EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 420 (2019) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 420 (2019) 40 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 420, 2019
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 40
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2019031
Published online 15 October 2019
  • Adámek Z, Andreji J, Gallardo JM. 2007. Food habitats of four bottom-dwelling gobiid species at the confluence of the Danube and Hron Rivers (South Slovakia). Int Rev Hydrobiol 92: 554–563. [Google Scholar]
  • Akçaalan R, Mazur-Marzec H, Zalewska A, Albay M. 2009. Phenotypic and toxicological characterization of toxic Nodularia spumigena from a freshwater lake in Turkey. Harmful Algae 8: 273–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Albay M, Akçaalan R. 2003. Comparative study of periphyton colonisation on common reed (Phragmites australis) and artificial substrate in a shallow lake, Manyas, Turkey. Hydrobiology 506–509: 531–540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Antsulevich A. 2007. First records of the tubenose goby Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) in the Baltic Sea. Aquat Invasions 2: 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  • Arslan N, Ayık Ö, Şahin Y. 2010. Diversity and structure of Chrinomidae (Diptera) limnofauna of Lake Uluabat, a Ramsar site of Turkey, and their relation to environmental variables. Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci 10: 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg LS. 1949. Freshwater Fishes of the U.S.S.R. and Adjacent Countries, Nauk SSSR, Moscow 1382 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Beyer K, Copp GH, Gozlan RE. 2007. Microhabitat use and interspecific associations of introduced topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva and native fishes in a small stream. J Fish Biol 71: 224–238. [Google Scholar]
  • Britton JR, Copp GH, Brazier M, Davies GD. 2011. A modular assessment tool for managing introduced fishes according to risks of species and their populations, and impacts of management actions. Biol Invasions 13: 2847–2860. [Google Scholar]
  • Borcherding J, Dolina M, Heermann L, et al. 2013. Feeding and niche differentiation in three invasive gobies in the Lower Rhine, Germany. Limnologica 43: 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp GH. 1989. Electrofishing for fish larvae and juveniles: equipment modifications for increased efficiency with short fishes. Aquacult Fish Manag 20: 453–462. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp GH, Bianco PG, Bogutskaya N, et al. 2005. To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J Appl Ichthyol 21: 242–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp GH, Vilizzi L, Mumford J, Fenwick GV, Godard MJ, Gozlan RE. 2009. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes. Risk Anal 29: 457–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Copp GH, Russell IC, Peeler EJ, et al. 2016. European Non-native Species in Aquaculture Risk Analysis Scheme − a summary of assessment protocols and decision support tools for use of alien species in aquaculture. Fish Manag Ecol 23: 1–1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Čápová M, Zlatnická I, Kováč V, Katina S. 2008. Ontogenetic variability in the external morphology of monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814) and its relevance to invasion potential. Hydrobiologia 607: 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Çınar Ş, Küçükkara R, Balık İ, et al. 2013. Uluabat (Apolyont) Gölü'ndeki balık faunasının tespiti, tür kompozisyonu ve ticari avcılığının türlere göre dağılımı. J Fish Sci 7: 309–316. [Google Scholar]
  • Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB. 2011. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14: 419–431. [Google Scholar]
  • Dillon A, Stepien CA. 2001. Genetic and Biogeographic Relationships of the Invasive Round (Neogobius melanostomus) and Tubenose (Proterorhinus marmoratus) Gobies in the Great Lakes Versus Eurasian Populations. J Great Lakes Res 27: 267–280. [Google Scholar]
  • Erös T, Sevcik A, Toth B. 2005. Abundance and night-time habitat use patterns of Ponto-Caspian gobiid species (Pisces, Gobiidae) in the litoral zone of the river Danube, Hungary. J Appl Ichthyol 21: 350–357. [Google Scholar]
  • Geldiay R, Balık S. 2009. The Freshwater Fishes of Turkey. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Kitaplar Serisi, İzmir, Turkey, 519 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gozlan RE, Britton JR, Cowx IG, Copp GH. 2010. Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. J Fish Biol 76: 751–786. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowska J, Pietraszewski D, Ondračková M. 2008. Tubenose goby Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) has joined three other Ponto-Caspian gobies in the Vistula River (Poland). Aquat Invasions 3: 261–265. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowska J, Grabowski M, Kostecka A. 2009. Diet and feeding habits of monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis) in a newly invaded area. Biol Invasions 11: 2161–2170. [Google Scholar]
  • Gürsoy Gaygusuz Ç, Tarkan AS, Gaygusuz Ö. 2010. Diel changes in feeding activity, microhabitat preferences and abundance of two freshwater fish species in small temperate streams. Ekoloji (Turkey) 19: 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Holčík J, Stránai I, Andreji J. 2003. The further advance of Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814) (Pisces, Gobiidae) upstream of the Danube. Biología (Bratislava) 58: 967–973. [Google Scholar]
  • Jakovlič I, Piria M, Šprem N, Tomljanovič T, Matulič D, Treer T. 2015. Distribution, abundance and condition of invasive Ponto-Caspian gobies Ponticola kessleri (Günther, 1861), Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814), and Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) in the Sava River basin, Croatia. J Appl Ichthyol 31: 888–894. [Google Scholar]
  • Janáč M, Valová Z, Jurajda P. 2012. Range expansion and habitat preferences of nonnative 0+ tubenose goby (Proterorhinus semilunaris) in two lowland rivers in the Danube basin. Fund Appl Limnol 181: 73–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jude DJ, Reider RH, Smith GR. 1992. Establishment of Gobiidae in the Great Lakes basin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49: 416–421. [Google Scholar]
  • Jude DJ, DeBoe SF. 1996. Possible impact of gobies and other introduced species on habitat restoration efforts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53: 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  • Karakuş U, Top N, Tepeköy EG, Britton JR, Tarkan AS. 2018. Life history characteristics of the potentially invasive Ponto-Caspian goby Neogobius fluviatilis in natural lakes from its native range (Black Sea region of Turkey). Mar Freshw Res 69: 1544–1556. [Google Scholar]
  • Kocovsky PM, Tallman JA, Jude DJ, Murphy DM, Brown JE, Stepien CA. 2011. Expansion of tubenose gobies Proterorhinus semilunaris into western Lake Erie and potential effects on native species. Biol Invasions 13: 2775–2784. [Google Scholar]
  • Konečná M, Jurajda P. 2012. Population structure, condition, and reproduction characteristics of native monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Actinopterygii: Perciformes Gobiidae), in the Bulgarian Danube. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 42: 321–327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kornis MS, Vander Zanden MJ. 2010. Forecasting the distribution of the invasive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Wisconsin tributaries to Lake Michigan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67: 553–562. [Google Scholar]
  • Kornis MS, Mercado-Silva N, Vander Zanden MJ. 2012. Twenty years of invasion: a review of round goby Neogobius melanostomus biology, spread and ecological implications. J Fish Biol 80: 235–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP. 2007. Invasion ecology. London: Blackwell, 444 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lusk S, Halačka K. 1995. The first finding of the tubenose goby, Proterorhinus marmoratus in the Czech Republic. Folia Zool 44: 90–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Magnin G, Yarar M. 1997. Important Bird Nesting Sites of Turkey. Society for Protection of Nature-DHKD, İstanbul, 313 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Naseka AM. 2005. New data on the historical and expanded range of Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) (Teleostei: Gobiidae) in eastern Europe. J Appl Ichthyol 21: 300–305. [Google Scholar]
  • Nelva A, Persat H, Chessel D. 1979. Une nouvelle méthode d'étude des peuplements ichtyologiques dans les grands cours d'aeu par échantillonnage ponctuel d'abodance. C R Acad Sci III Paris [in French] 289: 1295–1298. [Google Scholar]
  • Numann W. 1958. Research on limnological and fishery sciences in various lakes of Anatolia and a special study on common carp living in these lakes. Monography from İstanbul University Science Faculty Hydrobiology Research Institute No: 7, İstanbul [in Turkish], 114 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Özuluğ M, Altun Ö, Meriç N. 2005. On the fish fauna of Lake İznik (Turkey). Turk J Zool 29: 371–375. [Google Scholar]
  • Pagnucco KS, Maynard GA, Fera SA, Yan ND, Nalepa TF, Ricciardi A. 2015. The future of species invasions in the Great Lakes-St Lawrence River basin. J Great Lakes Res 41: 96–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Piria M, Jakšić G, Jakovlić I, Treer T. 2016. Dietary habits of invasive Ponto-Caspian gobies in the Croatian part of the Danube River basin and their potential impact on benthic fish communities. Sci Total Environ 540: 386–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Polačik M, Janáč M, Trichkova T, Vasillev M, Keckeis H, Jurajda P. 2008. The distribution and abundance of the Neogobius fishes in their native range (Bulgaria) with notes on the non-native range in the Danube River. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 166, Large Rivers 18: 193–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Polačik M, Janáč M, Jurajda P, Adámek Z, Ondračková M, Trichkova T, Vassilev M. 2009. Invasive gobies in the Danube: invasion success facilitated by availability and selection of superior food resources. Ecol Freshwat Fish 18: 640–649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • Rizevsky V, Pluta M, Leschenko A, Ermolaeva I. 2007. First record of the invasive Ponto-Caspian tubenose goby Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) from the River Pripyat, Belarus. Aquat Invasions 2: 275–277. [Google Scholar]
  • Roche KF, Janáč M, Jurajda P. 2013. A review of Gobiid expansion along the Danube-Rhine corridor geopolitical change as a driver for invasion. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 411: 01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roy HE, Peyton J, Aldridge DC, et al. 2014. Horizon scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain. Global Change Biol 20: 3859–3871. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, et al. 2017. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8: 14435. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sindilariu PD, Freyhof J, Wolter C. 2006. Habitat use of juvenile fish in the lower Danube and the Danube Delta: implications for ecotone connectivity. Hydrobiol 571: 51–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Svetovidov AN. 1964. Fishes of the Black sea. Nauka, Moscow, 550 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Tarkan AS, Karakuş U, Tepeköy EG, et al. 2018. Trophic interactions of two Ponto-Caspian gobies in the Turkish part of their native range. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 18: 1279–1286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Top N, Tarkan AS, Vilizzi L, Karakuş U. 2016. Microhabitat interactions of non-native pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus in a Mediterranean-type stream suggest no evidence for impact on endemic fishes. Knowl Manag Aquatic Ecosyst 417: 36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Top N, Karakuş U, Tepeköy EG, Britton JR, Tarkan AS. 2018. Plasticity in life history traits of the native Proterorhinus semilunaris suggests high adaptive capacity in its invasive range. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecocsyst 419: 48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Kessel N, Dorenbosch M, De Boer MRM, Leuveng RSEW, Van Der Velde G. 2011. Competition for shelter between four invasive gobiids and two native benthic fish species. Curr Zool 57: 844–851. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderploeg HA, Nalepa TF, Jude DJ, et al. 2002. Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59: 1209–1228. [Google Scholar]
  • Všetičková L, Janáč M, Vašek M, Roche K, Jurajda P. 2014. Non-native western tubenose gobies Proterorhinus semilunaris show distinct site, sex and age-related differences in diet. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 414: 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilizzi L, Stakėnas S, Copp GH. 2012. Use of constrained additive and quadratic ordination in fish habitat studies: an application to introduced pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and native Brown trout (Salmo trutta) in an English stream. Fund Appl Limnol 180: 69–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiesner C. 2005. New records of non-indigenous gobies (Neogobius spp.) in the Austrian Danube. J Appl Ichthyol 21: 324–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Yee TW. 2004. A new technique for maximum-likelihood canonical Gaussian ordination. Ecol Monogr 74: 685–701. [Google Scholar]
  • Yee TW. 2006. VGAM Family Functions for Reduced-Rank Regression and Constrained Ordination. Beta version 0.6-5. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/∼yee/VGAM/doc/rrvglm.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.