Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 412, 2014
Article Number 05
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 10 January 2014
  • Baldwin D.S. and Mitchell A.M., 2000. The effects of drying and re-flooding on the sediment and soil nutrient dynamics of lowland river-floodplain systems: a synthesis. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 16, 457–467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berner L.M., 1951. Limnology of the lower Missouri River. Ecology, 32, 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blevins D.W., 2011. Water-quality requirements, tolerances, and preferences of pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) in the lower Missouri River. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5186, 20 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Boulton A.J. and Lloyd L.N., 1992. Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the River Murray, Australia. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag., 7, 137–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cantrell M.A. and McLachlan A.J., 1977. Competition and chironomid distribution patterns in a newly flooded lake. Oikos, 29, 429–433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M., 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E, Plymouth, 168 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N., 2006. Primer version 6 user manual/tutorial. Primer-E, Plymouth, 190 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dierauer J., Pinter N. and Remo J.W.F., 2012. Evaluation of levee setbacks for flood-loss reduction, Middle Mississippi River, USA. J. Hydrol., 450-451, 1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dzialowski A.R., Bonneau J.L. and Gemeinhardt T.R., 2013. Comparisons of zooplankton and phytoplankton in created shallow water habitats of the lower Missouri River: implications for native fish. Aquat. Ecol., 47, 13–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edmondson W.T., 1959. Freshwater biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Galat D.L., Fredrickson L.H., Humburg D.D., Bataille K.J., Bodie J.R., Dohrenwend J., Gelwicks G.T., Havel J.E., Helmers D.L., Hooker J.B., Jones J.R., Knowlton M.F., Kubisiak J., Mazourek J., McColpin A.C., Renken R.B. and Semlitsch R.D., 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. Bioscience, 48, 721–733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Galat D.L., Whitledge G.W. and Gelwicks G.T., 2004. Influence of lateral connectivity on larval fish assemblage structure and habitat use in lower Missouri River floodplain water bodies. Final Report to Missouri Department of Conservation. U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia. 114 p [Google Scholar]
  • Golet G.H., Roberts M.D., Luster R.A., Werner G., Larsen E.W., Unger R. and White G.G., 2006. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacremento River Project, California. Environ. Manag., 37, 862–879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gosch N.J.C., Morris D.M., Gemeinhardt T.R. and Bonneau J.L., 2013. Pre- and post-construction assessment of nutrient concentrations at shallow water habitat restoration sites on the lower Missouri River. J. Water Resour. Prot., 5, 249–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Havel J.E., Medley K.A., Dickerson K.D., Angradi T.R., Bolgrien D.W., Bukaveckas P.A., Jicha T.M., 2009. Effect of mainstem dams on zooplankton communities of the Missouri River (USA). Hydrobiologia, 628, 121–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hesse L.W. and Mestl G.E., 1993. An alternative hydrograph for the Missouri River based on the precontrol condition. North Am. J. Fish. Manag., 13, 360–366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hesse L.W. and Sheets W., 1993. The Missouri River hydrosystem. Fisheries, 18, 5–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hesse L.W., Schmulbach J.C., Carr J.M., Keenlyne K.D., Unkenholz D.G., Robinson J.W. and Mestl G.E., 1989. Missouri River fishery resources in relation to past, present, and future stresses. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 106, 352–371. [Google Scholar]
  • Independent Post-Flood Review Panel, 2011. Review of the regulation of the Missouri River mainstem reservoir system during the flood of 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobson R.B., Linder G. and Bitner C.J., In press. The role of floodplain restoration in mitigating flood risk, lower Missouri River, USA. In: Hudson P.F. and Middlekoop H. (eds.), Geomorphology and management of lowland floodplains: North American and European fluvial systems in an era of global environmental change, Springer, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson M.W., Powers S.P., Hightower C.L. and Kenworthy M., 2010. Age, growth, mortality, and diet composition of vermilion snapper from the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 139, 1136–1149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. and Sparks R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 106, 110–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Konrad C.P., Black R.W., Voss F. and Neale C.M.U., 2008. Integrating remotely acquired and field data to assess effects of setback levees on riparian and aquatic habitats in glacial-melt water rivers. River Res. Appl., 24, 355–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Loden M.S., 1974. Predation by chironomid (diptera) larvae on oligochaetes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 19, 156–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mandaville S.M., 2002. Benthic macroinvertebrates in freshwaters – taxa tolerance, values, metrics, and protocols. Soil and Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller T.J., Crowder L.B., Rice J.A. and Marschall E.A., 1988. Larval size and recruitment mechanisms in fishes: toward a conceptual framework. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 1657–1670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Missouri River Recovery Program, 2013. Recovery channel newsletter, April, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • NRC, 2011. Missouri River planning, recognizing and incorporating sediment management. The National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 152 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Opperman J.J., Luster R., McKenney B.A., Roberts M. and Meadows A.W., 2010. Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime and scale. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46, 211–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Panis L.I., Goddeeris B. and Verheyen R., 1995. The hemoglobin concentration of Chironomus Cf. plumosus L. (Diptera: Chironomidae) larvae from two lentic habitats. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 29, 1–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poulton B.C. and Allert A.L., 2012. An evaluation of the relative quality of dike pools for benthic macroinvertebrates in the lower Missouri River, USA. River Res. Appl., 28, 1658–1679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poulton B.C., Wildhaber M.L., Charbonneau C.S., Fairchild J.F., Mueller B.G. and Schmitt C.J., 2003. A longitudinal assessment of the aquatic macroinvertebrate community in the channelized lower Missouri River. Environ. Monit. Assess., 85, 23–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sampson S.J. and Hall J.R., 2011. Habitat assessment and monitoring program : macroinvertebrate community assessment of constructed backwaters and side channels of the channelized Missouri River, 2010. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, 26 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sechler D.R., Phelps Q.E., Tripp S.J., Garvey J.E., Herzog D.P., Ostendorf D.E., Ridings J.W., Crites J.W. and Hrabik R.A., 2012. Habitat for age-0 shovelnose and pallid sturgeon in a large river: interactions among abiotic factors, food, and energy intake. North Am. J. Fish. Manag., 32, 24–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmulbach J.C., Hesse L.W. and Bush J.E., 1992. The Missouri River-Great Plains thread of life. In: Becker C.D. and Nietzel D.A. (eds) Water quality in North American river systems, Batelle Press, Columbus, 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Sommer T.R., Harrell W.C., Mueller-Solger A., Tom B. and Kimmerer W., 2004. Effects of flow variation on channel and floodplain biota and habitats of the Sacramento River, California, USA. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 14, 247-261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spooner J.D. and Landgraf K.F., 2006. Retrospective analysis of land cover at Overton Bottoms North, Missouri. In: Jacobson R.B. (ed.), Science to support adaptive habitat management–Overton Bottoms North Unit, Big Muddy National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, Missouri. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5086, 69–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K. and Stanford J.A., 2002. Riverine floodplains: present state and future trends. Environ. Conserv., 29, 308–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • USACE, 2006. Missouri River bank stabilization and navigation fish and wildlife mitigation program, Baltimore Bottom USFWS Big Muddy Fish and Wildlife Refuge chute construction project. Project Implementation Report November 2006, 166 p. [Google Scholar]
  • USACE, 2010. Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation program, Dalbey Bottoms mitigation site. Final Project Implementation Report April 2010, 297 p. [Google Scholar]
  • USACE, 2012. Assessment of conceptual nonstructural alternative levee setbacks along the Missouri River (Lower L-575/Upper L-550 and Lower L-550). Final Report April 2012, 93 p. [Google Scholar]
  • USACE, 2013. 2011 Missouri River Levee Rehab Update, Omaha District, 2 p. [Google Scholar]
  • USFWS, 2000. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biological opinion on the operation of the Missouri River main stem reservoir system, operation and maintenance of the Missouri River bank stabilization and navigation project, and operation of the Kansas River reservoir system. [Google Scholar]
  • USFWS, 2003. Amendment to the 2000 biological opinion. [Google Scholar]
  • USFWS, 2009. Letter to USACE clarifying the definition of shallow water habitat. [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel R.G., 2001. Limnology: lake and reservoir ecosystems, 3rd edition, Academic Press, San Diego, 1006 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiederholm T., 1980. Use of benthos in lake monitoring. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 52, 537–547. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiggins G.B., Mackay R.J. and Smith I.M., 1980. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools. Arch. fur Hydrobiol. Suppl., 58, 97–206. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.