Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 403, 2011
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 24 November 2011
  • Abdoli A., Pont D. and Sagnes P., 2007. Intrabasin variations in age and growth of bullhead: the effects of temperature. J. Fish Biol., 70, 1224–1238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bănărescu P., 1992. Zoogeography of fresh waters, Vol. 2, Distribution and dispersal of freshwater animals in North America and Eurasia, Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden. [Google Scholar]
  • Carter M.G., Copp G.H. and Szomlai V., 2004. Seasonal abundance and microhabitat use of bullhead Cottus gobio and accompanying fish species in the river Avon (Hampshire), and implications for conservation. Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 14, 395–412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Copp G.P., 1992. An empirical model for predicting the microhabitat of 0+ juveniles in lowland streams. Oceanologia, 91, 338–345. [Google Scholar]
  • Copp G.P., Warrington S. and de Bruine Q., 1994. Comparison of diet in stone loach Barbatula barbatula (L.) and bullhead Cottus gobio (L.) in a small stream. Folia Zoologica, 43, 171–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx I.G. and Harvey J.P., 2003. Monitoring the bullhead, Cottus gobio, Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Monitoring Series No. 4, English Nature, Peterborough. [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx I.G., Harvey J.P., Noble R.A. and Nunn A.D., 2009. Establishing survey and monitoring protocols for the assessment of conservation status of fish populations in river Special Areas of Conservation in the UK. Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 19, 96–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crisp D.T., Mann R.H.K. and McCormack J.C., 1974. The populations of fish at Cow Green, Upper Teesdale, before impoundment. J. Appl. Ecol., 11, 969–996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deufel J., Löffler H. and Wagner B., 1986. Auswirkungen der Eutrophierung and anderer anthropogener Einflüsse auf die Laichplätze einiger Bodenee-Fischarten. Österreichs Fischerei, 39, 325–336. [Google Scholar]
  • Englbrecht C., Freyhof J., Nolte A., Passmanu K., Schleiewe U. and Tautz D., 2000. Phylogeography of the bullhead Cottus gobio (Pisces: Teleostei, Cottidae) suggests a pre-Pleistocene origin of the major central European populations. Mol. Ecol., 9, 709–722. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer S. and Kummer H., 2000. Effects of residual flow and habitat fragmentation on distribution and movement of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in an alpine stream. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 305–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Freyhof J., Kottelat M. and Nolte A., 2005. Taxonomic diversity of European Cottus with description of eight new species (Teleostei: Cottidae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, 16, 107–172. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudin P. and Caillere L., 1990. Micro distribution of Cottus gobio L. and fry of Salmo trutta L. in a first order stream. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 37, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Gosselin M.P., Petts G. and Maddock I., 2010. Mesohabitat use by bullhead (Cottus gobio). Hydrobiologia, 652, 299–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hänfling B. and Brandl R., 1998. Genetic differentiation of the bullhead Cottus gobio L. across watersheds in Central Europe: evidence for two taxa. Heredity, 80, 110–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hewitt G., 1999. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 68, 87–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Holcík J., 2003. Changes in the fish fauna and fisheries in the Slovak section of the Danube river: a review. Ann. Limnol., 39, 177–195. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Jansen W., Tham J., Watzke S. and Rahmann H., 2000. Habitats and densities of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in a South German bog stream. Verh. Internat. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 27, 3021–3024. [Google Scholar]
  • Karapetkova M.S. and Dikov T.S., 1986. On the composition, distribution number and biomass of the ichthyofauna in the River Vit. Hydrobiology, 28, 3–14 (in Bulgarian, Russian and English summaries). [Google Scholar]
  • Knaepkens G., Bruyndoncx L., Bervoets L. and Eens M., 2002. The presence of artificial stones predicts the occurrence of the European bullhead (Cottus gobio) in a regulated lowland river in Flanders (Belgium). Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 11, 203–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knaepkens G., Baekelandt K. and Eens M., 2005. Assessment of the movement behaviour of the bullhead (Cottus gobio), an endangered European freshwater fish. Anim. Biol., 55, 219–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koli L., 1969. Geographical variation of Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae) in Northern Europe. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 6, 353–390. [Google Scholar]
  • Kontula T. and Väinölä R., 2001. Postglacial colonization of the Northern Europe by distinct phylogeographic lineages of the bullhead, Cottus gobio. Mol. Ecol., 10, 1983–2002. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kotusz J., Krappe M., Kusznierz J., Propiolek M., Riel P., Waterstraat A. and Witkowski A., 2004. Distribution, density and habitat of Cottus poecilopus (Heckel, 1836) in Lake Hancza (North East Poland) as compared with the situation in the Luzin lakes (North East Germany). Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ichthyologie Band, 4, 91–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M. and Freyhof J., 2007. Handbook of European fresh water fishes, Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland and Freyhof, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Legalle M., 2008. Spatial distribution patterns and causes of decline of three freshwater species with different biological traits (white-clawed crayfish, bullhead, freshwater pearl mussel): a review. Ann. Limnol. – Int. J. Lim., 44, 95–104. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Legalle M., Santoul F., Figuerola J., Mastrorillo S. and Céréghino R., 2005. Factors influencing the spatial distribution patterns of the bullhead (Cottus gobio L., Teleostei Cottidae): a multi-scale study. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1319–1334. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahon R., Balon E.K. and Noakes D.L.G., 1979. Distribution, community structure and production of fishes in the upper Speed River, Ontario: a pre impoundment study. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 4, 219–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mann R.H.K., 1971. The populations, growth and reproduction of fish in four small streams in southern England. J. Anim. Ecol., 40, 155–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Marinov B. and Dikov T.Z., 1986. Cottus gobio haemusi subsp. n. (Pisces, Cottidae) from Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg., 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Pedroli J.C., Zaugg B. and Kirchhofer A., 1991. Atlas de distribution des poissons et cyclostomes de Suisse, Centre Suisse de cartographie de la faune: Neuchatel, Suisse (Switzerland). [Google Scholar]
  • Perrow M., Punchard N. and Jowitt A., 1997. The habitat requirements of bullhead (Cottus gobio) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the headwaters of Norfolk rivers: Implications for conservation and fisheries, ECON, Ecological Consultancy & Environment Agency, Eastern Area, Peterborough, 50 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Persat H., Beaudou D. and Freyhof J., 1996. The sculpin of the Lez spring (South France), Cottus petiti (Bacescu and Bacescu-Mester, 1964), one of the most threatened fish species in Europe. In: Kirchhofer A. and Hefti D. (eds.), Conservation of endangered freshwater fish in Europe, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  • Pretty J.L., Harrison S.S.C., Shepherd D.J., Smith C., Hildrew A.G. and Hey R.D., 2003. River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of in stream structures. J. Appl. Ecol., 40, 251–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riffel M. and Schreiber A., 1995. Coarse-grained population structure in Central European sculpin (Cottus gobio L.): secondary contact or ongoing genetic drift? J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 33, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Seber G.A. and LeCren E.D., 1967. Estimating population parameters from catches large relative to the population. J. Anim. Ecol., 36, 631–643. [Google Scholar]
  • Šlechtová V., Bohlen J., Freyhof J., Persat H. and Delmastro G.B., 2004. The Alps as barrier to dispersal in cold-adapted freshwater fishes? Phylogeographic history and taxonomic status of the bullhead in the Adriatic freshwater drainage. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 33, 225–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smily W.J.P., 1957. The life history of the bullhead or millers thumb (Cottus gobio L.). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 128, 431–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stefanov T. and Trichkova T., in press. Critically endangered fish species. Bullhead Cottus gobio Linnaeus, 1758. In: Golemansky V. (ed.), Red Data Book of Bulgaria, Vol. 2, Animals (In Bulgarian and English). [Google Scholar]
  • Tomlinson M.L. and Perrow M.R., 2003. Ecology of the bullhead. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series No. 4, English Nature, Peterborough. [Google Scholar]
  • Utzinger J., Roth C. and Peter A., 1998. Effects of environmental parameters on the distribution of bullhead Cottus gobio with particular consideration of the effects of obstructions. J. Appl. Ecol., 35, 882–892. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Liefferinge C., Seeuws P., Meire P. and Verheyen R.F., 2005. Microhabitat use and preferences of the endangered Cottus gobio in the River Voer, Belgium. J. Fish Biol., 67, 897–909. [Google Scholar]
  • Volckaert F.A.M., Hänfling B., Hellemans B. and Carvalho G.R., 2002. Timing of the population dynamics of bullhead Cotttus gobio (Teleostei: Cottidae) during the Pleistocene. J. Evol. Biol., 15, 930–944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waterstraat A., 1992. Investigations on the ecology of Cottus gobio L. and other species from two lowland streams of Northern Germany. Limnologica, 22, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Welton J.S., Mills C.A. and Rendle E.L., 1983. Food and habitat partitioning in two small benthic fishes, Noemacheilus barbatulus (L.) and Cottus gobio (L.). Arch. Hydrobiol., 97, 434–454. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.