EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 401 (2011) Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 401 (2011) 04 References
Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 401, 2011
European Crayfish: food, flagships and ecosystem services
Article Number 04
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2011012
Published online 18 May 2011
  • Ahvenharju T. and Ruohonen K., 2007. Agonistic behaviour of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana) in different social environments: Effect of size heterogeneity on growth and food intake. Aquaculture, 271, 307–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aiken D.E. and Waddy S.L., 1992. The growth process in crayfish. Rev. Aquat. Sci., 6, 335–381. [Google Scholar]
  • Baird H.P., Patullo B.W. and Macmillan D.L., 2006. Reducing aggression between freshwater crayfish (Cherax destructor Clark: Decapoda, Parastacidae) by increasing habitat complexity. Aquac. Res., 37, 1419–1428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Basil J. and Sandeman D., 2000. Crayfish (Cherax destructor) use tactile cues to detect and learn topographical changes in their environment. Ethology, 106, 247–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Belanger R.M. and Moore P.A., 2006. The use of the major chelae by reproductive male crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) for discrimination of female odours. Behaviour, 143, 713–731. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Belanger R.M. and Moore P.A., 2009. The role of the major chelae in the localization and sampling of female odours by male crayfish, Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852). Crustaceana, 82, 653–668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Belanger R.M., Ren X., McDowell K.E., Chang S., Moore P.A. and Zielinski B.S., 2008. Sensory setae on the major chelae of male crayfish, Orconectes rusticus (Decapoda, Astacidae): Impact of reproductive state on function and distribution. J. Crust. Biol., 28, 27–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bely A.E. and Nyberg K.G., 2010. Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field. Trends Ecol. Evol., 25, 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Bergman D.A. and Moore P.A., 2003. Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. Biol. Bull., 205, 26–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bovbjerg R.V., 1956. Some factors affecting aggressive behavior in crayfish. Physiol. Zool., 29, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruski C.A. and Dunham D.W., 1987. The importance of vision in agonistic communication of the crayfish Orconectes rusticus. I. An analysis of bout dynamics. Behaviour, 103, 83–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M., Kouba A. and Kozák P., 2009. Chelae regeneration in European alien crayfish Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque 1817). Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 394-395, 04. [Google Scholar]
  • Buřič M., Kouba A. and Kozák P., 2010. Molting and growth in relation to form alternations in the male spiny-cheek crayfish. Orconectes limosus. Zool. Stud., 49, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Capelli G.M. and Hamilton P.A., 1984. Effects of food and shelter on aggressive activity in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard). J. Crustac. Biol., 4, 252–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cook M.E. and Moore P.A., 2009. Communication networks and loser effects interact to influence the outcome of aggressive interactions in the crayfish. Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour, 146, 263–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Corkum L.D. and Cronin D.J., 2004. Habitat complexity reduces aggression and enhances consumption in crayfish. J. Ethol., 22, 23–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Figiel C.R. and Miller G.L., 1995. The frequency of chelae autotomy and its influence on the growth and survival of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 68, 472–483. [Google Scholar]
  • Figler M.H., Cheverton H.M. and Blank G.S., 1999. Shelter competition in juvenile red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii): the influences of sex differences, relative size, and prior residence. Aquaculture, 178, 63–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garvey J.E. and Stein R.A., 1993. Evaluating how chela size influences the invasion potential of an introduced crayfish. Am. Midl. Nat., 129, 172–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gherardi F., 2002. Behaviour. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Oxford, Blackwell Science, 258–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Giri T. and Dunham D.W., 1999. Use of the inner antennule ramus in the localisation of distant food odours by Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 72, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Giri T. and Dunham D.W., 2000. Female crayfish (Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852)) use both antennular rami in the localization of male odour. Crustaceana, 73, 447–458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • González R., Celada J.D., González A., García V., Carral J.M. and Sáez-Royuela M., 2010. Stocking density for the intensive rearing of juvenile crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Astacidae), using Artemia nauplii to supplement a dry diet from the onset of exogenous feeding. Aquacult. Int., 18, 371–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harlıoğlu M.M., 2009. A comparison of the growth and survival of two freshwater crayfish species, Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) under different temperature and density regimes. Aquacult. Int., 17, 31–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hirvonen H., 1992. Effects of backswimmer (Notonecta) predation on crayfish (Pacifastacus) young: autotomy and behavioural responses. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 29, 262–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Holdich D.M., 2002. Background and functional morphology. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Oxford, Blackwell Science, 3–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Horner A.J., Schmidt M., Edwards D.H. and Derby C.D., 2008. Role of the olfactory pathway in agonistic behavior of crayfish. Procambarus clarkii. Invertebr. Neurosci., 8, 11–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Juanes F. and Smith L.D., 1995. The ecological consequences of limb damage and loss in decapod crustaceans: a review and prospectus. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 193, 197–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kawai T., Hamano T. and Matsuura S., 1994. Cheliped loss of the Japanese crayfish, Cambaroides japonicus in a stream and a lake in Hokkaido, Japan. Suisanzoshoku, 42, 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Keller T. and Hazlett B.A., 1996. Mechanical use of crayfish chelae. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol., 28, 149–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koch L.M., Patullo B.W. and Macmillan D.M., 2006. Exploring with damaged antennae: do crayfish compensate for injuries? J. Exp. Biol., 209, 3226–3233. [Google Scholar]
  • Kozák P., Buřič M., Policar T., Hamáčková J. and Lepičová A., 2007. The effect of inter- and intra-specific competition on survival and growth rate of native juvenile noble crayfish Astacus astacus and alien spiny-cheek crayfish. Orconectes limosus. Hydrobiologia, 590, 85–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariappan P., Balasundaram C. and Schmitz B., 2000. Decapod crustacean chelipeds: an overview. J.Biosciences, 25, 301–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mason J.C., 1979. Effects of temperature, photoperiod, substrate and shelter on survival, growth and biomass accumulation of juvenile Pacifastacus leniusculus in culture. Freshw. Crayfish, 4, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  • McCall J.R. and Mead K.S., 2008. Structural and functional changes in regenerating antennules in the crayfish. Orconectes sanborni. Biol. Bull., 214, 99–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patullo B.W., Bairda H.P. and Macmillan D.L., 2009. Altered aggression in different sized groups of crayfish supports a dynamic social behaviour model. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 120, 231–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pond C.M., 1975. The role of the “walking legs” in aquatic and terrestrial locomotion of the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). J. Exp. Biol., 62, 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  • Powell M.L., Hammer H.S. and Watts S.A., 1998. Observations on the frequency of claw loss in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 29, 485–490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramalho R.O., Correia A.M. and Anastácio P.M., 2008. Effects of density on growth and survival of juvenile red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard), reared under laboratory conditions. Aquacult. Res., 39, 577–586. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds J.D., 2002. Growth and reproduction. In: Holdich D.M. (ed.), Biology of freshwater crayfish, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 152–191. [Google Scholar]
  • Roth B.M. and Kitchell J.F., 2005. The role of size-selective predation in the displacement of Orconectes crayfishes following rusty crayfish invasion. Crustaceana, 78, 297–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rutherford P.L., Dunham D.W. and Allison V., 1996. Antennule use and agonistic success in the crayfish. Orconectes rusticus. Crustaceana, 69, 117–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Savolainen R., Ruohonen K. and Tulonen J., 2003. Effects of bottom substrate and presence of shelter in experimental tanks on growth and survival of signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) juveniles. Aquacult. Res., 34, 289–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Savolainen R., Ruohonen K. and Railo E., 2004. Effect of stocking density on growth, survival and cheliped injuries of stage 2 juvenile signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Aquaculture, 231, 237–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Snedden W.A., 1990. Determinants of male mating success in the temperate crayfish Orconectes rusticus: chela size and sperm competition. Behaviour, 115, 100–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.