Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 416, 2015
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2015028
Published online 10 December 2015
  • Alba-Tercedor J., Zamora-Munoz C., Sanchez-Ortega A. and Guisasola I., 1991. Mayflies and stone flies from the RioMonachil (Sierra, Nevada Spain) (Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera). In: Alba-Tercedor J. and Sanchez Ortega A. (eds.), Overview and strategies of Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera. Sandhill crane press, Inc., Gainesville, pp. 529–538. [Google Scholar]
  • Allan J.D. and Castillo M.M., 2007. Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters, Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA (American Public Health Association), 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edition APHA, AWWA, WPCF Washington Dc, USA, 1368 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage P.D., Moss D., Wright J.F. andFurse M.T., 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res., 17, 333–347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baptista D.F., Buss D.F., Dias L.G., Nessimian J.L., Da-Silva E.R., De Moraes Neto A.H.A., De Carvalho S.N., De Oliveira M.A. andRade L.R., 2006. Functional Feeding Groups Of Brazilian Ephemeroptera Nymphs: Ultrastructure Of Mouthparts. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 42, 87–96. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Battin T.J., Kaplan L.A., Newbold J.D. andHansen C.M.E., 2003. Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature, 426, 439–442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Biodiversity Professional Version 2 for Windows, 1997. The Natural History Museum and Scottish Association for Marine Science. [Google Scholar]
  • BIS, 2004. Indian Standard Specification For Drinking Water IS 10500:2004, Bureau of Indian Standards. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouchard R.W., 2004. Guide to Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Upper Midwest, Water Resources Centre, University Of Minnesota, St. Paul, Mn., 208 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouchard R.W., 2009. Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia Identification, Manual for Students, Citizen Monitors, and Aquatic Resource Professionals, Chironomidae Research Group, University Of Minnesota, St. Paul, Mn 55108. [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J., Boyero L., Covich A.P., Dobson M., Lake S. and Pearson R.G., 2008. Are Tropjcal Streams Ecologically Different from Temperate Streams? In: Dudgeon D. (ed.), Tropical Stream Ecology Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 257–284. [Google Scholar]
  • Braasch D., 2006. Compsoneuria (Siamoneuria) kovaci subg. N., Sp. N., A New Mayfly From Northern Thailand (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Senck. Biol., 86, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Brittain J.E., 1974. Studies on the Lentic Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera of Southern Norway. Norskent. Tidsskr, 21, 135–151. [Google Scholar]
  • Bunn S.E. andArthington A.H., 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manage., 30, 492–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chessman B., 1995. Rapid Assessment of Rivers Using Macroinvertebrates: A Procedure Based on Habitat-Specific Sampling, Family Level Identification, And A Biotic Index. Aust. J. Ecol., 20, 122–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chesters R.K., 1980. Biological Monitoring Working Party. The 1978 national testing exercise. Technical Memorandum 19. [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins K.W., 1973. Trophic Relations of Aquatic Insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 18, 183–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins K.W., 1974. Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems. Bioscience, 24, 631–641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins K.W. andKlug M.J., 1979. Feeding Ecology of Stream Invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. and Syst., 10, 147–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins T. andFarrell E.P., 2003. Biogeochemical impacts of clearfelling and reforestation on blanket peatland streams I. Phosphorus. Forest Ecol. Manag. 180, 545–555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D., 1999. Tropical Asian Streams: Zoobenthos, Ecology And Conservation, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong SAR, China. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D. andWu K.K.Y., 1999. Leaf Litter in A Tropical Stream: Food Or Substrate For Macroinvertebrates? Arch. Hydrobiol., 146, 65–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Engelmann H.D., 1978. Zur Dominanzklassifikazierung von Bodenarthropoden. Pedobiologia, 18, 378–380. [Google Scholar]
  • Ensign H.S. andMallin A.M., 2001. Stream water quality changes following timber harvest in a coastal plain swamp forest. Water Res. 35, 3381–3390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • EPA, 2010. Cooperation on emission inventories, trends, and mapping. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at: www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/usca/coop.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Epler J.H., 2006. Identification Manual forthe Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Heteropteraof Florida (Belostomatidae, Corixidae, Gelastocoridae, Gerridae, Hebridae, Hydrometridae, Mesoveliidae, Naucoridae, Nepidae, Notonectidae, Ochteridae, Pleidae, Saldidae, Veliidae), Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, FL, 186 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fox A.D. andCham S.A., 1994. Status, Habitat Use and Conservation of the Scarce Blue-Tailed Damselfly Ischnura Pumilio(Charpentier) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in Britain and Ireland. J. Biol. Conserv., 68, 115–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Freitag H., 2004. Composition and Longitudinal Patterns of Aquatic Insect Emergence in Small Rivers of Palawan Island, The Philippines. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 89, 375–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gauch H.G., 1982. Multivariate analysis and community structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. [Google Scholar]
  • Gooderham J. and Tsyrlin E., 2002. The Waterbug Book: A Guide tothe Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Temperate Australia. CSIRO Publishing, p. 240. [Google Scholar]
  • Gullan P.J. and Cranston P.J., 2010. The Insects an Outline of Entomology, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 565 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta S. andNarzary R., 2013. Aquatic insect community of lake, Phulbari anua in Cachar, Assam. J. Environ. Biol., 34, 591–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gurung D.B., Dorji S., Tshering U. andWangyal J.T., 2013. An annotated checklist of fishes from Bhutan. JOTT, 5, 4880–4886. [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkes H.A., 1998. Origin and Development of the Biological Monitoring Working Party Score System. Water Res., 32, 964–968. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., 2009. Biodiversity of aquatic insects: spatial gradients and environmental correlates of assemblage-level measures at large scales. Freshw. Rev., 2, 1–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes K.L., Goebel P.C., Williams L.R. andSchecengost M., 2011. Environmental influences on macroinvertebrate assemblages in headwater streams of northeastern Ohio. J. Freshwater Ecol., 26, 409–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Irons J.G., Oswood M.W., Stout R.J. andPringle C.M., 1994. Latitudinal Patterns In Leaf-Litter Breakdown – Is Temperature Really Important? Freshwater Biol., 32, 401–411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ishaq F. andKhan A., 2013. Seasonal limnological variation and macro benthic diversity of river Yamuna at Kalsi Dehradun of Uttarakhand. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res., 3, 133–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Jessup B.K., Markowitz A., Stribling J.B., Friedman E., Labelle K.and Dziepak N., 2003. Family- Level Key tothe Stream Invertebrates of Maryland and Surrounding Areas, 3rd edition, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Section 10, p. 98. [Google Scholar]
  • Lakly M.B. andMcArthur J.V., 2000. Macroinvertebrate recovery of a post thermal stream: habitat structure and biotic function. Ecol. Eng. 15, S87–S100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lekprayoon C., Fuangarworn M. and Mongkolchaichana E., 2007. The Water Bugs (Hemiptera; Heteroptera) from the Western Thong Pha Phum Research Project Area, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand, 38 BRT Research Reports. [Google Scholar]
  • Lenat D.R., Smock L.A. and Penrose D.L., 1980. Use of Benthic Macro Invertebrates as Indicators of Environmental Quality, pp. 97–114. In: Douglass L.W. (ed.), Biological Monitoring For Environmental Effects, Lexington Books, Toronto. [Google Scholar]
  • Maitland P.S., 1978. Biology of fresh waters, Ist edition, Blackie and Sons limited, Bishopbriggs Glasgow, G642 NZ. [Google Scholar]
  • Mandaville S.M., 2002. Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Freshwater – Taxa Tolerance Values, Metrics,and Protocols, Project H-1, Nova Scotia: Soil & Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax. [Google Scholar]
  • Manikannan R., Subramanian A. andAli A., 2011. Seasonal variations of physicochemical properties of the Great Vedaranyam Swamp, Point Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary, South-east coast of India. African J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 5, 673–681. [Google Scholar]
  • Menke A.S., 1979. Family Belostomatidae, P. 76–86. In: A.S. Menke (ed.), The Semiaquatic And Aquatic Hemiptera Of California (Heteroptera: Hemiptera). Bull. Calif. Insect Surv., 21. University of California. [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3th editon, Hunt Publishing Company, Kendall, p. 862. [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W., Cummins K.W. andAndrade P.C.N., 2005. The Use Of Invertebrate Functional Groups To Characterize Ecosystem Attributes In Selected Streams And Rivers In Southeast Brazil. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna E., 40, 71–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller K.B., 2005. Four New Species of Desmopachria Babington from Peru (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Zootaxa, 1059, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Nieser N., 2004. Guide to Aquatic Heteroptera of Singapore and Peninsular Malaysia III. Pleidae and Notonectidae. Raffles. B. Zool., 52, 79–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Nisbet T.R., 2001. The role of forest management in controlling diffuse pollution in UK forestry. Forest Ecol. Manage., 143, 215–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Norazliza R., Fauziah I., Mohd Rasdi Z., Fairuz K. andIsmail R., 2014. Comparison and relationship between water parameters and abundance of insects in field and irrigation system of paddy area of Sungai Burong, Tanjung Karang, Selangor, Malaysia. Agric. Forest. Fish., 3, 249–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira A.L.H. andNessimian J.L., 2010. Spatial Distribution and Functional Feeding Groups of Aquatic Insect Communities in Serra Da Bocaina Streams, Southeastern Brazil. Acta. Limnol. Bras., 22, 424–441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer M.W., 1993. Putting Things in Even Better Order: The Advantages of Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Ecology, 74, 2215–2230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearson T.H., 2001. Functional group ecology in the soft sediment marine benthos: the role of bioturbation. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev., 39, 233–267. [Google Scholar]
  • Polhemus J.T., 1984. Aquatic and Semiaquatic Hemiptera, In: Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W. (eds.), An Introduction To The Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd edition, Kendall/Hunt, pp. 231–260. [Google Scholar]
  • Popoola K.O.K. andOtalekor A., 2011. Analysis of Aquatic Insects’ Communities of Awba Reservoir and its Physico-Chemical Properties. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci., 3, 422–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Príncipe R., Gualdoni C., Oberto A., Raffaini G. andCorigliano M., 2010. Spatial-temporal patterns of functional feeding groups in mountain streams of Córdoba, Argentina. Ecología Austral, 20, 257–268. [Google Scholar]
  • Rieradevall M., Bonada N. andPrat N., 1999. Community Structure And Water Quality In The Mediterranean Streams Of A Natural Park (St. Llorená Del Munt, NE Spain). Limnetica, 17, 45–56 [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg R., 2001. Marine benthic faunal successional stages and related sedimentary activity. Sci. Mar., 65, 107–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Runck C. andBlinn D.W., 1990. Population Dynamics and Secondary Production By Ranatra Montezuma (Heteroptera: Nepidae). J. N. Am. Benthol. Sot., 9, 262–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sandin L. andHering D., 2004. Comparing Macroinvertebrate Indices to Detect OrganicPollution Across Europe: A Contribution To The EC Water Framework DirectiveIntercalibration. Hydrobiologia, 516, 55–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharon B., 1997. Definition of Water Quality Parameters. Source: Testing The Waters: Chemical And Physical Vital Signs Of A River By. Montpelier, VT: River Watch Network, ISBN-0-782-3492-3. Http://Fosc.Org/Wqdata/Wqparameters.Htm. Accessed on 20 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Spence J.R. andAnderson N.M., 1994. Biology of water striders: interactions between systematics and ecology. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 39, 101–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Subramanian K.A. and Sivaramakrishnan K.G., 2005. Habitat and Microhabitat Distribution of Stream Insect Communities of the Western Ghats. Curr. Sci., 89, 25. [Google Scholar]
  • Subramanian K.A. and Sivaramakrishnan K.G., 2007. Aquatic Insects For Biomonitoring Freshwater Ecosystems-A Methodology Manual. (Asoka Trust For Research In Ecology And Environment (ATREE), Bangalore, India), p. 31. [Google Scholar]
  • Takhelmayum K., Gupta S. and Singh N.R., 2013. Diversity and Density of Aquatic Insects in the Lower Reach of River Moirang, Manipur, North East India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci., 83, 575–584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F., 1983. Principal components biplots and alpha and beta diversity. Ecology, 64, 454–462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • TerBraak C.J.F., 1986. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F., 1987. CANOCO-a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1), Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, 95 p. [Google Scholar]
  • TerBraak C.J.F., 1988. CANOCO – An Extension of DECORANA to Analyze Species-Environment Relationships. Vegetation, 75, 159–160. [Google Scholar]
  • TerBraak C.J.F. andVerdonschot P.F.M., 1995. Canonical Correspondence Analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci., 57, 255–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thirumalai G., 1999. Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Heteroptera of India, Indian Association of Aquatic Biologists, Hyderabad, 7, 74 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Thirumalai G., 2002. A Checklist of Gerromorpha (Hemiptera) From India. Rec. Zool. Soc. India: J. Indian Zool., 100, 55–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Trimmer W.L., 1994. Estimating Water Flow Rates. Oregon State University, The U.S. Department of Agriculture, US. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. andCushing C.E., 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace J.B. andWebster J.R., 1996. The Role of Macroinvertebratein Stream Ecosystem Function. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 41, 115–1139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Waters T.F., 1977. Secondary Production In Inland Waters. Adv. Ecol. Res., 10, 91–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Webb J.M. and Suter P., 2001. Identification of Larvae of Australian Baetidae (Ephemeroptera). La Trobe University. Available at: Http://Wiki.Trin.Org.Au/Pub/Mayflies/Taxonomicworkshops. Accessed on 25 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Webb J.M. and Suter P.J., 2011. Identification of Larvae of Australian Baetidae. Museum Victoria Science Reports 15: 1–24. Available at: Http://Www.Museum.Vic.Gov.Au/Sciencereports. Accessed on 13 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO, 2011. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, Fourth Edition, World Health Organization, p. 564. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilhm J.L. andDorris T.C., 1968. Biological Parameters for Water Quality Criteria. Bioscience, 18, 477–481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.