EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 415 (2014) Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 415 (2014) 03 References
Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 415, 2014
Article Number 03
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2014027
Published online 15 September 2014
  • Acuña V., Giorgi A., Munõz I., Sabater F. andSabater S., 2007. Meterological and riparian influences on organic matter dynamics in a forested Mediterranean stream. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 26, 54–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baker M.E. andKing R.S., 2010. A new method for detecting and interpreting biodiversity and ecological community thresholds. Method Ecol. Evol., 1, 25–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Breiman L., 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown L.R., Cuffney T.F., Coles J.F., Fitzpatrick F., McMahon G., Steuer J., Bell A.H. andMay J.T., 2009. Urban streams across the USA: lessons learned from studies in 9 metropolitan areas. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 28, 1051–1069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao Y., Hawkins C.P., Olson J. andKosterman M.A., 2007. Modelling natural environmental gradients improves the accuracy and precision of diatom-based indicators. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 26, 566–585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlisle D.M., Hawkins C.P., Meador M.R., Potapova M. andFalcone J., 2008. Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrates, and diatom assemblages. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 27, 16–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clapcott J., Young R., Goodwin E., Leathwick J. andKelly D., 2011. Relationships between multiple land-use pressures and individual and combined indicators of stream ecological integrity. DOC Res. Dev., 326, 57. [Google Scholar]
  • Clapcott J.E., Collier K.J., Death R.G., Goodwin E.O., Harding J.S., Kelly D.J., Leathwick J.R. andYoung R.G., 2012. Quantifying the relationships between land-use gradients and structural and functional indicators of stream ecological integrity. Freshwater Biol., 57, 74–902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Collier K.J., 2008. Average score per metric: an alternative metric aggregation method for assessing wadeable stream health. New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh., 42, 367–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elith J., Leathwick J.R. andHastie T., 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol., 77, 802–813. [Google Scholar]
  • European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, 73 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fore L.S., Karr J.R. andWisseman R.W., 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 15, 212–231. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill B.H., Herlihy A.T., Kaufman P.R., Stevenson R.J., McCormick F.H. andJohnson C.B., 2000. Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 50–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes R.M., Kaufmann P.R., Herlihy A.T., Kincaid T.M., Reynolds L. andLarsen D.P., 1998. A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 1618–1631. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Joy M.K. andDeath R.G., 2004. Application of the index of biotic integrity methodology to New Zealand freshwater fish communities. Environ. Manage., 34, 415–428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Karr J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leathwick J. and Julian K., 2007. Production of pressure estimates for New Zealand river catchments. NIWA client report: HAM2007-027, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, Hamilton. [Google Scholar]
  • Leathwick J.R., Snelder T., Chadderton W.L., Elith J., Julian K. andFerrier S., 2011. Use of generalised dissimilarity modelling to improve the biological discrimination of river and stream classifications. Freshwater Biol., 56, 21–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maxted J.R., Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Poretti V., Primrose N., Silvia A., Penrose D. andRenfrow R., 2000. Assessment framework for mid-Atlantic coastal plain streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 19, 128–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pont D., Hugueny B., Beier U., Goffaux D., Melcher A., Noble R., Rogers C., Roset N. andSchmutz S., 2006. Assessing river biotic condition at a continental scale: a European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Schallenberg M., Kelly D., Clapcott J., Death R., MacNeil C., Young R., Sorrell B. andScarsbrook M., 2011. Approaches to assessing ecological integrity of New Zealand freshwaters. Sci.Cons., 307, 84. [Google Scholar]
  • Stark J.D., 1985. A macroinvertebrate community index of water quality for stony streams. Water and Soil Miscellaneous Publication National Water and Soil Conservation Authority, Wellington, 53 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoddard J.L., Larsen D.P., Hawkins C.P., Johnson R.K. andNorris R.H., 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: The concept of reference condition. Ecol. Appl., 16, 1267−1276. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoddard J.L., Herlihy A.T., Peck D.V., Hughes R.M., Whittier T.R. andTarquinio E., 2008. A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 27, 878–891. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Uehlinger U., 2000. Resistance and resilience of metabolism in a flood prone river system. Freshwater Biol., 45, 319–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vlek H.E., Verdonschot P.F.M. andNijboer R.C., 2004. Towards a multimetric index for the assessment of Dutch streams using benthic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia, 516, 173–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waite I., 2014. Agricultural disturbance response models for invertebrate and algal metrics from streams at two spatial scales within the U.S. Hydrobiologia, 726, 285–303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woods R., Elliot S., Shankar U., Bidwell V., Harris S., Wheeler D., Clothier B., Green S., Hewitt A., Gibb R. and Parfitt R., 2006. The CLUES project: Predicting the effects of land-use on water quality – Stage II. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, Hamilton, 109 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.