Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 411, 2013
Article Number 09
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 30 September 2013
  • Baattrup-Pedersen A. and Riis T., 1999. Macrophyte diversity and compostion in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams. Freshwater Biol., 42, 375–385. [CrossRef]
  • Baattrup-Pedersen A., Szoszkiewicz, K., Nijboer R., O’Hare M. and Ferreira T., 2006. Macrophyte communities in unimpacted European streams: variability in assemblage patterns, abundance and diversity. Hydrobiologia, 566, 179–196. [CrossRef]
  • Bernátová D., Kliment J., Topercer J., Obuch J. and Kučera P., 2006. Aktuálne poznatky o rozšírení niektorých prírodoochranne významných taxónov cievnatých rastlín, machorastov a chár v Turčianskej kotline. Ochr. Prír., 25, 50–96.
  • Bornette G. and Puijalon S., 2011. Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquat. Sci., 73, 1–14. [CrossRef]
  • Bornette G., Amoros C. and Lamouroux N., 1998. Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: The role of the connectivity. Freshwater Biol., 39, 267–283. [CrossRef]
  • Chen P.S., Toribara T.Y. and Warner H., 1956. Microdetermination of phosphorus. Anal. Chem., 28, 1756–1758. [CrossRef]
  • del Pozo R., Fernandez-Alaez C. and Fernandez-Alaez M., 2011. The relative importance of natural and anthropogenic effects on community composition of aquatic macrophytes in Mediterranean ponds. Mar. Freshwater Res., 62, 101–109.
  • Daniel H., Bernez I. and Haury J., 2006. Relationships between macrophytic vegetation and physical features of river habitats: the need for a morphological approach. Hydrobiologia, 570, 11–17. [CrossRef]
  • Demars B.O.L. and Harper D.M., 2005. Distribution of aquatic vascular plants in lowland rivers: Separating the effects of local environmental conditions, longitudinal connectivity and river basin isolation. Freshwater Biol., 50, 418–437. [CrossRef]
  • Dorotovičová C., 2013. Man-made canals as a hotspot of aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in Slovakia. Limnologica, 43, 277–287. [CrossRef]
  • Ferreira M.T. and Moreira I.S., 1999. River plants from an Iberian basin and environmnetal factors influencing their distribution. Hydrobiologia, 415, 101–107. [CrossRef]
  • Franklin P., Dunbar M. and Whitehead P., 2008. Flow controls on lowland river macropyhtes: A review. Sci. Total Environm., 400, 369–378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Futák J., 1966. Fytogeografické členenie. In: Futák J. (ed.), Flóra Slovenska I. Vydavatel’stvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava, 533–538.
  • Gecheva G., Yurukova L. and Cheshmedjiev S., 2013. Patterns of aquatic macrophyte species composition and distribution in Bulgarian rivers. Turk. J. Bot., 37, 99–110.
  • Hrivnák R. and Kochjarová J., 2008. Rastlinné spoločenstvá vôd a močiarov Vel’kej Fatry a pril’ahlej časti Turčianskej kotliny. Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn., 30, 261–278.
  • Hrivnák R., Ot’ahel’ová H., Valachovič M., Pal’ove-Balang P. and Kubinská A., 2010. Effect of environmental variables on the aquatic macrophyte composition pattern in streams: a case study from Slovakia. Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 177, 115–124. [CrossRef]
  • Janauer G.A., 2003. Methods. In: Janauer G.A., Hale P. and Sweeting R. (eds.), Macrophyte inventory of the river Danube: A pilot study, Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 147, Large Rivers, 14, 9–16.
  • Janauer G.A. nad Dokulil M., 2006. Macrophytes and algae in running waters. In: Ziglio G., Siligardi M. and Flaim G. (eds.), Biological monitoring of rivers, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 89–109.
  • Janauer G.A., Schmidt-Mumm U., Schmidt B., 2010. Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River. Ecol. Eng., 36, 1138–1145. [CrossRef]
  • Lacoul P. and Freedman B., 2006. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Rev., 14, 89–136. [CrossRef]
  • Lepš J. and Šmilauer P., 2007. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO (third printing). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 272 p.
  • Manolaki P. and Papastergiadou E., 2013. The impact of environmental factors on the distribution pattern of aquatic macrophytes in a middle-sized Mediterranean stream. Aquat. Bot., 104, 34–46. [CrossRef]
  • Marhold K. and Hindák F., 1998. Zoznam nižších a vyšších rastlín Slovenska. Veda, Bratislava, 688 p.
  • Meyers L.S., Gamst G. and Guarino A.J., 2006. Applied multivariete research: design and interpretation. Sage Publications, London, 722 p.
  • Miklos L., 2002. Atlas krajiny Slovenskej republiky. 1. vydanie. Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky, Bratislava and Slovenská agentúra životného prostredia, Banská Bystrica, 344 p.
  • O’Hare M., Baatrup-Pedersen A., Nijboer R., Szoszkiewicz K. and Ferreira T., 2006. Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitats. Hydrobiologia, 566, 197–210. [CrossRef]
  • Onaindia M., Amezaga I., Garbisu C. and Garcia-Bikuña B., 2005. Aquatic macrophytes as biological indicators of environmental conditions of rivers in north-eastern Spain. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Limn., 41, 175–182. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., 1995a. Lemnetea de Bolós et Masclans 1955. In: Valachovič M. (ed.), Rastlinné spoločenstvá Slovenska 1. Pionierska vegetácia, Veda, Bratislava, 129–150.
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., 1995b. Potametea R. Tx. et Preising 1942. In: Valachovič M. (ed.), Rastlinné spoločlenstvá Slovenska 1. Pionierska vegetácia, Veda, Bratislava, 151–179.
  • Ot’ahel’ová H. and Ot’ahel’ J., 2006. Distribution of aquatic macrophytes in pit lakes in relation to the environment (Borská nížina lowland, Slovakia). Ekológia, 25, 398–411.
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., Janauer G.A. and Husák Š., 1994. Beitrag Zur Wasser- und Sumpfvegetation im Marchinundationsgebiet (Slowakei). Ekológia, Suppl. 1/1994, 43–54.
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., Valachovič M. and Hrivnák R., 2007. The impact of environmental factors on the distribution pattern of aquatic plants along the Danube River corridor (Slovakia). Limnologica, 37, 290–302. [CrossRef]
  • Paal J., Trei T. and Viik M., 2007. Vegetation of Estonian watercourses, III. Drainage basins of the Moonsund Sea, the Gulf of Riga and Saaremaa Island. Ann. Bot. Fennici, 44, 321–344.
  • Rahbek C., 1995. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography, 18, 200–205. [CrossRef]
  • Riis T., Sand-Jensen K. and Vestergaard O., 2000. Plant communities in lowland Danish sterams: species composition and environmental factors. Aquat. Bot., 66, 255–272. [CrossRef]
  • Rodriguez J.B., Self J.R. and Soltanpour P.N., 1994. Optimal conditions for phosphorus analysis by the ascorbic acid-molybdenum blue method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 866–870. [CrossRef]
  • Sârbu A., Janauer G.A., Schmidt-Mumm U., Filzmoser P., Smarandache D. nad Pascale G., 2011. Characterisation of the potamal Danube River and the Delta: connectivity determines indicative macropyhte assemblages. Hydrobiologia, 671, 75–93. [CrossRef]
  • StatSoft, 2001. STATISTICA. System reference. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa.
  • Svitok M., Hrivnák R., Ot’ahel’ová H., Dúbravková D., Pal’ove-Balang P. and Slobodník V., 2011. The importance of local and regional factors on the vegetation of created wetlands in Central Europe. Wetlands, 31, 663–674. [CrossRef]
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P., 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.
  • Tockner K., Schiemer F., Baumgartner C., Kum G., Weigand E., Zweimüller I. and Ward J.V. 1999. The Danube restoration project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt., 15, 245–258. [CrossRef]
  • Toivonen H. and Huttunen P., 1995. Aquatic macrophytes and ecological gradients in 57 small lakes in southern Finland. Aquat. Bot., 51, 197–221. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Ward J.V. and Tockner K. 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biol., 46, 807–819. [CrossRef]
  • Willby N.J., Abernethy V.J. and Demars B.O.L., 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwater Biol., 43, 43–74. [CrossRef]
  • Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P. and Sear D., 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv., 115, 329–341. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.