Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 422, 2021
Article Number 37
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 03 December 2021
  • Acreman M, Dunbar MJ. 2004. Defining environmental river flow requirements − a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8: 861–876. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anibas C, Buis K, Verhoeven R, Meire P, Batelaan O. 2011. A simple thermal mapping method for seasonal spatial patterns of groundwater-surface water interaction. J Hydrol 397: 93–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anibas C, Verbeiren B, Buis K, et al. 2012. A hierarchical approach on groundwater-surface water interaction in wetlands along the upper Biebrza River. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16: 2329–2346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Armitage PD, Petts GE. 1992. Biotic score and prediction to assess the effects of water abstractions on river macroinvertebrates fo conservation purposes. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 2: 1–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bączyk A, Wagner M, Okruszko T, Grygoruk M. 2018. Influence of technical maintenance measures on ecological status of agricultural lowland rivers − systematic review and implications for river management. Sci Total Environ 627: 189–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bis B, Mikulec A. 2013. Przewodnik do oceny stanu ekologicznego rzek na podstawie makrobezkręgowców bentosowych. Warszawa: Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradley DC, Streetly M, Farren E, Cadman D, Banham A. 2014. Establishing hydroecological relationschips to manage the impacts of groundwater abstraction. Water Environ J 28: 114–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell EY, Dunham JB, Reeves GH. 2020. Linkages between temperature, macroinvertebrates, and young-of-year Coho Salmon growth in surface-water and groundwater streams. Freshw Sci 39: 447–460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chormański J, Berezowski T, Okruszko T, Ignar S. 2011. Hydrography and hydrology of the Upper Biebrza Basin. Contemporary Problems of Management and Environmental Protection, No. 7, “Issues of Landscape Conservation and Water Management in Rural Areas”. URL: (accessed on 25.02.2021). [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18: 117–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Gorley R. 2006. PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM. 2001. Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 2nd Edition, PRIMER-E. UK: Plymouth Marine Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  • Conant Jr. B, Robinson CE, Hinton MJ, Russell HAJ. 2019. A framework for conceptualizing groundwater-surface water interactions and identifying potential impacts on water quality, water quantity, and ecosystems. J Hydrol 573: 609–627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diaz M, Sinicyn G, Grodzka-Łukaszewska M. 2020. Modelling of Groundwater-Surface Water Interaction. Water 12 (3303): 1–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fleckenstein JH, Krause S, Hannah DM, Boano F. 2010. Groundwater-surface water interactions: new methods and models to improve understanding of processes and dynamics. Adv Water Resour 33: 1291–1295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Graeber D, Pusch MT, Lorenz S, Brauns M. 2013. Cascading effects of flow reduction on the benthic invertebrate community in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 717: 147–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grodzka-Łukaszewska M, Pawlak Z, Sinicyn G. 2021. Spatial distribution of the water exchange through river cross-section − measurements and the numerical model. Arch Environ Protect 47: 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Grygoruk M, Frąk M, Chmielewski A. 2015. Agricultural rivers at risk: dredging results in a loss of macroinvertebrates. Preliminary observations from the Narew catchment, Poland. Water 7: 4511–4522. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grygoruk M, Rannow S. 2017. Mind the Gap! Lessons from science-based stakeholder dialogue in climate-adapted management of wetlands. J Environ Manag 186: 108–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk E. 2007. Strefa hyporeiczna, jej funkcjonowanie i znaczenie. Kosmos 56: 181–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M. 2006. Measuring methods for groundwater − surface water interactions: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10: 873–887. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klimaszyk P, Trawiński A. 2007. Ocena stanu rzek na podstawie makrobezkręgowców bentosowych. Indeks BMWP-PL. Poznań. URL:∼zow/pobieranie/BMWP-PL.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Kołodziejczyk A, Koperski P. 2000. Bezkręgowce słodkowodne Polski. Wyd. Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, 250 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Kubosova K, Brabec K, Jarkovsky J, Syrovatka V. 2010. Selection of indicative taxa for river habitats: a case study on benthic macroinvertebrates using indicator species analysis and the random forest methods. Hydrobiologia 651: 101–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewandowski J, Meinikmann K, Krause S. 2020. Groundwater-surface water interactions: recent advances and interdisciplinary challenges. Water 12 988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewin I, Jusik S, Szoszkiewicz K, Czerniawska-Kusza I, Ławniczak AE. 2014. Application of the new multimetric MMI_PL index for biological water quality assessment in reference and human-impacted streams (Poland, the Slovak Republic). Limnologica 49: 42–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ling Q, Song J, Gualtieri C, et al. 2020. Effect of Hyporheic Exchange on Macroinvertebrate Community in the Weihe River Basin, China. Water 12: 457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magliozzi C, Usseglio-Polatera P, Meyer A, Grabowski RC. 2019. Functional traits of hyporheic and benthic invertebrates reveal importance of wood‐driven geomorphological processes in rivers. Funct Ecol 33: 1758–1770. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marciniak M, Chudziak Ł. 2015. Nowa metoda pomiaru współczynnika filtracji osadów dennych. Przegląd Geologiczny 63: 919–925. [Google Scholar]
  • Mathers KL, Hill MJ, Wood PJ. 2016. Benthic and hyporheic macroinvertebrates distribution within the heads and tails of riffles during baseflow conditions. Hydrobiologia 794: 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Monk WA, Wood PJ, Hannah DM, Wilson DA, Extence CA, Chadd R. 2006. Flow variability and macroinvertebrate community response within riverine systems in England and Wales. River Res Appl 19: 595–615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Obolewski K, Glińska-Lewczuk K, Jarząb N, et al. 2014. Benthic invertebrates in floodplain lakes of a polish river: structure and biodiversity analyses in relation to hydrological conditions. Pol J Environ Stud 23: 1679–1689. [Google Scholar]
  • Packman AI, Bencala KE. 2003. Relative roles of stream flow and sedimentary conditions in controlling hyporheic exchange. Hydrobiologia 494: 291–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pepin DM, Hauer FR. 2002. Benthic response to groundwater-surface water exchange in 2 alluvial rivers in north-western Montana. J North Am Bentholog Soc 21: 370–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Principe RE, Márquez JA, Cibils L. 2019. Distribution and habitat preference of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera in subtropical mountain streams: implications for monitoring and conservation. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 91: e20180692. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanders LL. 1998. A Manual of Field Hydrogeology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Vimos-Lojano D, Hampel H, Vázquez RF, Martínez-Capel F. 2020. Community structure and functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates in pristine Andean streams under different vegetation cover. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 20: 357–368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wood PJ, Armitage PD. 2004. The response of the macroinvertebrate community to low-flow variability and supra-seasonal drought within a groundwater dominated stream. Arch Hydrobiol 161: 1–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Źurek S. 2005. Rzeźba i budowa geologiczna doliny Biebrzy, in Przyroda Biebrzańskiego Parku Narodowego, edited by A. Dyrcz, C. Werpachowski. Biebrzański Park Narodowy, Osowiec-Twierdza: 19–32. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.