Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 420, 2019
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 21
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2019013
Published online 30 April 2019
  • Britton JR, Gozlan RE, Copp GH. 2011. Managing non-native fish in the environment. Fish Fish 12: 256–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ćaleta M, Jeli D, Buj I, Zanella D, Marčić Z, Mustafić P, Mrakovčić M. 2011. First record of the alien invasive species rotan (Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877) in Croatia. J Appl Ichthyol 27: 146–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Davies GD, Britton JR. 2015. Assessing the efficacy and ecology of biocontrol and biomanipulation for managing invasive pest fish. J Appl Ecol 52: 1264–1273. [Google Scholar]
  • Didenko AV, Gurbyk AB. 2016. Spring diet and trophic relationships between piscivorous fishes in Kaniv Reservoir (Ukraine). Folia Zool 65: 15–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eby LA, Roach WJ, Crowder LB, Stanford JA. 2006. Effects of stocking-up freshwater food webs. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 576–584. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eklöv P. 1992. Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: The perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. Anim Behav 44: 313–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Pauly D. 2018. FishBase. World Wide Web electronics publication. Available from www.fishbase.org, version (02/2018). [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowska J, Grabowski M, Pietraszewski D, Gmur J. 2009. Non-selective predator – The versatile diet of Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877) in the Vistula River (Poland), a newly invaded ecosystem. J Appl Ichthyol 25: 451–459. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowska J, Pietraszewski D, Przybylski M, Tarkan A, Marszał L, Lampart-Kałuzniacka M. 2011. Life-history traits of Amur sleeper, Perccottus glenii, in the invaded Vistula River: Early investment in reproduction but reduced growth rate. Hydrobiologia 661: 197–210. [Google Scholar]
  • Harper DG, Blake RW. 1991. Prey capture and the fast-start performance of northern pike Esox lucius . J Exp Biol 155: 175–192. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme PE. 2006. Beyond control: Wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43: 835–847. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46: 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Davidson TA, Liu Z, Mazzeo N, Trochine C, Özkan K, Jensen HS, Trolle D. 2012. Biomanipulation as a restoration tool to combat eutrophication: Recent advances and future challenges. Adv Ecol Res 47: 411–487. [Google Scholar]
  • Jurajda P, Vassilev M, Polacik M, Trichkova T. 2006. A first record of Perccottus glenii (Perciformes: Odontobutidae) in the River Danube in Bulgaria. Acta Zool Bulgar 58: 279–282. [Google Scholar]
  • Kati S, Mozsár A, Árva D, Cozma NJ, Czeglédi I, Antal L, Nagy SA, Erős T. 2015. Feeding ecology of the invasive Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877) in Central Europe. Int Rev Hydrobiol 100: 116–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Koščo J, Manko P, Miklisová D, Košuthová L. 2008. Feeding ecology of invasive Perccottus glenii (Perciformes, Odontobutidae) in Slovakia. Czech J Anim Sci 53: 479–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kvach Y, Drobiniak O, Kutsokon Y, Hoch I. 2013. The parasites of the invasive Chinese sleeper Perccottus glenii (Fam. Odontobutidae), with the first report of Nippotaenia mogurndae in Ukraine. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 409: 05. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kvach Y, Kutsokon Y, Stepien CA, Markovych M. 2016. Role of the invasive Chinese sleeper Perccottus glenii Dybowski 1877 (Actinopterygii: Odontobutidae) in the distribution of fish parasites in Europe: New data and a review. Biologia 71: 941–951. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemmens P, Mergay J, Vanhove T, De Meester L, Declerck SAJ. 2015. Suppression of invasive topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva by native pike Esox lucius in ponds. Aquat Conserv 25: 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Litvinov AG, O‘Gorman R. 1996. Biology of amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii) in the delta of the Selenga River, Buryatia, Russia. J Gt Lakes Res 22: 370–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Louette G. 2012. Use of a native predator for the control of an invasive amphibian. Wildl Res 39: 271–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez-Ibarra JA, Grant-Guillen JI, Arredondo-Jimenez JI, Rodriguez-Lopez MH. 2002. Indigenous fish species for the control of Aedes aegypti in water storage tank in Southern Mexico. Biocontrol 47: 481–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mérö TO. 2016. The first record in central Europe of the alien invasive rotan, Perccottus glenii, in the diet of the European perch Perca fluviatilis. Nat Croat 25: 155–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Musseau C, Boulenger C, Crivelli AJ, Lebel I, Pascal M, Bouletreau S, Santoul F. 2015. Native European eels as a potential biological control for invasive crayfish. Freshw Biol 60: 636–645. [Google Scholar]
  • Nehring S, Steinhof J. 2015. First records of the invasive Amur sleeper, Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 in German freshwaters: A need for realization of effective management measures to stop the invasion. BioInvasions Rec 4: 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  • Pedreschi D, Mariani S, Coughlan J, Voigt CC, O’Grady M, Caffrey J, Kelly-Quinn M. 2015. Trophic flexibility and opportunism in pike Esox lucius . J Fish Biol 87: 876–894. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pyke GH. 2008. Plague minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 39: 171–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rakauskas V, Smilgevičienė S, Arbačiauskas K. 2010. The impact of introduced Ponto-Caspian amphipods and mysids on perch (Perca fluviatilis) diet in Lithuanian lakes. Acta Zool Lit 20: 189–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reshetnikov AN. 2003. The introduced fish, rotan (Perccottus glenii), depresses populations of aquatic animals (macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and fish). Hydrobiologia 510: 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Reshetnikov AN. 2004. The fish Perccottus glenii: History of introduction to western regions of Eurasia. Hydrobiologia 522: 349–350. [Google Scholar]
  • Reshetnikov AN. 2013. Spatio-temporal dynamics of the expansion of rotan Perccottus glenii from West Ukrainian centre of distribution and consequences for European freshwater ecosystems. Aquat Invasions 8: 193–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reshetnikov AN, Chibilev EA. 2009. Distribution of the fish rotan (Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877) in the Irtysh River basin and analysis of possible consequences for environment and people. Contemp Probl Ecol 2: 224–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reshetnikov AN, Ficetola GF. 2011. Potential range of the invasive fish rotan (Perccottus glenii) in the Holarctic. Biol Invasions 13: 2967–2980. [Google Scholar]
  • Skov C, Nilsson PA. 2007. Evaluating stocking of YOY pike Esox lucius as a tool in the restoration of shallow lakes. Freshw Biol 52: 1834–1845. [Google Scholar]
  • Sokolov SG, Reshetnikov AN, Protasova EN. 2014. A checklist of parasites in non-native populations of rotan Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 (Odontobutidae). J Appl Ichthyol 30: 574–596. [Google Scholar]
  • Telcean I, Cicort-Lucaciu A. 2016. Messages of invasive Perccottus glenii individuals eaten by an Esox lucius from the Danube Delta. J Fish 4: 435–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thoresson G. 1993. Guidelines for Coastal Monitoring. Kustrapport 1. Öregrund, Sweden: National Board of Fisheries, Institute of Coastal Research. [Google Scholar]
  • Turesson H, Brönmark C. 2004. Foraging behaviour and capture success in perch, pikeperch and pike and the effects of prey density. J Fish Biol 65: 363–375. [Google Scholar]
  • Virbickas J. 2000. Lietuvos žuvys (Fishes of Lithuania). Vilnius, Lithuania: Ekologijos institutas. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.