Open Access
Issue
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 406, 2012
Article Number 07
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2012024
Published online 19 October 2012
  • Alaş A. andAk A., 2007. Investigation of some population of the tench (Tinca tinca L., 1758) inhabiting Beyşehir Lake (Konya-Turkey). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 7, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Altindag A., Ozkurt S., Yigit S. andAhiska S., 1998. The growth features of tench (Tinca tinca L., 1758) in Kesikkopru Dam Lake. Turk. J. Zool., 22, 311–318. [Google Scholar]
  • Altindag A., Shah S.L. andYigit S., 2002. The growth features of tench (Tinca tinca L., 1758) in Bayındır Dam Lake, Ankara, Turkey. Turk. J. Zool., 26, 385–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Bagenal T.B., 1978 : Fish production in fresh waters. Blackwell, London, 365 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bagenal T.B. and Tesch F.W., 1985. Age and growth. In : Bagenal T.B. (ed.), Fish production in fresh waters, Editor Blackwell, London, 101–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Baglinière J.L. and Le Louarn H., 1987. Caractéristiques scalimétriques des principales espèces de poissons d’eau douce de France. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 306, 1–39. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Balık I., Çubuk H., Çınar Ş. andÖzkök R., 2009. Population structure, growth, mortality and estimated stock size of the introduced tench, Tinca tinca (L.), population in Lake Beyşehir, Turkey. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 25, 206–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benzer S.S., Gül A. andYılmaz M., 2007. Breeding Properties of Tinca tinca (L., 1758) Living in Hirfanlı Dam Lake (Kırşehir, Turkey). E.U. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 24, 127–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg L.S. 1963. Freshwater Fishes of the U.S.S.R. and Adjacent Countries. Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R. (Translated from Russian, Published by The Israel Program For Scientific Translations, Jerusalem), 1, 19-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Cucchia L., 2004. Gli ambienti del Trasimeno - Guida naturalistica delle sponde del lago. Provincia di Perugia, 51 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dekker W. and De Leeuw J.J., 2003. Bird-fisheries interactions : the complexity of managing a system of predators and preys. In : Cowx I.G. (ed.), Interactions between fish and birds : implications for management. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale dell’Umbria 121-2011 del 15 Febbraio 2011 “Disciplina dell’attività di pesca professionale e sportiva nelle acque interne”. [Google Scholar]
  • DeMaster D.P., 1978. Calculation of the average age of sexual maturity in marine mammals. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 35, 912–915. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Devries D.R. and Frie R.V. 1996. Determination of age and growth. In : Murphy B.R. and Willis D.W. (eds.), Fisheries Techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 483-512. [Google Scholar]
  • Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 of May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. [Google Scholar]
  • Erguden S.A. andGoksu M.Z. L., 2009. Length-weight relationships for 12 fish species caught in Seyhan Dam Lake in southern Anatolia, Adana, Turkey. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 25, 501–502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Erguden S.A. andGoksu M.Z.L., 2010. Age, growth and sex ratio of tench Tinca tinca (L., 1758) in Seyhan Dam Lake, Turkey. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 26, 546–549. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R. and Pauly D., 2011. FishBase, World Wide Web electronic publications, www.fishbase.org, version (04/2012). [Google Scholar]
  • Gandolfi G., Zerunian S., Torricelli P. and Marconato A., 1991. I pesci delle acque interne italiane, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Roma, 617 p. [Google Scholar]
  • González G., Mazé R.A., Domínguez J. andPena J.C., 2000. Trophic ecology of the tench, Tinca tinca in two different habitats in north-west of Spain. Cybium, 24, 123–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Gürbüz O.A., 2011. Age and reproduction features of tench (Tinca tinca (L., 1758)) from Hirfanlı Dam Lake (Kırşehir, Turkey). J. Fish. Sci., 5, 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Halačka K., Luskovà V. andLusk S., 2003. Carassius gibelio in fish communities of the Czech Republic. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 3, 133–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Innal D., 2010. Population Structures and Some Growth Properties of Three Cyprinid Species [Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758); Tinca tinca (Linnaeus, 1758) and Alburnus escherichii Steindachner, 1897] Living in Camkoru Pond (Ankara-Turkey). XIV Symposium of Fisheries, Muğla-Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  • La Porta G., Angeli V., Bicchi A., Carosi A., Pedicillo G., Viali P., Lorenzoni M., (2010). Variations in the fish community in lake Piediluco (Italy) caused by changes in the lake’s trophic status and the introduction of alien species. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 26, 53–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Cren E.D., 1951. The length relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the Perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol., 20, 210–218. [Google Scholar]
  • Lelek A., 1987. Threatened fishes of Europe. Vol. 9. In : The freshwater fishes of Europe. AULA-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden. [Google Scholar]
  • Linhart O. and Billard R., 1995. Biology of gametes and artificial reproduction in common tench, Tinca tinca (L.). A review. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 42, 37–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Giovinazzo G., Mearelli M. andNatali M., 1993. Growth and biology of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy). Pol. Archiw. Hydrobiol., 40, 313–328. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Corboli M., Dörr A.J.M., Mearelli M. andGiovinazzo G., 2002a. The growth of pike (Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758) in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy). Fish. Res., 59, 239–246. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Corboli M., Dörr A.J.M., Giovinazzo G., Selvi S., Mearelli M., 2002b. Diets of Micropterus salmoides Lac. and Esox lucius L. in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy) and their diet overlap. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 365-366, 537–547. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Corboli M., Ghetti L., Pedicillo G. and Carosi A., 2007. Growth and reproduction of the goldfish Carassius auratus : a case study from Italy. In : Gherardi F. (ed.), Biological invaders in inland waters : profiles, distribution and threats. Springer Book, Dordrecht, 259–273. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Dolciami R., Ghetti L., Pedicillo G. andCarosi A., 2010a. Fishery biology of the goldfish Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy). Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 396, 01. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M., Ghetti L., Pedicillo G. andCarosi A., 2010b. Analysis of the biological features of the goldfish Carassius auratus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy) with a view to drawing up plans for population control. Folia Zool., 59, 142–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorenzoni M. and Ghetti L., 2011. Evoluzione della fauna ittica e problematiche gestionali del lago Trasimeno. Atti Convegno ARPA UMBRIA : Conoscenze, valutazioni, proposte per il futuro del Trasimeno, Castiglione del Lago, 1-2 dicembre 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Mearelli M., Lorenzoni M. andMantilacci L., 1990. Il lago Trasimeno. Riv. Idrobiol., 29, 353–390. [Google Scholar]
  • Miranda R., Oscoz J., Leunda P.M. andEscala M.C., 2006. Weight-length relationships of cyprinid fishes of the Iberian Peninsula. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 22, 297–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Natali M., 1993. I pesci del Lago Trasimeno. Provincia di Perugia, Perugia. [Google Scholar]
  • Natali M. andGennari L., 1989. Indagine sulla popolazione di lucci (Esox lucius) del Lago Trasimeno. Riv. Idrobiol., 27, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Neophitou C., 1993. Some Biological Data on Tench (Tinca tinca (L., 1758)), in Lake Pamvolida (Greece). Acta Hydrobiol., 35, 367–379. [Google Scholar]
  • Nikolsky G.V., 1963. The Ecology of Fishes. Academic Press, London. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Maoileidigh N. and Bracken J.J., 1989. Biology of the tench, Tinca tinca (L.), in Irish lakes. Aquacult. Fish. Manage., 20, 199–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D.E., Munro J.L. 1984 : Once more on comparation of growth in fish and invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte, 1, 21–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Pompei L., Carosi A., Pedicillo G., Rocchini E. andLorenzoni M., 2011. Age and growth analysis of the chub, Squalius squalus (Bonaparte, 1837), in the Assino creek (Umbria, Italy). Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst., 400, 09. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Pompei L., Carosi A., Dolciami R., Franchi E., Ghetti L., Giannetto D., Natali M. and Lorenzoni M., 2012. Monitoring plan of catch and fishing effort in Trasimeno Lake (Umbria, Italy) : preliminary results. 6th World Fisheries Congress 7th –11th May 2012, Edinburgh, Scotland. [Google Scholar]
  • Poncin P., Melard C. and Philippart JC., 1987. Utilisation dela Temperature et de la Photoperiode Pour controler la Maturation Sexuelle en Captiviti de Poissions Cyprinides Europeens, Barbus barbus (L.), Leuciscus cephalus (L.) et Tinca tinca (L.) resultats preliminaries. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 304, 1–12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricker W.E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can., 191, 1–382. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosa H., 1958. A synopsis of the biological data on the tench, Tinca tinca (L., 1758). FAO 58 / 2 / 951, Rome, p. 26. [Google Scholar]
  • Santoul F., Hougas J.B., Green A.J. and Mastrorillo S., 2004. Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis wintering in Malause (South-West France). Arch. Hydrobiol., 160, 281–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sinis A.I., Meunier F.J. andFrancillon-Veieillot H., 1999. Comparation of scales, opercular bones and vertebrae to determine age and population structure in tench, Tinca tinca (L., 1758) (Pisces, Telostei). Isr. J. Zool., 45, 453–465. [Google Scholar]
  • Suter W., 1997. Roach rules : shoaling fish are a constant factor in the diet of Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo in Switzerland. Ardea, 85, 9–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Trippel E.A. andHarvey H.H., 1987. Reproductive responses of five white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) populations in relation to lake acidity. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 44, 1018–1023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vaughan D.S. andBurton M.L., 1994. Estimation of von Bertalanffy growth parameters in the presence of size-selective mortality : a simulated example with red grouper. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 123, 1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vetlugina T.A., 1992. The biology of tench, Tinca tinca, in the Volga Delta. J. Ichthyol., 32, 58–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Volponi S., 2005. Progetto REDCAFE : un approccio pan-europeo per la risoluzione del conflitto tra cormorani e pescatori. Atti Tavola Rotonda “Cormorani e fauna ittica : esperienze a confronto”. Provincia di Lucca. [Google Scholar]
  • Von Bertalanffy L., 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Hum. Biol., 10, 181–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang J., Min W., Guan M., Gong L., Ren J., Huang Z., Zheng H., Zhang J., Liu H. andHan Y., 2006. Tench farming in China : present status and future prospects. Aquacul. Int., 14, 205–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright R.M. and Giles N., 1991. The population biology of tench, Tinca tinca (L.), in two gravel pit lakes. J. Fish Biol. 38, 17–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • WWF Italia (AAVV), 1998. Lista rossa degli animali d’Italia. Vertebrati. [Google Scholar]
  • Yılmaz F., 2002. Reproductive Biology of the Tench Tinca tinca (L., 1758) inhabiting Porsuk Dam Lake (Kütahya,Turkey). Fish. Res., 55, 313–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zerunian S., 2004. Pesci delle acque interne d’Italia. Quaderni di Conservazione della Natura, 20. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio – Istituto Nazionale Fauna Selvatica. [Google Scholar]
  • Zerunian S., 2007. Problematiche di conservazione dei Pesci d’acqua dolce italiani. Biol. Amb., 21, 49–55. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.