Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 425, 2024
Anthropogenic impact on freshwater habitats, communities and ecosystem functioning
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2024006
Published online 12 April 2024
  • Amestoy F, Spinetti M, Fabiano G. 1998. Aquatic species introduced in Uruguay. SIL Proc. 1922–2010 26: 2170–2173. [Google Scholar]
  • Azpelicueta MM, Almirón A. 1999. A sturgeon (Acipenseridae) in temperate waters of the South Hemisphere. Río Plata Argent Biogeogr 75: 129–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbosa FG, Both C, Araújo MB. 2017. Invasive American bullfrogs and African clawed frogs in South America: high suitability of occurrence in biodiversity hotspots. Zool Stud 56: e28. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyd E, Folke C. 2011. Adapting institutions: governance, complexity and social-ecological resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Carnevia D. 2008. Análisis de las oportunidades de cultivo de especies acuáticas en Uruguay. DINARA-FAO, Montevideo, 40 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Carnevia D, Mazzoni R. 1990. Primer ensayo de cría de rana autóctona Leptodactylus ocellatus en Uruguay. Bol Inst Investig Pesq 23: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Carnevia D, Speranza G. 2002. Piscicultura para productores. Bol Inst Investig Pesq 23: 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Carnevia D, Perretta A, Letamendía M, Delgado E. 2010. Enfermedades diagnosticadas en organismos acuáticos de cultivo en Uruguay. Agrociencia Urug 14: 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Cassemiro FA, Bailly D, da Graça WJ, Agostinho AA. 2018. The invasive potential of tilapias (Osteichthyes, Cichlidae) in the Americas. Hydrobiologia 817: 133–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Chan FT, Beatty SJ, Gilles-Jr AS, Hill JE, Kozic SK, Luo D, Copp GH. 2019. Leaving the fish bowl: the ornamental trade as a global vector for freshwater fish invasions. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 22: 417–439. [Google Scholar]
  • Chuctaya J, Ferrer J, Ferrari A, Vianna RT, Malabarba LR. 2019. On the spread of the Russian sturgeon Acipenser gueldenstaedtii (Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae) in the Neotropics: a marine path to invade freshwater drainages in South America? J Appl Ichthyol 35: 396–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Crichigno S, Cordero P, Blasetti G, Cussac V. 2016. Dispersion of the invasive common carp Cyprinus carpio in southern South America: changes and expectations, westward and southward. J Fish Biol 89: 403–416. [Google Scholar]
  • Demonte D, Liotta J, Rueda EC, Civetti R, Rozzati JC. 2017. First record of the Russian sturgeon Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt & Ratzeburg, 1833 (Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae) from Argentina. Ichthyolog Contrib Peces Criollos 58: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Diaz-Angeriz DA, Loureiro M, Gonzalez-Bergonzoni I. 2022. Diet and trophic niche of common carp Cyprinus carpio in the Lower Santa Lucía River, Uruguay. Panamjas 17: 152–160. [Google Scholar]
  • DINARA. 2019. Boletín Estadístico Pesquero 2018, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Montevideo, 52 p. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture − Visión general del sector acuícola nacional − Uruguay. https://firms.fao.org/fi/website/FIRetrieveAction.do?dom=countrysector&xml=naso_uruguay.xml&lang=es ( accessed September 19, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • Foti R, Spinetti M. 2012. Herramientas aplicadas a la evaluación para la introducción y manejo preventivo de las especies exóticas invasoras para su uso en acuicultura. In: Aber A, Ferrari G, PorcileJF, Rodríguez E, Zerbino S, ed. Identificación de prioridades para la gestión nacional de las especies exóticas invasoras, Comité Nacional de Especies Exóticas Invasoras, Montevideo 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Galli L, Pereira A, Márquez A, Mazzoni R. 2006. Ranavirus detection by PCR in cultured tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana Shaw, 1802) from South America. Aquaculture 257: 78–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia DAZ, Orsi ML, Silva-Souza ÂT. 2019. From Africa to Brazil: detection of African Oreochromis niloticus parasites in Brazilian fish farms. Acta Limnol Bras 31: e202. [Google Scholar]
  • Gobel N, Laufer G, Cortizas S. 2019. Changes in aquatic communities recently invaded by a top predator: evidence of American bullfrogs in Aceguá. Uruguay Aquat Sci 81: 8. [Google Scholar]
  • Gobel N, Laufer G, González-Bergonzoni I, Soutullo A, Arim M. 2023. Invariant and vulnerable food web components after bullfrog invasion. Biol Invasions 25: 901–916. [Google Scholar]
  • Haubrock PJ, Oficialdegui FJ, Zeng Y, Patoka J, Yeo DC, Kouba A. 2021. The redclaw crayfish: A prominent aquaculture species with invasive potential in tropical and subtropical biodiversity hotspots. Rev Aquac 13: 1488–1530. [Google Scholar]
  • Ju RT, Li X, Jiang JJ, Wu J, Liu J, Strong DR, Li B. 2020. Emerging risks of non-native species escapes from aquaculture: call for policy improvements in China and other developing countries. J Appl Ecol 57: 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer G. 2011. Acerca del riesgo de la introducción de Xenopus laevis en ecosistemas naturales de Uruguay. Noticias de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay 12: 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer G, Gobel N. 2017. Habitat degradation and biological invasions as a cause of amphibian richness loss: a case report in Aceguá, Cerro Largo, Uruguay. Phyllomedusa 16: 289–293. [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer G, Canavero A, Núñez D, Maneyro R. 2008. Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) invasion in Uruguay. Biol Invasions 10: 1183–1189. [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer G, Gobel N, Borteiro C, Soutullo A, Martínez-Debat C, de Sá RO. 2018. Current status of American bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus, invasion in Uruguay and exploration of chytrid infection. Biol Invasions 20: 285–291. [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer G, Gobel N, Berazategui M, Zarucki M, Cortizas S, Soutullo A, Martinez Debat C, de Sá RO. 2021. American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) diet in Uruguay compared with other invasive populations in Southern South America. North-West J Zool 17: 196–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer G, González EM, Cravino A, Gobel N, Montenegro F, Nión G, Velázquez J, Valenzuela AE. 2022. A potential threat to the Pampas Biome: the introduction of American mink, Neovison vison (Schreber, 1777) in Uruguay. Neotropical Biodivers 8: 178–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Loureiro M, González-Bergonzoni I, Teixeira de Mello F. 2023. Peces de agua dulce de Uruguay (segunda edición), Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 97 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mac Donagh EJ. 1948. Sobre la cría de carpas y pejerreyes en la provincia de San Luis. Notas Mus Plata 13: 313–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Magalhães ALB, Bezerra LAV, Daga VS, Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Brito MFG. 2021. Biotic differentiation in headwater creeks after the massive introduction of non-native freshwater aquarium fish in the Paraíba do Sul River basin, Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 19: e 200147. [Google Scholar]
  • Magalhães ALB, Eskinazi-Sant’Anna EM, Orsi ML, Lima DP, Vitule JRS, Pelicice FM. 2023. From the pond to the creek many years ago: life-history dynamics of feral poeciliids in Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras 35: e30. [Google Scholar]
  • Mazzoni R. 2001. Ranicultura: manual básico para inversores, DINARA/IIP, Montevideo, 20 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mazzoni R, Cunningham AA, Daszak P, Apolo A, Perdomo E, Speranza G. 2003. Emerging Pathogen in Wild Amphibians and Frogs (Rana catesbeiana) Farmed for International Trade. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 995–998. [Google Scholar]
  • Measey GJ, Rödder D, Green SL, Kobayashi R, Lillo F, Lobos G, Rebelo R, Thirion JM. 2012. Ongoing invasions of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis: a global review. Biol Invasions 14: 2255–2270. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Brundu G, Carlton JT, Hierro JL, Kueffer C, Pandit MK, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Packer JG. 2022. Moving toward global strategies for managing invasive alien species. In Clementsv DR, Upadhyaya MK, Joshi S, Shrestha A eds. Global plant invasions. Cham: Springer International Publishing 331–360. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreira EA, Silva DDP. 2023. A dozen fish: some exotic invasive species found in Brazilian waters and their impacts. Ciênc Anim Bras 24: e-74647E. [Google Scholar]
  • Mormul RP, Vieira DS, Bailly D, Fidanza K, da Silva VFB, da Graça WJ, Pontara V, Bueno ML, Thomaz SM, Mendes RS. 2022. Invasive alien species records are exponentially rising across the Earth. Biol Invasions 24: 3249–3261. [Google Scholar]
  • MVOTMA. 2016. Estrategia nacional para la conservación y uso sostenible de la diversidad biológica del Uruguay 2016-2020, MVOTMA, Montevideo, 63 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Nunes AL, Zengeya TA, Hoffman AC, Measey GJ, Weyl OL. 2017. Distribution and establishment of the alien Australian redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus, in South Africa and Swaziland. PeerJ 5: e3135. [Google Scholar]
  • Otero E, Hozbor F, Torres S, Echenique A, Cabrera M, Saadoun A, Capra G. 2005. Estudio de la adaptación y ajuste tecnológico de la producción del visón (Mustela vison) a las condiciones climáticas y productivas en Uruguay (Proyecto FPTA 152), INIA, Canelones, 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Otero E, Hozbor FA, Torres Negreira S, Echenique A, Cabrera C, Capra G. 2006. Guía práctica para la producción del visón (Mustela vison) en Uruguay (Proyecto FPTA 152), INIA, Canelones, 40 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira-Garbero R, Barreneche JM, Laufer G, Achaval F, Arim M. 2013. Mamíferos invasores en Uruguay, historia, perspectivas y consecuencias. Rev Chil Hist Nat 86: 403–421. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dawson W, Essl F, Foxcroft LC, Genovesi P, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Liebhold AM, Mandrak NE, Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Pergl J, Roy HE, Seebens H, van Kleunen M, Vilà M, Wingfield MJ, Richardson DM. 2020. Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol Rev 95: 1511–1534. [Google Scholar]
  • Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ. 2011. Impacts of biological invasions on freshwater ecosystems. In: Richardson DM, ed. Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 211–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson PA, Mill A, Novoa A, Jeschke JM, Essl F, Gallardo B, Geist J, Jarić I, Lambin X, Musseau C. 2020. A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biol Invasions 22: 2633–2645. [Google Scholar]
  • Sena LG. 2012. Huellas y paisajes de la ganadería en el territorio uruguayo. Labor E Eng 6: 49–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Serra W, Bessonart J, Teixeira de Mello F, Duarte A,Malabarba L, Loureiro M. 2014. Peces del Río Negro MGAP-DINARA, Montevideo, 208 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Simberloff D. 2021. Maintenance management and eradication of established aquatic invaders. Hydrobiologia 848: 2399–2420. [Google Scholar]
  • Spinetti M, Foti R, Ares L, Viera M. 2010. Manual básico de piscicultura en estanques, MGAP-DINARA, Montevideo, 50 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vecchioni L, Marrone F, Chirco P, Arizza V, Tricarico E, Arculeo M. 2022. An update of the known distribution and status of Cherax spp. Italy Crustac Parastacidae BioInvasions Rec 11: 1045–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilches J. 2010. Producción de alevines de Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) en Uruguay. Agrociencia Urug 14: 230–230. [Google Scholar]
  • Valladão GMR, Gallani SU, Pilarski F. 2016. South American fish for continental aquaculture. Rev Aquac 10: 351–369. [Google Scholar]
  • Volonterio O. 2009. First report of the introduction of an Australian Temnocephalidan into the New World. J Parasitol 95: 120–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Xi’ao Zhang XS, Lü Z, Chen Y. 2014. A prediction of the global habitat of two invasive fishes (Pseudorasbora parva and Carassius auratus) from East Asia using Maxent. Biodivers Sci 22: 182–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, González-Oreja JA. 2010. Estimating costs and outcomes of invasive American mink (Neovison vison) management in continental areas: a framework for evidence based control and eradication. Biol Invasions 12: 2999–3012. [Google Scholar]
  • Zarucki M, Loureiro M, Díaz D, Serra WS, Fabiano G. 2021. Situación de las especies de peces exóticas e invasoras en Uruguay. In: Brazeiro A, Bresciano D, Brugnoli E, Iturburu M, ed. Especies exóticas invasoras de Uruguay: distribución, impactos socioambientales y estrategias de gestión. Montevideo: Ministerio de Ambiente 215–226. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.