Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Article Number 27
Number of page(s) 22
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2016014
Published online 13 July 2016
  • Abaffy D., Liška M., Lukáč M. and Matulík J., 1979. Vodné diela na Slovensku, Príroda, Bratislava, 319 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ács É., 2007. A Velencei-tó bevonatlakó algáinak tér- és idöbeli változása, kapcsolata a tó ökológiai állapotával – Spatial and temporal change of epiphytic algae and their connection with the ecological condition of shallow lake Velencei-tó (Hungary). Acta Biologica Debrecina. Supplementum Oecologica Hungarica, 17, 9–111. [Google Scholar]
  • Ács É., Borsodi A.K., Makk J., Molnár P., Mózes A., Rusznyák A., Reskóné M.N. and Kiss K.T., 2003. Algological and bacteriological investigations on reed periphyton in Lake Velencei, Hungary. Hydrobiologia, 506-509, 549–557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ács É., Szabó K., Tóth B. and Kiss K.T., 2004. Investigation of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection with reference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Bot. Hung., 46, 255–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ács É., Reskóné N. M., Szabó K., Taba G. and Kiss K.T., 2005. Application of benthic diatoms in water quality monitoring of Lake Velence: recommendations and assignments. Acta Bot. Hung., 47, 211–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ács É., Borsodi A.K., Kiss É., Kiss K.T., Szabó K.É, Vladár P., Várbíró G. and Záray Gy., 2007. Comparative algological and bacteriological examinations on biofilms developed on different substrata in a shallow soda lake. Aquat. Ecol., 42, 521–531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Almeida S.F.P., 2001. Use of diatoms for freshwater quality evaluation in Portugal. Limnetica, 20, 205–213. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. Method 5220B.4b, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Baláži P., Hrivnák R. and Ot′ahelová H., 2014. The relationship between macrophyte assemblages and selected environmental variables in reservoirs of Slovakia examined for the purpose of ecological assessment. Pol. J. Ecol., 62, 541–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bennion H., Kelly M.G., Juggins S., Yallop M.L., Burgess A., Jamieson B.J. and Krokowski J., 2014. Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshw. Sci., 33, 639–654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs B.J.F., Stevenson R.J. and Lowe R.L., 1998. A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Arch. Hydrobiol., 143, 21–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Bigler C., Heiri O., Krskova R., Lotter A.F. and Sturm M., 2006. Distribution of diatoms, chironomids and cladocera in surface sediments of thirty mountain lakes in south-eastern Switzerland. Aquat. Sci., 68, 154–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Birk S., Strackbein J. and Hering D., 2010. WISER methods database. Version: March 2011. Available at http://www.wiser.eu/results/method-database [Google Scholar]
  • Blanco S., Ector L. and Bécares E., 2004. Epiphytic diatoms as water quality indicators in Spanish shallow lakes. Vie Milieu, 54, 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanco S., Romo S., Fernández-Aláez M. and Bécares E., 2008. Response of epiphytic algae to nutrient loading and fish density in a shallow lake: a mesocosm experiment. Hydrobiologia, 600, 65–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bolla B., Borics G., Kiss K.T., Reskóné N.M., Várbíró G. and Ács É., 2010. Recommendations for ecological status assessment of lake Balaton (largest shallow lake of Central Europe), based on benthic diatom communities. Vie Milieu, 60, 197–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Cantonati M. and Lowe R.L., 2014. Lake benthic algae: Toward an understanding of their ecology. Freshw. Sci., 33, 475–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cellamare M., Morin S., Coste M. and Haury M., 2012. Ecological assessment of French Atlantic lakes based on phytoplankton, phytobenthos and macrophytes. Environ. Monit. Assess., 184, 4685–4708. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • CEMAGREF, 1982. Étude des Méthodes Biologiques d’Appréciation Quantitative de la Qualité des Eaux. Ministère de l’Agriculture, CEMAGREF, Division Qualité des Eaux, Pêche et Pisciculture, Lyon, 218 p. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN, 1998. The European Standard. Water quality. Determination of biochemical oxygen demand after n days (BODn). Part 2: Method for undiluted samples. EN 1899-2. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (ISO 5815, 1989, modified). [Google Scholar]
  • CEN, 2003. The European Standard. Water quality. Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pre-treatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. EN 13946. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN, 2004. The European Standard. Water quality. Guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation of benthic diatom samples from running waters. EN 14407. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • CIS WG 2A Ecological Status, 2003. Guidance Document No. 13. Overall Approach to the Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). [Google Scholar]
  • CIS WG 2.2 HMWB, 2003. Guidance Document No. 4. Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol., 18, 117–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N., 2006. PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK, 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Connell J.H., 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forest. Science, 199, 1302–1310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coste M. and Ayphassorho H., 1991. Étude de la qualité des eaux du Bassin Artois-Picardie à l’aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques (Application des indices diatomiques). Rapport Cemagref Bordeaux, Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, 227 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cron N., Quick I. and Vollmer S., 2015. Quantitative Evaluation of Hydromorphological Changes in Navigable Waterways as Contribution to Sustainable Management. In: Hipel K.W., Fang L., Cullmann J. and Bristow M. (eds.), Conflict Resolution in Water Resources and Environmental Management, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 245–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Crossetti L.O., Stenger-Kovács C. and Padisák J., 2013. Coherence of phytoplankton and attached diatom-based ecological status assessment in Lake Balaton. Hydrobiologia, 716, 87–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahm V., Hering D., Nemitz D., Graf W., Schmidt Kloiber A., Leitner P., Melcher A. and Feld C.K., 2013. Effects of physico-chemistry, land use and hydromorphology on three riverine organism groups: a comparative analysis with monitoring data from Germany and Austria. Hydrobiologia, 704, 389–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Danáčová Z., Tausberik O., Kullman E., L′uptáková A., Mrafková L., Májovská A., Melová K., Gavurník J., Makovinská J., Rajczyková E., Mišíková Elexová E., Baláži P., Ščerbáková S., Plachá M., Fidlerová D., Lešt′áková M., Tlučáková A., Patschová A., Tkáčová J., Bene M., Mackových D., Mináriková M., Tkáč J., Pašerba A., Pašerbová E., Mláka M., Rozdobud′ková N., Mikula P. and Matulík D., 2014. Program monitorovania vôd na rok 2014, MŽP SR, Bratislava, 49 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dell’Uomo A., 1996. Assessment of water quality of an Apennine river as pilot study for diatom-based monitoring of Italian watercourses. In: Whitton B.A. and Rott E. (eds.), Use of Algae for monitoring rivers II, Innsbruck, Austria, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Dell’Uomo A., 2004. L’indice diatomico di eutrofizzazione/polluzione (EPI-D) nel monitoraggio delle acque correnti. Linee guida. APAT Agenzia per la protezione dell’ambiente e per I servizi tecnici, Roma, 101 p. [Google Scholar]
  • De Nicola D.M. and Kelly M., 2014. Role of periphyton in ecological assessment of lakes. Freshw. Sci., 33, 619–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Descy J. P. and Coste M., 1991. A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, 24, 2112–2116. [Google Scholar]
  • Gajdová J., Valúchová M., Makovinská J., Tóthová L., Škoda P., L′uptáková A., Kullman E., Supeková M., Mináriková M., Pediačová L., Mackových D., Chriaštel’ R. and Majerová M., 2010. Program monitorovania vôd na rok 2011, MŽP SR, Bratislava, 60 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gajdová J., Valúchová M., Makovinská J., Tóthová L., Škoda P., L′uptáková A., Kullman E., Supeková M., Mináriková M., Pediačová L., Mackových D., Chriaštel’ R. and Majerová M., 2011. Program monitorovania vôd v Slovenskej republike na rok 2012, MŽP SR, Bratislava, 47 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodall D.W., 1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust. J. Bot., 2, 304–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gottschalk S. and Kahlert M., 2012. Shifts in taxonomical and guild composition of littoral diatom assemblages along environmental gradients. Hydrobiologia, 694, 41–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Greenacre M.J., 1984. Theory and application of correspondence analysis, Academic press, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Hering D., Johnson R.K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshw. Biol., 51, 1757–1785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hill M.O. and Gauch H.G., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio, 42, 47–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hindák F. and Hindáková A., 2003. Cyanobaktérie a riasy štrkoviskových jazier Veĺký Draždiak a Malý Draždiak v Petržalke (Bratislava, západné Slovensko). Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn., Bratislava, 25, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Hindák F. and Hindáková A., 2005. Diverzita cyanobaktérií a rias štrkoviskového jazera Štrkovec v Bratislave v r. 1999 – 2004. Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn., Bratislava, 27, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Hlúbiková D., 2010. Výber vhodných hodnotiacich metrík ekologického stavu tokov Slovenska založených na bentických rozsievkach (Bacillariophyceae). Dizertačná práca. FPV UK, Bratislava, 212 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hlúbiková D., Hindáková A., Haviar M. and Miettinen J., 2007. Application of diatom water quality indices in influenced and non-influenced sites of Slovak rivers (Central Europe). In: Ács É., Kiss K.T. and Padisák J. (eds.), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers VI., Hungarian Algological Society, Göd, Hungary. Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl., 161, 443–464. [Google Scholar]
  • Hlúbiková D., Fidlerová D. and Hindáková A., 2010. Zoznam zistených taxónov na monitorovaných lokalitách vodných útvarov povrchových vôd Slovenska, čast´2 Bentické rozsievky. Acta Envir. Univ. Comenianae, Bratislava, 18/1, 5–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Hofmann G., 1994. Aufwuchs-Diatomeen in Seen und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren der Trophie, Bibliotheca Diatomologica, 30, J. Cramer, Berlin, Stuttgart, 241 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hürlimann J. and Niederhauser P., 2002. Méthode d’étude et d’appréciation de l’état de santé des cours d’eau : Diatomées, niveau R (région). OFEFP, Berne, 111 p. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO, 1984. The International Standard. Water quality. Determination of ammonium. Part 1: Manual spectrometric method. ISO 7150-1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO, 1988. The International Standard. Water quality. Determination of nitrate. Part 3: Spectrometric method using sulfosalicylic acid. ISO 7890-3. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO, 1992. The International Standard. Water quality. Measurement of biochemical parameters. Spectrometric determination of the chlorophyll-a concentration. ISO 10260. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO, 1994. The International Standard. Water quality. Determination of alkalinity. Part 1: Determination of total and composite alkalinity. ISO 9963-1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO, 1997. The International Standard. Water quality. Determination of nitrogen. Part 1: Method using oxidative digestion with peroxodisulfate. ISO 11905-1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO, 2004. The International Standard. Water quality. Determination of phosphorus. Ammonium molybdate spectrometric method. ISO 6878. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • Jenkins K.M. and Boulton A.J., 2003. Connectivity in a dryland river: short-term aquatic microinvertebrate recruitment following floodplain inundation. Ecology, 84, 2708–2723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones V.J. and Flower R.F., 1986. Spatial and temporal variability in periphytic diatom communities: Palaeoecological significance in an acidified lake. In: Smol J.P., Battarbee R.W., Davis S. and Merilainen J. (eds.), Diatoms and Lake Acidity, Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Jüttner I., Sharma S., Dahal B.M., Ormerod S.J., Chimonides P.J. and Cox E.J., 2003. Diatoms as indicators of stream quality in the Kathmandu Valley and Middle Hills of Nepal and India. Freshw. Biol., 48, 2065–2084. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jüttner I., Chimonides P.J. and Ormerod S.J., 2010. Using diatoms as quality indicators for a newly-formed urban lake and its catchment. Environ. Monit. Assess., 162, 47–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kahlert M. and Gottschalk S., 2014. Differences in benthic diatom assemblages between streams and lakes in Sweden and implications for ecological assessment. Freshw. Sci., 33, 655–669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., 2013. Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive. Eur. J. Phycol., 48, 437–450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G. and Whitton B.A., 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Cazaubon A., Coring E., Dell’Uomo A., Ector L., Goldsmith B., Guasch H., Hürlimann J., Jarlman A., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Laugaste R., Lindstrøm E.-A., Leitao M., Marvan P., Padisák J., Pipp E., Prygiel J., Rott E., Sabater S., van Dam H. and Vizinet J., 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol., 10, 215–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., King L., Jones R.I., Barker P.A. and Jamieson B.J., 2008a. Validation of diatoms as proxies for phytobenthos when assessing ecological status in lakes. Hydrobiologia, 610, 125–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Pritchard S., Jamieson J., Rippey B., Hirst H. and Yallop M., 2008b. Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshw. Biol., 53, 403–422. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Gómez-Rodríguez C., Kahlert M., Almeida S.F.P., Bennett C., Bottin M., Delmas F., Descy J.-P., Dörflinger G., Kennedy B., Marvan P., Opatřilová L., Pardo I., Pfister P., Rosebery J., Schneider S. and Vilbaste S., 2012. Establishing expectations for pan-European diatom based ecological status assessment. Ecol. Indic., 20, 177–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Urbanic G., Ács É., Bennion H., Bertrin V., Burgess A., Denys L., Gottschalk S., Kahlert M., Karjalainen S. M., Kennedy B., Kosi G., Marchetto A., Morin S., Picinska-Fałtynowicz J., Poikane S., Rosebery J., Schönfelder I., Schönfelder J. and Varbiro G., 2014a. Comparing aspirations: intercalibration of ecological status concepts across European lakes for littoral diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 734, 125–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.G., Juggins S., Bennion H., Burgess A., Yallop M., Hirst H., Jamieson J., Guthrie R. and Rippey B., 2014b. DARLEQ2: Diatom Assessment of River and Lake Ecological Quality. Version 2.0.0. Software for Freshwater Status Classification using benthic diatoms. [Google Scholar]
  • King L., Barker P. and Jones R.I., 2000. Epilithic algal communities and their relationship to environmental variables in lakes of the English Lake District. Freshw. Biol., 45, 425–442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • King L., Jones R.I. and Barker P., 2002. Seasonal variation in the epilithic algal communities from four lakes of different trophic state. Arch. Hydrobiol., 154, 177–198. [Google Scholar]
  • King L., Clarke G., Bennion H., Kelly M.G. and Yallop M., 2006. Recommendations for sampling littoral diatoms in lakes for ecological status assessments. J. Appl. Phycol., 18, 15–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kitner M. and Poulíčková A., 2003. Littoral diatoms as indicators for the eutrophication of shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia, 506–509, 519–524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kosi G., Bricelj M., Eleršek T. and Stanič K., 2007. Prilagoditev trofičnega indeksa zahtevam Vodne directive (Direktiva 2000/60/ES) za vrednotenje ekološkega stanja jezer v Sloveniji na podlagi fitobentosa. Nacionalni inštitut za biologijo, Ljubljana, 47 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K., 1997a. Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen, Eine Monographie der weltweit bekannten Taxa, Teil 1. Allgemeines und Encyonema part., Bibliotheca Diatomologica, 36, J. Cramer, Stuttgart, 382 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K., 1997b. Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen, Eine Monographie der weltweit bekannten Taxa, Teil 2. Encyonema part., Encyonopsis und Cymbellopsis, Bibliotheca Diatomologica, 37, J. Cramer, Stuttgart, 469 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K., 2002. Cymbella. In: Lange-Bertalot H. (eds.), Diatoms of Europe, 3, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell, 584 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1986. Bacillariophyceae, 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/1, 876 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991. Bacillariophyceae, 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Achnanthes s. l., Navicula s. str. und Gomphonema, Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 1-4. Ergänzter Nachdruck 2004. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/4, G. Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart, 468 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 2000. Bacillariophyceae, 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/3, G. Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart, 600 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 2007. Bacillariophyceae, 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/2, G. Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart, 612 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 2001. Navicula sensu stricto, 10 Genera Separated from Navicula sensu lato, Frustulia. In: Lange-Bertalot H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe, 2, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G, Ruggell, 526 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lange-Bertalot H. and Krammer K., 1989. Achnanthes, Eine Monographie der Gattung mit Definition der Gattung Cocconeis und Nachträgen zu den Naviculaceae, Bibliotheca Diatomologica, 18, J. Cramer, Stuttgart, 393 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Leclercq L. and Maquet B., 1987. Deux nouveaux indices chimique et diatomique de qualité d’eau courante. Application au Samson et à ses affluents (Bassin de la Meuse Belge). Comparaison avec d’autres indices chimiques. biocénotiques et diatomiques. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Documents de Travail, 38, 113 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecointe C., Coste M. and Prygiel J., 1993. OMNIDIA: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia, 269/270, 509–513. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecointe C., Coste M., Prygiel J. and Ector L., 1999. Le logiciel OMNIDIA version 2. une puissante base de données pour les inventaires de diatomées et pour le calcul des indices diatomiques européens. Cryptog. Algol., 20, 132–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Lenoir A. and Coste M., 1996. Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board Network. In: Whitton B.A. and Rott E. (eds.), Use of Algae for monitoring rivers II, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, Austria, 29–43. [Google Scholar]
  • Levkov Z., 2009. Amphora sensu lato. In: Lange-Bertalot H. (ed.), Diatoms of Europe, 5, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, 916 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Manyolov K.M. and Stevenson R.J., 2006. Density dependent algal growth along N and P nutrient gradients in artificial streams. In: Ognjanova-Rumenova N. and Manoylov K. (eds.), Advances in phycological studies. Pensoft Publishers, Moscow, Russia, 333–352. [Google Scholar]
  • Michelutti N., Holtham A.J., Douglas M.S.V. and Smol J.P., 2003. Periphytic diatom assemblages from ultra-oligotrophic and UV transparent lakes and ponds on Victoria Island and comparisons with other diatom surveys in the Canadian Arctic. J. Phycol., 39, 465–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, 2011. Water Plan of the Slovak Republic – Abbreviated version, 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Moss B., 2008. The kingdom of the shore: achievement of good ecological potential in reservoirs. Freshw. Rev., 1, 29–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Novais M.H., Blanco S., Delgado C., Morais M., Hoffmann L. and Ector L., 2012. Ecological assessment of Portuguese reservoirs based on littoral epilithic diatoms. Hydrobiologia 695, 265–279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Novais M.H, Jüttner I., Van de Vijver B., Morais M.M., Hoffmann L. and Ector L. 2015 Morphological variability within the Achnanthidium minutissimum species complex (Bacillariophyta): comparison between the type material of Achnanthes minutissima and related taxa, and new freshwater Achnanthidium species from Portugal. Phytotaxa 224, 101–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potapova M. and Hamilton P.B., 2007. Morphological and ecological variation within the Achnanthidium minutissimum (Bacillariophyceae) species complex. J. Phycol., 43, 561–575. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poulíčková A., Kitner M., Karabinová H., Pakostová A. and Křížová B., 2003. Fishpond trophic status assessment based on nutrients and bioindication II. Littoral diatom communities. Czech Phycology, 3, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Poulíčková A., Duchoslav M. and Dokulil M., 2004. Littoral diatom assemblages as bioindicators of lake trophic status: A case study from perialpine lakes in Austria. Eur. J. Phycol., 39 143–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poulíčková A., Dvořák P., Mazalová P. and Hašler P., 2014. Epipelic microphototrophs: an overlooked assemblage in lake ecosystems. Freshw. Sci., 33, 513–523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prygiel J. and Coste M., 2000. Guide méthodologique pour la mise en oeuvre de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées. NF T 90–354. Agences de l’eau – Cemagref Bordeaux, 133 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Prygiel J., Leveque L. and Iserentant R., 1996. L’IDP: Un nouvel Indice Diatomique Pratique pour l’évaluation de la qualité des eaux en réseau de surveillance. Revue des Sciences de l’Eau, 9, 97–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F., 2012. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 683, 1–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F., Bouchez A. and Montuelle B., 2015. Benthic diatoms and phytoplankton to assess nutrients in a large lake: Complementarity of their use in Lake Geneva (France-Switzerland). Ecol. Indic., 53, 231–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rimet F., Bouchez A. and Tapolczai K., 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of littoral benthic diatoms in a large lake: monitoring implications. Hydrobiologia, DOI 10.1007/s10750-015-2629-y. [Google Scholar]
  • Rott E., Hofmann G., Pall K., Pfister P. and Pipp E., 1997. Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil 1: Saprobielle Indikation. Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Wien, 73 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rott E., Binder N., Ortler K., Pall K., Pfister P., Pipp E. and Van Dam H., 1999. Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil 2: Trophienindikation sowie geochemische Präferenz; taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen. Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Wien, 248 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Round F.E., 1990. The effect of liming on the benthic diatom population in three Upland Welsh streams. Diatom Res., 5, 129–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rumeau A. and Coste M., 1988. Initiation à la systématique des diatomées d’eau douce. B. Fr. Peche Piscic., 309, 1–69. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Schaumburg J., Schranz C., Hofmann G., Stelzer D., Schneider S. and Schmedtje U., 2004. Macrophytes and phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in German lakes – a contribution to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica, 34, 302–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schiefele S. and Kohmann F., 1993. Bioindikation der Trophie in Fliessgewässern. Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Forschungsbericht, 102 01 504. München: Bayerisches Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft, Germany, 211 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Schiefele S. and Schreiner C., 1991. Use of diatoms for monitoring nutrient enrichment, acidification and impact of salt in rivers in Germany and Austria. In: Whitton B.A., Rott E. and Friedrich G. (eds.), Use of algae for monitoring rivers, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Schönfelder I., Gelbrecht J., Schönfelder J. and Steinberg CH.E.W., 2002. Relationships between littoral diatoms and their chemical environment in Northeastern German lakes and rivers. J. Phycol., 38, 66–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sgro G.V., Reavie E.D., Kingston J.C., Kireta A.R., Ferguson M.J., Danz N.P. and Johansen J.R., 2007. A diatom quality index from a diatom-based total phosphorus inference model. Environ. Bioindic., 2, 15–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Škoda P., Kullman E., L′uptáková A., Mrafková L., Martinka M., Gavurník J., Makovinská J., Rajczyková E., Mišíková Elexová E., Baláži P., Ščerbáková S., Plachá M., Fidlerová D., Lešt′áková M., Vrana B., Ondrejková I., Patschová A., Tkáčová J., Bene M., Mackových D., Mináriková M., Tkáč J., Pašerba A., Pašerbová E., Mláka M., Rozdobud′ková N. and Mikula P., 2012. Program monitorovania vôd na rok 2013, MŽP SR, Bratislava, 42 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sládeček V., 1986. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydroch. Hydrob., 14, 555–566. [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft Inc., 2001. STATISTICA for Windows [Computer program manual]. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft Inc., 2300, Tulsa, Available at: http://www.statsoft.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Štefková E., 2006. Epilithic diatoms of mountain lakes of the Tatra Mountains (Slovakia). Biologia, 61, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinberg C. and Schiefele S., 1988. Biological indication of trophy and pollution of running waters. Zeitschrift für Wasser- und Abwasser-Forschung, 21, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  • Stenger-Kovács C., Buczkó K., Hajnal É. and Padisák J., 2007. Epiphytic, littoral diatoms as bioindicators of shallow lake trophic status: Trophic Diatom Index for Lakes (TDIL) developed in Hungary. Hydrobiologia, 589, 141–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • terBraak C.F.J., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P., 2002. Reference Manual and User’s Guide to CANOCO for Windows (version 4.5), Center for Biometry, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • terBraak C.J.F. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci., 57, 255–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • The European Parliament and European Council, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official J. L. 327, 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Dam H., Mertens A. and Sinkeldam J., 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 28, 117–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilbaste S., 2004. Application of diatom indices in the evaluation of the water quality in Estonian streams. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol., 53, 37–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe M.M., Takeuchi Y. and Takamura N., 1988. Cu tolerance of a freshwater benthic diatom, Achnanthes minutissima. In: Yasuno M. and Whitton B.A. (eds.), Biological monitoring of environmental pollution, Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 171–177. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.