Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 406, 2012
Article Number 01
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2012018
Published online 25 July 2012
  • Afnor, 2000. Norme Française NF T 90-354 : Qualité de l’eau – Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Afnor, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Afnor, 2003. NF EN 13946 : Qualité de l’eau – Guide pour l’échantillonnage en routine et le prétraitement des diatomées benthiques de rivières. Afnor, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Afnor, 2004. NF EN 14407 : Qualité de l’eau – Guide pour l’identification et le dénombrement des échantillons de diatomées benthiques de rivières, et leur interprétation. Afnor, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Afnor, 2007. NF T90-354 : Qualité de l’eau – Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Afnor, 1–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Bahls L.L., 1993. Periphyton bioassessment methods for Montana streams. Water Quality Bureau, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers : periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, 2nd edition, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, 1 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Battegazzore M., Morosi A., Gallino B. andFenoglio S., 2004. Environmental quality evaluation of Alpine springs in NW Italy using benthic diatoms. Diatom Res., 19, 149–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berthon V., Bouchez A. andRimet F., 2011. Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pollution in rivers : case study of south-eastern french rivers. Hydrobiologia, 673, 259–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Butcher R. W., 1947. Studies in the ecology of rivers. IV. The algae of organically enriched water. J. Ecol., 35, 186–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carrère P. and Bloor J.M.G., 2009. Lexique thématique à l’usage des techniciens en écologie, INRA, EFPA, Unité de Recherche sur l’Ecosystème Prairial, 234 av. du Brezet, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France, 7 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Chessman B., Growns I., Currey J. andPlunkett-Cole N., 1999. Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers. Freshwater Biol., 41, 317–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coste M., Bosca C. and Dauta A., 1991. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in France. In : Whitton B.A., Rott E. and Fridriech G. (eds.), Institut für Botanik, Universitat Innsbruck, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Druart J.C. andStraub F., 1988. Description de deux nouvelles Cyclotelles (Bacillariophyceae) de milieux alcalins et eutrophes : Cyclotella costei nov. sp. et Cyclotella wuetrichiana nov. sp. Schweizererische Zeitschrift für Hydrobiologie, 50, 182–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans K.M., Wortley A.H., Simpson G.E., Chepurnov V.A. andMann D.G., 2008. A molecular systematic approach to explore diversity within the Sellaphora pupula species complex (bacillariophyta). J. Phycol., 44, 215–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Finkel Z.V., Vaillancourt C.J., Irwin A.J., Reavie E.D. andSmol J.P., 2009. Environmental control of diatom community size structure varies across aquatic ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B, 276, 1627–1634. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fjerdingstad E., 1950. The microflora of the river Molleaa with special reference to the relation of benthic algae to pollution. Folia Limnol. Scand., 5, 1–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Fore L.S., 2002. Evaluating the biological condition of Bellevue streams using invertebrates and diatoms, Statistical Design, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Fore L.S. andGrafe C., 2002. Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (USA). Freshwater Biol., 47, 2015–2037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guiry M.D. and Guiry G.M., 2012. AlgaeBase, World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway, http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 29 March 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Hakansson, H. and Carter K.B., 1990. An interpretation of Hustedt’s terms “Schattenlinie”, “Perlenreihe” and “Höcker” Using Specimens of the Cyclotella radiosa-complex, C. distinguenda Hust., and C. cyclopuncta nov. sp. J. Iowa Acad. Sci., 97, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Hillebrand H., Durselen C.D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. andZohary T., 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol., 35, 403–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoagland K.D., Roemer S.C. andRosowski J.R., 1982. Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages, with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Am. J. Bot., 69, 188–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hustedt F., 1957. Die Diatomeenflora des Flusssystems der Weser im Gebiet der Hansestadt Bremen. Abhandlungen naturwissenschaftlichen Verein zu Bremen, 34, 181–440. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones F.C., 2008. Taxonomic sufficiency : The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ. Rev., 16, 45–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Julius M.L. and Theriot E.C., 2010. The Diatoms : a primer. In : Smol J.P. and Stoermer E.F. (eds.), The diatoms : applications for the environmental and earth sciences, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 8–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Cazaubon A., Coring E., Dell’Uomo A., Ector L., Goldsmith B., Guasch H., Hürlimann J., Jarlman A., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Laugaste R., Lindstrom E.A., Leitao M., Marvan P., Padisak J., Pipp E., Prygiel J., Rott E., Sabater S., Van Dam H. andVizinet J., 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water qualtiy assessments in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol., 10, 215–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kermarrec L., Bouchez A., Rimet F. and Humbert J.F., 2012. Using a polyphasic approach to explore the diversity and geographical distribution of the Gomphonema parvulum (Kützing) Kützing complex (Bacillariophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 44, 567–577. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil : Naviculaceae. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 876 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil : Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H., and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 610 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil : Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 598 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil : Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 4. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 437 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwig., 64, 285–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Lavoie I., Lento J. andMorin A., 2010. Inadequacy of size distributions of stream benthic diatoms for environmental monitoring. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29, 586–601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecointe C., Coste M. and Prygiel J., 1993. “Omnidia” : software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories managment. Hydrobiologia, 269/270, 509–513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leira M., Chen G., Dalton C., Irvine K.N. andTaylor D.H., 2009. Patterns in freshwater diatom taxonomic distinctness along an eutrophication gradient. Freshwater Biol., 54, 1–14. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lobo E., Katoh K. andAruga Y., 1995. Response of epilithic diatom assemblages to water pollution in rivers in the Tokyo Metropolitan area, Japan. Freshwater Biol., 34, 191–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mann D.G. andDroop S.J.M., 1996. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 336, 19-32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mann D.G., McDonald S.M., Bayer M.M., Droop S.J.M., Chepurnov V.A., Loke R.E., Ciobanu A. and du Buf J.M.H., 2004. The Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyceae) : morphometric analysis, ultrastructure and mating data provide evidence for five new species. Phycologia, 43, 459–482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Padisak J., Crossetti L.O. andNaselli-Flores L., 2009. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification : a critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia, 621, 1–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passy S.I., 2007a. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquat. Bot., 86, 171–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passy S.I., 2007b. Differential cell size optimization strategies produce distinct diatom richness-body size relationships in stream benthos and plankton. J. Ecol., 95, 745–754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passy S.I. andLarson C.A., 2011. Succession in stream biofilms is an environmentally driven gradient of stress tolerance. Microb. Ecol., 62, 414–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Patrick R., 1961. A study of the number and kinds of species found in rivers of the Eastern Unisted States. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. Phila., 113, 215–258. [Google Scholar]
  • Ponader K.C. andPotapova M.G., 2007. Diatoms from the genus Achnanthidium in flowing waters of the Appalachian Mountains (North America) : Ecology, distribution and taxonomic notes. Limnologica, 37, 227–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M.G., Charles D.F., Ponader K.C. andWinter D.M., 2004. Quantifying species indicator values for trophic diatom indices : a comparison of approaches. Hydrobiologia, 517, 25–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poulickova A., Vesela J., Neustupa J. andSkaloud P., 2010. Pseudocryptic Diversity versus Cosmopolitanism in Diatoms : a Case Study on Navicula cryptocephala Kutz. (Bacillariophyceae) and Morphologically Similar Taxa. Protist, 161, 353–369. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pringle C.M., 1990. Nutrient spatial heterogeneity : effects on community structure, physiognomy, and diversity of stream algae. Ecology, 71, 905–920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F., 2012. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 683, 1–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F. andBouchez A., 2011. Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers : lotic mesocosm approaches. Ecol. Indic., 11, 489–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F. andBouchez A., 2012. Biomonitoring River Diatoms : Implications of Taxonomic Resolution. Ecol. Indic., 15, 92–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Round F.E., Crawford R.M. and Mann D.G., 1990. The diatoms, Biology, morphology of the genera, Cambridge University Press, 747 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rumeau, A. and Coste M., 1988. Initiation à la systematique des diatomées d’eau douce pour l’utilisation pratique d’un indice diatomique générique. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 309, 1–69. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Smol J.P. and Stoermer E.F., 2010. Applications and uses of diatoms : prologue. In : Smol J.P. and Stoermer E.F. (eds.), The diatoms : applications for the environmental and earth sciences, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Trobajo R., Clavero E., Chepurnov V., Sabbe K., Mann D.G., Ishihara S. andCox E.J., 2009. Morphological, genetic and mating diversity within the widespread bioindicator Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia, 48, 443–459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tudesque L., Grenouillet G., Gevrey M., Khazraie K. andBrosse S., 2012. Influence of small-scale gold mining on French Guiana streams : Are diatom assemblages valid disturbance sensors? Ecol. Indic., 14, 100–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tuji A., 2000. Observation of developmental processes in loosely attached diatom (Bacillariophyceae) communities. Phycol. Res., 48, 75–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Heurck H., 1882. Synopsis des diatomées de Belgique, Anvers 1885. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanelslander B., Creach V., Vanormelingen P., Ernst A., Chepurnov V.A., Sahan E., Muyzer G., Stal L.J., Vyverman W. andSabbe K., 2009. Ecological differentiation between sympatric pseudocryptic species in the estuarine benthic diatom Navicula Phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae) 1. J. Phycol., 45, 1278–1289. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weaver W. and Shannon C.E., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana. [Google Scholar]
  • Zampella R.A., Laidig K.J. andLowe R.L., 2007. Distribution of the diatoms in relation to land use and pH in blackwater coastal plain streams. Environ. Mange., 39, 369–384. [Google Scholar]
  • Zelinka M. andMarvan P., 1961. Zur Prazisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewasser. Arch. Hydrobiol., 57, 389–407. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.