Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Article Number 21
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2016008
Published online 03 May 2016
  • Allan J.D. and Castillo M.M., 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters, 2nd ed., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 436 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson M.J., 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol., 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Baldi A., 2003. Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl. Ecol., 4, 589–593. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barmuta L.A., Mckenny C.E.A. andSwain R., 2001. The responses of a lotic mayfly Nousia sp. (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) to moving water and light of different wavelengths. Freshw. Biol., 46, 567–573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barnes J.B., Vaughan I.P. andOrmerod S.J., 2013. Reappraising the effects of habitat structure on river macroinvertebrates. Freshw. Biol., 58, 2154–2167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bergey E.A. andResh V. H., 1994. Effects of burrowing by a stream caddisfly on case-associated algae. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 13, 379–390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S., Bonne W., Borja A., Brucet S., Courrat A., Poikane S., Solimini A., van de Bund W., Zampoukas N. andHering D., 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol. Indic., 18, 31–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bo T. andFenoglio S., 2011. Impacts of a micro-sewage effluent on the biota of a small Apennine creek. J. Freshw. Ecol., 26, 537–545. [Google Scholar]
  • Bo T., Fenoglio S., Malacarne G., Pessino M. andSgariboldi F., 2007. Effect of clogging on stream macroinvertebrates: an experimental approach. Limnologica, 37, 186–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bournaud M., Cellot B., Richoux P. andBerrahou A., 1996. Macroinvertebrate community structure and environmental characteristics along a large river: congruity of patterns for identification to species or family. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 15, 232–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boyero L. andBailey R.C., 2001. Organization of macroinvertebrate communities at a hierarchy of spatial scales in a tropical stream. Hydrobiologia, 464, 219–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain J.E. andEikeland T.J., 1988. Invertebrate Drift – A Review. Hydrobiologia, 166, 77–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brooks A.J., Haeusler T.I.M., Reinfelds I. andWilliams S., 2005. Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles. Freshw. Biol., 50, 331–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruno M.C., Bottazzi E. andRossetti G., 2012. Downward, upstream or downstream? Assessment of meio-and macrofaunal colonization patterns in a gravel-bed stream using artificial substrates. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 48, 371–381. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A. and Erba S., 2007. Macroinvertebrati acquatici e Direttiva 2000/60/ EC (WFD). Parte A. Metodo di campionamento per i fiumi guadabili. Resource document. IRSA-CNR. 118 p. Available from: http://www.irsa.cnr.it/Docs/Notiz/notiz2007_{%}2803{%}29.pdf. (In Italian, accessed 17 February 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A., Erba S., Cazzola M., Murray-Bligh J., Soszka H. andGenoni P., 2006. The Star common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibration process: full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries. Hydrobiologia, 566, 379–399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso P., Erwin T.L., Borges P.A. andNew T.R., 2011. The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol. Conserv., 144, 2647–2655. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Conallin J., Jyde M., Filrup K. andPedersen S., 2012. Diel foraging and shelter use of large juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) under food satiation. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 404, 05. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Copp G.H., Spathari S. andTurmel M., 2005. Consistency of diel behaviour and interactions of stream fishes and invertebrates during summer. River Res. Appl., 21, 75–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Culp J.M., Walde S.J. andDavies R.W., 1983. Relative importance of substrate particle size and detritus to stream benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 40, 1568–1574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davey A.J., Booker D.J. andKelly D.J., 2011. Diel variation in stream fish habitat suitability criteria: implications for instream flow assessment. Aquat. Conserv. 21, 132–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Cáceres M. andLegendre P., 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90, 3566–3574. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dell A.I., Zhao L., Brose U., Pearson R.G. andAlford R.A., 2015. Population and community body size structure across a complex environmental gradient. Adv. Ecol. Res., 52, 115–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dodson S., 1990. Predicting diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1195–1200 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dolédec S., Olivier J.M. andStatzner B., 2000. Accurate description of the abundance of taxa and their biological traits in stream invertebrate communities: effects of taxonomic and spatial resolution. Archiv für Hydrobiologie – Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 148, 25–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dufrêne M. andLegendre P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr., 67, 345–366. [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.M., 2000. Contrasting diel activity and feeding patterns of four species of carnivorous stoneflies. Ecol. Entomol., 25, 26–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.M., 2002. A quantitative study of day-night changes in the spatial distribution of insects in a stony stream. J. Anim. Ecol., 71, 112–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.M., 2005a. Day-night changes in the spatial distribution and habitat preferences of freshwater shrimps, Gammarus pulex, in a stony stream. Freshw. Biol., 50, 552–566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott J.M., 2005b. Contrasting diel activity and feeding patterns of four instars of Rhyacophila dorsalis (Trichoptera). Freshw. Biol., 50, 1022–1033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fenoglio S., Bo T., Agosta P. andMalacarne G., 2005. Temporal and spatial patterns of coarse particulate organic matter and macroinvertebrate distribution in a low-order Apennine stream. J. Freshw. Ecol., 20, 539–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreiro N., 2014. Evidence on Night Movements of Macroinvertebrates to Macrophytes in a Pampean Stream. Open J. Mod. Hydrol., 4, 95–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Florencio M., Díaz-Paniagua C., Gomez-Mestre I. andSerrano L., 2011. Sampling macroinvertebrates in a temporary pond: comparing the suitability of two techniques to detect richness, spatial segregation and diel activity. Hydrobiologia, 689, 121–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fu L., Jiang Y., Ding J., Liu Q., Peng Q.Z., Kang M.Y. andWang L.Z., 2015. Spatial variation of macroinvertebrate community structure and associated environmental conditions in a subtropical river system of southeastern China. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 416, 17. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Fuller R.L., Roelofs J.R. andFry T.J., 1986. The importance of algae to stream invertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 5, 290–296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaston K.J., Bennie J., Davies T.W. andHopkins J., 2013. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biol. Rev., 88, 912–927. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gayraud S. andPhilippe M., 2001. Does subsurface interstitial space influence general features and morphological traits of the benthic macroinvertebrate community in streams? Archiv für Hydrobiologie – Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 151, 667–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerrish G.A., Morin J.G., Rivers T.J. andPatrawala Z., 2009. Darkness as an ecological resource: the role of light in partitioning the nocturnal niche. Oecologia, 160, 525–536. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Graça M.A., Pinto P., Cortes R., Coimbra N., Oliveira S., Morais M., Carvalho M.J. andMalo J., 2004. Factors Affecting Macroinvertebrate Richness and Diversity in Portuguese Streams: a Two Scale Analysis. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 89, 151–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guareschi S., Laini A., Racchetti E., Bo T., Fenoglio S. andBartoli M., 2014. How do hydromorphological constraints and regulated flows govern macroinvertebrate communities along an entire lowland river? Ecohydrology, 7, 366–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guest M.A., Connolly R.M. andLoneragan N.R., 2003. Seine nets and beam trawls compared by day and night for sampling fish and crustaceans in shallow seagrass habitat. Fish. Res., 64, 185–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guevara J. andAvilés L., 2013. Community-wide body size differences between nocturnal and diurnal insects. Ecology, 94, 537–543. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gumiero B., Maiolini B., Rinaldi M., Surian N., Boz B. and Moroni F., 2009. The Italian Rivers. In: Rivers of Europe. Academic Press, Amsterdam, 467–495. [Google Scholar]
  • Hampton S.E. andDuggan I.C., 2003. Diel habitat shifts of macrofauna in a fishless pond. Mar. Freshwater Res., 54, 797–805. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen E.A. andCloss G.P., 2007. Temporal consistency in the long-term spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate drift along a stream reach. Hydrobiologia, 575, 361–371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Helfman G.S., 1986. Fish behaviour by day, night and twilight. In: The behaviour of teleost fishes. Springer, USA, 366–387. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson G.E., 1967. A treatise on limnology, Wiley, New York, Vol. 2, 1115 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiménez-Valverde A. andHortal J., 2003. Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos. Rev. Ibérica Aracnol., 8, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson S.L. andCovich A.P., 2000. The importance of night-time observations for determining habitat preferences of stream biota. Regul. River., 16, 91–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs C.J., 1999. Ecological Methodology, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Menlo Park, 624 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Laini A., Vorti A., Bolpagni R. andViaroli P., 2014. Small-scale variability of benthic macroinvertebrates distribution and its effects on biological monitoring. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 50, 211–216. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lombardo P., Miccoli F.P., Giustini M. andCicolani B., 2010. Diel activity cycles of freshwater gastropods under natural light: patterns and ecological implications. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 46, 29–40. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Marklund O., Blindow I. andHargeby A., 2001. Distribution and diel migration of macroinvertebrates within dense submerged vegetation. Freshw. Biol., 46, 913–924. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martínez-Sanz C., García-Criado F., Aláez C.F. andAláez M.F., 2010. Assessment of richness estimation methods on macroinvertebrate communities of mountain ponds in Castilla y León (Spain). Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 46, 101–110. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd ed., Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IO, 862 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer L.A. andSullivan S.M.P., 2013. Bright lights, big city: influences of ecological light pollution on reciprocal stream-riparian invertebrate fluxes. Ecol. Appl., 23, 1322–1330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morisita M., 1959. Measuring of the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. E 2, 215–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Nardi P.A., Bernini F., Bo T., Bonardi A., Fea G., Ghia D., Negri A., Razzetti E., Rossi S. andSpairani M. 2005. Status of Austropotamobius pallipes complex in the watercourses of the Alessandria province (NW Italy). Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 376-377, 585–598. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J., Guillaume Blanchet F., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O’Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Henry M., Stevens H. and Wagner H., 2013. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0–8. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. [Google Scholar]
  • Perkin E.K., Hölker F., Richardson J.S., Sadler J.P., Wolter C. and Tockner K., 2011. The influence of artificial light on stream and riparian ecosystems: questions, challenges, and perspectives. Ecosphere 2, art. 122. [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 23 December 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • Roussel J.M., Bardonnet A. andClaude A., 1999. Microhabitats of brown trout when feeding on drift and when resting in a lowland salmonid brook: effects on weighted usable area. Archiv für Hydrobiologie – Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 146, 413–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez-Fernández D., Abellán P., Mellado A., Velasco J. andMillán A., 2006. Are water beetles good indicators of biodiversity in Mediterranean aquatic ecosystems? The case of Segura river basin (SE Spain). Biodivers. Conserv., 15, 4507–4520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez-Fernández D., Lobo J.M., Abellán P., Ribera I. andMillán A., 2008. Bias in freshwater biodiversity sampling: the case of Iberian water beetles. Divers. Distrib., 14, 754–762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalici M. andGibertini G., 2007. Feeding habits of the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (Decapoda, Astacidae) in a brook in Latium (central Italy). Ital. J. Zool., 74, 157–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tachet H., Richoux P., Bournaud M. and Usseglio-Polatera P., 2010. Invertébrés d’eau douce: systématique, biologie, écologie, CNRS Editions, Paris, France, 588 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Walther B.A. andMoore J.L., 2005. The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography, 28, 815–829. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiley M.J. andKohler S., 1980. Positioning Changes of Mayfly Nymphs Due to Behavioral Regulation of Oxygen Consumption. Can. J. Zool., 58, 618–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaccara S., Stefani F., Galli P., Nardi P. A. andCrosa G. 2004. Taxonomic implications in conservation management of white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) (Decapoda, Astacidae) in Northern Italy. Biol. Conserv., 120, 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.