Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 412, 2014
Article Number 05
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 10 January 2014
  • Baldwin D.S. and Mitchell A.M., 2000. The effects of drying and re-flooding on the sediment and soil nutrient dynamics of lowland river-floodplain systems: a synthesis. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 16, 457–467. [CrossRef]
  • Berner L.M., 1951. Limnology of the lower Missouri River. Ecology, 32, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  • Blevins D.W., 2011. Water-quality requirements, tolerances, and preferences of pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) in the lower Missouri River. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5186, 20 p.
  • Boulton A.J. and Lloyd L.N., 1992. Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the River Murray, Australia. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 7, 137–151. [CrossRef]
  • Cantrell M.A. and McLachlan A.J., 1977. Competition and chironomid distribution patterns in a newly flooded lake. Oikos, 29, 429–433. [CrossRef]
  • Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M., 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E, Plymouth, 168 p.
  • Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N., 2006. Primer version 6 user manual/tutorial. Primer-E, Plymouth, 190 p.
  • Dierauer J., Pinter N. and Remo J.W.F., 2012. Evaluation of levee setbacks for flood-loss reduction, Middle Mississippi River, USA. J. Hydrol., 450-451, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  • Dzialowski A.R., Bonneau J.L. and Gemeinhardt T.R., 2013. Comparisons of zooplankton and phytoplankton in created shallow water habitats of the lower Missouri River: implications for native fish. Aquat. Ecol., 47, 13–24. [CrossRef]
  • Edmondson W.T., 1959. Freshwater biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Galat D.L., Fredrickson L.H., Humburg D.D., Bataille K.J., Bodie J.R., Dohrenwend J., Gelwicks G.T., Havel J.E., Helmers D.L., Hooker J.B., Jones J.R., Knowlton M.F., Kubisiak J., Mazourek J., McColpin A.C., Renken R.B. and Semlitsch R.D., 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. Bioscience, 48, 721–733. [CrossRef]
  • Galat D.L., Whitledge G.W. and Gelwicks G.T., 2004. Influence of lateral connectivity on larval fish assemblage structure and habitat use in lower Missouri River floodplain water bodies. Final Report to Missouri Department of Conservation. U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia. 114 p
  • Golet G.H., Roberts M.D., Luster R.A., Werner G., Larsen E.W., Unger R. and White G.G., 2006. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacremento River Project, California. Environ. Manag., 37, 862–879. [CrossRef]
  • Gosch N.J.C., Morris D.M., Gemeinhardt T.R. and Bonneau J.L., 2013. Pre- and post-construction assessment of nutrient concentrations at shallow water habitat restoration sites on the lower Missouri River. J. Water Resour. Prot., 5, 249–258. [CrossRef]
  • Havel J.E., Medley K.A., Dickerson K.D., Angradi T.R., Bolgrien D.W., Bukaveckas P.A., Jicha T.M., 2009. Effect of mainstem dams on zooplankton communities of the Missouri River (USA). Hydrobiologia, 628, 121–135. [CrossRef]
  • Hesse L.W. and Mestl G.E., 1993. An alternative hydrograph for the Missouri River based on the precontrol condition. North Am. J. Fish. Manag., 13, 360–366. [CrossRef]
  • Hesse L.W. and Sheets W., 1993. The Missouri River hydrosystem. Fisheries, 18, 5–14. [CrossRef]
  • Hesse L.W., Schmulbach J.C., Carr J.M., Keenlyne K.D., Unkenholz D.G., Robinson J.W. and Mestl G.E., 1989. Missouri River fishery resources in relation to past, present, and future stresses. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 106, 352–371.
  • Independent Post-Flood Review Panel, 2011. Review of the regulation of the Missouri River mainstem reservoir system during the flood of 2011.
  • Jacobson R.B., Linder G. and Bitner C.J., In press. The role of floodplain restoration in mitigating flood risk, lower Missouri River, USA. In: Hudson P.F. and Middlekoop H. (eds.), Geomorphology and management of lowland floodplains: North American and European fluvial systems in an era of global environmental change, Springer, New York.
  • Johnson M.W., Powers S.P., Hightower C.L. and Kenworthy M., 2010. Age, growth, mortality, and diet composition of vermilion snapper from the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 139, 1136–1149. [CrossRef]
  • Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. and Sparks R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 106, 110–127.
  • Konrad C.P., Black R.W., Voss F. and Neale C.M.U., 2008. Integrating remotely acquired and field data to assess effects of setback levees on riparian and aquatic habitats in glacial-melt water rivers. River Res. Appl., 24, 355–372. [CrossRef]
  • Loden M.S., 1974. Predation by chironomid (diptera) larvae on oligochaetes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 19, 156–159. [CrossRef]
  • Mandaville S.M., 2002. Benthic macroinvertebrates in freshwaters – taxa tolerance, values, metrics, and protocols. Soil and Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax.
  • Miller T.J., Crowder L.B., Rice J.A. and Marschall E.A., 1988. Larval size and recruitment mechanisms in fishes: toward a conceptual framework. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 1657–1670. [CrossRef]
  • Missouri River Recovery Program, 2013. Recovery channel newsletter, April, 4 p.
  • NRC, 2011. Missouri River planning, recognizing and incorporating sediment management. The National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 152 p.
  • Opperman J.J., Luster R., McKenney B.A., Roberts M. and Meadows A.W., 2010. Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime and scale. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46, 211–226. [CrossRef]
  • Panis L.I., Goddeeris B. and Verheyen R., 1995. The hemoglobin concentration of Chironomus Cf. plumosus L. (Diptera: Chironomidae) larvae from two lentic habitats. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 29, 1–4. [CrossRef]
  • Poulton B.C. and Allert A.L., 2012. An evaluation of the relative quality of dike pools for benthic macroinvertebrates in the lower Missouri River, USA. River Res. Appl., 28, 1658–1679. [CrossRef]
  • Poulton B.C., Wildhaber M.L., Charbonneau C.S., Fairchild J.F., Mueller B.G. and Schmitt C.J., 2003. A longitudinal assessment of the aquatic macroinvertebrate community in the channelized lower Missouri River. Environ. Monit. Assess., 85, 23–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sampson S.J. and Hall J.R., 2011. Habitat assessment and monitoring program : macroinvertebrate community assessment of constructed backwaters and side channels of the channelized Missouri River, 2010. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, 26 p.
  • Sechler D.R., Phelps Q.E., Tripp S.J., Garvey J.E., Herzog D.P., Ostendorf D.E., Ridings J.W., Crites J.W. and Hrabik R.A., 2012. Habitat for age-0 shovelnose and pallid sturgeon in a large river: interactions among abiotic factors, food, and energy intake. North Am. J. Fish. Manag., 32, 24–31. [CrossRef]
  • Schmulbach J.C., Hesse L.W. and Bush J.E., 1992. The Missouri River-Great Plains thread of life. In: Becker C.D. and Nietzel D.A. (eds) Water quality in North American river systems, Batelle Press, Columbus, 137–158.
  • Sommer T.R., Harrell W.C., Mueller-Solger A., Tom B. and Kimmerer W., 2004. Effects of flow variation on channel and floodplain biota and habitats of the Sacramento River, California, USA. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 14, 247-261. [CrossRef]
  • Spooner J.D. and Landgraf K.F., 2006. Retrospective analysis of land cover at Overton Bottoms North, Missouri. In: Jacobson R.B. (ed.), Science to support adaptive habitat management–Overton Bottoms North Unit, Big Muddy National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, Missouri. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5086, 69–90.
  • Tockner K. and Stanford J.A., 2002. Riverine floodplains: present state and future trends. Environ. Conserv., 29, 308–330. [CrossRef]
  • USACE, 2006. Missouri River bank stabilization and navigation fish and wildlife mitigation program, Baltimore Bottom USFWS Big Muddy Fish and Wildlife Refuge chute construction project. Project Implementation Report November 2006, 166 p.
  • USACE, 2010. Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation program, Dalbey Bottoms mitigation site. Final Project Implementation Report April 2010, 297 p.
  • USACE, 2012. Assessment of conceptual nonstructural alternative levee setbacks along the Missouri River (Lower L-575/Upper L-550 and Lower L-550). Final Report April 2012, 93 p.
  • USACE, 2013. 2011 Missouri River Levee Rehab Update, Omaha District, 2 p.
  • USFWS, 2000. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biological opinion on the operation of the Missouri River main stem reservoir system, operation and maintenance of the Missouri River bank stabilization and navigation project, and operation of the Kansas River reservoir system.
  • USFWS, 2003. Amendment to the 2000 biological opinion.
  • USFWS, 2009. Letter to USACE clarifying the definition of shallow water habitat.
  • Wetzel R.G., 2001. Limnology: lake and reservoir ecosystems, 3rd edition, Academic Press, San Diego, 1006 p.
  • Wiederholm T., 1980. Use of benthos in lake monitoring. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 52, 537–547.
  • Wiggins G.B., Mackay R.J. and Smith I.M., 1980. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools. Arch. fur Hydrobiol. Suppl., 58, 97–206.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.