Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 416, 2015
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2015010
Published online 05 June 2015
  • Alexandre C.M., Ferreira T.F. andAlmeida P.R., 2013. Fish assemblages in non-regulated and regulated rivers from permanente and temporary Iberian systems. River Res. Appl., 29, 1042–1058. [Google Scholar]
  • Almeida D., Stefanoudis P.V., Fletcher D.H., Rangel C. andSilva E., 2014. Population traits of invasive bleak Alburnus alburnus between different habitats in Iberian fresh waters. Limnologica, 46, 70–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amaral S.D., Brito D., Ferreira M.T., Neves R. andFranco A., 2013. Modeling water quality in reservoirs used for angling competition: can groundbait contribute to eutrophication? Lake Reserv. Manage., 29, 257–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), 2005. SMEWW – Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed., In: Eaton A., Clesceri L.S., Rice E.W., Greenberg A.E. (eds.). Washington DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R., 2007. Voluntary catch-and-release can generate conflict within the recreational angling community: a qualitative case study of specialised carp, Cyprinus carpio, angling in Germany. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 14, 161–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R. andNiesar M., 2005. Nutrient digestibility of angling baits for carp, Cyprinus carpio, with implications for groundbait formulation and eutrophication control. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 12, 91–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R., Cooke S.J., Lyman J., Policansky D., Schwab A., Suski C., Sutton S.G. andThorstad E.B., 2007. Understanding the Complexity of Catch-and-Release in Recreational Fishing: An Integrative Synthesis of Global Knowledge from Historical, Ethical, Social, and Biological Perspectives. Rev. Fish. Sci., 15, 75–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R., Cooke S.J. andPotts W., 2013. Towards resilient recreational fisheries on a global scale through improved understanding of fish and fisher behaviour. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 20, 91–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F., Ilhéu M. and Anastácio P.M., 2015. Angling web forums as an additional tool for detection of new fish introductions: the first record of Perca fluviatilis in continental Portugal. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 416, 03. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter S.R. andLathrop R.C., 2008. Probabilistic estimate of a threshold for eutrophication. Ecosystems, 11, 601–613. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chumchal M.M., Nowlin W.H. andDrenner R.W., 2005. Biomass-dependent effects of common carp on water quality in shallow ponds. Hydrobiologia, 545, 271–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clavero M. andHermoso V., 2011. Reservoirs promote the taxonomic homogenization of fish communities within river basins. Biodivers. Conserv., 20, 41–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clavero M., Hermoso V., Aparicio E. andGodinho F.N., 2013. Biodiversity in heavily modified waterbodies: native and introduced fish in Iberian reservoirs. Freshwater Biol., 58, 1190–1201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx I.G. andGerdeaux D., 2004. The effects of fisheries management practises on freshwater ecosystems. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 11, 145–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx I.G., Arlinghaus R. andCooke S.J., 2010. Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. J. Fish Biol., 76, 2194–2215. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Drenner R. and Hambright, K., 1999. Biomanipulation of fish assemblages as a lake restoration technique. Arch. Hydrobiol., 146, 129–165. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira M.T. and Godinho F., 2002. Comunidades biológicas de albufeiras. In: Moreira I., Ferreira M.T., Cortes R., Pinto P. and Almeida P.R. (eds.), Ecossistemas Aquáticos e Ribeirinhos – Ecologia, Gestão e Conservação, Instituto da Água, Lisboa, 10.3–10.25. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer J.R., Krogman R.M. andQuist M.C., 2013. Influences of native and non-native benthivorous fishes on aquatic ecosystem degradation. Hydrobiologia, 711, 187–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Granado-Lorencio C., 2002. Ecologia de Pesces, Universidad de Sevilla, Secretariado de Publicaciones, Sevilha, 353 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hansson L., Annadotter H., Bergman E., Hamrin S., Jeppesen E., Kairesalo T., Luokkanem E., Nilsson P., Søndergaard M. andStrand J., 1998. Biomanipulation as an application of food-chain theory: constraints, synthesis and recommendations for temperate lakes. Ecosystems, 1, 558–574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Isermann D.A. and Paukert C.P., 2010. Regulating harvest. In: Hubert W.A. and Quist M.C. (eds.), Inland Fisheries Management in North America 3rd edn., Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, 185−212. [Google Scholar]
  • Kasprzak P., Benndorf J., Mehner T. andKoschel R., 2002. Biomanipulation of lake ecosystems: an introduction. Freshwater Biol., 47, 2277–2281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewin W.C., Arlinghaus R. andMehner T., 2006. Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing: Insights for management and conservation. Rev. Fish. Sci., 14, 305–367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehner T., Benndorf J., Kasprzak P. andKoschel R., 2002. Biomanipulation of lake ecosystems: successful applications and expanding complexity in the underlying science. Freshwater Biol., 47, 2453–2465. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehner T., Arlinghaus R., Berg S., Dörner H., Jacobsen L., Kasprzak P., Koschel R., Schulze T., Skov C., Wolter C. andWysujack K., 2004. How to link biomanipulation and sustainable fisheries management: a step-by-step guideline for lakes of the European temperate zone. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 11, 261–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nieoczym M. andKloskowski J., 2013. The role of body size in the impact of common carp Cyprinus carpio on water quality, zooplankton, and macrobenthos in ponds. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 98, 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Niesar M., Arlinghaus R., Rennert B. and Mehner T., 2004. Coupling insights from a carp, Cyprinus carpio, angler survey with feeding experiments to evaluate composition, quality and phosphorus input of groundbait in coarse fishing. Fisheries Manag. Ecol., 11, 225–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saint-Denis T. andGoupy J., 2004. Optimization of a nitrogen analyser based on the Dumas method. Anal. Chim. Acta, 515, 191–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos J.M., Ferreira M.T., Pinheiro A.N. andBochechas J., 2006. Effects of small hydropower plants on fish assemblages in medium-sized streams in Central and Northern Portugal. Aquat. Conserv., 16, 373–388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith V.H., Tilman G.D. andNekola J.C., 1999. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Pollut., 100, 179–196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanni M.J., 2002. Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S., 33, 341–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber M.J. andBrown M.L., 2009. Effects of Common Carp on Aquatic Ecosystems 80 Years after “Carp as a Dominant”: Ecological Insights for Fisheries Management. Rev. Fish. Sci., 17, 524–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiley R.W. and Wydoski R.S., 1993. Management of undesirable fish species. In: Kohler C.C. and Hubert W.A. (eds.), Inland Fisheries Management in North America, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, 335–354. [Google Scholar]
  • Wolos A., Teodorowicz M. andGrabowska K., 1992. Effect of groundbaiting on anglers’ catches and nutrient budget of water bodies as exemplified by Polish lakes. Aquacult. Fish. Manage., 23, 499−509. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.