Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 393, 2009
Article Number 01
Number of page(s) 29
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2009012
Published online 20 August 2009
  • Baird J., Barber I., Bradley M., Calow P. and Soares A.M.V.M., 1989. The Daphnia bioassay: a critique. Hydrobiologia, 188-189, 1, 403–406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baird D.J., Barber I. and Calow P., 1990. Clonal variation in general responses of Daphnia magna to toxic stress. I. Chronic life-history effects. Funct. Ecol., 4, 339–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baudo R., Sbalchiero A. and Beltrami M., 2004. Test di tossicità acuta con Daphnia magna. Biologi Italiani, 6, 62–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Baudo R., Sbalchiero A. and Beltrami M., 2006. National intercomparisons acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna. Report to the Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per I Servizi Technici, Roma, Italy, Internal document, 13 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaise C., 1991. Microbiotests in aquatic ecotoxicology: Characteristics, utility and prospects. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual., 6, 145–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Broderius S.J., 1983. Analysis of an inter-laboratory comparative study of acute toxicity tests with freshwater aquatic organisms, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Buikema A.L., 1983. Variation in static acute toxicity test results with Daphnia magna exposed to refinery effluents and reference toxicants. Oil & Petrochemical Pollution, 1, 3 189–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Bulich A.A. and Isenberg D.L., 1980. Use of the luminescent bacterial system for the rapid assessment of aquatic toxicology. Adv. Intrum., 80, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Canton J.J. and Adema D.M.M., 1978. Reproducibility of short-term and reproduction toxicity experiments with Daphnia magna and comparison of the sensitivity of Daphnia magna with Daphnia pulex and Daphnia cucullata in short-term experiments. Hydrobiologia, 59, 135–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Commission of the European Communities, 1979. Inter-laboratory ringtest concerning the study of the ecotoxicity of a chemical substance with respect to the Daphnia, Study D.8369, 18 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Commission of the European Communities, 1992. Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the 17th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances, C.2. Acute toxicity test Daphnia. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotman M., Drolc A. and Ros M., 2003. An inter-laboratory study to improve the quality of chemical and biological measurements in waste water. Accred. Qual. Assur., 8, 156–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cotman M., Drolc A., Ros M. and Tisler T., 2007. Daphnia magna wastewater toxicity assays: an inter-laboratory study. Int. J. Environ. Poll., 31, 1/2, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotman M., Drolc A. and Tisler T., 2009. Inter-laboratory studies on waste water toxicity using Daphnia magna. Accred. Qual. Assur., 14, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Daniel M., Sharpe A., Driver J., Knight A.W., Keenan P.O., Walmsley R.M., Robinson A., Zhang T. and Rawson D., 2004. Results of a technology demonstration project to compare rapid aquatic toxicity screening tests in the analysis of industrial effluents. J. Environ. Monit., 6, 855–865. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Environment Canada, 1990. Guidance document on control of toxicity test precision using reference toxicants, Environmental Protection, Conservation and Protection, Report EPS 1/RM/12, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 85 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Environment Canada, 1996. Biological test method: Acute lethality test using Daphnia spp., Report EPS 1/RM/11, 55 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fochtman P., 2000. Acute toxicity of nine pesticides as determined with conventional assays and alternative microbiotests. In: Persoone G., Janssen C. and De Coen W. (eds.), New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Gersich F.M., Blanchard F.A., Applegath S.L. and Park C.N., 1986. The precision of daphnid (Daphnia magna Straus, 1820) static acute toxicity tests. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 15, 741–749. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grothe D.R. and Kimerle R.A., 1985. Inter- and intra-laboratory variability in Daphnia magna effluent toxicity test results. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 4, 189–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ISO 6341:1996. Water Quality – Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) – Acute toxicity test. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO 20665:2008. Water Quality – Determination of chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO 20666:2008. Water Quality – Determination of chronic toxicity to Brachionus calyciflorus in 48 h. [Google Scholar]
  • Janssen C.R., 1998. Alternative assays for routine toxicity assessments: a review. In: Schüürman G. and Markert B. (eds.), Ecotoxicology, Wiley & Sons, 813–839. [Google Scholar]
  • Jonczyk E. and Gilron G., 2005. Acute and chronic toxicity testing with Daphnia sp. In: Blaise C. and Férard J.-F. (eds.), Small-scale Toxicity Testing for freshwater Environments, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 337–394. [Google Scholar]
  • Jop K.M., Rodgers J.H., Dorn P.B. and Dickson K.L., 1986. Use of hexavalent chromium as a reference toxicant in aquatic toxicity tests. In: Poston T.M. and Purdy R. (eds.), Aquatic Toxicology and Environmental Fate, 9th Vol. ASTM STP 921, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA, 390–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Latif M. and Zach A., 2000. Toxicity studies of treated residual wastes in Austria using different types of conventional assays and cost-effective microbiotests. In: Persoone G., Janssen C. and De Coen W. (eds.), New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 367–383. [Google Scholar]
  • Lewis P.A. and Horning W.B., 1991. Differences in acute toxicity test results of three reference toxicants on Daphnia at two temperatures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10, 1351–1357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewis P.A. and Weber C.I., 1985. A study on the reliability of Daphnia acute toxicity tests. In: Cardwell R.D., Purdy R. and Bahner R.C. (eds.), Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment, 7th Symposium, ASTM STP 854, R.D. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreira dos Santos M., 1998. The controlled production and hatching of ephippia of Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Cladocera) for toxicity testing. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium, 372 p. [Google Scholar]
  • OECD, 1984. Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test and Reproduction Test, OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals, Guideline 202. [Google Scholar]
  • OECD, 2004. Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test, OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals, Guideline 202. [Google Scholar]
  • Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 2002. Guidance document for acute lethality testing of metal mining effluents, Report E1191 prepared by ESG International and B. Zajdlik and Associates, 60 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Parker W.R., 1983. Results of an inter-laboratory study on the toxicity of potassium dichromate to Daphnia, Laboratory Division, Air and Water Branch, Environmental Protection Service, Environment Canada, Atlantic Region, 36 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Parkhurst B.R., Warren-Hickx W. and Noel L.E., 1992. Performance characteristics of effluent toxicity tests: summarization and evaluation of data. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 11, 6, 771–791. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Persoone G., 1992. Cyst-based toxicity tests I. A promising new tool for rapid and cost-effective toxicity screening of chemicals and effluents. Z. Angew. Zool., 78, 2, 235–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoone G., 1998. Development and first validation of Toxkit microbiotests with invertebrates, in particular crustaceans. In: Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C. (eds.), Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology – Advances, Techniques and Practice, C.R.C. Publishers, Chapter 30, 437–449. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoone G., 2001. Microbiotests for rapid and cost-effective hazard assessment of industrial products, effluents, wastes, waste leachates and groundwaters. In: Clark S.A., Thompson K.C., Keevil C.W. and Smith M.S. (eds.), Rapid detection assays for food and water, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, Special Publication 272, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoone G., 2004. Variability of the ecotoxicity of industrial waste waters – Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional toxicity tests with that of Toxkit microbiotests, Report of a study commissioned by the Flemish Environmental Agency in Belgium (in Dutch), 29 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoone G. and Van de Vel A., 1987. Cost-analysis of 5 current aquatic ecotoxicological tests, Commission of the European Communities, Environment and Quality of Life, Report EUR 1134 EN, 119 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoone G. and Wadhia K., 2008. Comparison between Toxkit microbiotests and standard tests. In: Moser H. and Römbke J. (eds.), Ecotoxicological Characterization of Waste – Results and Experiences from an International Ring Test, Springer Publisher, Chapter 23, 213–221. [Google Scholar]
  • Rue W.J., Fava J.A. and Grothe D.R., 1988. A review of inter- and intra-laboratory effluent toxicity test method variability. In: Adams W.J., Chapman G.A. and Landis W.G. (eds.), Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment, 10th Vol. STP 971, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA, 190–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruymen V., Vreys C., Witters H., Vandenbroele M., Heijerick D. and Van Sprang P., 2003. Variability of the ecotoxicity of industrial wastewaters, Study commissioned by the Environmental Agency of Flanders, LISEC Report VR-2003-17907 (in Dutch), 63 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ulm L., Vrzina J., Schiesl V., Puntaric D. and Smit Z., 2000. Sensitivity comparison of the conventional acute Daphnia magna immobilization test with the Daphtoxkit FTM microbiotest for household products. In: Persoone G., Janssen C. and De Coen W. (eds.), New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2001. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, Fifth edition, EPA- 821-R-02-012, Washington DC, USA, 266 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wadhia K. and Persoone G., 2008. Toxkit microbiotests. In: Moser H. and Römbke J. (eds.), Ecotoxicological Characterization of Waste – Results and Experiences from an International Ring Test, Springer Publisher, Chapter 13, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitehouse P., Crane M., Redshaw C.J. and Turner C., 1996. Aquatic toxicity tests for the control of effluent discharges in the UK – the influence of test precision. Ecotoxicology, 5, 155–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.