Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 416, 2015
Article Number 21
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 14 September 2015
  • Alaranta A., Henttonen P., Jussila J., Kokko H., Prestegaard T., Edsman L. and Halmekytö M., 2006. Genetic differences among noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) stocks in Finland, Sweden and Estonia based on the ITS1 region. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 380–381, 965–976. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Alaranta A., Jussila J. and Kokko H., 2011. Inheritance of ITS1 region microsatellite-like repeats in the noble crayfish, Astacus astacus (Decapoda, Astacidea). Crustaceana, 84, 1325–1336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alderman D.J., 1996. Geographical spread of bacterial and fungal diseases of crustaceans. Rev. Off. Int. Epizoot., 15, 603–632. [Google Scholar]
  • Buhay J.E., 2009. “Coi-like” sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. J. Crustacean Biol., 29, 96–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bybee S.M., Bracken-Grissom H.D., Hermansen R.A., Clement M.J., Crandall K.A. and Felder D.L., 2011. Directed next generation sequencing for phylogenetics: An example using Decapoda (Crustacea). Zool. Anz., 250, 497–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crandall K., Robison H. and Buhay J., 2009. Avoidance of extinction through nonexistence: the use of museum specimens and molecular genetics to determine the taxonomic status of an endangered freshwater crayfish. Conserv. Genet., 10, 177–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cukerzis J.M., 1988. Astacus astacus in Europe. In: Holdich D.M. and Lowery R.S. (eds.), Freshwater crayfish: biology, management, and exploitation. Croom Helm, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Edsman L., Farris J.S., Källersjö M. and Prestegaard T., 2002. Genetic differentiation between noble crayfish, Astacus astacus (L.), populations detected by microsatellite length variation in the rDNA ITS1 region. Bull. Fr. Pêche Prot. Milieux Aquat., 367, 691–706. [Google Scholar]
  • Erkamo E., Ruokonen T., Alapassi T., Ruokolainen J., Järvenpää T., Tulonen J. and Kirjavainen J., 2010. Evaluation of crayfish stocking success in Finland. Freshw. Crayfish, 17, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Fezner J. and Crandall K., 2001. Genetic variation. In: Holdich D. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater crayfish Blackwell Science, Oxford, 291–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Fürst M., 1995. On the recovery of Astacus astacus L. populations after an epizootic of the crayfish plague (Aphanomyces astaci Shikora). Freshw. Crayfish, 8, 565–576. [Google Scholar]
  • Gross R., Palm S., Kõiv K, Prestegaard T., Jussila J., Paaver T., Geist J., Kokko H., Karjalainen A. and Edsman L., 2013. Microsatellite markers reveal clear geographic structuring among threatened noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) populations in Northern and Central Europe. Conserv. Genet. 14, 809–821. [Google Scholar]
  • Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W. and Gascuel O., 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol., 59, 307–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Järvi T.H., 1910. Ravuista ja rapukulkutaudeista Suomessa. Luonnon Ystävä, 2, 41–53. In Finnish. [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J. and Mannonen A., 2004. Crayfisheries in Finland, a short overview. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 372-373, 263–273. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J., Vrezec A., Makkonen J., Kortet R. and Kokko H., 2015a. Invasive crayfish and their invasive diseases in Europe with the focus on the virulence evolution of the crayfish plague. In: Canning-Clode J. (ed.), Biological invasions in changing ecosystems: vectors, ecological impacts, management and predictions. De Gruyter Open, Berlin, chapter 9, in print. [Google Scholar]
  • Jussila J., Maguire I., Kokko H. and Makkonen J., 2015b. Chaos and adaptation in the pathogen-host relationship in relation to the conservation: the case of the crayfish plague and the noble crayfish. In: Kawai T. (ed.), Freshwater crayfish. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 246–274, in print. [Google Scholar]
  • Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., Buxton S., Cooper A., Markowitz S., Duran C., Thierer T., Ashton B., Meintjes P. and Drummond A., 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 1647–1649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kilpinen K., 2003. Suomen Rapu: Ravun nousu, tuho ja tulevaisuus. Edita Publishing Oy, Helsinki. In Finnish. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirjavainen J. and Sipponen M., 2004. Environmental benefit of different crayfish management strategies in Finland. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 11, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  • Kouba A., Petrusek A. and Kozák P., 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: Update and maps. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 413, 05. [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P., Füderer L., Kouba A., Reynolds J. and Souty-Grosset C., 2011. Current conservation strategies for European crayfish. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 401, 01. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lehtonen J., 1975. Kansanomainen ravustus ja rapujen hyväksikäyttö Suomessa. Kansantieteellinen arkisto, 27, Helsinki. In Finnish. [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen T.T.T., Murphy N.P. and Austin C.M., 2002. Amplification of multiple copies of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene fragments in the Australian freshwater crayfish, Cherax destructor Clark (Parastacidae: Decapoda). Anim. Genet., 33, 304–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Owen C.L., Bracken-Grissom H., Stern D. and Crandall K.A., 2015. A synthetic phylogeny of freshwater crayfish: Insights for conservation. Philos. T. R. Soc. B., 370, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Richman N.I., Böhm M., Adams S.B., Alvarez F., Bergey E.A., Bunn J.J.S., Burnham Q., Cordeiro J., Coughran J., Crandall K.A., Dawkins K.L., DiStefano R.J., Doran N.E., Edsman L., Eversole A.G., Füreder L., Furse J.M., Gherardi F., Hamr P., Holdich D.M., Horwitz P., Johnston K., Jones C.M., Jones J.P.G., Jones R.L., Jones T.G., Kawai T., Lawler S., López-Mejía M., Miller R.M., Pedraza-Lara C., Richardson A.M.M., Schultz M.B., Schuster G.A., Sibley P.J., Souty-Grosset C., Taylor C.A., Thoma R.F., Walls J., Walsh T.S. and Collen B., 2015. Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea). Philos. T. R. Soc. B., 370, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Sauramo M., 1954. Das Rätsel des Ancylussees. Geol. Rundsch., 42, 197–233. In German. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. <>. Downloaded on 16 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • Schizas N.V., 2012. Misconceptions regarding nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts) may obscure detection of mitochondrial evolutionary novelties. Aquat. Biol., 17, 91–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schrimpf A., 2013. DNA-based methods for freshwater biodiversity conservation – Phylogeographic analysis of noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) and new insights into the distribution of crayfish plague. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau. [Google Scholar]
  • Schrimpf A., Schulz H.K., Theissinger K., Pârvulescu L. and Schulz R., 2011. The first large-scale genetic analysis of the vulnerable noble crayfish Astacus astacus reveals low haplotype diversity in Central European populations. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 401, 35. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Schrimpf A., Theissinger K., Dahlem J., Maguire I., Pârvalescu L., Schultz H. and Schulz R., 2014. Phylogeography of noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) reveals multiple refugia. Freshw. Biol., 59, 761–776. [Google Scholar]
  • da Silva J.M., Creer S., dos Santos A., Costa A.C., Cunha M.R., Costa F.O. and Carvalho G.R., 2011. Systematic and evolutionary insights derived from mtDNA COI barcode diversity in the Decapoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca). PLoS One, 6, e19449. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Skurdal J. and Taugbøl T., 2002 Astacus. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 467–510. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C. and Reynolds J., 2009. Current ideas on methodological approaches in European crayfish conservation and restocking procedures. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394-395, 01. [Google Scholar]
  • Souty-Grosset C., Holdich D.M., Noël P.Y., Reynolds J. and Haffner P., 2006. Atlas of crayfish in Europe. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoeckle M. and Thaler D., 2014. DNA barcoding works in practice but not in (neutral) theory. PLoS One 9, e100755. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Unestam T., 1972. On the host range and origin of the crayfish plague fungus. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm, 52, 192–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Unestam T., 1975. Defense reactions in and susceptibility of Australian and New Guinean freshwater crayfish to European-crayfish-plague fungus. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci., 53, 349–359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viljamaa-Dirks S., Heinikainen S., Torssonen H., Pursiainen M., Mattila J. and Pelkonen S., 2013. Distribution and epidemiology of genotypes of the crayfish plague agent Aphanomyces astaci from noble crayfish Astacus astacus in Finland. Dis. Aquat. Organ., 103, 199–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K., 1973. The population of the crayfish, Astacus astacus L. in Finland and the introduction of the American crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Freshw. Crayfish, 1, 41–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K., 1991. The crayfish fishery in Finland – its past, present and future. Finn. Fish. Res., 12, 187–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman K., 2000. Comparison of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana, a species introduced into Finland, with the native species, Astacus astacus L., in allopatry and sympatry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang F.Y., Ma L.B., Qiao Z.G. and Chen L.Q., 2008. Multiple nuclear pseudogenes of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene in Scylla paramamosain (Decapoda: Portunidae). J. Mol. Cell. Biol., 41, 155–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.