Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2015039
Published online 18 January 2016
  • Anderson R.M., 1982. Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities. Parasitology, 85, 373–398. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson R.M., Whitefield P.J. and Dobson A.P., 1978. Experimental studies of infection dynamics: infection of the definitive host by cercaria of Transversotrema patialense. Parasitology, 77, 189–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauer G., 1987. Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. J. Anim. Ecol., 56, 691–704. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauer G., 1992. Variation in the life span and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. J. Anim. Ecol., 61, 425–436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bern Convention, 1979. Convention of the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitat. Switzerland, Bern. [Google Scholar]
  • Bohlin T., 1984. Quantitative electrofishing for salmon and trout – views and recommendations. Information from Sotrattenslaboratoriet. Drottningholm, 4, pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya I.E., 1985. Fish Parasites. Study Manual. Nauka, Leningrad [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  • Crofton H.D., 1971a. A Quantitative Approach to Parasitism. Parasitology, 62, 179–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crofton H.D., 1971b. A model of host-parasite relationships. Parasitology, 63, 343–364. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cunjak R.A. and McGladdery S.E., 1991. The parasite-host relationship of glochidia (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae) on the gills of young-of-the-year Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Zool., 69, 353–358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J., 2010. Strategies for the conservation of endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.): a synthesis of Conservation Genetics and Ecology. Hydrobiologia, 664, 69–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J. and Auerswald K., 2007. Pysicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel. Freshwater Biol., 52, 2299–2316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J. and Kuehn R., 2008. Host-parasite interactions in oligotrophic stream ecosystems: The roles of life history strategy and ecological niche. Molec. Ecol., 17, 997–1008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J., Porkka M. and Kuehn R., 2006. The status of host fish populations and fish species richness in European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) streams. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 16, 251–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grafena A. and Woolhouse M.E.J., 1993. Does the negative binomial distribution add up? Parasitology Today, 9, 475–477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeont. Electronica, 4, 9 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hastie L.C. and Young M.R., 2001. Freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) glochidiosis in wild and farmed salmonid stocks in Scotland. Hydrobiologia, 45, 109–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ieshko E.P., Shulman B.S., Shchurov I.L. and Barskaya Yu.Yu., 2008. Long-term changes in the juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) epizootic in the Keret’ River (White Sea drainage basin) caused by the invasion of Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg, 1957. Parazitologija, 42, 486–496 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  • Ieshko E.P., Larsson B.M., Pavlov Yu.L., Barskaya Yu.Yu., Lebedeva D.I. and Novokhatskaya O.V., 2009. Population dynamics of the numbers of freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera L., glochidia on juvenile salmonids in northern waterbodies. Biol. Bull., 36, 624–629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals, Gland. Switzerland. IUCN, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Karna D.W. and Millemann R.E., 1978. Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes. III. Comparative susceptibility to natural infection with Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) (Pelycypoda: Margaritiferidae) and associated histopathology. J. Parasitol., 64, 528–537. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meyers T.R. and Millemann R.E., 1977. Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes. I. Comparative susceptibility to experimental infection with Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) (Pelecypoda: Margaritiferidae). J. Parasitol., 63, 728–733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mikodina E.V., Sedova M.A. and Chmilevsky D.A. et al. 2009. Histology for ichthyologists: experience and advices. VNIRO, Moscow [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy G., 1942. Relationship of the freshwater mussel to trout in the Truckee River. California Fish and Game, 28, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Nezlin L.P., Cunjak R.A., Zotin A.A. and Ziuganov V.V. 1994. Glochidium morphology of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritirefa margaritifera) and glochidiosis of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a study by scanning electron microscopy. Can. J. Zool., 72, 15–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlov Y.L. and Ieshko E.P., 1986. A distribution model of the number of parasites. Rep. Acad. Sci. USSR, 289, 746–748. [Google Scholar]
  • Red Data Book of East Fennoscandia. Helsinki, 1998, pp. 291–293. [Google Scholar]
  • Red Data Book of Karelia. Petrozavodsk, Karelia, 2007, pp. 307–308 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  • Red Data Book of the Russian Federation (Animals), 2001. Astrel, Moscow, pp. 61–62 [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts A.D. and Barnhart M.C., 1999. Effect of temperature, pH, and CO2 on transformation of the glochidia of Anadonta suborbiculata on fish host and in vitro. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 18, 477–487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rozsa L., Reiczigel J. and Majoros G., 2000. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. J. Parasitol., 86, 228–232. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stewart W.A., Murray A.L. and Pascho R.J., 2002. Effects of rearing temperature on immune functions in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Fish Shellfish Immunol., 12, 303–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taeubert J.E. and Geist J., 2013. Critical swimming speed of brown trout (Salmo trutta) infested with freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) glochidia and implications for artificial breeding of an endangered mussel species. Parasitol. Res., 112, 1607–1613. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taeubert J.E., Denic M., Gum B., Lange M. and Geist J., 2010. Suitability of different salmonid strains as hosts for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 20, 728–734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taeubert J.E., El-Nobi G. and Geist J., 2014. Effects of water temperature on the larval parasitic stage of the thick-shelled river mussel (Unio crassus). Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 24, 231–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Treasurer J.W., Hastie L.C., Hunter D., Duncan F. and Treasurer C.M., 2006. Effects of Margaritifera margaritifera glochidial infection on performance of tank-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 256, 74–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Young M.R. and Williams J.C., 1984. The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel. I. Field studies. Archive Hydrobiol., 99, 405–422. [Google Scholar]
  • Young M.R., Purser J. and Al-Mousawi B., 1987. Infection and successful reinfection of Brown trout Salmo trutta (L.) with glochidia of Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Am. Malacol. Bull., 5, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Zippin C., 1956. An evaluation of removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics, 12, 163–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ziuganov V., Zotin A., Nezlin L. and Tretiakov V., 1994. The Freshwater Pearl Mussels and their Relationships with Salmonid Fish. VNIRO. Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Moscow [in Russian]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.