Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 421, 2020
Article Number 13
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 26 March 2020
  • APHA. 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1409 p. [Google Scholar]
  • AQEM consortium. 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM method − A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive, Version 1.0, February 2002, 198 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Askew RR. 2004. The dragonflies of Europe, 2nd ed. Essex: Harley Books, 308 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Barua M, Gurdak DJ, Ahmed RA, Tamuly J. 2012. Selecting flagships for invertebrate conservation. Biodivers Conserv 21: 1457–1476. [Google Scholar]
  • Baxter RM. 1977. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 8: 255–283. [Google Scholar]
  • Belančić A, Bogdanović T, Franković M, Ljuština M, Mihoković N, Vitas B. 2008. Crvena knjiga vretenaca Hrvatske, Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb, 132 p. (In Croatian). (Red book of Croatian Odonata, Ministry of culture, State institute for nature protection, Croatia, Zagreb. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonacci O, Roje-Bonacci T. 2008. Water losses from the Ričice reservoir in the Dinarickarst. Eng Geol 99: 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudot J-P, Kalkman VJ, Azpilicueta Amorín M, Bogdanović T, Cordero Rivera A, Degabriele G, Dommanget JL, Ferreira S, Garrigós B, Jović M, Kotarac M, Lopau W, Marinov M, Mihoković N, Riservato E, Samraoui B, Schneider W. 2009. Atlas of the Odonata of the Mediterranean and North Africa. Libellula Supplement 9, 256 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudot J-P. 2014. A brief observation of egg laying in Lindenia tetraphylla (Odonata: Gomphidae) on Kríti (Crete), Greece. Not odonatol 8: 94–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudot J-P, Kalkman VJ. 2015. Atlas of the European dragonflies and damselflies. the Netherlands: KNNV publishers, 381 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brochard C, Groendijk D, van der Ploeg E, Termaat T. 2012. Fotogids Larvenhuidjes van Libellen. Zeist: KNNV uitgeverij, 320 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN, 2006. Primer V6: User manual/tutorial. Plymouth: Primer-E Ltd., 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Corbet P, Brooks S. 2008. Dragonflies, Collins New Naturalist Library No 106. London: HarperCollins, 480 p. [Google Scholar]
  • De Knijf G, Vanappelghem C, Demolder H. 2013. Odonata from Montenegro, with notes on taxonomy, regional diversity and conservation. Odonatologica 42: 1– 29. [Google Scholar]
  • Dijkstra K-DB, Lewington R. 2006. Field guide to the dragonflies of Britain and Europe. Gillingham: British Wildlife Publishing, 320 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dolný A, Harabiš F. 2012. Underground mining can contribute to freshwater biodiversity conservation: allogenic succession forms suitable habitats for dragonflies. Biol Conserv 145: 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  • Foote AL, Hornung CLR. 2005. Odonates as biological indicators of grazing effects on Canadian prairie wetlands. Ecol Entomol 30: 273–283. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerken B, Sternberg K. 1999. Die Exuvien Europaïscher Libellen − The exuviae of European dragonflies (Insecta, Odonata). Hökster, Jena: Arnika & Eisvogel, 354 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Harabiš F, Dolný A. 2012. Human altered ecosystems: suitable habitats as well as ecological traps for dragonflies (Odonata): the matter of scale. J Insect Conserv 16: 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Harabiš F, Dolný A. 2018. Military training areas as refuges for threatened dragonfly species: Effect of spatial isolation and military activity. Biol Conserv 217: 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Holtmann L, Juchem M, Brüggeshemke J, Möhlmeyer A, Fartmann T. 2018. Stormwater ponds promote dragonfly (Odonata) species richness and density in urban areas. Ecol Eng 118:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Horning CE, Pollard JE. 1978. Macroinvertebrate sampling techniques for streams in semi-arid regions: Comparison of the Surber method and unit-effort traveling Kick method, Report number EPA 600-4-78-040. Washington: US EPA, 37 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Horsák M, Bojková J, Zahrádková S, Omesová M, Helesic J. 2009. Impact of reservoirs and channelization of lowland river macroinvertebrates: a case study from Central Europe. Limnologica 39: 140–151. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes RM, Larsen DP, Omemik JM, 1986. Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream pollution. Environ Manag 10: 629–635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Illies J. 1978. Limnofauna Europaea, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 532 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Inger R, Gregory R, Duffy JP, Stott I, Voříšek P, Gaston KJ. 2015. Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. Ecol Lett 18: 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Irz P, Odion M, Argillier C, Pont D. 2006. Comparison between the fish communities of lakes, reservoirs and rivers: Can natural systems help define the ecological potential of reservoirs? Aquat Sci 68: 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Janecek BFU, Moog O, Waringer J. 1995. Odonata. In: Moog O, ed. Fauna aquatica Austriaca: A comprehensive species inventory of Austrian aquatic organisms with ecological notes. Wien: Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 14 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalkman VJ, Boudot J-P., Bernard R, et al. 2010. European red list of dragonflies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 38 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalkman V, Boudot J, Bernard R, De Knijf G, Suhling F, Termaat T. 2018. Diversity and conservation of European dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata). Hydrobiologia 811: 269–282. [Google Scholar]
  • Kulijer D. 2012. Odonata species and habitats at Livanjsko polje karst wetland area. Int Dragonfly Fund Rep 48: 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Lenz N. 1991. The importance of abiotic and biotic factors for the structure of odonate communities of ponds (Insecta: Odonata). Faun Ökol Mitt 6: 175–189. [Google Scholar]
  • Martín R, Maynou X. 2016. Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of habitat quality in Mediterranean streams and rivers in the province of Barcelona (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Int J Odonatol 19: 107–124. [Google Scholar]
  • May ML. 2019. Odonata: who they are and what they have done for us lately: classification and ecosystem services of dragonflies. Insects 10: 62. [Google Scholar]
  • McPeek MA. 2008. Ecological factors limiting the distributions and abundances of Odonata. In: Córdoba-Aguilar A, ed. Dragonflies and damselflies: model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press, pp. 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Peterlin M, Urbanič G. 2013. A Lakeshore Modification Index and its association with benthic invertebrates in alpine lakes. Ecohydrology 6: 297–311. [Google Scholar]
  • Petrere M. 1996. Fisheries in large tropical reservoirs in South America. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 2: 111–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinto NS, Juen L, Cabette HSR, De Marco P Jr. 2012. Fluctuating asymmetry and wing size of Argia tinctipennis Selys (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) in relation to riparian forest preservation status. Neotrop Entomol 41: 178–185. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raebel EM, Merckx T, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thompson DJ. 2010. The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys. J Insect Conserv 14: 523–534. [Google Scholar]
  • Remsburg AJ. 2007. Aquatic and terrestrial vegetation influence lacustrine dragonfly (order Odonata) assemblages at multiple life stages, PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Wisconsin, 127 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Renner S, Périco E, Sahlén G. 2016. Man-made lakes form species-rich dragonfly communities in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Odonata). Odonatologica 45:135–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Rose C, Crumpton WG. 1996. Effects of emergent macrophytes on dissolved oxygen dynamics in a prairie pothole wetland. Wetlands 16: 495–502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Samways MJ, McGeoch MA, New TR. 2009. Insect conservation: handbook of approaches and methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 432 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Samways MJ, Steytler NS. 1996. Dragonfly (Odonata) distribution patterns in urban and forest landscapes, and recommendations for riparian management. Biol Conserv 78: 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  • Schindler M, Fesl C, Chovanec A. 2003. Dragonfly associations (Insecta: Odonata) in relation to habitat variables: a multivariate approach. Hydrobiologia 497: 169–180. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmedtje U, Colling M. 1996. Ökologische Typisierung der aquatischen Makrofauna, Informationsberichte des Bayerischen Landesamtes für Wasserwirtschaft 4/96, 543 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Schwarz U. 2012. Balkan rivers − The blue heart of Europe, Hydromorphological status and dam projects, Report for EcoWatch-Austria and EuroNatur, Vienna, Austria, 151 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Seaman W, Sprague LM. 1991. Artificial habitats for marine and freshwater fisheries San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 267 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ. 2011. Comparative assessment of indices of freshwater habitat conditions using different invertebrate taxon sets. Ecol Indic 11: 370–378. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith J, Samways MJ, Taylor S. 2007. Assessing riparian quality using two complementary sets of bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 16: 2695–2713. [Google Scholar]
  • Stille M, Stille B, Schröter A. 2014. Lindenia tetraphylla − new for the island of Kérkira (Corfu), Greece (Odonata: Gomphidae). Not odonatol 8: 86–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Steytler NS, Samways MJ. 1995. Biotope selection by adult male dragonflies (Odonata)at an artificial lake created for insect conservation in South Africa. Biol Conserv 72: 381–386. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoddard JL, Herlihy AT, Peck DV, Hughes RM, Whittier TR, Tarquinio E. 2008. A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys. J N Am Benthol Soc 27: 878–891. [Google Scholar]
  • Takamura K, Hatakeyama S, Shiraishi H. 1991. Odonata larvae as an indicator of pesticide contamination. Appl Entomol Zool 26: 321–326. [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. 2012. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: Software for ordination, Version 5.0. Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power, 496 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, et al. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879–1881. [Google Scholar]
  • Urbanič G, Petkovska V, Pavlin M. 2012. The relationship between littoral benthic invertebrates and lakeshore modification pressure in two alpine lakes. Fundam Appl Limnol 180: 157–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van Geest GJ, Wolters H, Roozen FCJM, et al. 2005. Water-level fluctuations affect macrophyte richness in floodplain lakes. Hydrobiologia 539: 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Mičetić Stanković V, Franković M. 2011. Dragonfly fauna (Insecta, Odonata) in the Turopolje region (Croatia). Nat Croat 20: 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Previšić A, Ivković M, et al. 2016a. Mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) assemblages of a regulated perennial Mediterranean river system in the Western Balkans. Biologia 71: 1038–1048. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Alegro A, Koletić N, Mihaljević Z. 2016b. New evidence of Lindenia tetraphylla (Vander Linden, 1825) (Odonata, Gomphidae) reproduction at the north-western border of its distribution. Nat Croat 25: 287–294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M. 2017. Ecological traits of dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages along an oligotrophic Dinaric karst hydrosystem. Ann Limnol − Int J Lim 53: 377–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Vučković N, Mihaljević Z. 2019. Littoral mayfly assemblages in South-East European man-made lakes. J Limnol 78: 47–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Zwick P. 1992. Stream habitat fragmentation-a threat to biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 1: 80–97. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.