Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 398, 2010
Article Number 06
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 14 October 2010
  • Azrina M.Z., Yap C.K., Rahim Ismail A.,Ismail A. andTan S.G., 2006. Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Ecotox. Environ. Safe., 64, 337–347. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Benstead J.P., De Rham P.H.,Gattolliat J.-L.,Gibon F.-M.,Loiselle P.V.,Sartori M.,Sparks J.S. andStiassny M.L.J., 2003. Conserving Madagascar’s freshwater biodiversity. Bioscience, 53, 1101–1111. [CrossRef]
  • Brosse S. and Lek S., 2002. Relationship between environmental characteristics and the density of age-0 Eurasian Perch Perca fluviatilis in littoral zone of lake: a nonlinear approach. T. Am. Fish. Soc., 131, 1033–1043. [CrossRef]
  • Brosse S., Grossman G.D. and Lek S., 2007. Fish assemblage patterns in the littoral zone of a European reservoir. Freshwater Biol., 52, 448–458. [CrossRef]
  • Chon T.S., Park Y.S., Moon K.H., Cha E. and Pa Y., 1996. Patternizing communities by using an artificial neural network. Ecol. Model., 90, 69–78. [CrossRef]
  • Cummins K.W., 1979. The natural stream ecosystem. In: Ward J.V. and Standford J.A. (eds.), The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Plenum Press, New York, 7–24.
  • de Moor I.J., Day J.A. and de Moor F.C., 2003a. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Volume 7, Insecta I: Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera, WRC report N° TT 207/03, South Africa, 288 p.
  • de Moor I.J., Day J.A. and de Moor F.C., 2003b. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa. Volume 8, Insecta II: Hemiptera, Megaloptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera, WRC report N° TT 214/03, South Africa, 209 p.
  • de Thoisy B., Brosse S. and Dubois M., 2008. Assessment of large-vertebrate species richness and abundance in neotropical forest using line-transect censuses: what is the minimal effort required? Biodivers. Conserv., 17, 2627–2644. [CrossRef]
  • Day J.A., Harrison A.D. and de Moor I.J., 2002. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Volume 9: Diptera, WRC report N° TT 201/02, South Africa, 200 p.
  • Dejoux C., Elouard J.M., Forge P. and Maslin J.L., 1981. Catalogue Iconographique des Insectes Aquatiques de Côte d’Ivoire, Report ORSTOM, Bouaké, Ivory Coast, 172 p.
  • Diétoa Y.M., 2002. Entomofaune et stratégies alimentaires des poissons du genre Brycinus (Characidae) en milieux fluviatiles et lacustres (Bassins Bia et Agnéby ; Côte d’Ivoire). Ph.D. thesis, University of Abobo-Adjamé, Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 261 p.
  • Diomandé D., 2001. Macrofaune benthique et stratégies alimentaires de Synodontis bastiani et S. schall en milieu fluvio-lacustre (Bassins Bia et Agnébi, Côte d’Ivoire). Ph.D. thesis, University of Abobo-Adjamé, Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 260 p.
  • Edia O.E., Brosse S., Ouattara A., Gourène G., Winterton P. and Lek-Ang S., 2007. Aquatic insect assemblage patterns in four West-African coastal rivers. J. Biol. Sci., 7, 1130–1138. [CrossRef]
  • Freeman M.C.,Pringle C.M. andJackson C.R., 2007. Hydrologic connectivity and contribution of stream headwaters in ecological integrity at regional scales. J. Am. Water Resour. As., 43, 5–14. [CrossRef]
  • Galdean N. andStaicu G., 1997. The carrying capacity assessment of the lotic system Crisul Repede (Tisa Area Catchment, Romania), based on faunistical analysis. Trav. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. ‘Grigore Antipa’, 37, 237–254.
  • Gayraud S., 2001. Les sédiments du lit des cours d’eau : quantification de leur influence sur les peuplements de macroinvertébrés par une approche multi-sites. Ph.D. thesis, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, 188 p.
  • Gevrey M., Dimopoulos I., and Lek S., 2003. Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in Artificial Neural Network models. Ecol. Model., 160, 249–264. [CrossRef]
  • Gevrey M., Park Y.S., Verdonschot P.F.M. and Lek S., 2005. Predicting Dutch macroinvertebrate species richness and functional feeding groups using five modelling techniques. In: Lek S., Scardi M., Verdonschot P.F.M., Descy J.P. and Park Y.S. (eds.), Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems, Springer, Berlin, 158–166.
  • Gordon N.D., McMahon T.A. and Finlayson B.L., 1994. Stream Hydrology, an Introduction for Ecologists, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 526 p.
  • Hawkins C.P., Norris R.H., Hogue J.N. and Feminela J.W., 2000. Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity. Ecol. Appl., 10, 1456–1477. [CrossRef]
  • Hellawell J.M., 1986. Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management, Elsevier, London, 546 p.
  • Justic D.,Rabelais N.N.,Turner R.E. andDortch Q., 1995. Changes in nutrient structure of river-dominated coastal waters: stoichiometric nutrient balance and its consequences. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 40, 339–356. [CrossRef]
  • Kohavi R., 1995. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for estimation and model selection. In: 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montréal, Canada, 1137–1143.
  • Kohonen T., 1982. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern., 43, 59–69. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Kohonen T., 2001. Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edition, Springer, Berlin, 501 p.
  • Legendre P. and Legendre L., 1998. Numerical ecology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 853 p.
  • Lek S. and Guégan J.F., 1999. Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction. Ecol. Model., 120, 65–73. [CrossRef]
  • Lek S. and Guégan J.F., 2000. Artificial Neuronal Networks: Application to Ecology and Evolution, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 262 p.
  • Lek S., Delacoste M., Baran P., Dimopoulos J., Lauga J. and Aulagnier S., 1996. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecol. Model., 90, 39–52. [CrossRef]
  • Lek S., Giraudel J.L. and Guégan J.F., 2000. Neuronal networks: algorithms and architectures for ecologists and evolutionary ecologists. In: Lek S. and Guégan J.P. (eds.), Artificial Neuronal Networks: Application to Ecology and Evolution, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 3–27.
  • Lenat D.R., 1988. Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 7, 222–233. [CrossRef]
  • Leprieur F., Hickey M.A., Arbuckle C.J., Closs G.P., Brosse S. and Townsend C.R., 2006. Hydrological disturbance benefits a native fish at the expense of an exotic fish. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 930–939. [CrossRef]
  • Lowrance R., Sharpe J.K. and Sheridan J.M., 1986. Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal plain watershed. J. Soil Water Conserv., 41, 266–271.
  • Malmqvist B. andOtto C., 1987. The influence of substrate stability on the composition of stream benthos: an experimental study. Oikos, 48, 33–38. [CrossRef]
  • Matthaei C.D., Peacock K.A. and Townsend C.R., 1999. Patchy surface stone movement during disturbance in a New Zealand stream and its potential significance for fauna. Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1091–1102. [CrossRef]
  • Naiman R.J., Beechie T.J., Benda L.E., Berg D.R., Bisson P.A., MacDonald L.H., Connor M.D.O., Olson P.L. and Steel E.A., 1992. Fundamental elements of ecologically healthy watersheds in the Pacific Northwest coastal ecoregion. In: Naiman R.J. (ed.), Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change, Springer-Verlag, New York, 127–188.
  • Norris R.H., 1995. Biological monitoring: the dilemma of data analysis. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 14, 440–450. [CrossRef]
  • Resh V.H. and Jackson J.K., 1993. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H. (eds.), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrate, Chapman and Hall, London, 195–223.
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman & Hall, New York, London, 488 p.
  • Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E. and Williams R.J., 1986. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart D.E. and McCelland J.L. (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Foundations, MIT Press, Cambridge, 318–362.
  • Sankaré Y., 1991. Étude comparative de la macrofaune associée aux racines de Pistia stratiotes L. (Araceae) du lac de barrage d’Ayamé II et du fleuve Comoé (Côte d’Ivoire). J. Ivoir. Océanol. Limnol., 1, 131–138.
  • Schindler D.W., 1990. Experimental perturbations of whole lakes as tests of hypotheses concerning ecosystem structure and function. Oikos, 57, 25–41. [CrossRef]
  • Smogor R.A. and Angermeier P.L., 1999. Effects of drainage basin and anthropogenic disturbance on relations between stream size and IBI metrics in Virginia. In: Simon T.P. (ed.), Assessment Approaches for Estimating Biological Integrity Using Fish Assemblages, Lewis Press, Boca Raton, 249–272.
  • Stals R. and de Moor I.J., 2007. Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Volume 10: Coleoptera, WRC report N° TT 320/07, South Africa, 263 p.
  • Townsend C.R., 1989. The patch dynamic concept of stream community ecology. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 8, 36–50. [CrossRef]
  • Turner R.E. andRabalais N.N., 1994. Coastal eutrophication near the Mississippi River delta. Nature, 368, 619–621. [CrossRef]
  • Wiederholm T., 1984. Responses of aquatic insects to environmental pollution. In: Resh V.H. and Rosenberg D.M. (eds.), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects, Praeger Pubs., New York, 508–557.
  • Worner S.P. and Gevrey M., 2006. Modelling global insect pest species assemblages to determine risk of invasion. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 858–867. [CrossRef]
  • Wright J.F.,Furse M.T. andArmitage P.D., 1995. R1VPACS: A technique for evaluating the biological quality of rivers in the UK. Eur. Water Pollut. Contr., 3, 15–25.
  • Yaméogo L.,Resh V.H. andMolyneux D.H., 2004. Control of rivers blindness in West Africa: Case history of biodiversity in a disease control program. EcoHealth, 1, 172–183. [CrossRef]
  • Zar J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edition, NJ Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, New Jersey, 662 p.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.