Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 408, 2013
Article Number 08
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013044
Published online 26 April 2013
  • Barling R.D. and Moore I.D., 1994. Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environ. Manag., 18, 543–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartholomé E. and Belward A.S., 2005. A new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1959–1977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bereitschaft, B.J.F., 2007. Modeling nutrient attenuation by riparian buffer zones along headwater streams. University of North Carolina, Greensboro, 79 pp. http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/listing.aspx?id=1087. Accessed: 2012/10/10/. [Google Scholar]
  • Britz W., 2004. CAPRI Modelling System Documentation. Final report of the FP5 shared cost project CAP-STRAT “Common Agricultural Policy Strategy for Regions, Agriculture and Trade”. University of Bonn, QLTR-2000-00394, Bonn, Germany, 147 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Castelle A.J., Johnson A.W. and Conolly C., 1994. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements - a review. J. Environ. Qual., 23, 878–882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clerici N., Weissteiner C.J., Paracchini M.L. and Strobl P., 2011. Riparian zones: Where green and blue networks meet. European Community, D. G. Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg, 60 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Clerici N., Weissteiner C.J., Paracchini M.L., Boschetti L., Baraldi A. and Strobl P., 2013. Pan-European distribution modelling of stream riparian zones based on multi-source Earth Observation data. Ecological Indicators, 24, 211–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper J.R., Gilliam J.W., Daniels R.B. and Robarge W.P., 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 416–420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels R.B. and Gilliam J.W., 1996. Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 246–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dickson B.C. and Schaeffer D.J., 1997. Ecorestoration of riparian forest for non-point source pollution control: Policy and ecological considerations in agroecosystem watersheds. In: Haycock, N.E., Burt, T.P., Goulding, K.W.T. and Pinay, G. (eds.), Buffer Zones: Their processes and potential in water protection. [Google Scholar]
  • Dillaha T.A., Reneau R.B., Mostaghimi S. and Lee D., 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 32, 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  • EEA E.E.A., Corine land cover 2000 (CLC2000) 100 m - version 8/2005. http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/dataservice/metadetails.asp?id=822 Date accessed: 2012/01/02/. [Google Scholar]
  • EPA U.S., 1993. The role and function of forest buffers in the Chesapeake Bay basin for nonpoint source management. Publication U. S. EPA, U.S. EPA: Chesapeake Bay Program Forestry Work Group, CBP/TRS 91/93, 10 p., Annapolis, Md. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher J. and Acreman M.C., 2004. Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 673–685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FOOTPRINT, 2008. FOOTPRINT SUGAR, the SUrface water / GroundwAter contRibution index. Produced as part of the EU-funded FOOTPRINT project SSPI-CT-2005-022704. http://www.eu-footprint.org/sugar.html, accessed: 2012/01/02/. [Google Scholar]
  • Gascuel C., Dorioz J.M., Krogstad T. and Bechmann M., 2010. Create and manage vegetated buffers at field boundaries. COST869 (COoperation in Science and Technology). http://www.cost869.alterra.nl/Fs/FS_vegetated_buffers.pdf, date accessed: 10.10.2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilliam J.W., 1994. Riparian wetlands and water quality. J. Environ. Qual., 23, 896–900. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilliam J.W., Osmond D.L. and Evans R.O., 1997. Selected agricultural best management practices to control nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin n. 311, 58 p., Raleigh, N.C. [Google Scholar]
  • Giupponi C. and Vladimirova I., 2006. Ag-PIE: A GIS-based screening model for assessing agricultural pressures and impacts on water quality on a European scale. Sci. Total Environ., 359, 57–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grizzetti B., Bouraoui F. and Aloe A., 2012. Changes of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to European seas. Glob. Chang. Biol., 18, 769–782. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hedin L.O., von Fischer J.C., Ostrom N.E., Kennedy B.P., Brown M.G. and Robertson G.P., 1998. Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen transformations and other biogeochemical processes at soil-stream interfaces. Ecology, 79, 684–703. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill A.R., 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. J. Environ. Qual., 25, 743–755. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Inamdar S.P., Lowrance R.R., Altier L.S., Williams R.G. and Hubbard R.K., 1999. Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM): II. Testing of the water quality and nutrient cycling component for a Coastal Plain riparian system. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 42, 1691–1707. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston C.A., Bubenzer G.D., Lee G.B., Madison F.W. and McHenry J.R., 1984. Nutrient trapping by sediment deposition in a seasonally flooded lakeside wetland. J. Environ. Qual., 13, 283–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan T.E., Correll D.L. and Weller D.E., 1993. Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland. J. Environ. Qual., 21, 401–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Klapproth J.C. and Johnson J.E., 2009. Understanding the Science Behind Riparian Forest Buffers: Effects on Water Quality. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Publication 420–151, 22 p. http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/420/420-151/420-151.html, accessed: 26.07.2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Klein Goldewijk K. and Van Drecht G., 2006. HYDE 3: Current and historical population and land cover. In: Bouwman, A.F., Kram, T. and Klein Goldewijk, K. (eds.), Integrated modelling of global environmental change. An overview of IMAGE 2.4. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 228 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Knight K.W., Schultz R.C., Mabry C.M. and Isenhart T.M., 2010. Ability of remnant riparian forests, with and without grass filters, to buffer concentrated surface runoff. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46, 311–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lowrance R., Todd R.L. and Asmussen L.E., 1984. Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed: I. phreatic movement. J. Environ. Qual., 13, 22–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lowrance R., Williams R.G., Inamdar S.P., Bosch D.D. and Sheridan J.M., 2001. Evaluation of coastal plain conservation buffers using the riparian ecosystem management model. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37, 1445–1455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mander Ü., Kuusemets V. and Ivask M., 1995. Nutrient dynamics of riparian ecotones: a case study from the Porijogi River catchment, Estonia. Landsc. Urban Plann., 31, 333–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mayer P.M., Reynolds S.K.J., Canfield T.J. and McCutchen M.D., 2005. Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness. US-EPA publication, EPA, EPA/600/R-05/118, 27 p., Cincinnati, Ohio. http://ccrm.vims.edu/education/seminarpresentations/fall2006/Workshop%20CD/Other%20References/Riparian%20Buffers%20&%20Nitrogen%20Removal.pdf, accessed: 2012/10/10/. [Google Scholar]
  • Monfreda C., Ramankutty N. and Foley J.A., 2007. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22 GB1022. [Google Scholar]
  • Munoz-Carpena R. and Parsons J.E., 2005. VFSMOD-W Vegetative Filter Strips Hydrology and Sediment Transport Modeling System Model Documentation and Users Manual. University of Florida. Gainsville, FL. http://abe.ufl.edu/carpena/files/pdf/publications/proceedings/VegetativeFilterStripsHydrologyAndSediment.pdf, accessed: 2012/10/10/. [Google Scholar]
  • Munoz-Carpena R., Parsons J.E. and Wendell G.J., 1999. Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips. J. Hydrol., 214, 111–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Navulur K.C.S. and Engel B.A., 1996. Predicting spatial distributions of vulnerability of Indiana State aquifer systems to nitrate leaching using a GIS. Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modelling, Santa Fe, New Mexiko, USA. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA_FE_CD-ROM/sf_papers/navulur_kumar/my_paper.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Osborne L.L. and Kovacic D.A., 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water qualilty restoration and stream management. Freshw. Biol., 29, 243–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pankau R.C., Schoonover J.E., Williard K.W.J. and Edwards P.J., 2012. Concentrated flow paths in riparian buffer zones of southern Illinois. Agrofor. Syst., 84, 191–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pärn J., Pinay G. and Mander Ü., 2012. Indicators of nutrients transport from agricultural catchments under temperate climate: A review. Ecological Indicators, 22, 4–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peterjohn W.T. and Correll D.L., 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology, 65, 1466–1475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips J.D., 1989. An evaluation of the factors determining the effectiveness of water quality buffer zones. J. Hydrol., 107, 133–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pionke H.B., Gburek W.J., Sharpley A.N. and Schnabel R.R., 1995. Flow and nutrient export patterns for an agricultural hill-land watershed. Clean Water, Clean Environment – 21st century. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Kansas City, Mo, 167–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Vidon P. and Hill A.R., 2005. Denitrification and patterns of electron donors and acceptors in eight riparian zones with contrasting hydrogeology. Biogeochemistry, 71, 259–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vidon P.G.F. and Hill A.R., 2004. Landscape controls on nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Water Resour. Res., 40, 14. [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt J., Soille P., de Jager A., Rimaviciute E.W.M., Foisneau S., Bodis K., Dusart J., Paracchini M.L., Haastrup P. and Bamps C., 2007. Pan European River and Catchment Database. European Commission, EUR22920EN, 120 pp. p. European Community, D.G.J.R.C., IES, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ccm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/CCM2-Report_EUR-22920-EN_2007_STD.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Vought L.B.M., Dahl J., Pedersen C.L. and Lacoursiere J.O., 1994. Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones. Ambio, 23, 342–348. [Google Scholar]
  • Vymazal J., 2007. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ., 380, 48–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wenger S., 1999. A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation. Office of Public Service & Outreach, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia. http://www.chathamnc.org/WatershedReviewBoard/supporting_documents/stream_buffers/LitReviewRiparianBuffers.pdf, date accessed: 29.07.2011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.