Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Article Number 35
Number of page(s) 31
Published online 19 October 2016
  • Allan J. 2004. Influence of land use and landscape setting on the ecological status of rivers. Limnetica 23: 187–198.
  • AQEM consortium. 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM method. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0, February 2002. Contract No. EVK1-C T1999-00027.
  • Bazzanti M, Mastrantuono L, Solimini AG. 2012. Selecting macroinvertebrate taxa and metrics to assess eutrophication in different depth zones of Mediterranean lakes. Fundam Appl Limnol/Arch Hydrobiol 180: 133–143. [CrossRef]
  • Berg S, Jeppesen E, Sondergaard M. 1997. Pike (Esox lucius L) stocking as a biomanipulation tool: 1. Effects on the fish population in Lake Lyng, Denmark. Hydrobiologia 342: 311–318. [CrossRef]
  • Bernes C, Carpenter SR, Gardmark A. et al. 2013. What is the influence on water quality in temperate eutrophic lakes of a reduction of planktivorous and benthivorous fish? A systematic review protocol. Environ Evid 2: 9. [CrossRef]
  • Borisko JP, Kilgour BW, Stanfield LW, Jones FC. 2007. An evaluation of rapid bioassessment protocols for stream benthic invertebrates in Southern Ontario, Canada. Water Qual Res J Can 42: 184–193.
  • Bozelli RL, Caliman A, Guariento RD, et al. 2009. Interactive effects of environmental variability and human impacts on the long-term dynamics of an Amazonian floodplain lake and a South Atlantic coastal lagoon. Limnologica 39: 306–313. [CrossRef]
  • Brodersen KP, Dall PC, Lindegaard C. 1998. The fauna in the upper stony littoral of Danish lakes: macroinvertebrates as trophic indicators. Freshw Biol 39: 577–592. [CrossRef]
  • Brönmark C, Hansson LA. 2005. The biology of lakes and ponds, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 285 p.
  • Camargo JA, Alonso A, Salamanca A. 2005. Nitrate toxicity to aquatic animals: a review with new data for freshwater invertebrates. Chemosphere 58: 1255–1267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Corine Land Cover. 2006. Eionet. European Topic Centre for Spatial information and Analysis. (accessed 25.02.13).
  • Crain CM, Kroeker K, Halpern BS. 2008. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol Lett 11: 1304–1315. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Donohue I, Irvine K. 2003. Effects of sediment particle size composition on survivorship of benthic invertebrates from Lake Tanganyika, Africa. Arch Hydrobiol 157: 131–144. [CrossRef]
  • Donohue I, Donohue LA, Ainín BN, Irvine K. 2009a. Assessment of eutrophication pressure on lakes using littoral invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 633: 105–122. [CrossRef]
  • Donohue I, Jackson AL, Pusch M, Irvine K. 2009b. Nutrient enrichment homogenizes lake benthic assemblages at local and regional scales. Ecology 90: 3470–3477. [CrossRef]
  • Dußling U, Berg R, Klinger H, Wolter C. 2004. Assessing the Ecological Status of River Systems Using Fish Assemblages. Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie 20. Erg.Lfg. 12, 84 p.
  • Eby LA, Roach WJ, Crowder LB, Stanford JA. 2006. Effects of stocking-up freshwater food webs. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 576–584. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • EPA. 2006. Estimation and Application of Macroinvertebrate Tolerance Values. Washington, DC 20460: National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • European Union. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 2000 establishing a framework for Communities in the field of water policy, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327/1, 22.12.2000.
  • Fraterrigo JM, Downing JA. 2008. The influence of land use on lake nutrients varies with watershed transport capacity. Ecosystems 11: 1021–1034. [CrossRef]
  • Friberg N. 2014. Impacts and indicators of change in lotic ecosystems. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. Doi:10.1002/wat2.1040.
  • Furse MT, Hering D, Brabec K, Buffagni A, Sandin L, Verdonschot P. 2006. The ecological status of European rivers: evaluation and intercalibration of assessment methods. Hydrobiologia 566: 1–2. [CrossRef]
  • Gabel F, Garcia XF, Schnauder I, Pusch MT. 2012. Effects of ship-induced waves on littoral benthic invertebrates. Freshw Biol 57: 2425–2435. [CrossRef]
  • Hall RI, Leavitt PR, Quinlan R, Dixit AS, Smol JP. 1999. Effects of agriculture, urbanization, and climate on water quality in the northern Great Plains. Limnol Oceanogr 44: 739–756. [CrossRef]
  • Hanson MA, Herwig BR, Zimmer KD, et al. 2012. Comparing effects of lake- and watershed-scale influences on communities of aquatic invertebrates in shallow lakes. PLoS ONE 7: 9.
  • IBM. 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics 21 Core System User's Guide. Armonk: IBM Corporation, 1989, 2012.
  • Jenkins M. 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302: 1175–1177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Johnson RK, Goedkoop W. 2002. Littoral macroinvertebrate communities: spatial scale and ecological relationships. Freshw Biol 47: 1840–1854. [CrossRef]
  • Johnson RK, Hering D, Furse MT, Clarke RT. 2006. Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty. Hydrobiologia 566: 115–137. [CrossRef]
  • Johnson RK, Hering D. 2009. Response of taxonomic groups in streams to gradients in resource and habitat characteristics. J Appl Ecol 46: 175–186. [CrossRef]
  • Jurca T, Donohue L, Laketić D, Radulović S, Irvine K. 2012. Importance of the shoreline diversity features for littoral macroinvertebrate assemblages. Fundam Appl Limnol/Arch Hydrobiol 180: 175–184. [CrossRef]
  • Jyväsjärvi J, Aroviita J, Hämäläinen H. 2011. Evaluation of approaches for measuring taxonomic completeness of lake profundal macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshw Biol 56: 1876–1892. [CrossRef]
  • Jyväsjärvi J, Aroviita J, Hämäläinen H. 2012. Performance of profundal macroinvertebrate assessment in boreal lakes depends on lake depth. Fundam Appl Limnol/Arch Hydrobiol 180: 91–100. [CrossRef]
  • Kovalenko KE, Brady VJ, Brown TN, et al. 2010. Congruence of community thresholds in response to anthropogenic stress in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Freshw Sci 33: 958–971. [CrossRef]
  • Leppä M, Hämäläinen H, Karjalainen J. 2003. The response of benthic macroinvertebrates to whole-lake biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia 498: 97–105. [CrossRef]
  • Li L, Zheng B, Liu L. 2010. Biomonitoring and bioindicators used for river ecosystems: definitions, approaches and trends. Proc Environ Sci 2: 1510–1524. [CrossRef]
  • Longing SD, Voshell JR, Dolloff CA, Roghair CN. 2010. Relationships of sedimentation and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in headwater streams using systematic longitudinal sampling at the reach scale. Environ Monit Assess 161: 517–530. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Mazzoni AC, Lanzer R, Schafer A. 2014. Tolerance of benthic macroinvertebrates to organic enrichment in highland streams of northeastern Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras 26: 119–128. [CrossRef]
  • McGoff E, Sandin L. 2012. Catchment land-use effects on littoral macroinvertebrates in response to local habitat structure and trophic state. Fundam Appl Limnol/Arch Hydrobiol 180: 111–121. [CrossRef]
  • McGoff E, Aroviita J, Pilotto F, et al. 2013. Assessing the relationship between the Lake Habitat Survey and littoral macroinvertebrate communities in European lakes. Ecol Indic 25: 205–214. [CrossRef]
  • Mehner T, Holmgren K, Lauridsen TL, Jeppesen E, Diekmann M. 2007. Lake depth and geographical position modify lake fish assemblages of the European “Central Plains” ecoregion. Freshw Biol 52: 2285–2297. [CrossRef]
  • Miler O, Porst G, Mcgoff E, et al. 2014. An index of human alteration of lake shore morphology. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 25: 353–364. [CrossRef]
  • Monroe JB, Baxter CV, Olden JD, Angermeier PL. 2009. Freshwaters in the public eye: understanding the role of images and media in aquatic conservation. Fisheries 34: 581–585. [CrossRef]
  • Nasmith LE, Tonn WM, Paszkowski CA, Scrimgeour GJ. 2010. Effects of stocked trout on native fish communities in boreal foothills lakes. Ecol Freshw Fish 19: 279–289. [CrossRef]
  • Nõges T. 2009. Relationships between morphometry, geographic location and water quality parameters of European lakes. Hydrobiologia 633: 33–43. [CrossRef]
  • O'Toole C, Donohue I, Moe SJ, Irvine K. 2008. Nutrient optima and tolerances of benthic invertebrates, the effects of taxonomic resolution and testing of selected metrics in lakes using an extensive European data base. Aquat Ecol 42: 277–291. [CrossRef]
  • OGRS. 2009. Rules on monitoring of surface water. Pravilnik o monitoringu stanja površinskih voda. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia 10: 832–839 (in Slovene) (accessed 02.02.16).
  • Pavlin M, Birk S, Hering D, Urbanič G. 2011. The role of land use, nutrients, and other stressors in shaping benthic invertebrate assemblages in Slovenian rivers. Hydrobiologia 678: 137–153. [CrossRef]
  • Petek F. 2004. Land use in Slovenia, Slovenia: a geographical overview, ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana 105–108. (accessed 02.02.16).
  • Peterlin M, Urbanič G. 2013. A Lakeshore Modification Index and its association with benthic invertebrates in alpine lakes. Ecohydrology 6: 297–311. [CrossRef]
  • Petkovska V, Urbanič G. 2015. The links between morphological parameters and benthic invertebrate assemblages, and general implications for hydromorphological river management. Ecohydrology 8: 67–82. [CrossRef]
  • Pierce CL, Hinrichs BD. 1997. Response of littoral invertebrates to reduction of fish density: simultaneous experiments in ponds with different fish assemblages. Freshw Biol 37: 397–408. [CrossRef]
  • Pilotto F, Bazzanti M, Di Vito V, et al. 2015. Relative impacts of morphological alteration to shorelines and eutrophication on littoral macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean lakes. Freshw Sci 34: 410–422. [CrossRef]
  • Poff NL. 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J North Am Benthol Soc 16: 391–409. [CrossRef]
  • Porst G, Miler O, Donohue L, et al. 2016. Efficient sampling methodologies for lake littoral invertebrates in compliance with the European Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 767: 207–220. [CrossRef]
  • R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (accessed 02.02.16).
  • Remec Rekar Š. 2009. Lake water quality monitoring in Slovenia report. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia, 35 p. (in Slovene). Available at
  • Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH. 2006. The prokaryotes: Vol. 2: Ecophysiology and Biochemistry, 3rd ed., New York: Springer, 1107 p.
  • Sandin L, Johnson RK. 2000. The statistical power of selected indicator metrics using macroinvertebrates for assessing acidification and eutrophication of running waters. Hydrobiologia 422: 233–243. [CrossRef]
  • Sandin L, Solimini AG. 2009. Freshwater ecosystem structure-function relationships: from theory to application. Freshw Biol 54: 2017–2024. [CrossRef]
  • Schinegger R, Trautwein C, Melcher A, Schmutz S. 2012. Multiple human pressures and their spatial patterns in European running waters. Water Environ J 26: 261–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sharitz R, Batzer D. 1999. An introduction to freshwater wetlands in North America and their invertebrate fauna. In: Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA, eds. Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–22.
  • Soininen J. 2007. Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms—a review. Diatom Res 22: 473–490. [CrossRef]
  • Solimini AG, Free G, Donohue I, et al. 2006. Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates to Assess Ecological Status of Lakes Current Knowledge and Way Forward to Support WFD Implementation. Environment EUR 22347, 48.
  • Stefanidis K, Papastergiadou E. 2012. Relationships between lake morphometry, water quality, and aquatic macrophytes, in Greek lakes. Fresenius Environ Bull 21: 3018–3026.
  • Stendera S, Adrian R, Bonada N, et al. 2012. Drivers and stressors of freshwater biodiversity patterns across different ecosystems and scales: a review. Hydrobiologia 696: 1–28. [CrossRef]
  • Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2012. Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide: Software for Ordination, Version 5.0. Ithaca, USA: Microcomputer Power, 496 p.
  • Tolonen KT, Hamalainen H, Holopainen IJ, Karjalainen J. 2001. Influences of habitat type and environmental variables on littoral macroinvertebrate communities in a large lake system. Arch Hydrobiol 152: 39–67. [CrossRef]
  • Urbanič G. 2014a. Hydromorphological degradation impact on benthic invertebrates in large rivers in Slovenia. Hydrobiologia 729: 191–207. [CrossRef]
  • Urbanič G. 2014b. A Littoral Fauna Index for assessing the impact of lakeshore alterations in Alpine lakes. Ecohydrology 7: 703–716. [CrossRef]
  • Urbanič G, Petkovska V, Pavlin M. 2012. The relationship between littoral benthic invertebrates and lakeshore modification pressure in two alpine lakes. Fundam Appl Limnol/Arch Hydrobiol 180: 157–173. [CrossRef]
  • Urbanič G, Mohorko T, Peterlin M, et al. 2013. Decree on surface water status: expert groundwork. Ljubljana: Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia, 63 p. (in Slovene).
  • Vadeboncoeur Y, Lodge DM, Carpenter SR. 2001. Whole-lake fertilization effects on distribution of primary production between benthic and pelagic habitats. Ecology 82: 1065–1077. [CrossRef]
  • Verdonschot PFM, Spears BM, Feld CK, et al. 2013. A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters. Hydrobiologia 704: 453–474. [CrossRef]
  • Verdonschot RCM, Verdonschot PFM. 2014. Shading effects of free-floating plants on drainage-ditch invertebrates. Limnology 15: 225–235. [CrossRef]
  • Walker I. 1998. Population dynamics of Chironomidae (Diptera) in the central Amazon blackwater river Tarumã-Mirim (Amazonas, Brazil). Oecologia Brasiliensis 5: 235–252. [CrossRef]
  • Wang L, Seelbach P, Hughes R. 2006. Introduction to landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. Landsc Influ Stream Habitat Biol Assem 48: 1–23.
  • Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems, 3rd ed., San Diego: Academic Press, 1006 p.
  • White J, Irvine K. 2003. The use of littoral mesohabitats and their macroinvertebrate assemblages in the ecological assessment of lakes. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13: 331–351. [CrossRef]
  • Williams D. 1996. Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna. J North Am Benthol Soc 15: 634–650. [CrossRef]
  • Yuan LL. 2004. Assigning macroinvertebrate tolerance classifications using generalised additive models. Freshw Biol 49: 662–677. [CrossRef]
  • Zelinka M, Marvan P. 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewässer. Arch Hydrobiol 57: 389–407.
  • Zohary T, Ostrovsky I. 2011. Ecological impacts of excessive water level fluctuations in stratified freshwater lakes. Inl Waters 1: 47–59. [CrossRef]
  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1: 3–14. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.