Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 408, 2013
Article Number 08
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 26 April 2013
  • Barling R.D. and Moore I.D., 1994. Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environ. Manag., 18, 543–558. [CrossRef]
  • Bartholomé E. and Belward A.S., 2005. A new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1959–1977. [CrossRef]
  • Bereitschaft, B.J.F., 2007. Modeling nutrient attenuation by riparian buffer zones along headwater streams. University of North Carolina, Greensboro, 79 pp. Accessed: 2012/10/10/.
  • Britz W., 2004. CAPRI Modelling System Documentation. Final report of the FP5 shared cost project CAP-STRAT “Common Agricultural Policy Strategy for Regions, Agriculture and Trade”. University of Bonn, QLTR-2000-00394, Bonn, Germany, 147 p.
  • Castelle A.J., Johnson A.W. and Conolly C., 1994. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements - a review. J. Environ. Qual., 23, 878–882. [CrossRef]
  • Clerici N., Weissteiner C.J., Paracchini M.L. and Strobl P., 2011. Riparian zones: Where green and blue networks meet. European Community, D. G. Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg, 60 p.
  • Clerici N., Weissteiner C.J., Paracchini M.L., Boschetti L., Baraldi A. and Strobl P., 2013. Pan-European distribution modelling of stream riparian zones based on multi-source Earth Observation data. Ecological Indicators, 24, 211–223. [CrossRef]
  • Cooper J.R., Gilliam J.W., Daniels R.B. and Robarge W.P., 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 416–420. [CrossRef]
  • Daniels R.B. and Gilliam J.W., 1996. Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 246–251. [CrossRef]
  • Dickson B.C. and Schaeffer D.J., 1997. Ecorestoration of riparian forest for non-point source pollution control: Policy and ecological considerations in agroecosystem watersheds. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T.P., Goulding, K.W.T. and Pinay, G. (eds.), Buffer Zones: Their processes and potential in water protection.
  • Dillaha T.A., Reneau R.B., Mostaghimi S. and Lee D., 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 32, 513–519.
  • EEA E.E.A., Corine land cover 2000 (CLC2000) 100 m - version 8/2005. Date accessed: 2012/01/02/.
  • EPA U.S., 1993. The role and function of forest buffers in the Chesapeake Bay basin for nonpoint source management. Publication U. S. EPA, U.S. EPA: Chesapeake Bay Program Forestry Work Group, CBP/TRS 91/93, 10 p., Annapolis, Md.
  • Fisher J. and Acreman M.C., 2004. Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 673–685. [CrossRef]
  • FOOTPRINT, 2008. FOOTPRINT SUGAR, the SUrface water / GroundwAter contRibution index. Produced as part of the EU-funded FOOTPRINT project SSPI-CT-2005-022704., accessed: 2012/01/02/.
  • Gascuel C., Dorioz J.M., Krogstad T. and Bechmann M., 2010. Create and manage vegetated buffers at field boundaries. COST869 (COoperation in Science and Technology)., date accessed: 10.10.2012.
  • Gilliam J.W., 1994. Riparian wetlands and water quality. J. Environ. Qual., 23, 896–900. [CrossRef]
  • Gilliam J.W., Osmond D.L. and Evans R.O., 1997. Selected agricultural best management practices to control nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin n. 311, 58 p., Raleigh, N.C.
  • Giupponi C. and Vladimirova I., 2006. Ag-PIE: A GIS-based screening model for assessing agricultural pressures and impacts on water quality on a European scale. Sci. Total Environ., 359, 57–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Grizzetti B., Bouraoui F. and Aloe A., 2012. Changes of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to European seas. Glob. Chang. Biol., 18, 769–782. [CrossRef]
  • Hedin L.O., von Fischer J.C., Ostrom N.E., Kennedy B.P., Brown M.G. and Robertson G.P., 1998. Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen transformations and other biogeochemical processes at soil-stream interfaces. Ecology, 79, 684–703.
  • Hill A.R., 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. J. Environ. Qual., 25, 743–755. [CrossRef]
  • Inamdar S.P., Lowrance R.R., Altier L.S., Williams R.G. and Hubbard R.K., 1999. Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM): II. Testing of the water quality and nutrient cycling component for a Coastal Plain riparian system. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 42, 1691–1707.
  • Johnston C.A., Bubenzer G.D., Lee G.B., Madison F.W. and McHenry J.R., 1984. Nutrient trapping by sediment deposition in a seasonally flooded lakeside wetland. J. Environ. Qual., 13, 283–289. [CrossRef]
  • Jordan T.E., Correll D.L. and Weller D.E., 1993. Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland. J. Environ. Qual., 21, 401–405.
  • Klapproth J.C. and Johnson J.E., 2009. Understanding the Science Behind Riparian Forest Buffers: Effects on Water Quality. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Publication 420–151, 22 p., accessed: 26.07.2011.
  • Klein Goldewijk K. and Van Drecht G., 2006. HYDE 3: Current and historical population and land cover. In: Bouwman, A.F., Kram, T. and Klein Goldewijk, K. (eds.), Integrated modelling of global environmental change. An overview of IMAGE 2.4. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 228 p.
  • Knight K.W., Schultz R.C., Mabry C.M. and Isenhart T.M., 2010. Ability of remnant riparian forests, with and without grass filters, to buffer concentrated surface runoff. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46, 311–322. [CrossRef]
  • Lowrance R., Todd R.L. and Asmussen L.E., 1984. Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed: I. phreatic movement. J. Environ. Qual., 13, 22–27. [CrossRef]
  • Lowrance R., Williams R.G., Inamdar S.P., Bosch D.D. and Sheridan J.M., 2001. Evaluation of coastal plain conservation buffers using the riparian ecosystem management model. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37, 1445–1455. [CrossRef]
  • Mander Ü., Kuusemets V. and Ivask M., 1995. Nutrient dynamics of riparian ecotones: a case study from the Porijogi River catchment, Estonia. Landsc. Urban Plann., 31, 333–348. [CrossRef]
  • Mayer P.M., Reynolds S.K.J., Canfield T.J. and McCutchen M.D., 2005. Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness. US-EPA publication, EPA, EPA/600/R-05/118, 27 p., Cincinnati, Ohio., accessed: 2012/10/10/.
  • Monfreda C., Ramankutty N. and Foley J.A., 2007. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22 GB1022.
  • Munoz-Carpena R. and Parsons J.E., 2005. VFSMOD-W Vegetative Filter Strips Hydrology and Sediment Transport Modeling System Model Documentation and Users Manual. University of Florida. Gainsville, FL., accessed: 2012/10/10/.
  • Munoz-Carpena R., Parsons J.E. and Wendell G.J., 1999. Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips. J. Hydrol., 214, 111–129. [CrossRef]
  • Navulur K.C.S. and Engel B.A., 1996. Predicting spatial distributions of vulnerability of Indiana State aquifer systems to nitrate leaching using a GIS. Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modelling, Santa Fe, New Mexiko, USA.
  • Osborne L.L. and Kovacic D.A., 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water qualilty restoration and stream management. Freshw. Biol., 29, 243–258. [CrossRef]
  • Pankau R.C., Schoonover J.E., Williard K.W.J. and Edwards P.J., 2012. Concentrated flow paths in riparian buffer zones of southern Illinois. Agrofor. Syst., 84, 191–205. [CrossRef]
  • Pärn J., Pinay G. and Mander Ü., 2012. Indicators of nutrients transport from agricultural catchments under temperate climate: A review. Ecological Indicators, 22, 4–15. [CrossRef]
  • Peterjohn W.T. and Correll D.L., 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology, 65, 1466–1475. [CrossRef]
  • Phillips J.D., 1989. An evaluation of the factors determining the effectiveness of water quality buffer zones. J. Hydrol., 107, 133–145. [CrossRef]
  • Pionke H.B., Gburek W.J., Sharpley A.N. and Schnabel R.R., 1995. Flow and nutrient export patterns for an agricultural hill-land watershed. Clean Water, Clean Environment – 21st century. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Kansas City, Mo, 167–170.
  • Vidon P. and Hill A.R., 2005. Denitrification and patterns of electron donors and acceptors in eight riparian zones with contrasting hydrogeology. Biogeochemistry, 71, 259–283. [CrossRef]
  • Vidon P.G.F. and Hill A.R., 2004. Landscape controls on nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Water Resour. Res., 40, 14.
  • Vogt J., Soille P., de Jager A., Rimaviciute E.W.M., Foisneau S., Bodis K., Dusart J., Paracchini M.L., Haastrup P. and Bamps C., 2007. Pan European River and Catchment Database. European Commission, EUR22920EN, 120 pp. p. European Community, D.G.J.R.C., IES, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Vought L.B.M., Dahl J., Pedersen C.L. and Lacoursiere J.O., 1994. Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones. Ambio, 23, 342–348.
  • Vymazal J., 2007. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ., 380, 48–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Wenger S., 1999. A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation. Office of Public Service & Outreach, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia., date accessed: 29.07.2011.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.