Appendix 3

(A) Standardized coefficients of canonical discriminant functions 1–4. Numbers in bold indicate the largest absolute correlation between each food category and the discriminant functions. (B) Between-species ANOVA on Ranks (Kruskal–Wallis) for each of the four discriminant functions at 2 m depth. Equal letters indicate lack of significant differences (Dunn’s method, p < 0.05).

  Function

  1 2 3 4
(A) Food category
   Aquatic insects 0.74 −0.06 0.07 0.37
   Galaxias maculatus 0.54 0.39 0.10 0.20
   Terrestrial insects 0.44 −0.05 −0.10 −0.29
   Decapods 0.39 −0.04 0.03 0.10
   Big fish 0.07 0.66 0.07 −0.07
   Rodents 0.07 0.61 0.07 −0.08
   Pumice stones 0.01 0.44 −0.14 0.22
   Snails −0.34 0.06 0.86 0.33
   Synthetic fragments −0.31 0.03 −0.29 0.68
   Plant fragments −0.27 0.22 −0.23 0.45
   Variance (%) 59.26 19.47 14.12 6.53
   Accumulated variance (%) 59.26 78.73 92.85 99.38
   Wilk’s lambda 0.25 0.52 0.70 0.88
   Canonical correlation 0.72 0.51 0.45 0.32
(B) ANOVA on ranks
   O. hatcheri a ab a ab
   P. trucha bc c ad a
   WRT ac a cd b
   ERT a ab bc ab
   Brown trout c b abc ab

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.