EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 418 (2017) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 418 (2017) 52 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 418, 2017
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 52
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017047
Published online 10 November 2017
  • Abdolmalaki S, Psuty I. 2007. The effects of stock enhancement of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in Iranian coastal waters of the Caspian Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 64: 973–980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andersson M, Degerman E, Persson J, Ragnarsson-Stabo H. 2015. Movements, recapture rate and length increment of tagged pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) − a basis for management in lakes. Fish Manag Ecol 22: 450–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Klefoth T, Kobler A, Cooke SJ. 2008. Size selectivity, injury, handling time, and determinants of initial hooking mortality in recreational angling for northern pike: the influence of type and size of bait. N Am J Fish Manag 28: 123–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Balfry S, Welch DW, Atkinson J, Lill A, Vincent S. 2011. The effect of hatchery release strategy on marine migratory behaviour and apparent survival of Seymour River steelhead smolts (Oncorhynchus mykiss). PLoS ONE 6: e14779. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bíró P. 1997. Temporal variation in Lake Balaton and its fish populations. Ecol Freshw Fish 6: 196–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bolland JD, Cowx IG, Lucas MC. 2009. Dispersal and survival of stocked cyprinids in a small English river: comparison with wild fishes using a multi-method approach. J Fish Biol 74: 2313–2328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Booth AJ, Weyl OLF. 2008. Retention of T-bar anchor and dart tags by a wild population of African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Fish Res 92: 333–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buckmeier DL, Betsill RK, Schlechte JW. 2005. Initial predation of stocked fingerling largemouth bass in Texas Reservoir and implications for improving stocking efficiency. N Am J Fish Manag 25: 652–659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buijse AD, Houthuijzen RP. 1992. Piscivory, growth, and size-selective mortality of age 0 pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca). Can J Aquat Sci 49: 894–902. [Google Scholar]
  • Craig JF. 2000. Percid fishes: systematics, ecology and exploitation. Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Fielder DG. 1992. Evaluation of stocking walleye fry and fingerlings and factors affecting their success in lower Lake Oahe, South Dakota. N Am J Fish Manag 12: 336–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen MM. 2002. Estimating the long-term effects of stocking domesticated trout into wild brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations: an approach using microsatellite DNA analysis of historical and contemporary samples. Mol Ecol 11: 1003–1015. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansson S, Arrhenius F, Nellbring S. 1997. Benefits from fish stocking − experiences from stocking young-of-the-year pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca L. to a bay in the Baltic Sea. Fish Res 32: 123–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hickley P, Chare S. 2004. Fisheries for non-native species in England and Wales: angling or the environment? Fish Manag Ecol 11: 203–212. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Istvánovics V, Clement A, Somlyódy L, Specziár A, László G, Padisák J. 2007. Updating water quality targets for shallow Lake Balaton (Hungary), recovering from eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 581: 305–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson BM, Vogelsang M, Stewart RS. 1996. Enhancing a walleye population by stocking: effectiveness and constraints on recruitment. Ann Zool Fennici 33: 577–588. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy GJA, Strange CD, O'Neill GO. 1982. Tagging studies on various age classes of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Fish Manag 13: 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Keskinen T, Pääkkönen JPJ, Lilja J, Marjomäki TJ, Karjalainen J. 2005. Homing behaviour of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) following experimental transplantation. Boreal Environ Res 10: 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Kristiansen TS, Otterå H, Svåsand T. 2000. Size-dependent mortality of juvenile Atlantic cod, estimated from recaptures of released reared cod and tagged wild cod. J Fish Biol 56: 687–712 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lappalainen J, Erm V, Kjellman J, Lehtonen H. 2000. Size-dependent winter mortality of age-0 pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in Pärnu Bay, the Baltic Sea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57: 451–458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lappalainen J, Milardi M, Nyberg K, Venäläinen A. 2009. Effects of water temperature on year-class strengths and growth patterns of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) in the brackish Baltic Sea. Aquat Ecol 43: 181–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michaletz PH, Wallendorf MJ, Nicks DM. 2008. Effects of stocking rate, stocking size and angler catch inequality on exploitation of stocked channel catfish in small Missouri impoundments. N Am J Fish Manag 28: 1486–1497. [Google Scholar]
  • Paragamian VL, Kingery R. 1992. A comparison of walleye fry and fingerling stockings in three rivers in Iowa. N Am J Fish Manag 12: 313–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson WF, Sullivan MG. 2013. Testing and refining the assumptions of put-and-take rainbow trout fisheries in Alberta. Hum Dimens Wildl 18: 340–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Popova OA, Sytina LA. 1977. Food and feeding relations of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in various waters of the USSR. J Fish Res Bd Can 34: 1559–1570. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruuhijärvi J, Salminen M, Nurmio T. 1996. Releases of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) fingerlings in lakes with no established pikeperch stock. Ann Zool Fennici 33: 553–567. [Google Scholar]
  • Sackett DK, Catalano M. 2017. Spatial heterogeneity, variable rewards, tag loss, and tagging mortality affect the performance of mark-recapture designs to estimate exploitation: an example using red snapper in the northern Gulf of Mexico. N Am J Fish Manag 37: 558–573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saloniemi I, Jokikokko E, Kallio-Nyberg I, Jutila E, Pasanen P. 2004. Survival of reared and wild Atlantic salmon smolts: size matters more in bad years. ICES J Mar Sci 61: 782–787. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saulamo K, Thoresson G. 2005. Management of pikeperch migrating over management areas in a Baltic Archipelago area. Ambio 34: 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Schultz ET, Conover DO. 1999. The allometry of energy reserve depletion: test of a mechanism for size-dependent winter mortality. Oecologia 119: 474–483. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sogard SM. 1997. Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: a review. Bull Mar Sci 60: 1129–1157. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A. 2005. First year ontogenetic diet patterns in two coexisting Sander species, S. lucioperca and S. volgensis, in Lake Balaton. Hydrobiologia 549: 115–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A. 2010. Fish fauna of Lake Balaton: stock composition, living conditions of fish and directives of the modern utilization of the fish stock. Acta Biol Debr Suppl Oecol Hung 23 (Hydrobiol Monogr) 2: 7–185 (in Hungarian with an English summary). [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A. 2011. Size-dependent prey selection in piscivorous pikeperch Sander lucioperca and Volga pikeperch S. volgensis shaped by bimodal prey size distribution. J Fish Biol 79: 1895–1917. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Erős T. 2016. Freshwater resources and fisheries in Hungary. In: Craig JF, ed. Freshwater fisheries ecology. Wiley, Oxford, pp. 196–200. [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, Turcsányi B. 2014. Effect of stocking strategy on distribution and recapture rate of common carp Cyprinus carpio L., in a large and shallow temperate lake: implications for recreational put-and-take fisheries management. J Appl Ichthyol30: 887–894. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Specziár A, György ÁI, Erős T. 2013. Within-lake distribution patterns of fish assemblages: the relative roles of spatial, temporal and random environmental factors in assessing fish assemblages using gillnets in a large and shallow temperate lake. J Fish Biol 82: 840–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strange CD, Kennedy GJA. 1979. Yield to anglers of spring and autumn stocked, hatchery reared and wild, brown trout. Fish Manag 10: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Stuart IG, Jones MJ. 2006. Movement of common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in a regulated lowland Australian river: implications for management. Fish Manag Ecol 13: 213–219. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Templeton RG. 1971. An investigation of the advantages of autumn and spring stocking with brown trout in a Yorkshire reservoir. Fish Manag 1: 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandersteen W, Biro P, Harris L, Devlin R. 2012. Introgression of domesticated alleles into a wild trout genotype and the impact on seasonal survival in natural lakes. Evol Appl 5: 76–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vostradovský J. 1991. Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) “put-and-take” fisheries in the management of angling waters in Czechoslovakia. In: Cowx IG, ed. Catch effort sampling strategies: their application in freshwater fisheries management. Fishing new books. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 100–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiperth A, Ferincz Á, Kováts N, Hufnagel L, Staszny Á, Keresztessy K, Szabó I, Tátrai I, Paulovits G. 2014. Effect of water level fluctuation on fishery and angler's catch data of economically utilised fish species of Lake Balaton between 1901–2011. Appl Ecol Environ Res 12: 221–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Young GC, Wise BS, Ayvazian SG. 1999. A tagging study on tailor (Pomatomus saltatrix) in Western Australian waters: their movement, exploitation, growth and mortality. Mar Freshw Res 50: 633–642. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.