Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 418, 2017
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 53
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017043
Published online 17 November 2017
  • Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Santos NCL, Ortega JCG, Pelicice FM. 2016. Fish assemblages in neotropical reservoirs: colonization patterns, impacts and management. Fish Res 173: 26–36. [CrossRef]
  • Argillier C, Caussé S, Gevrey M, Pédron S, De Bortoli J, Brucet S, Emmrich M, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen T, Mehner T, Olin M, Rask M, Volta P, Winfield I, Kelly F, Krause T, Palm A, Holmgren K. 2013. Development of a fish-based index to assess the eutrophication status of European lakes. Hydrobiologia 704: 193–211. [CrossRef]
  • Baker EA, Wehrly KE, Seelbach PW, Wang L, Wiley MJ, Simon T. 2005. A multimetric assessment of stream condition in the northern lakes and forests ecoregion using spatially explicit statistical modeling and regional normalization. Trans Am Fish Soc 13: 697–710. [CrossRef]
  • Belpaire C, Smolders R, Auweele IV, Ercken D, Breine J, Thuyne G Van, Ollevier F. 2000. An index of biotic integrity characterizing fish populations and the ecological quality of flandrian water bodies. Hydrobiologia 434: 17–33. [CrossRef]
  • Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A, Poikane S, Solimini A, van de Bund W, Zampoukas N, Hering D. 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol Indic 18: 31–41. [CrossRef]
  • Blabolil P, Logez M, Ricard D, Prchalová M, Říha M, Sagouis A, Peterka J, Kubečka J, Argillier C. 2016. An assessment of the ecological potential of Central and Western European reservoirs based on fish communities. Fish Res 173: 80–87. [CrossRef]
  • Blabolil P, Boukal DS, Ricard D, Kubečka J, Říha M, Vašek M, Prchalová M, Čech M, Frouzová J, Jůza T, Muška M, Tušer M, Draštík V, Šmejkal M, Vejřík L, Peterka J. 2017. Optimal gillnet sampling design for the estimation of fish community indicators in heterogeneous freshwater ecosystems. Ecol Indic 77: 368–376. [CrossRef]
  • Boukal DS, Jankovský M, Kubečka J, Heino M. 2012. Stock-catch analysis of carp recreational fisheries in Czech reservoirs: insights into fish survival, water body productivity and impact of extreme events. Fish Res 119-120: 23–32. [CrossRef]
  • Carol J, Benejam L, Alcaraz C, Vila-Gispert A, Zamora L, Navarro E, Armengol J, Garcia-Berthou E. 2006. The effects of limnological features on fish assemblages of 14 Spanish reservoirs. Ecol Freshwater Fish 15: 66–77. [CrossRef]
  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR. 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioSci 35: 634–639. [CrossRef]
  • CEN. 2005. Water Quality − Sampling of fish with multimesh gillnets. European Committee for Standardization, EN 14757, Brussels.
  • CFU. 2017. Czech Fishing Union − Statistics catches. www.rybsvaz.cz (9/2017).
  • EC. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327: 1–72.
  • Emmrich M, Pédron S, Brucet S, Winfield IJ, Jeppesen E, Volta P, Argillier C, Lauridsen TL, Holmgren K, Hesthagen T, Mehner T. 2014. Geographical patterns in the body-size structure of European lake fish assemblages along abiotic and biotic gradients. J Biogeogr 14: 2221–2233. [CrossRef]
  • Froese R, Pauly D. 2016. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. (10/2016).
  • Gassner H, Tischler G, Wanzenböck J. 2003. Ecological integrity assessment of lakes using fish communities − suggestions of new metrics developed in two Austrian prealpine lakes. Int Rev Hydrobiol 88: 635–652. [CrossRef]
  • Gassner H, Wanzenböck J, Zick D, Tischler G, Pamminger-Lahnsteiner B. 2005. Development of a fish based lake typology for natural Austrian lakes >50 ha based on the reconstructed historical fish communities. Int Rev Hydrobiol 90: 422–432. [CrossRef]
  • Hutchinson GE. 1957. Concludig remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22: 415–427. [CrossRef]
  • Illies J. 1978. Limnofauna Europaea. A checklist of the animals inhabiting european inland waters, with account of their distribution and ecology. Stuttgart and Swets & Zeitlinger: Amsterdam, 532 p.
  • Irz P, Odion M, Argillier C, Pont D. 2006. Comparison between the fish communities of lakes, reservoirs and rivers: can natural systems help define the ecological potential of reservoirs? Aquat Sci 68: 109–116. [CrossRef]
  • Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen T, Landkildehus F. 2000. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshwater Biol 45: 201–218. [CrossRef]
  • Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Jensen JP, Havens KE, Anneville O, Carvalho L, Coveney MF, Deneke R, Dokulil MT, Foy B, Gerdeaux D, Hampton SE, Hilt S, Kangur K, Kohler J, Lammens EHHR, Lauridsen TL, Manca M, Miracle MR, Moss B, Noges P, Persson G, Phillips G, Portielje R, Schelske CL, Straile D, Tatrai I, Willen E, Winder M. 2005. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading − an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. Freshwater Biol 50: 1747–1771. [CrossRef]
  • Jůza T, Vašek M, Kratochvíl M, Blabolil P, Čech M, Draštík V, Frouzová J, Muška M, Peterka J, Prchalová M, Říha M, Tušer M, Kubečka J. 2014. Chaos and stability of age-0 fish assemblages in a temperate deep reservoir: unpredictable success and stable habitat use. Hydrobiologia 724: 217–234. [CrossRef]
  • Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey: Champaign, 28 p.
  • Kelly FL, Harrison AJ, Allen M, Connor L, Rosell R. 2012. Development and application of an ecological classification tool for fish in lakes in Ireland. Ecol Indic 18: 608–619. [CrossRef]
  • Kottelat M., Freyhof J. 2007. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Kottelat: Copeia, 646 p. [EDP Sciences]
  • Krolová M, Čížková H, Hejzlar J, Poláková S. 2013. Response of littoral macrophytes to water level fluctuations in a storage reservoir. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 408: 1–21.
  • Kubečka J. 1993. Succession of fish communities in reservoirs of Central and Eastern Europe. In: Straškraba M, Tundisi JG, Duncan A (eds). I n comparative reservoir limnology and water quality management, developments in hydrobiology. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 153–168.
  • Kubečka J, Hohausová E, Matěna J, Peterka J, Amarasinghe US, Bonar SA, Hateley J, Hickley P, Suuronen P, Tereschenko V, Welcomme R, Winfield IJ. 2009. The true picture of a lake or reservoir fish stock: A review of needs and progress. Fish Res 96: 1–5. [CrossRef]
  • Lammens E, van Luijn F, Wessels Y, Bouwhuis H, Noordhuis R, Portielje R, van der Molen D. 2008. Towards ecological goals for the heavily modified lakes in the IJsselmeer area, the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 599: 239–247. [CrossRef]
  • Launois L, Veslot J, Irz P, Argillier C. 2011a. Development of a fish-based index (FBI) of biotic integrity for French lakes using the hindcasting approach. Ecol Indic 11: 1572–1583. [CrossRef]
  • Launois L, Veslot J, Irz P, Argillier C. 2011b. Selecting fish-based metrics responding to human pressures in French natural lakes and reservoirs: towards the development of a fish-based index (FBI) for French lakes. Ecol Freshwater Fish 20: 120–132. [CrossRef]
  • McCluney KE, LeRoy Poff N, Palmer MA, Thorp JH, Poole GC, Williams BS, Williams MR, Baron JS. 2014. Riverine macrosystems ecology: sensitivity, resistance, and resilience of whole river basins with human alterations. Front Ecol Environ 12: 48–58. [CrossRef]
  • Mehner T, Diekmann M, Brämick U, Lemcke R. 2005. Composition of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human-use intensity. Freshwater Biol 50: 70–85. [CrossRef]
  • Mouton AM, Dedecker AP, Lek S, Goethals PLM. 2010. Selecting variables for habitat suitability of Asellus (Crustacea, Isopoda) by applying input variable contribution methods to artificial neural network models. Environ Model Assess 15: 65–79. [CrossRef]
  • Poikane S, Zampoukas N, Borja A, Davies SP, van de Bund W, Birk S. 2014. Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward. Environ Sci Policy 44: 237–246. [CrossRef]
  • Pont D, Hugueny B, Rogers C. 2007. Development of a fish-based index for the assessment of river health in Europe: the European Fish Index. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 427–439. [CrossRef]
  • Prchalová M, Kubečka J, Říha M, Mrkvička T, Vašek M, Jůza T, Kratochvíl M, Peterka J, Draštík V, Křížek J. 2009. Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species. Fish Res 96: 51–57. [CrossRef]
  • Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Kubečka J, Peterka J, Čech M, Muška M, Kratochvíl M, Vašek M. 2010. Fish activity as determined by gillnet catch: a comparison of two reservoirs of different turbidity. Fish Res 102: 291–296. [CrossRef]
  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ritterbusch D. 2011. Proposal of an alternative option to assure that national good/moderate class boundaries correspond to comparable levels of ecosystem alteration. Draft proposal discussed at meeting on November 18 2011 In: The Institute of Inland Fisheries: Potsdam-Sacr, 35 p.
  • Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA. Folke C. Walker B. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Schmidt-Kloiber A, Hering D. 2015. www.freshwaterecology.info − an online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecol Indic 53: 271–282. [CrossRef]
  • Segurado P, Caiola N, Pont D, Oliveira JM, Delaigue O, Ferreira M-T. 2014. Comparability of fish-based ecological quality assessments for geographically distinct Iberian regions. Sci Total Environ 476–477: 785–794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Šmejkal M, Ricard D, Prchalová M, Říha M, Muška M, Blabolil P, Čech M, Vašek M, Jůza T, Herreras AM, Encinad L, Peterka J, Kubečka J. 2015. Biomass and abundance biases in European standard gillnet sampling. PLOS ONE 10: 1–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Peder Jensen J, Lildal Amsinck S. 2005. Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. J Appl Ecol 42: 616–629. [CrossRef]
  • Stefanidis K, Papastergiadou E. 2013. Effects of a long term water level reduction on the ecology and water quality in an eastern mediterranean lake. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 411: 1–14.
  • Sutela T, Vehanen T, Rask M. 2011. Assessment of the ecological status of regulated lakes: stressor-specific metrics from littoral fish assemblages. Hydrobiologia 675: 55–64. [CrossRef]
  • Ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57: 255–289. [CrossRef]
  • Thornton KW, Kimmel BL, Payne FE. 1990. Reservoir limnology: ecological perspectives. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 307 p.
  • Vašek M, Prchalová M, Říha M, Blabolil P, Čech M, Draštík V, Frouzová J, Jůza T, Kratochvíl M, Muška M, Peterka J, Sajdlová Z, Šmejkal M, Tušer M, Vejřík L, Znachor P, Mrkvička T, Seďa J, Kubečka J. 2016. Fish community response to the longitudinal environmental gradient in Czech deep-valley reservoirs: implications for ecological monitoring and management. Ecol Indic 63: 219–230. [CrossRef]
  • Vollenweider RA. 1976. Advances in defining critical loading levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication. Memorie dell' Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 33: 53–83.
  • Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems 3rd ed. 37 Academic Press: New York, 1006 p. [EDP Sciences]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.