Mislabelling may explain why some prohibited invasive aquatic plants are still being sold in Belgium
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 423 (2022) 8
Published online: 2022-02-18
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Genetic comparisons of the invasive pond mussel Sinanodonta woodiana from wild and pet shop populations in Germany
Alia Benedict, Ralph Kuehn, Bernhard C. Stoeckle and Juergen GeistHydrobiologia 851 (9) 2125 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05442-w
Salvinia plants in trade: what species are we actually talking about?
Johan L. C. H. van Valkenburg, Laurens F. Piet and Edu BoerEPPO Bulletin 53 (1) 108 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12909
Corrigendum to: Mislabelling may explain why some prohibited invasive aquatic plants are still being sold in Belgium
Tom Van den Neucker and Kevin ScheersKnowledge & Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (424) 10 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2023003
The large Gunnera’s (G. tinctoria and G. manicata) in Europe in relation to EU regulation 1143/2014
Johan L. C. H. van Valkenburg, Bruce A. Osborne, Marcel Westenberg and Gianniantonio DominaPLOS ONE 18 (4) e0284665 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284665