First look into the evolutionary history, phylogeographic and population genetic structure of the Danube barbel in Croatia

Lucija Raguž; Ivana Buj; Zoran Marčić; Vatroslav Veble; Lucija Ivić; Davor Zanella; Sven Horvatić; Perica Mustafić; Marko Ćaleta; Marija Sabolić

doi:10.1051/kmae/2021011

All issues

No 422 (2021)

Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 422 (2021) 13

Full HTML

Topical Issue on Fish Ecology

Open Access

Table 4

Effective size estimates for river catchments.

River catchment	Population	N_e (MLE)	N_e (5–95% probability)
Bednja	Željeznica, Žarovnica	217	130–348
Lonja	Lonjica, Kašina, Burnjak	217	143–356
Sava ^*	Vidovec	61	34-^*
Krapina	Sarni, Pronjak, Rijeka	78	43–147
Glina	Brusovača, Listovački, Bublen	65	36-^*
Sunja	Sunja	234	126–478
Karašica	Velika Radetina 1&2, Šumečica	1043	478-^*
Pakra	Toplica, Strančevac, Kravajčevca, Bijela rijeka, Brusnica, Sivornica	652	430–1043
Orljava	Dubočanka, Rinovica, Londža, Kutjevačka rijeka	27	17–48
Rešetarnica	Putnjak	113	82–152

N_e (MLE − maximum likelihood estimate) and N_e (5–95% − estimates at 5th and 95th probability percentile; an asterisk represents estimation that did not converge to the 95th percentile). For the Sutla, Una and Česma River catchments. The sample size was insufficient for valid analysis.

^*The Vidovec Stream does not represent the Sava River drainage, it is just a small tributary that is not a part of larger river catchmet so it was assigned to Sava River.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.