Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 419, 2018
Article Number 17
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018011
Published online 27 March 2018
  • Álvarez-Troncoso R, Benetti Cesar J, Sarr AB, Garrido J. 2017. The microhabitat preferences of Trichoptera in rivers in north-western Spain. Mar Freshwater Res 68: 1686–1694. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16246 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arimoro FO, Muller WJ. 2010. Mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) community structure as an indicator of the ecological status of a stream in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess 166: 581–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bae WJ, McCafferty WP. 1994. Microhabitat of Anthopotamus verticis (Ephemeroptera: Potamanthidae). Hydrobiologia 288: 65–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bãnãrescu PM. 2004. Distribution pattern of the aquatic fauna of the Balkan Peninsula. In Griffith H, Kryštufek B, Reed JM, eds. Balkan Biodiversity Pattern and Process in the European Hotspot, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 203–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Baptista DF, Buss DF, Dorvillé LFM, Nessimian JL. 2001. Diversity and habitat preference of aquatic insects along the longitudinal gradient of the Macaé River basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Bras Biol 61: 249–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauernfeind E, Moog O. 2000. Mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) and the assessment of ecological integrity: a methodological approach. Hydrobiologia 423: 71–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauernfeind E, Soldán T. 2012. The mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera), Denmark: Apollo Books, Ollerup, 781 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Baxter RM. 1977. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 8: 255–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonacci O. 1987. Karst Hydrology, With Special Reference to the Dinaric Karst. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 184 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonacci O, Pipan T, Culver D. 2008. A framework for karst ecohydrology. Environ Geol 56: 891–900. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain JE, Sartori M. 2003. Ephemeroptera (Mayflies). In Resh VH, Cardé RT, eds. Encylopedia of Insects, Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp. 373–380. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Desio F. 1994. Le specie del genere Baetis Leach (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) nell' Italia settentrionale: sintesi ecologica. Atti Cong Naz Ital Entomol 17: 413–416. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Crosa G, Marchetti R. 1995. Size-related shift in the physical habitat in two mayfly species (Ephemeroptera). Freshw Biol 34: 297–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Cazzola M, López-Rodríguez MJ, Alba-Tercedor J, Armanini DG. 2009. Volume 3–Ephemeroptera. In Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D, eds. Distribution and Ecological Preferences of European Freshwater Organisms, Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers, pp. 1–254. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Armanini DG, Cazzola M, et al. 2017. Dataset "Ephemeroptera". www.freshwaterecology.info − the taxa and autecology database for freshwater organisms, version 7.0 (accessed on 16.05.2017). [Google Scholar]
  • Chatzinikolaou Y, Dakos V, Lazaridou M. 2006. Longitudinal impacts of anthropogenic pressures on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in a large transboundary Mediterranean river during the low flow period. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 34: 453–463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciborowski JJH. 1983. Influence of current velocity, density, and detritus on drift of two mayfly species (Ephemeroptera). Can J Zool 61: 119–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciborowski JJH, Clifford HF. 1983. Life histories, microdistribution and drift of two mayfly (Ephemeroptera) species in the Pembina River, Alberta, Canada. Holarct Ecol 6: 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. PRIMER V6: User Manual/Tutorial. Primer-E, Plymouth. [Google Scholar]
  • Collier KJ. 1994. Influence of nymphal size, sex and morphotype on microdistribution of Deleatidium (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) in a New Zealand River. Freshw Biol 31: 35–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Corkum LD, Pointing PJ, Ciborowski JJH. 1977. The influence of current velocity and substrate on the distribution and drift of two species of mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Can J Zool 55: 1970–1977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dedieu N, Rhone M, Vigouroux R, Céréghino R. 2015. Assessing the impact of gold mining in headwater streams of Eastern Amazonia using Ephemeroptera assemblages and biological traits. Ecol Indic 52: 332–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dell Inc. 2016. Dell Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. software.dell.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Dinakaran S, Anbalagan S. 2006. Seasonal variation and substrate selection of aquatic insects in a small stream in Sirumalai hills of southern Western Ghats. J Aquat Biol 21: 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67: 345–366. [Google Scholar]
  • European Environment Agency. 2008. Biogeographical regions in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/report_2002_0524_154909/biogeographical-regions-in-europe (Assessed on 11.10.2017). [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J. 2012. Threatened freshwater fishes and molluscs of the Balkan, potential impact of hydropower projects, Unpublished report, ECA Watch Austria & EuroNatur, 82 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Giller PS, Malmqvist B. 1998. The Biology of Streams and Rivers, New York: Oxford University Press, 296 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gligora Udovič M, Cvetkoska A, Žutinić P, et al. 2017. Defining centric diatoms of most relevant phytoplankton functional groups in deep karst lakes. Hydrobiologia 788: 169–191. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-2996-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon NB, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL. 1992. Stream Hydrology: an introduction for ecologists, Chichester: Wiley, 429 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Graf WL. 2005. Geomorphology and American dams: the scientific, social and economic context. Geomorphology 71: 3–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths HI, Kryštufek B, Reed JM. 2004. Balkan Biodiversity, Pattern and Process in the European Hotspot, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins CP. 1985. Substrate associations and longitudinal distributions in species of Ephemerellidae (Ephemeroptera: Insecta) from western Oregon. Freshw Invertebr Biol 4: 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Holomuzki JR, Messier SH. 1993. Habitat selection by the stream mayfly Paraleptophlebia guttata. J N Am Benthol Soc 12: 126–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ivković M, Plant A. 2015. Aquatic insects in the Dinarides: identifying hotspots of endemism and species richness shaped by geological and hydrological history using Empididae (Diptera). Insect Conserv Diver. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/icad.12113. [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN. 1979. IUCN Review. World Heritage Nomination. Lake Plitvice National Park. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamp WO, Britt NW. 1981. Resource partitioning by two species of stream mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Great Lakes Entomol 14: 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Lampert W, Sommer U. 1997. Limnoecology: the ecology of lakes and streams, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 323 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Landa V, Soldán T. 1991. The possibility of mayfly faunistics to indicate environmental changes of large areas. In Tercedor JA, Ortega JS, eds. Overview and Strategies of Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera, Gainesville, Florida: Sandhill-Crane Press, pp. 559–565. [Google Scholar]
  • Leitner P, Hauer C, Ofenböck T, Pletterbauer F, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Graf W. 2015. Fine sediment deposition affects biodiversity and density of benthic macroinvertebrates: A case study in the freshwater pearl mussel river Waldaist (Upper Austria). Limnologica 50: 54–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 5.0 for Windows. [Google Scholar]
  • Mihevc A, Zupan-Hajna N, Prelovšek M. 2010. Case study from the Dinaric karst of Slovenia. In Mihevc A, Prelovšek M, Zupan-Hajna N, eds. Introduction to the Dinaric Karst, Postojna: Karst Research Institute, pp. 49–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Milesi SV, Doledec S, Melo AS. 2016. Substrate heterogeneity influences the trait composition of stream insect communities: an experimental in situ study. Freshw Sci 35: 1321–1329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/688706 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miliša M, Habdija I, Primc-Habdija B, Radanović I, Matoničkin Kepčija R. 2006. The role of flow velocity in the vertical distribution of particulate organic matter on moss-covered travertine barriers of the Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). Hydrobiologia 553: 231–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Minshall GW. 1984. Aquatic Insect − substratum relationship. In Resh VH, Rosenberg DM, eds. The Ecology of Aquatic Insects, New York: Praeger Scientific, pp. 358–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Monaghan MT, Robinson CT, Spaak P, Ward JV. 2005. Macroinvertebrate diversity in fragmented Alpine streams: implications for freshwater conservation. Aquat Sci 67: 454–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moog O. 2002. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca, Edition 2002, Wassserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Vienna. [Google Scholar]
  • Obelić B, Horvatinčić N, Barešić J, Briansó Babinka S, Suckow A. 2005. Anthropogenic pollution in karst lake sediments (Croatia). In Özkul M, Yaĝiz S, Jones B, eds. Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Travertine, Denizli, Turkey, pp. 179–186. [Google Scholar]
  • Plenković-Moraj A, Horvatinčić N, Primc-Habdija B. 2002. Periphyton and its role in tufa deposition in karstic waters (Plitvice Lakes, Croatia). Biologia 57: 423–432. [Google Scholar]
  • Popijač A, Sivec I. 2009. Diversity and distribution of stoneflies in the area of Plitvice Lakes National Park and along the Mediterranean River Cetina (Croatia). Aquat Insect 31: 731–742. DOI: 10.1080/01650420902745521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Previšić A, Kerovec M, Kučinić M. 2007. Emergence and composition of Trichoptera from karst habitats, Plitvice Lakes Region, Croatia. Int Rev Hydrobiol 92: 61–83. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200510921. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Previšić A, Walton C, Kučinić M, Mitrikeski PT, Kerovec M. 2009. Pleistocene divergence of Dinaric Drusus endemics (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) in multiple microrefugia within the Balkan Peninsula. Mol Ecol 18: 634–647. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Previšić A, Schnitzler J, Kučinić M, et al. 2014. Microscale vicariance and diversification of Western Balkan caddisflies linked to karstification. Freshw Sci 33: 250–262. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramette A. 2007. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62: 142–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rounick JS, Winterbourn MJ. 1983. Leaf processing in two contrasting beech forest streams: effects of physical and biotic factors on litter breakdown. Arch Hydrobiol 96: 448–474. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarr AB, Benetti CJ, Fernández-Díaz M, Garrido J. 2013. The microhabitat preferences of water beetles in four rivers in Ourense province, northwest Spain. Limnetica, 32: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Savić A, Randjelović V, Krpo-Ćetković J. 2010. Seasonal variability in community structure and habitat Selection of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in the Nišava River (Serbia). Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 24: 639–645. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2010.10817913. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmedtje U, Colling M. 1996. Ökologische Typisierung der aquatischen Makrofauna. Informationsberichte des Bayerischen Landesamtes für Wasserwirtschaft 4: 1–543. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D. 2015. www.freshwaterecology.info − an online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecol Indic 53: 271–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.007. (accessed on 30.09.2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schwarz U. 2012. Balkan Rivers-The Blue Heart of Europe, Hydromorphological Status and Dam Projects. Report, Vienna, Austria, 151 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sroka P, Klecka J, Boukal DS. 2016. Spatial heterogeneity and habitat permanence affect community assembly but not phenology of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in sandpit pools. Zoosymposia 11: 205–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zoosymposia.11.1.20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stahler A. 1952. Hypsometric (area altitude) analysis of erosional topology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63: 1117–1142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stilinović B, Božičević S. 1998. The Plitvice Lakes − a natural phenomenon in the middle of the Dinaric karst in Croatia. Eur Water Manage 5: 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Subramanian KA, Sivaramakrishnan KG. 2005. Habitat and microhabitat distribution of stream communities of the Western Ghats. Curr Sci 89: 976–987. [Google Scholar]
  • Šegota T, Filipčić A. 2003. Köppenova podjela klima i hrvatsko nazivlje. Geoadria 8: 17–23. (In Croatian). [Google Scholar]
  • Šemnički P, Previšić A, Ivković M, Čmrlec K, Mihaljević Z. 2012. Tufa barriers from a caddisfly's point of view: Streams or lake outlets? Internat Rev Hydrobiol 97: 465–484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Špoljar M, Primc-Habdija B, Habdija I. 2007. Transport of seston in the karstic hydrosystem of the Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). Hydrobiologia 579: 199–209. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0409-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Štambuk-Giljanović N. 2001. The quality of water in Buško Blato Reservoir. Environ Monit Assess 71: 279–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tierno de Figueroa JM, López-Rodríguez MJ, Fenoglio S, Sánchez-Castillo P, Fochetti R. 2013. Freshwater biodiversity in the rivers of the Mediterranean Basin. Hydrobiologia 719: 137–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • UNEP/MAP/PAP. 2000. River Cetina Watershed and the Adjacent Coastal Area: Environmental and Socio-economic Profile. Priority Actions Programme, Split. [Google Scholar]
  • Urbanič G, Toman MJ, Krušnik C. 2005. Microhabitat type selection of caddisfly larvae (Insecta: Trichoptera) in a shallow lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 541: 1–12. DOI:10.1007/S10750-004-4314-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Gattolliat J-L., Ivković M, et al. 2014. The mayfly fauna (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia. Nat Croat 23: 349–363. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Gattolliat J-L, Mihaljević Z, Sartori M. 2015. Croatian mayflies (Insecta, Ephemeroptera): species diversity and distribution patterns. ZooKeys 523: 99–127. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.523.6100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Previšić A, Kučinić M, Gattolliat J-L., Sartori M, Mihaljević Z. 2016a. Distribution and autecology of mayflies (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) in a Mediterranean river in the Western Balkans. Entomol News 126: 19–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Previšić A, Ivković M, et al. 2016b. Mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) assemblages of a regulated perennial Mediterranean river system in the Western Balkans. Biologia 71: 1038–1048. DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2016-0121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Brigić A, Kerovec M, Gottstein S, Ternjej I. 2016c. Spatial distribution and seasonal changes of mayflies (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) in a Western Balkan peat bog. ZooKeys 637: 135–149. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.637.10359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilenica M, Mičetić Stanković V, Sartori M, Kučinić M, Mihaljević Z. 2017. Environmental factors affecting mayfly assemblages in tufa-depositing habitats of the Dinaric Karst. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 418. DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2017005. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1979. The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Springer, 391 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Webster JR, Benfield EF, Golladay SW, et al. 1987. Experimental studies of physical factors affecting seston transport in streams. Limnol Oceanogr 32: 848–863. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wentworth CK. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30: 377–392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.