Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Article Number 45
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2016032
Published online 19 December 2016
  • Baki A, Zhu D, Rajaratnam N. 2014. Mean flow characteristics in a rock-ramp-type fish pass. J Hydraul Eng 140 (2): 156–168. [CrossRef]
  • Belcher SE, Jerram N, Hunt JCR. 2003. Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 488: 369–398. [CrossRef]
  • Cassan L, Tien T, Courret D, Laurens P, Dartus D. 2014. Hydraulic resistance of emergent macroroughness at large Froude numbers: design of nature-like fishpasses. J Hydraul Eng 140 (9): 04014043. [CrossRef]
  • Coceal O, Belcher SE. 2004. A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130 (599): 1349–1372. [CrossRef]
  • Defina A, Bixio A. 2005. Mean flow turbulence in vegetated open channel flow. Water Resour Res 41: 1–12. [CrossRef]
  • FAO. 2002. Fish passes – design, dimensions and monitoring. Rome: FAO, 138 p.
  • Florens E, Eiff O, Moulin F. 2013. Defining the roughness sublayer and its turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids 54 (4): 1–15. [CrossRef]
  • Ghisalberti M, Nepf HM. 2006. The structure of the shear layer in flows over rigid and flexible canopies. Environ Fluid Mech 6: 277–301. [CrossRef]
  • Heimerl S, Krueger F, Wurster H. 2008. Dimensioning of fish passage structures with perturbation boulders. Hydrobiologia 609 (1): 197–204. [CrossRef]
  • Huai W-x, Chen Z-b, Han J, Zhang L-x, Zeng Y-h. 2009. Mathematical model for the flow with submerged and emerged rigid vegetation. J Hydrodyn B 21 (5): 722–729. [CrossRef]
  • Huthoff F, Augustijn DCM, Hulscher SJMH. 2007. Analytical solution of the depth-averaged flow velocity in case of submerged rigid cylindrical vegetation. Water Resour Res 43 (6): W06413 [CrossRef]
  • Idelcick IE. 1986. Mémento des pertes de charges. 3e édition. Eyrolles, EDF.
  • Jarvela J. 2005. Effect of submerged flexible vegetation on flow structure and resistance. J Hydrol 307 (1–4): 233–241. [CrossRef]
  • Katul GG, Poggi D, Ridolfi L. 2011. A flow resistance model for assessing the impact of vegetation on flood routing mechanics. Water Resour Res 47 (8): 1–15. [CrossRef]
  • King AT, Tinoco RO, Cowen EA. 2012. A k-ε turbulence model based on the scales of vertical shear and stem wakes valid for emergent and submerged vegetated flows. J Fluid Mech 701: 1–39. [CrossRef]
  • Klopstra D, Barneveld H, van Noortwijk J, van Velzen E. 1997. Analytical model for hydraulic resistance of submerged vegetation. In: Proceedings of the 27th IAHR Congress, pp. 775–780.
  • Konings AG, Katul GG, Thompson SE. 2012. A phenomenological model for the flow resistance over submerged vegetation. Water Resour Res 48 (2). [CrossRef]
  • Kouwen N, Unny TE. 1969. Flow retardance in vegetated channels. J Irrigat Drain Div 95 (2): 329–344.
  • Kubrak E, Kubrak J, Rowinski PM. 2008. Vertical velocity distributions through and above submerged, flexible vegetation. Hydrol Sci J 53 (4): 905–920. [CrossRef]
  • Larinier M, Travade F, Porcher JP. 2006. Fishways: biological basis, design criteria and monitoring. Bull Fr Peche Piscic 364 (Suppl.): 208 p. ISBN 92-5-104665-4.
  • Larinier M, Courret D, Gomes P. 2006. Technical Guide to the Concept on nature-like Fishways. Rapport GHAAPPE RA.06.05-V1, 5 (in French).
  • Lopez F, Garcia M. 2001. Mean flow and turbulence structure of open-channel flow through non-emergent vegetation. J Hydraul Eng 127 (5): 392–402. [CrossRef]
  • Luhar M, Rominger J, Nepf H. 2008. Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure. Environ Fluid Mech 8: 423–439. [CrossRef]
  • Meijer DG, Velzen EHV. 1999. Prototype scale flume experiments on hydraulic roughness of submerged vegetation. In: 28th International Conference, Int. Assoc. of Hydraul. Eng. and Res., Graz, Austria.
  • Murphy EG, Nepf H. 2007. Model and laboratory study of dispersion in flows with submerged vegetation. Water Resour Res 43 (5): 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Nepf HM. 1999. Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35 (2): 479–489. [CrossRef]
  • Nepf HM. 2012. Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. J Hydraul Res 50 (3): 262–279. [CrossRef]
  • Nezu I, Sanjou M. 2008. Turbulence structure and coherent motion in vegetated canopy open-channel flows. J Hydro-Environ Res 2 (2): 62–90. [CrossRef]
  • Nikora N, Nikora V, O’Donoghue T. 2013. Velocity profiles in vegetated open-channel flows: combined effects of multiple mechanisms. J Hydraul Eng 139 (10): 1021–1032. [CrossRef]
  • Nikora V, Goring D, McEwan I, Griffiths G. 2001. Spatially averaged open-channel flow over rough bed. J Hydraul Eng 127 (2): 123–133. [CrossRef]
  • Pagliara S, Das R, Carnacina I. 2008. Flow resistance in large-scale roughness conditions. Can J Civil Eng 35: 1285–1293. [CrossRef]
  • Poggi D, Krug C, Katul GG. 2009. Hydraulic resistance of submerged rigid vegetation derived from first-order closure models. Water Resour Res 45 (10). [CrossRef]
  • Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L. 2004. The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Bound-Layer Meteorol 111: 565–587. [CrossRef]
  • Rice C, Kadavy K, Robinson K. 1998. Roughness of loose rock riprap on steep slopes. J Hydraul Eng 124 (2): 179–185. [CrossRef]
  • Righetti M, Armanini A. 2002. Flow resistance in open channel flows with sparsely distributed bushes. J Hydrol 269 (1–2): 55–64. [CrossRef]
  • Shimizu Y, Tsujimoto T. 1994. Numerical analysis of turbulent open-channel flow over vegetation layer using a k-ε turbulence model. J Hydrosc Hydraul Eng 11 (2): 57–67.
  • Tran DT. 2015. Metrologie et modelisation des ecoulements a forte pente autour d’obstacles: application au dimensionnement des passes naturelles, Ph.D. thesis, INPT (in French).
  • Yang W, Choi S-U. 2009. Impact of stem flexibility on mean flow and turbulence structure in depth-limited open channel flows with submerged vegetation. J Hydraul Res 47 (4): 445–454. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.