Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 411, 2013
Article Number 09
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013076
Published online 30 September 2013
  • Baattrup-Pedersen A. and Riis T., 1999. Macrophyte diversity and compostion in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams. Freshwater Biol., 42, 375–385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baattrup-Pedersen A., Szoszkiewicz, K., Nijboer R., O’Hare M. and Ferreira T., 2006. Macrophyte communities in unimpacted European streams: variability in assemblage patterns, abundance and diversity. Hydrobiologia, 566, 179–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernátová D., Kliment J., Topercer J., Obuch J. and Kučera P., 2006. Aktuálne poznatky o rozšírení niektorých prírodoochranne významných taxónov cievnatých rastlín, machorastov a chár v Turčianskej kotline. Ochr. Prír., 25, 50–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Bornette G. and Puijalon S., 2011. Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquat. Sci., 73, 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bornette G., Amoros C. and Lamouroux N., 1998. Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: The role of the connectivity. Freshwater Biol., 39, 267–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen P.S., Toribara T.Y. and Warner H., 1956. Microdetermination of phosphorus. Anal. Chem., 28, 1756–1758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • del Pozo R., Fernandez-Alaez C. and Fernandez-Alaez M., 2011. The relative importance of natural and anthropogenic effects on community composition of aquatic macrophytes in Mediterranean ponds. Mar. Freshwater Res., 62, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  • Daniel H., Bernez I. and Haury J., 2006. Relationships between macrophytic vegetation and physical features of river habitats: the need for a morphological approach. Hydrobiologia, 570, 11–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demars B.O.L. and Harper D.M., 2005. Distribution of aquatic vascular plants in lowland rivers: Separating the effects of local environmental conditions, longitudinal connectivity and river basin isolation. Freshwater Biol., 50, 418–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorotovičová C., 2013. Man-made canals as a hotspot of aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in Slovakia. Limnologica, 43, 277–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira M.T. and Moreira I.S., 1999. River plants from an Iberian basin and environmnetal factors influencing their distribution. Hydrobiologia, 415, 101–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Franklin P., Dunbar M. and Whitehead P., 2008. Flow controls on lowland river macropyhtes: A review. Sci. Total Environm., 400, 369–378. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Futák J., 1966. Fytogeografické členenie. In: Futák J. (ed.), Flóra Slovenska I. Vydavatel’stvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava, 533–538. [Google Scholar]
  • Gecheva G., Yurukova L. and Cheshmedjiev S., 2013. Patterns of aquatic macrophyte species composition and distribution in Bulgarian rivers. Turk. J. Bot., 37, 99–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Hrivnák R. and Kochjarová J., 2008. Rastlinné spoločenstvá vôd a močiarov Vel’kej Fatry a pril’ahlej časti Turčianskej kotliny. Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn., 30, 261–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Hrivnák R., Ot’ahel’ová H., Valachovič M., Pal’ove-Balang P. and Kubinská A., 2010. Effect of environmental variables on the aquatic macrophyte composition pattern in streams: a case study from Slovakia. Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 177, 115–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Janauer G.A., 2003. Methods. In: Janauer G.A., Hale P. and Sweeting R. (eds.), Macrophyte inventory of the river Danube: A pilot study, Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 147, Large Rivers, 14, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Janauer G.A. nad Dokulil M., 2006. Macrophytes and algae in running waters. In: Ziglio G., Siligardi M. and Flaim G. (eds.), Biological monitoring of rivers, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 89–109. [Google Scholar]
  • Janauer G.A., Schmidt-Mumm U., Schmidt B., 2010. Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River. Ecol. Eng., 36, 1138–1145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lacoul P. and Freedman B., 2006. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Rev., 14, 89–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lepš J. and Šmilauer P., 2007. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO (third printing). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 272 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Manolaki P. and Papastergiadou E., 2013. The impact of environmental factors on the distribution pattern of aquatic macrophytes in a middle-sized Mediterranean stream. Aquat. Bot., 104, 34–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marhold K. and Hindák F., 1998. Zoznam nižších a vyšších rastlín Slovenska. Veda, Bratislava, 688 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyers L.S., Gamst G. and Guarino A.J., 2006. Applied multivariete research: design and interpretation. Sage Publications, London, 722 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Miklos L., 2002. Atlas krajiny Slovenskej republiky. 1. vydanie. Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky, Bratislava and Slovenská agentúra životného prostredia, Banská Bystrica, 344 p. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Hare M., Baatrup-Pedersen A., Nijboer R., Szoszkiewicz K. and Ferreira T., 2006. Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitats. Hydrobiologia, 566, 197–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Onaindia M., Amezaga I., Garbisu C. and Garcia-Bikuña B., 2005. Aquatic macrophytes as biological indicators of environmental conditions of rivers in north-eastern Spain. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Limn., 41, 175–182. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., 1995a. Lemnetea de Bolós et Masclans 1955. In: Valachovič M. (ed.), Rastlinné spoločenstvá Slovenska 1. Pionierska vegetácia, Veda, Bratislava, 129–150. [Google Scholar]
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., 1995b. Potametea R. Tx. et Preising 1942. In: Valachovič M. (ed.), Rastlinné spoločlenstvá Slovenska 1. Pionierska vegetácia, Veda, Bratislava, 151–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Ot’ahel’ová H. and Ot’ahel’ J., 2006. Distribution of aquatic macrophytes in pit lakes in relation to the environment (Borská nížina lowland, Slovakia). Ekológia, 25, 398–411. [Google Scholar]
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., Janauer G.A. and Husák Š., 1994. Beitrag Zur Wasser- und Sumpfvegetation im Marchinundationsgebiet (Slowakei). Ekológia, Suppl. 1/1994, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Ot’ahel’ová H., Valachovič M. and Hrivnák R., 2007. The impact of environmental factors on the distribution pattern of aquatic plants along the Danube River corridor (Slovakia). Limnologica, 37, 290–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paal J., Trei T. and Viik M., 2007. Vegetation of Estonian watercourses, III. Drainage basins of the Moonsund Sea, the Gulf of Riga and Saaremaa Island. Ann. Bot. Fennici, 44, 321–344. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahbek C., 1995. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography, 18, 200–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riis T., Sand-Jensen K. and Vestergaard O., 2000. Plant communities in lowland Danish sterams: species composition and environmental factors. Aquat. Bot., 66, 255–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez J.B., Self J.R. and Soltanpour P.N., 1994. Optimal conditions for phosphorus analysis by the ascorbic acid-molybdenum blue method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 866–870. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sârbu A., Janauer G.A., Schmidt-Mumm U., Filzmoser P., Smarandache D. nad Pascale G., 2011. Characterisation of the potamal Danube River and the Delta: connectivity determines indicative macropyhte assemblages. Hydrobiologia, 671, 75–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft, 2001. STATISTICA. System reference. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa. [Google Scholar]
  • Svitok M., Hrivnák R., Ot’ahel’ová H., Dúbravková D., Pal’ove-Balang P. and Slobodník V., 2011. The importance of local and regional factors on the vegetation of created wetlands in Central Europe. Wetlands, 31, 663–674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P., 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca. [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner K., Schiemer F., Baumgartner C., Kum G., Weigand E., Zweimüller I. and Ward J.V. 1999. The Danube restoration project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt., 15, 245–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toivonen H. and Huttunen P., 1995. Aquatic macrophytes and ecological gradients in 57 small lakes in southern Finland. Aquat. Bot., 51, 197–221. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward J.V. and Tockner K. 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biol., 46, 807–819. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Willby N.J., Abernethy V.J. and Demars B.O.L., 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwater Biol., 43, 43–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams P., Whitfield M., Biggs J., Bray S., Fox G., Nicolet P. and Sear D., 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv., 115, 329–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.