Table 1
Number of experiments in which the indicated group of newts was observed to have the higher capture success, with comparisons among sexes (top panel), species (middle panel), and genera (bottom panel). The ‘small-bodied’ newt species included are Lissotriton helveticus and L. vulgaris. The data are from Arntzen and Zuiderwijk (2020).
Comparison | Taxa involved | Groups compared | Significance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Males | Females | |||
L. helveticus | 21 | 9 | * | ||
L. vulgaris | 5 | 0 | * | ||
T. cristatus | 8 | 12 | NS | ||
T. marmoratus | 10.5 | 9.5 | NS | ||
Species | A | B | |||
L. helveticus (A) | L. vulgaris (B) | 3 | 6 | NS | |
T. cristatus (A) | T. marmoratus (B) | 4 | 7 | NS | |
Genus | A | B | |||
Lissotriton (A) | Triturus (B) | 3 | 31 | *** |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.