar M, Jelic M, Stambuk A, Schrimpf A, Schulz H, Klobucar G. 2014. Two distinct evolutionary lineages of the Astacus leptodactylus species-complex (Decapoda: Astacidae) inferred by phylogenetic analyses. Invertebr Syst 28: 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Marino F, Pretto T, Tosi F, Monaco S, De Stefano C, Manfrin A, Quaglio F. 2014. Mass mortality of Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens, 1868) reared in Sicily (Italy): crayfish plague introduced in an intensive farming. Freshw Crayfish 20: 93–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P, Dorn NJ, Kawai T, van der Heiden C, Scholtz G. 2010. The enigmatic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) is the parthenogenetic form of Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870). Contrib Zool 79: 107–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin P, Kohlman K, Scholtz G. 2007. The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) produces genetically uniform offspring. Naturwissenschaften 94: 843–846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Momot WT. 1995. Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems. Rev Fish Sci 3: 33–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moog O, Leitner P, Huber T, Rabitsch W, Graf W. 2018. Marbled crayfish (Procambarus virginalis Lykow, 2017) − a supplement to the list of Aquatic Invertebrate Neozoa in Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Oidtman B, Heitz E, Rogers D, Hoffman RW. 2002. Transmission of crayfish plague. Diseases Aquat Organ 52: 159–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pacioglu O, Theissinger K, Alexa A, Samoilă C, Sîrbu O-I, Schrimpf A, Zubrod JP, Schulz R, Pîrvu M, Lele S-F. 2020. Multifaceted implications of the competition between native and invasive crayfish: a glimmer of hope for the native's long-term survival. Biol Invas 22: 827–842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L. 2019. Introducing a new Austropotamobius crayfish species (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacidae): A Miocene endemism of the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Zool Anzeiger 279: 94–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L, Pérez‐Moreno JL, Panaiotu C, Drăguț L, Schrimpf A, Popovici ID, Zaharia C, Weiperth A, Gál B, Schubart CD. 2019. A journey on plate tectonics sheds light on European crayfish phylogeography. Ecol Evolut 9: 1957–1971. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L, Pîrvu M, Moroşan L-G., Zaharia C. 2015. Plasticity in fecundity highlights the females' importance in the spiny-cheek crayfish invasion mechanism. Zoology 118: 424–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pârvulescu L, Togor A, Lele S-F., Scheu S, Șinca D, Panteleit J. 2017. First established population of marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis (Decapoda, Cambaridae) in Romania. BioInvas Record 6: 357–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J. 2020. Crayfish of New Guinea: Current status, exploitation and threats. In: Ribeiro, FB (ed.), Evolution, Habitat and Conservation Strategies. Nova: 43–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Bláha M, Kalous L, Kouba A. 2017. Irresponsible vendors: Non‐native, invasive and threatened animals offered for garden pond stocking. Aquat Conserv 27: 692–697. [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Bláha M, Kouba A. 2015a. Cherax (Cherax) subterigneus, a new crayfish (Decapoda: Parastacidae) from West Papua, Indonesia. J Crustacean Biol 35: 830–838. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Buřič M, Kolář V, Bláha M, Petrtýl M, Franta P, Tropek R, Kalous L, Petrusek A, Kouba A. 2016. Predictions of marbled crayfish establishment in conurbations fulfilled: evidences from the Czech Republic. Biologia 71: 1380–1385. [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Kalous L, Kopecký O. 2014. Risk assessment of the crayfish pet trade based on data from the Czech Republic. Biol Invas 16: 2489–2494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Kalous L, Kopecký O. 2015b. Imports of ornamental crayfish: the first decade from the Czech Republic's perspective. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 416: 4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patoka J, Magalhães ALB., Kouba A, Faulkes Z, Jerikho R, Vitule JRS. 2018. Invasive aquatic pets: failed policies increase risks of harmful invasions. Biodivers Conserv 27: 3037–3046. [Google Scholar]
  • Peay S, Holdich D, Brickland J. 2010. Risk assessments of non-indigenous crayfish in Great Britain. Freshw Crayfish 17: 109–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petrusek A, Laštůvka Z, Musil J, Perglová I, Šanda R, Šefrová H, Šíma J, Vohralík V. 2016. Black, Grey and Watch Lists of alien species in the Czech Republic based on environmental impacts and management strategy. NeoBiota 28: 1–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ. 2014. Tracer v1.6, Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. [Google Scholar]
  • Richman NI, Boehm M, Adams SB, Alvarez F, Bergey EA, Bun JJS, Burnham Q, Cordeiro J, Coughran J, Crandal KA, Dawkins KL, DiStefano RJ, Doran NE, Edsman L, Eversole AG, Fuereder L, Furse JM, Gherardi F, Hamr P, Holdich DM, Horwitz P, Johnston K, Jones CM, Jones JPG, Jones RL, Jones TG, Kawai T, Lawler S, Lopez-Mejia M, Miller RM, Pedraza-Lara C, Reynolds JD, Richardson AMM, Schultz MB, Schuster GA, Sibley PJ, Souty-Grosset C, Taylor CA, Thoma RF, Walls J, Walsh TS, Collen B. 2015. Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea). Philos Trans Royal Soc B 370: 20140060. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Samardžić M, Lucić A, Maguire I, Hudina S. 2014. The first record of the marbled crayfish (Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis) in Croatia. Crayfish News 36: 4–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pyšek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M. 2017. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8: 14435. [Google Scholar]
  • Seprős R, Farkas A, Sebestyén A, Lőkkös A, Kelbert B, Gál B, Puky M, Weiperth A. 2018. Current status and distribution of non-native spiny cheek crayfish (Faxonius limosus Rafinesque, 1817) in Lake Balaton. Hungarian Agric Res 27: 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Simberlof D, Martin J-L., Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, Courchamp F, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Pascal M. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 58–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soes M, Koese B. 2010. Invasive freshwater crayfish in the Netherlands: a preliminary risk analysis. TRCPD/2010/0001, Ministery of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Leiden, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C, Holdich DM, Noël PY, Reynolds J, Haffner P. 2006. Atlas of Crayfish in Europe. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Svoboda J, Fischer D, Kozubíková‐Balcarová E, Šťástková A, Brůčková M, Kouba A, Petrusek A. 2020. Experimental evaluation of the potential for crayfish plague transmission through the digestive system of warm‐blooded predators. J Fish Dis 43: 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Svoboda J, Mrugała A, Kozubíková-Balcarová E, Petrusek A. 2017. Hosts and transmission of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci: a review. J Fish Dis 40: 127–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Svoboda J, Strand DA, Vralstad T, Grandjean F, Edsman L, Kozak P, Kouba A, Fristad RF, Koca SB, Petrusek A. 2014. The crayfish plague pathogen can infect freshwater-inhabiting crabs. Freshw Biol 59: 918–929. [Google Scholar]
  • Szendőfi B, Bérces S, Csányi B, Gábris V, Gál B, Gönye Z, Répás E, Seprős R, Tóth B, Kouba A, Patoka J, Weiperth A. 2018. Egzotikus halfajok és decapodák a Barát‐és Dera‐patakban, valamint a torkolatuk dunai élőhelyein /Occurrence of exotic fish and crayfish species in Barát and Dera creeks and their adjacent section of the River Danube. Pisces Hungarici 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor CA, DiStefano RJ, Larson ER, Stoeckel J. 2019. Towards a cohesive strategy for the conservation of the United States' diverse and highly endemic crayfish fauna. Hydrobiologia 846: 39–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor CA, Schuster GA, Cooper JE, DiStefano RJ, Eversole AG, Hamr P, Hobbs HH, III, Robison HW, Skelton CE, Thoma RE. 2007. Feature: Endangered species − A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the united states and Canada after 10+years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32: 372–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Turkmen G, Karadal O. 2012. The survey of the imported freshwater decapod species via the ornamental aquarium trade in Turkey. J Animal Veterin Adv 11: 2824–2827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Twardochleb LA, Olden JD, Larson ER. 2013. A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of nonnative crayfish. Freshw Sci 32: 1367–1382. [Google Scholar]
  • Unestam T. 1969. On the adaptation of Aphanomyces astaci as a parasite. Physiol Plant 22: 221–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Unestam T. 1975. Defence reactions in and susceptibility of Australian and New Guinean freshwater crayfish to European‐crayfish‐plague fungus. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 53: 349–359. [Google Scholar]
  • Ungureanu E, Mojžišová M, Tangerman M, Ion MC, Pârvulescu L, Petrusek A. 2020. The spatial distribution of Aphanomyces astaci genotypes across Europe: Introducing the first data from Ukraine. Freshw Crayfish 25: 77–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanarman PG. 2003. Biology and ecology of epigean crayfish that inhabit Everglades environments Procambarus alleni (Faxon) and Procambarus fallax (Hagen). Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL: 173. [Google Scholar]
  • VanArman PG. 2011. Role of native crayfish, Procambarus alleni (Faxon) and Procambarus fallax (Hagen), in everglades food webs: a literature review and conceptual model. Florida Sci 74: 100–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Veselý L, Buřič M, Kouba A. 2015. Hardy exotics species in temperate zone: can “warm water” crayfish invaders establish regardless of low temperatures? Sci Rep 5: 16340. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vodovsky N, Patoka J, Kouba A. 2017. Ecosystem of Caspian Sea threatened by pet-traded non-indigenous crayfish. Biol Invas 19: 2207–2217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt G, Falckenhayn C, Schrimpf A, Schmid K, Hanna K, Panteleit J, Helm M, Schulz R, Lyko F. 2015. The marbled crayfish as a paradigm for saltational speciation by autopolyploidy and parthenogenesis in animals. Biol Open 4: 1583–1594. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiperth A, Csányi B, Gál B, György Á, Szalóky Z, Szekeres J, Tóth B, Puky M. 2015. Egzotikus rák-, hal-és kétéltűfajok a Budapest környéki víztestekben [Exotic crayfish, fish and amphibian species in various water bodies in the region of Budapest]. Pisces Hungarici 9: 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiperth A, Gál B, Kuříková P, Bláha M, Kouba A, Patoka J. 2017. Cambarellus patzcuarensis in Hungary: The first dwarf crayfish established outside of North America. Biologia 72: 1529–1532. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiperth A, Gál B, Kuříková P, Langrová I, Kouba A, Patoka J. 2019. Risk assessment of pet-traded decapod crustaceans in Hungary with evidences of Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens) in the wild. North-Western J Zool 14: 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiperth A, Kouba A, Csányi B, Danyik T, Farkas A, Gál B, Józsa V, Patoka J, Juhász V, Pârvulescu L, Mozsár A, Seprős R, Staszny Á, Szajbert B, Ferincz Á. 2020. Az idegenhonos tízlábú rákok (Crustacea: Decapoda) helyzete Magyarországon [The present status of non-native Decapod (Crustacea: Decapoda) species in Hungary]. Halászat 113 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Yonvitner Y, Patoka J, Yuliana E, Bohatá L, Tricarico E, Karella T, Kouba A, Reynolds JD. 2020. Enigmatic hotspot of crayfish diversity at risk: Invasive potential of non‐indigenous crayfish if introduced to New Guinea. Aquat Conserv 30: 219–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29: 2869–2876. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.