Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 419, 2018
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 08 January 2018
  • Barałkiewicz D, Chudzińska M, Szpakowska B, Świerk D, Gołdyn R, Dondajewska R. 2014. Storm water contamination and its effect on the quality of urban surface waters. Environ Monit Assess 186: 6789–6803. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter SR. 1980. The decline of Myriophyllum spicatum in a eutrophic Wisconsin lake. Can J Bot 58: 527–535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Celewicz-Gołdyn S. 2010. Influence of Ceratophyllum demersum L. on phytoplankton structure in a shallow eutrophic lake. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 39: 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Ciecierska H. 2006. Evaluation of the status of lakes located in the City of Olsztyn (Masurian Lake District, N-E Poland ) by the macrophytoindication method (MPhI). Hydrobiologia 570: 141–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciecierska H, Kolada A. 2014. ESMI: a macrophyte index for assessing the ecological status of lakes. Environ Monit Assess 186: 5501–5517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Directive. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJL 327: 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunalska JA, Grochowska J, Wiśniewski G Napiórkowska-Krzebietke A. 2015. Can we restore badly degraded urban lakes? Ecol Eng 82: 432–441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gołdyn R. 1975. Plant communities of Raczyńskie Lake near Zaniemyśl. Badania fizjograficzne nad Polską Zachodnią, Seria B. Botanika 28: 49–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Gołdyn R, Gołdyn H, Kaniewski W. 2005. Water plant associations in the valley of the Cybina River. Rocz. AR Pozn. 373. Botanica-Steciana 9: 69–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Gołdyn R, Podsiadłowski S, Kowalczewska-Madura K, Dondajewska R, Szeląg-Wasielewska E, Budzyńska A, Domek P, Romanowicz-Brzozowska W. 2010. Functioning of the Lake Rusałka ecosystem in Poznań (western Poland). Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 39: 65–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Gołdyn R, Messyasz B, Domek P, Windhorst W, Hugenschmidt C, Nicoara M. 2013. The response of Lake Durowskie ecosystem to restoration measures. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 8: 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Gołdyn B, Kowalczewska-Madura K, Celewicz-Gołdyn S. 2015. Drought and deluge: influence of environmental factors on water quality of kettle holes in two subsequent years with different precipitation. Limnologica 54: 14–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grochowska J, Brzozowska R, Łopata M, Dunalska J. 2015. Influence of restoration methods on the longevity of changes in the thermal and oxygen dynamics of a degraded lake. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 44: 18–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall CM, Härkönen T. 2006. Lake tourism: an introduction to lacustrine tourism systems. Aspects of Tourism 32: 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  • James WF, Best EP, Barko JW. 2004. Sediment resuspension and light attenuation in Peoria Lake: can macrophytes improve water quality in this shallow system? Hydrobiologia 515: 193–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jusik S, Macioł A. 2014. The influence of hydromorphological modifications of the littoral zone in lakes on macrophytes. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 43: 66–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klimaszyk P, Piotrowicz R, Rzymski P. 2015. Changes in physico-chemical conditions and macrophyte abundance in a shallow soft-water lake mediated by a great cormorant roosting colony. J Limnol 74: 114–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Kolada A, Ciecierska H. 2008. Methods for lake macrophyte surveying in the light of biological monitoring required by Water Framework Directive. Environ Prot Nat Res 37: 9–23 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Kolada A, Ciecierska H, Ruszczyńska J, Dynowski P. 2014. Sampling techniques and inter-surveyor variability as sources of uncertainty in Polish macrophyte metric for lake ecological status assessment. Hydrobiologia 737: 265–279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lombardo P, Mjelde M, Källqvist T. Brettum P. 2013. Seasonal and scale-dependent variability in nutrient- and allelopathy-mediated macrophyte-phytoplankton interactions. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 409: 10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matuszkiewicz W. 2002. A guide book to identification plant communities in Poland, Warszawa: PWN Sci Publ, 536 p. (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Nagengast B, Kuczyńska-Kippen N. 2015. Macrophyte biometric features as an indicator of the trophic status of small water bodies. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 44: 38–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ordinance of the Minister of Environment. 2011. Ordinance of the Minister of Environment dated 9 November 2011 on the classification of status of surface water bodies and environmental quality standards for priority substances, Dz. U. 2011, item 1545 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Ordinance of the Minister of Environment. 2016. Ordinance of the Minister of Environment dated 21 July 2016 on the classification of status of surface waterbodies and environmental quality standards for priority substances, Dz.U. 2016, item 1187 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Ozimek T, Gulati RD, van Donk E. 1990. Can macrophytes be useful in biomanipulation of lakes? The Lake Zwemlust example. Hydrobiologia 200–201: 399–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pełechaty M, Pronin E. 2015. The role of aquatic and rush vegetation in the functioning of lakes and assessment of the state of their waters. Studia Limnologica et Telmatologica 9: 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Penning WE, Mjelde M, Dudley B, Hellsten S, Hanganu J, Kolada A, van den Berg M, Poikane S, Phillips G, Willby N, Ecke F. 2008. Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes. Aquatic Ecol 42: 237–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Podbielkowski Z, Tomaszewicz H. 1996. A guide to hydrobotany, Warszawa: PWN Sci. Publ., 530 p. (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Pułyk M. 2012. Report of the state of the environment in Wielkopolska in 2011, Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Poznań (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Pułyk M, Buczyńska E. 1997. Surface water quality in the Kopla river catchment based on monitoring studies, Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Poznań (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Pułyk M, Koziarska M. 2014. Information of the state of the environment and control activities of the Wielkopolska Inspector Provincial Environmental Protection in Średzki District in 2013, WIOŚ, Poznań (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Pułyk M, Tybiszewska E. 2002. Report of the state of the environment in Wielkopolska in 2001, Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Poznań (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Rosińska J, Rybak M, Gołdyn R. 2017. Patterns of macrophyte community recovery as a result of the restoration of a shallow urban lake. Aquat Bot 138: 45–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer M, Hosper SH, Meijer M-L., Moss B, Jeppesen E. 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 275–279. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmieder K. 2004. European lake shores in danger − concepts for sustainable development. Limnologica 34: 3–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sender J. 2012. The dynamics of macrophytes in a lake in an agricultural landscape. Limnol Rev 12: 93–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E. 2007. Anthropogenic impacts on lake and stream ecosystems, and approaches to restoration. J Appl Ecol 44: 1089–1094. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Søndergaard M, Phillips G, Hellsten S, Kolada A, Ecke F, Mäemets H, Mjelde M, Azzella MM, Oggioni A. 2013. Maximum growing depth of submerged macrophytes in European lakes. Hydrobiologia 704: 165–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van de Haterd RJW, Ter Heerdt GNJ. 2007. Potential for the development of submerged macrophytes in eutrophicated shallow peaty lakes after restoration measures. Hydrobiologia 584: 277–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu ZH, Yin XA, Yang ZF. 2014. An optimisation approach for shallow lake restoration through macrophyte management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18: 2167–2176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zuccarini P, Ciurli A, Alpi A. 2011. Implications for shallow lake manipulation: results of aquaria and enclosure experiments manipulating macrophytes, zooplankton and fish. AEER 9: 123–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.