EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 423 (2022) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 423 (2022) 15 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 423, 2022
Anthropogenic impact on freshwater habitats, communities and ecosystem functioning
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2022015
Published online 29 July 2022
  • Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 257–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Allan JD, Erickson DL, Fay J. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshw Biol 37: 149–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (APHA, AWWA, WEF). (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington, 1546 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Amuchástegui G, Di Franco L, Feijoó C. 2015. Catchment morphometric characteristics, land use and water chemistry in Pampean streams: a regional approach. Hydrobiologia 767: 65–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to software and Statistical Methods, PRIMER-E, Plymouth, 218 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Arocena R, Chalar G, Fabián D, et al. 2008. Evaluación ecológica de cursos de agua y Biomonitoreo, DINAMA–Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, 24 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Arocena R, Chalar G, Pacheco JP. 2018. Agriculture and elevation are the main factors for Pampasic stream habitat and water quality. Environ Monit Assess (4): 1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Banda Noriega R, Díaz AA. 2010. Estimación de Cargas Contaminantes del Arroyo Langueyú, Tandil, Buenos Aires. Ciencia 5: 157–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Banda Noriega R, Ruiz de Galarreta A, Barranquero RS, Díaz A, Miguel E, Rodríguez C. 2010. Análisis de fuentes y cargas contaminantes y su relación con el recurso hídrico en Tandil. Estudios Ambientales 2: 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 339 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Basílico GO, De Cabo L, Faggi A. 2015. Adaptación de índices de calidad de agua y de riberas para la evaluación ambiental en dos arroyos de la llanura pampeana. Rev Museo Argen Ciencias Natur nueva serie 17: 119–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Berón L. 1984. Evaluación de la Calidad de las Aguas de los ríos de La Plata y Matanza-Riachuelo, mediante la utilización de índices de calidad de agua, Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social, Buenos Aires, 38 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Binkley D, Ice GG, Kaye J, Williams CA. 2004. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in forest streams of the United States. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40: 1277–1291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York, Springer: 488 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Carey RO, Migliaccio KW. 2009. Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. Environ Manage 44: 205–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ceneviva‐Bastos, M., Montaña CG, Schalk CM, Camargo PB, Casatti L. 2017. Responses of aquatic food webs to the addition of structural complexity and basal resource diversity in degraded Neotropical streams. Austral Ecol 42: 908–919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2015. Getting Started with PRIMER v7. Plymouth, Plymouth Marine Laboratory: 300 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cochero J, Cortelezzi A, Tarda AS, Gómez N. 2016. An index to evaluate the fluvial habitat degradation in lowland urban streams. Ecol Indic 71: 134–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper CM. 1993. Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems—a review. J Environ Qual 22: 402–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Corenblit D, Tabacchi E, Steiger J, Gurnell AM. 2007. Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth-Sci Rev 84: 56–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cortelezzi A, Barranquero RS, Marinelli CB, San Juan MRF, Cepeda RE. 2019. Environmental diagnosis of an urban basin from a social–ecological perspective. Sci Total Environ 678: 267–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cortelezzi A, Sierra MV, Gómez N, Marinelli C, Capítulo AR. 2013. Macrophytes, epipelic biofilm, and invertebrates as biotic indicators of physical habitat degradation of lowland streams (Argentina). Environ Monit Assess 185: 5801–5815. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cude CG. 2001. Oregon water quality index a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37: 125–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cunha DGF, Finkler NR, Gómez N, et al. 2019. Agriculture influences ammonium and soluble reactive phosphorus retention in South American headwater streams. Ecohydrology 13: e2184. [Google Scholar]
  • da Cruz e Sousa R, Ríos-Touma B. 2018. Stream restoration in Andean cities: learning from contrasting restoration approaches. Urban Ecosyst 21: 281–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Debels P, Figueroa R, Urrutia R, Barra R, Niell X. 2005. Evaluation of water quality in the Chillán River (Central Chile) using physicochemical parameters and a modified water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 110: 301–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dodds WK, Oakes RM. 2008. Headwater influences on downstream water quality. Environ Manage 41: 367–377. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis JB, Hvitved-Jacobsen T. 1996. Urban drainage impacts on receiving waters. J Hydraul Res 34: 771–783. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elosegi A, Arana X, Basaguren A, Pozo J. 1995. Self-purification processes along a medium-sized stream. Environ Manage 19: 931–939. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elosegi A, Butturini A, Armengol J. 2009. El caudal circundante. In: Elosegi, A., Sabater, S., eds. Conceptos y técnicas en ecología fluvial, Fundación BVAA, Bilbao, pp. 51–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Feijoó C, Giorgi A, García ME, Momo F. 1999. Temporal and spatial variability in streams of a pampean basin. Hydrobiologia 394: 41–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fletcher DE, Wilkins SD, McArthur JV, Meffe GK. 2000. Influence of riparian alteration on canopy coverage and macrophyte abundance in Southeastern USA blackwater streams. Ecol Eng 15: S67–S78 [Google Scholar]
  • Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Seto KC, Goodness J. 2013. A Synthesis of Global Urbanization Projections. In: Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, S., Sendstad, M., Seto, K., Wilkinson, C., eds. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. Netherlands, Springer, pp. 409–435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Giorgi A, Feijoó C, Tell G. 2005. Primary producers in a Pampean stream: temporal variation and structuring role. Biodivers Conserv 14: 1699–1718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Giorgi A, Rosso JJ, Zunino E. 2014. Efectos de la exclusión de ganado sobre la calidad ambiental de un arroyo pampeano. Biol Acuática 30: 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  • Giri S, Qiu Z. 2016. Understanding the relationship of land uses and water quality in twenty first century: a review. J Environ Manage 173: 41–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, et al. 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818. [Google Scholar]
  • Granitto M, Rosso JJ, Boveri MB, Rennella AM. 2016. Impacto del uso del suelo sobre la condición de ribera en arroyos pampeanos y su relación con la estructura de la comunidad de peces. Biol Acuática 31: 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández M, Giaconi LM, Gonzalez N. 2002. Línea de base ambiental para las aguas subterráneas y superficiales en el área minera de Tandilia, Buenos Aires, Argentina. In: Bocanegra, E., Martínez, D., Massone, H., eds. Groundwater and Human Development, ALSHUD, Buenos Aires, pp. 336–343. [Google Scholar]
  • Horak CN, Assef YA, Grech MG, Miserendino ML. 2020. Agricultural practices alter function and structure of macroinvertebrate communities in Patagonian piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia 847: 3659–3676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de la República Argentina (INDEC). 2010. Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010. https://www.indec.gob.ar/indec/web/Nivel4-CensoProvincia-999-999-06-791-2010 [Google Scholar]
  • James E, Kleinman P, Veith T, Stedman R, Sharpley A. 2007. Phosphorus contributions from pastured dairy cattle to streams of the Cannonsville Watershed, New York. J Soil Water Conserv 62: 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Jewell C. 2001. A systematic methodology for the identification and remediation of illegal connections. Proc of the Water Environ Fed 2: 669–683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jing SR, Lin YF, Lee DY, Wang TW. 2001. Nutrient removal from polluted river water by using constructed wetlands. Bioresource Technol 76: 131–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson S, Covich A. 1997. Scales of observation of riparian forests and distributions of suspended detritus in a prairie river. Freshw Biol 37: 163–175. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson TE, McNair JN, Srivastava P, Hart DD. 2007. Stream ecosystem responses to spatially variable land cover: an empirically based model for developing riparian restoration strategies. Freshw Biol 52: 680–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones JI, Collins AL, Naden PS, Sear DA. 2011. The relationship between fine sediment and macrophytes in rivers. River Res Appl 28: 1006–1018. [Google Scholar]
  • Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S. 2000. Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters, Springer Science and Business Media, Vienna, 487 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kaushal SS, Belt KT. 2012. The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosyst 15: 409–435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly WR, Panno SV, Hackley KC, Hwang HH, Martinsek AT, Markus M. 2010. Using chloride and other ions to trace sewage and road salt in the Illinois Waterway. Appl Geochem 25: 661–673. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kleinheinz G, Coenan A, Zehms T, et al. 2009. Effect of aquatic macrophytes on the survival of Escherichia coli in a laboratory microcosm. Lake Reserv Manag 25: 149–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Line DE. 2003. Changes in a stream’s physical and biological conditions following livestock exclusion. Trans ASAE 46: 287–293. [Google Scholar]
  • Magilligan FJ, McDowell PF. 1997. Stream channel adjustments following elimination of cattle grazing. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33: 867–878. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marti E, Aumatell J, Godé L, Poch M, Sabater F. 2004. Nutrient retention efficiency in streams receiving inputs from wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Qual 33: 285–293. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McGrane SJ. 2016. Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: a review. Hydrol Sci J 61: 2295–2311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK. 2005. Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. J North Am Benthol Soc 24: 602–612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Molina MC, Roa-Fuentes CA, Zeni JO, Casatti L. 2017. The effects of land use at different spatial scales on instream features in agricultural streams. Limnologica 65: 14–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morrás HJM. 1999. Geochemical differentiation of Quaternary sediments from the Pampean region based on soil phosphorus contents as detected in the early 20th century. Quaternary Int 62: 57–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moscuzza C, Volpedo AV, Ojeda C, Fernández Cirelli AF. 2007. Water quality index as an tool for river assessment in agricultural areas in the pampean plains of Argentina. J Urban Environ Eng 1: 18–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moss B. 2008. Water pollution by agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363: 659–666. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mugni H, Jergentz S, Schulz R, Maine A, Bonetto C. 2005. Phosphate and nitrogen compounds in streams of Pampean Plain areas under intensive cultivation (Buenos Aires, Argentina). In: Serrano, L., Golterman, H.L., eds. Phosphates in Sediments. Leiden, Backhuys Publishers, pp. 163–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Muller I, Delisle M, Ollitrault M, Bernez I. 2015. Responses of riparian plant communities and water quality after 8 years of passive ecological restoration using a BACI design. Hydrobiologia 781: 67–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Munné A, Prat N, Solà C, Bonada N, Rieradevall M. 2003. A simple field method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian habitat in rivers and streams: QBR index. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13: 147–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naiman RJ. 2013. Socio-ecological complexity and the restoration of river ecosystems. Inland Waters 3: 391–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 28: 621–658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakamura F, Inahara S, Kaneko M. 2005. A hierarchical approach to ecosystem assessment of restoration planning at regional, catchment and local scales in Japan. Landscape Ecol Eng 1: 43–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Callaghan P, Kelly‐Quinn M, Jennings E, et al. 2018. The environmental impact of cattle access to watercourses: A review. J Environ Qual 48: 340–351. [Google Scholar]
  • Omernik J, Abernathy AR, Male LM. 1981. Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest land to streams: some relationships. J Soil Water Conserv 36: 227–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Omernik JM. 1977. Nonpoint source-stream nutrient level relationships: A nationwide study, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 151 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible (OPDS). 2009. Informe inédito dirigido al municipio de Tandil. Expediente: 2436-10771/08, OPDS, La Plata. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E. 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw Biol 55: 205–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 333–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Platts WS. 1979. Livestock grazing and riparian/stream ecosystems—an overview. In: Cope, O.B., ed. Proceedings of the forum—grazing and riparian/stream ecosystems. Denver, Trout Unlimited Inc.: pp. 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Poole GC. 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshw Biol 47: 641–660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Qi M, Yang Y, Zhang X, et al. 2020. Pollution reduction and operating cost analysis of municipal wastewater treatment in China and implication for future wastewater management. J Clean Prod 253: 120003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Queralt R. 1982. La calidad de las aguas en los ríos. Tecnología del agua 4: 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Rabeni CF, Smale MA. 1995. Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303: 211–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramião JP, Cássio F, Pascoal C. 2020. Riparian land use and stream habitat regulate water quality. Limnologica 82: 125762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ranganath SC, Hession WC, Wynn TM. 2009. Livestock exclusion influences on riparian vegetation, channel morphology, and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages. J Soil Water Conserv 64: 33–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reisinger AJ, Blair JM, Rice CW, Dodds WK. 2013. Woody vegetation removal stimulates riparian and benthic denitrification in tallgrass prairie. Ecosystems 16: 547–560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richards C, Johnson LB, Host GE. 1996. Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53: 295–311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodrigues Capítulo A, Gómez N, Giorgi A, Feijoó C. 2010. Global changes in pampean lowland streams (Argentina): implications for biodiversity and functioning. Hydrobiologia 657: 53–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez-Dominguez MA, Konnerup D, Brix H, Arias CA. 2020. Constructed wetlands in Latin America and the Caribbean: a review of experiences during the last decade. Water 12: 1744. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosso JJ, Fernández Cirelli A. 2013. Effects of land use on environmental conditions and macrophytes in prairie lotic ecosystems. Limnologica 43: 18–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz de Galarreta VA, Banda Noriega RB, Barranquero RS, Díaz AA, Rodríguez CI, Miguel RE. 2010. Análisis integral del sistema hídrico, uso y gestión. Cuenca del arroyo Langueyú, Tandil, Argentina. Bol Geol Min 121: 341–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz de Galarreta VA, Banda Noriega RB, Najle R, et al. 2013. Análisis de la calidad del agua del arroyo Langueyú, Tandil, Buenos Aires. Rev Est Amb 1: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz TT, Leininger WC. 1990. Differences in riparian vegetation structure between grazed areas and exclosures. J Range Manag 43: 295–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sekely AC, Mulla DJ, Bauer DW. 2002. Streambank slumping and its contribution to the phosphorus and suspended sediment loads of the Blue Earth River, Minnesota. J Soil Water Conserv 57: 243–250. [Google Scholar]
  • Shields Jr FD, Lizotte Jr RE, Knight SS, Cooper CM, Wilcox D. 2010. The stream channel incision syndrome and water quality. Ecol Eng 36: 78–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sirota J, Baiser B, Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM. 2013. Organic-matter loading determines regime shifts and alternative states in an aquatic ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 7742–7747. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Somoza A, Vazquez PS, Zulaica ML, Sacido MB. 2021. Cambios en los usos del suelo en el partido de Tandil en un periodo de 30 años diferenciando por sistemas ecológico paisajísticos. Revista de Geografía y Sistemas de Información Geográfica 13: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Strayer DL, Beighley RE, Thompson LC, et al. 2003. Effects of land cover on stream ecosystems: roles of empirical models and scaling issues. Ecosystems 6: 407–423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Symonds MRE, Moussalli A. 2011. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65: 13–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR. 1957. Instructions and Tables for Computing Potential Evapotranspitration and Water Balance, Laboratory of Climatology, New Jersey, 132 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 20260–20264. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights, United Nations, New York, 46 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vagnetti R, Miana P, Fabris M, Pavoni B. 2003. Self-purification ability of a resurgence stream. Chemosphere 52: 1781–1795. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vidon P, Allan C, Burns D, et al. 2010. Hot spots and hot moments in riparian zones: potential for improved water quality management 1. JAWRA 46: 278–298. [Google Scholar]
  • Vidon P, Campbell MA, Gray M. 2008. Unrestricted cattle access to streams and water quality in till landscape of the Midwest. Agric Water Manag 95: 322–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viglizzo EF, Frank FC, Carreño LV, et al. 2011. Ecological and environmental footprint of 50 years of agricultural expansion in Argentina. Glob Chang Biol 17: 959–973. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Viglizzo EF, Lértora F, Pordomingo AJ, Bernardos JN, Roberto ZE, Del Valle H. 2001. Ecological lessons and applications from one century of low external-input farming in the pampas of Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83: 65–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilches C, Giorgi A, Mastrángelo M, Ferrari L. 2011. Non-point contamination homogenizes the water quality of Pampean streams. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 87: 147–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP. 2005. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc 24: 706–723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P, Gatti R. 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22: 6–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weigelhofer G, Fuchsberger J, Teufl B, Welti N, Hein T. 2012. Effects of riparian forest buffers on in‐stream nutrient retention in agricultural catchments. J Environ Qual 41: 373–379. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu C, Maurer C, Wang Y, Xue S, Davis DL. 1999. Water pollution and human health in China. Environ Health Perspec 107: 251–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.