EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 418 (2017) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 418 (2017) 45 References
Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 418, 2017
Article Number 45
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017036
Published online 26 September 2017
  • Asha Nair MS, Reshma J, Anu Mathew K, Aswathy Ashok JA. 2015. Effect of water quality on phytoplankton abundance in selected ponds of Nedumangad Block Panchayat, Kerala. Emerg Life Sci Res 1: 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Asaduzzaman M, Rahman MM, Azim ME, Ashraful Islam M, Wahab MA. 2010. Effects of C/N and substrate addition on antural food communities in freshwater prawn monoculture ponds. Aquaculture 306: 127–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Battarbee RW. 1979. Diatoms in lake sediments. In: International Geological Correlation Programme Project 158, Paleohydrological Changes in the Temperate Zone in the Last 15, 000 Years. Subproject B, Lake and Mire Environments. Lund, Sweden: Dept. of Quaternary Geology. [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield P, Nicolet P, Weatherby A. 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Consevation. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15: 693–714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boix D, Gascon S, Sala J, et al. 2008. Patterns of composition and species richness of crustaceans and aquatic insects along envirobmental gradients in mediaterraen water bodies. Hydrobiologia 597: 53–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho L, Beklioglu M, Moss B. 1995. Changes in a deep lake following sewage diversion – a challenge to the orthodoxy of external phosphorus control as a restoration strategy? Freshwater Biol 34: 399–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Celewicz-Gołdyn S, Kuczyńska-Kippen N, Nagengast B. 2008. Phytoplankton community structure in two types (forest vs. field) of small water bodies. Botanika-Steciana 12: 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Céréghino R, Biggs J, Oertli B, Declerck S. 2008a. The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 597: 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Céréghino R, Ruggiero A, Marty P, Angelibert S. 2008b. Biodiversity and distribution patterns of freshwater invertebrates in farm ponds of southwestern French agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia 597: 43–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Céréghino R, Boix D, Cauchie H-M, Martens K, Oertli B. 2014. The ecological role of ponds in a changing world. Hydrobiologia 723: 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Council Directive. 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22 July 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • Declerck S, De Bie T, Ercken D, et al. 2006. Ecological characteristics of small ponds: associations with land-use practices at different spatial scales. Biol Conserv 131: 523–532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V, Bazzanti M, Dowgiallo MG, Iberite M. 2008. Macrophyte diversity and physic-chemical characteristics of Tyrrhenian coast ponds in central Italy: implications for conservation. Hydrobiologia 579: 85–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Downing JA, Watson SB, McCauley E. 2001. Predicting cyanobacteria dominance in lakes. CanJ Fish Aquat Sci 58: 1905–1908. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gascon S, Boix D, Sala J, Quintana D. 2008. Relation between macroinvertebrate life strategies and habitat traits in Mediterranean salt marsh ponds (Emporda wetlands, NE Iberan Peninsula). Hydrobiologia 597: 71–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gligora M, Plenković-Moraj A, Kralj K, Grigorszky I, Peroš-Pucar D. 2007. The relationship between phytoplankton species dominance and environmental variables in a shallow lake (Lake Vrana, Croatia). Hydrobiologia 584: 337–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hašler P, Štěpánková J, Špačková J, et al. 2008. Epipelic cyanobacteria and algae: a case study from Czech ponds. Fottea 8: 133–146. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutcheson K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. J Theor Biol 29: 151–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Joniak T, Kuczyńska-Kippen N, Nagengast B. 2006. Chemistry of waters of small water bodies in the agricultural landscape of the western Wielkopolska region. Teka Komisji Ochrony Środowiska Przyrodniczego 8: 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Kocarkova A, Duchoslav M, Poulickova A. 2004. The variation of phytoplankton in different types of floodplain ponds: a case study from the River Morava floodplain (the Czech Republik). Chech Phycology, Olomouc 4: 87–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuczyńska-Kippen N, Nagengast B. 2006. The impact of a sudden water level decrease on the biocenotic structure of a small pastoral water body. Teka Komisji Ochrony Środowiska Przyrodniczego 3: 104–114. [Google Scholar]
  • Lombardo P. 2005. Applicability of littoral food-web biomanipulation for lake management purposes: snails: macrophytes, and water transparency in northeast Ohio shallow lakes. Lake Reserv Manag 21: 186–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maurer BA, McGill BJ. 2011. Measurement of species diversity. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ, eds. Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Napiórkowska-Krzebietke A, Hutorowicz A, Tucholski S. 2011. Dynamics and structure of phytoplankton in fishponds fed with treated wastewater. Pol J Environ Stud 20: 157–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Naselli-Flores L, Barone R. 2000. Phytoplankton dynamics and structure: a comparative analysis in natural and man-made water bodies of different trophic state. Hydrobiologia 438: 65–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Owsianny PM, Gąbka M. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity of biotic and abiotic habitat conditions of the lake-bog ecosystem Kuźniczek (NW Poland). Limnol Rev 6: 223–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B, Indermuehle N, Angelibert S, Hinden H, Stoll A. 2008. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in 25 high alpine ponds of the Swiss National park (Cirque of Macun) and relation to environmental variables. Hydrobiologia 597: 29–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips G, Pietilainen OP, Carvalho L, Solimini A, Solheim AL, Cardoso AC. 2008. Chlorophyll-nutrient relationships of different lake types using a large European dataset. Aquat Ecol 42: 213–226. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Rott E. 1981. Some results from phytoplankton counting intercalibrations. Schweiz Z Hydrol 43: 34–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Sahin B. 2000. Algal flora of lakes Aygyr and Balykly (Trabzon, Turkey). Turk J Bot 24: 35–45. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor FJR, Pollingher U. 1987. Ecology of dinoflagellates. In: Taylor FJR, ed. The biology of flagellates. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publisher, pp. 398–529. [Google Scholar]
  • Teissier S, Peretyatko A, De Backer S, Triest L. 2012. Strength of phytoplankton-nutrient relationship: evidence from 13 biomanipulated ponds. Hydrobiologia 689: 147–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiliams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J. 2008. How can we make new ponds biodiverse? – a case monitored over 8 years. Hydrobiologia 597: 137–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.