Open Access
| Issue |
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 414, 2014
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 11 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2014023 | |
| Published online | 27 August 2014 | |
- Barko J.W., Hardin D.G. and Matthews M.S., 1982. Growth and morphology of submersed freshwater macrophytes in relation to light and temperature. Can. J. Botany, 60, 877–887. [Google Scholar]
- Burks R.L., Lodge D.M., Jeppesen E. and Lauridsen T.L., 2002. Diel horizontal migration of zooplankton: costs and benefits of inhabiting littoral zones. Freshwater Biol., 47, 343–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Choi J.Y., Kim S.K., Chang K.H., Kim M.C., La G.H., Joo G.J. and Jeong K.S., 2014a. Population growth of the cladoceran, Daphnia magna: A quantitative analysis of the effects of different algal food. PLoS One 9, e95591. [Google Scholar]
- Choi J.Y., Jeong K.S., La G.H., Kim S.K. and Goo G.J., 2014b. Sustainment of epiphytic microinvertebrate assemblage in relation with different aquatic plant microhabitats in freshwater wetlands (South Korea). J. Limnol., 73, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Forchhammer N.C., 1999. Production potential of aquatic plants in systems mixing floating and submerged macrophytes. Freshwater Biol., 41, 183–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gross E.M., Hilt S., Lombardo P. and Mulderij G., 2007. Searching for allelopathic effects of submerged macrophytes on phytoplankton – state of the art and open questions. Hydrobiologia, 584, 77–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gyllström M., Hansson L.A., Jeppesen E., García-Criado F., Gross E., Irvine K., Kairesalo T., Kornijow R., Miracle M.R., Nykänen M., Nõges T., Romo S., Stephen D., Van Donk E. and Moss B., 2005. The role of climate in shaping zooplankton communities of shallow lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 2008–2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jeppesen E., Jensen J.P., Søndergaard M., Lauridsen T., Pedersen L.J. and Jensen L., 1997. Top-down control in freshwater lakes: the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 151–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lauridsen T.L. and Lodge D.M., 1996. Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnol. Oceanog., 41, 794–798. [Google Scholar]
- Manatunge J., Aseada T. and Priyadarshana T., 2000. The influence of structural complexity on fish-zooplankton interactions: A study using artificial submerged macrophytes. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 58, 425–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Meerhoff M., Mazzeo N., Moss B. and Rodríguez-Gallego L., 2003. The structuring role of free-floating versus submerged plants in a subtropical shallow lake. Aquat. Ecol. 37, 377–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Meerhoff M., Fosalba C., Bruzzone C., Mazzeo N., Noordoven W. and Jeppesen E., 2006. An experimental study of habitat choice by Daphnia: plants signal danger more than refuge in subtropical lakes. Freshwater Biol., 51, 1320–1330. [Google Scholar]
- Meerhoff M., Iglesias C., Teixeira de Mello F., Clemente J.M., Jensen E., Lauridsen T.L. and Jeppesen E., 2007. Effects of habitat complexity on community structure and predator avoidance behavior of littoral zooplankton in temperate versus subtropical shallow lakes. Freshwater Biol., 52, 1009–1021. [Google Scholar]
- Mizuno T. and Takahashi E., 1999. (Eds). An illustrated guide to freshwater zooplankton in Japan. Tokai University press, Tokyo. [Google Scholar]
- Moss B., Kornijow R. and Measey G., 1998. The effect of nymphaeid (Nuphar lutea) density and predation by perch (Perca fluviatilis) on the zooplankton communities in a shallow lake. Freshwater Biol., 39, 689–697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Muylaert K., Pérez-Martínez C., Sánchez-Castillo P., Lauridsen T.L., Vanderstukken M., Declerck S.A.J., Van der Gucht K., Conde-Porcuna J.M., Jeppesen E., De Meester L. and Vyverman W., 2010. Influence of nutrients, submerged macrophytes and zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton biomass and diversity along a latitudinal gradient in Europe. Hydrobiologia, 653, 79–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O’Hare M.T., Baattrup-Pedersen A., Nijboer R., Szoszkiewicz K. and Ferreira T., 2006. Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitat. Hydrobiology, 566, 197–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pelicice F.M. and Agostinho A.A., 2006. Feeding ecology of fishes associated with Egeria spp. patches in a tropical reservoir, Brazil. Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 15, 10–19. [Google Scholar]
- Sakuma M., Hanazato T., Nakazato R. and Haga H., 2002. Methods for quantitative sampling of epiphytic microinvertebrates in lake vegetation. Limnology, 3, 115–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Shannon C.E. and Weaver W., 1949. A mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Smokorowski K.E. and Pratt T.C., 2007. Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems – a review and meta-analysis. Environ. Rev., 15, 15–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stansfield J.H., Perrow M.R., Tench L.D., Jowitt A.J.D. and Taylor A.A.L., 1997. Submerged macrophytes as refuge for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observations on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation pressure. Hydrobiologia, 342-343, 229–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tolonen K.T., Holopainen I.J., Hämäläinen H., Rahkola-Sorsa M., Ylöstalo P., Mikkonen K. and Karjalainen J., 2005. Littoral species diversity and biomass: concordance among organismal groups and the effects of environmental variables. Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 961–980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- van Donk E. and van de Bund W.J., 2002. Impact of submerged macrophytes including charophytes on phyto-and zooplankton communities: allelopathy versus other mechanisms. Aquat. Bot., 72, 261–274. [Google Scholar]
- Wetzel R.G. and Likens G.E., 2000. Limnological Analyses. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 20–70. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.