Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 422, 2021
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021001
Published online 25 February 2021
  • Anastácio P, Marques M, Águas M, Wójcik-Fudalewska D, Normant-Saremba M. 2018. Population structure and reproductive status of the invasive Eriocheir sinensis (Decapoda, Varunidae) in the Tagus estuary (Portugal). Limnetica 37: 47–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Atlas das Aves Invernantes e Migradoras de Portugal. 2018. http://www.labor.uevora.pt/pt/ja-esta-disponivel-o-atlas-das-aves-invernantes-e-migradoras-de-portugal/ (accessed May 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Aylward B, Bandyopadhyay J, Belausteguigotia JC, Borkey P, Cassar A, Meadors L, et al. 2005. Chapter 7–Freshwater ecosystem services. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Policy Responses. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 3: 213– 256. [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F, Anastácio PM. 2015. Live bait capture and crayfish trapping as potential vectors for freshwater invasive fauna. Limnologica 51: 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F, Diniz A, Anastácio PM. 2017. The role of anglers' perceptions and habits in biological invasions: perspectives from the Iberian Peninsula. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 27: 51–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Banha F, Anastácio PM, Rachalewski M, Bacela-Spychalska K, Grabowski M. 2018. Enhanced fecundity and parasite release in the first amphipod invader on the Iberian Peninsula. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 419: 21. [Google Scholar]
  • Biorede. 2020. Corophium multisetosum. http://www.biorede.pt/index4.htm (accessed April 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Brown KE, King CK, Harrison P.L. 2015. Reproduction, growth and early life history of the Antarctic gammarid amphipod Paramoera walkeri . Polar Biol 38: 1583–1596. [Google Scholar]
  • Castiglioni DDS, Ozga AV, Rodrigues SG, Bueno AADP. 2016. Population dynamics of a freshwater amphipod from South America (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Hyalellidae). Nauplius 24 (e2016028): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Copilaş-Ciocianu D, Boroş BV. 2016. Contrasting life history strategies in a phylogenetically diverse community of freshwater amphipods (Crustacea: Malacostraca). Zoology 119: 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Crawford GI. 1937. An amphipod, Eucrangonyx gracilis S.I. Smith, new to Britain. Nature 139: 327. [Google Scholar]
  • Devin S, Piscart C, Beisel JN, Moreteau JC. 2004. Life history traits of the invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the Moselle River, France. Int Rev Hydrobiol 89: 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Dick JTA, Faloon SE, Elwood RW. 1998. Active brood care in an amphipod: influences of embryonic development, temperature and oxygen. Anim Behav 56: 663–672. [Google Scholar]
  • Dick JTA, MacNeil C, Anderson R. 1999. The Distribution of Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Bousfield, 1958) (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Northern Ireland, with Notes on Its Ecology and Behaviour. Irish Nat J 26: 236–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Dickson GW, Holsinger JR. 1981. Variation among populations of the troglobitic amphipod crustacean Crangonyx antennatus Packard (Crangonyctidae) living in different habitats, III: population dynamics and stability. Int J Speleol 11: 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Disalvo BC. 2006. Colonization and Persistence of the Freshwater Amphipod, Crangonyx pseudogracilis , in Temporary Ponds: Aspects of its Ecology, Resistance to Desiccation, and Dispersal Abilities. Thesis (Environmental Science and Ecology), The College At Brockport State University Of New York, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • DiSalvo BC, Haynes JM. 2015. Colonization and persistence of Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Bousfield 1958) in temporary pools. Freshw Sci 34: 547–554. [Google Scholar]
  • Dobson M. 2012. Identifying invasive freshwater shrimps and isopods. Ambelside: Freshwater Biological Association, pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira MT. 1994. Aquatic and marginal vegetation of the River Divor and its relation to land use. Int Ver Theo Angew Limnol Verh 25: 2309–2315. [Google Scholar]
  • Gama M, Marquéz L, Banha F, Anastácio P. 2017. Coexistence patterns between the invasive amphipod Crangonyx pseudogracilis and native Echinogammarus meridionalis: a laboratory approach. Fundam Appl Limnol 190: 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  • Gledhill T, Sutcliffe DW, Williams WD. 1993. British freshwater Crustacea Malacostraca: a key with ecological notes. Ambleside Freshw Biol Assoc Sci Publ 52: 1–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabowski M, Rachalewski M, Banha F, Anastacio P. 2012. Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield, 1958–the first alien amphipod crustacean in freshwaters of Iberian Peninsula (Portugal). Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 404: 11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guerra MT, Gaudêncio MJ. 2016. Identificação das espécies de crustáceos não indígenas da costa portuguesa. (http://biomarpt.ipma.pt/pdfs/5382CURSO12_Guia_tecnico.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Henry AL, Tarter DC. 1997. Ecological observations of Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the Green Bottom Wildlife Management Area, Cabell County, West Virginia. Proc West Virginia Acad Sci 69: 10. [Google Scholar]
  • Holland DG. 1976. Distribution of freshwater Malacostraca in area of Mersey and Weaver river authority. Freshw Biol 6: 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes JMC. 1975. Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield a freshwater amphipod new to Ireland. Irish Nat J 18: 225–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Hynes HBN. 1955. The reproductive cycle of some freshwater Gammaridae. J Anim Ecol 24: 352–387. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobucci GB, Leite FPP. 2006. Biologia populacional das espécies de Ampithoidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) associadas a Sargassum filipendula (Phaeophyta, Fucales) na Praia da Fortaleza, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 23: 1207–1216. [Google Scholar]
  • Josens G, Vaate AB de, Usseglio-Polatera P, Cammaerts R, Chérot F, Griseg F, Bossche J-PV. et al. 2005. Native and exotic Amphipoda and other Pericarida in the River Meuse: new assemblages emerge from a fast changing fauna. Hydrobiologia, 542: 203–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Jourdan J, Westerwald B, Kiechle A, Chen W, Streit B, Klaus S, Oetken M, Plath M. 2016. Pronounced species turnover, but no functional equivalence in leaf consumption of invasive amphipods in the river Rhine. Biol Invasions 18: 763–774. [Google Scholar]
  • Katsanevakis S, Gatto F, Zenetos A, Cardoso AC. 2013. How many marine aliens in Europe. Manag Biol Invasions 4: 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Kinne O. 1959. Ecological data on the amphipod Gammarus duebeni . Veroff Inst Meeresforsch Bremerh 6: 177–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Lockwood J, Hoopes M, Marcheti M. 2007. Invasion ecology. Blackwell Publishing, p. 312. [Google Scholar]
  • MacNeil C, Dick JTA. 2014. Physicochemical tolerance, habitat use and predation are drivers of patterns of coexistence and exclusion among invasive and resident amphipods. Freshw Biol 59: 1956–1969. [Google Scholar]
  • MacNeil C, Montgomery WI, Dick JTA, Elwood RW. 2001. Factors influencing the distribution of the native and introduced Gammarus species in Irish river systems. Arch Hydrobiol 151: 353–368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maitland PS, Adams CE. 2001. Enhanced biodiversity or a threat to native species? Glasg Nat 23: 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S. 1973. The Echinogammarus berilloni group a number of predominantly Iberian Amphipod species (Crustacea). Bijd Dierkunde 43: 1–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S. 1993. A revision of the genus Echinogammarus Stebbing, 1899, with some notes on related genera (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Memorie del Museo Civ. Stor. Nat. (IIa ser) 10: 1–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S, Platvoet D. 1983. Further observations on the distribution and biology of two alien amphipods, Gammarus tigrinus (Sexton, 1939), and Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bousfield, 1958, in the Netherlands (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bull Zool Mus 9: 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinkster S, Dieleman J, Platvoet D. 1980. The present position of Gammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939, in the Netherlands, with the description of a newly discovered amphipod species, Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Bousfield, 1958) (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bull Zool Mus 7: 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Piscart C, Mermillod-Blondin F, Maazouzi C, Merigoux S, Marmonier P. 2011. Potential impact of invasive amphipods on leaf litter recycling in aquatic ecosystems. Biol Invasions 13: 2861–2868. [Google Scholar]
  • Rachalewski M, Banha F, Grabowski M, Anastácio P. 2013. Ectozoochory as a possible vector enhancing the spread of an alien amphipod Crangonyx pseudogracilis . Hydrobiologia 717: 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  • Sheader M. 1983. The reproductive biology and ecology of Gammarus duebeni (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in southern England. J Mar Biol Assoc U.K. 63: 517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silfverberg H. 1999. A provisional list of Finnish Crustacea. Memoranda Soc Pro Fauna Fl Fenn 75: 15–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Slothouber Galbreath JG, Smith JE, Becnel JJ, Butlin RK, Dunn AM. 2009. Reduction in post-invasion genetic diversity in Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Amphipoda: Crustacea): a genetic bottleneck or the work of hitchhiking vertically transmitted microparasites? Biol Invasions 12: 191–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Sparre P, Ursin E, Venema SC. 1992. Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part 1- Manual. FAO Rome, Vol. 306, p. 376. [Google Scholar]
  • Sprules WG. 1967. The life cycle of Crangonyx richmondensis laurentianus Bousfield (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Zool 45: 877–884. [Google Scholar]
  • Sutcliffe DW, Carrick TR. 1981. Effect of temperature on the duration of egg development, and moulting and growth in juveniles of Crangonyx pseudogracilis (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in the laboratory. Freshw Biol 11: 511–522. [Google Scholar]
  • Tattersal WM. 1937. Occurrence of Eucrangonyx gracilis . Nature 139: 593. [Google Scholar]
  • Väinölä R, Witt JDS, Grabowski M, Bradbury JH, Jazdzewski K, Sket B. 2007. Global diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595: 241–255. [Google Scholar]
  • Watts MM, Pascoe D, Carroll K. 2002. Population responses of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus pulex (L.) to an environmental estrogen, 17α‐ethinylestradiol. Environ Toxicol Chem Int J 21: 445–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 1–663. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J, Holsinger JR. 2003. Systematics of the Freshwater Amphipod Genus Crangonyx (Crangonyctidae) in North America. Virginia Museum of Natural History 6: 1–274. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.