EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues No 427 (2026) Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 427 (2026) 11 References
Issue
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 427, 2026
Development of biological and environmental indicators and indices, testing and use
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2026003
Published online 17 March 2026
  • Abatzoglou JT. 2013. Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. Int J Climatol 33: 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Allan JD. 2004. Influence of land use and landscape setting on the ecological status of rivers. Limnetica 23: 187–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Amatulli G, Garcia Marquez J, Sethi T, Kiesel J, Grigoropoulou A, Üblacker MM, Shen LQ, Domisch S. 2022. Hydrography90m: a new high-resolution global hydrographic dataset. Earth Syst Sci Data 14: 4525–4550. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffagni A, Armanini DG, Erba S. 2009. Does the lentic-lotic character of rivers affect invertebrate metrics used in the assessment of ecological quality? J Limnol 68: 92–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Chase JM, Knight TM. 2006. Effects of eutrophication and snails on Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) invasion. Biol Invasions 8: 1643–1649. [Google Scholar]
  • Domisch S, Jähnig SC, Simaika JP, Kuemmerlen M, Stoll S. 2015. Application of species distribution models in stream ecosystems: the challenges of spatial and temporal scale, environmental predictors and species occurrence data. Fund Appl Limnol 186: 45–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81: 163–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Elith J, Leathwick JR. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40: 677–697. [Google Scholar]
  • Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D. 2007. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 45: RG2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Fennessy MS, Cronk JK. 1997. The effectiveness and restoration potential of riparian ecotones for the management of nonpoint source pollution, particularly nitrate. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27: 285–317. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth DK, Riseng CM, Wehrly KE, Mason LA, Gaiot J, Hollenhorst T, Johnston CM, Wyrzykowski C, Annis G, Castiglione C, Todd K, Robertson M, Infante DM, Wang L, McKenna JE, Whelan G. 2016. The great lakes hydrography dataset: consistent, binational watersheds for the Laurentian Great Lakes basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc 52: 1068–1088. [Google Scholar]
  • Guisan A, Thuiller W, Zimmermann NE. 2017. Habitat suitability and distribution models: with applications in R. C.U.P. [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson G, Williams DA, Shadwell KS, Reimer CJ, LeClare SK, Fraser LS, Engelstad PS, Jarnevich CS. 2026. Freshwater habitat environmental predictor layers for waterbodies and streams across the contiguous United States: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P14JDTTJ. [Google Scholar]
  • Hijmans RJ, Bivand R, Cordano E, Dyba K, Pebesma E, Sumner MD. 2024. terra: spatial data analysis (Version 1.7-83) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/terra/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A. 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol Model 199: 142–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Irving K, Kuemmerlen M, Kiesel J, Kakouei K, Domisch S, Jähnig SC. 2018. A high-resolution streamflow and hydrological metrics dataset for ecological modeling using a regression model. Sci Data 5: 180224. [Google Scholar]
  • Jarnevich CS, Engelstad P, Williams D, Shadwell K, Reimer C, Henderson G, Prevey JS, Pearse IS. 2024. Predicted occurrence and abundance habitat suitability of invasive plants in the contiguous United States: updates for the INHABIT web tool. NeoBiota 96: 261–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Jarnevich CS, Engelstad P, Williams DA, Shadwell KS, Reimer CJ, Henderson GC, Fraser L, LeClare S, Inman RD, Pfingsten I, Daniel W. 2026. Aqua INHABIT species potential distribution across the contiguous United States: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P13JMOQW. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones KA, Niknami LS, Buto SG, Decker D. 2022. Federal standards and procedures for the national Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) (5 ed.): USGS Techniques and Methods 11-A3, 54 p. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/ [Google Scholar]
  • Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-Auza RW, Zimmermann NE, Linder HP, Kessler M. 2021. Data from: climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Envi Dat https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.228.v2.1. [Google Scholar]
  • Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-Auza RW, Zimmermann NE, Linder HP, Kessler M. 2017. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Sci Data 4: 170122. [Google Scholar]
  • Katsiapi M, Mazaris AD, Charalampous E, Moustaka-Gouni M. 2012. Watershed land use types as drivers of freshwater phytoplankton structure. Hydrobiologia 698: 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy RE, Yang Z, Gorelick N, Braaten J, Cavalcante L, Cohen WB, Healey S. 2018. Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens 10: Article 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Maloney KO, Weller DE. 2011. Anthropogenic disturbance and streams: land use and land use change affect stream ecosystems via multiple pathways: Land use affects streams via multiple pathways. Freshw Biol 56: 611–626. [Google Scholar]
  • Martinuzzi S, Januchowski-Hartley SR, Pracheil BM, McIntyre PB, Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ, Radeloff VC. 2014. Threats and opportunities for freshwater conservation under future land use change scenarios in the United States. Glob Change Biol 20: 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  • McGarvey DJ, Menon M, Woods T, Tassone S, Reese J, Vergamini M, Kellogg E. 2018. On the use of climate covariates in aquatic species distribution models: are we at risk of throwing out the baby with the bath water? Ecography 41: 695–712. [Google Scholar]
  • Moore RB, McKay LD, Rea AH, Bondelid TR, Price CV, Dewald TG, Johnston CM. 2019. User's guide for the national hydrography dataset plus (NHDPlus) high resolution. In Open-File Report (Nos. 2019–1096). USGS. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20191096 [Google Scholar]
  • Morisette JT, Jarnevich CS, Holcombe TR, Talbert CB, Ignizio DA, Talbert M, Silva C, Koop D, Swanson A, Young NE. 2013. VisTrails SAHM: Visualization and workflow management for species habitat modeling. Ecography 36: 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Nauman TW, Kienast-Brown S, Roecker SM, Brungard C, White D, Philippe J, Thompson JA. 2024. Soil landscapes of the United States (SOLUS): developing predictive soil property maps of the conterminous United States using hybrid training sets. Soil Sci Soc Am J 88: 2046–2065. [Google Scholar]
  • Nauman T, Ramcharan A, Brungard C, Thompson J, Wills S, Waltman S, Hengl T. 2017. Soil properties and class 100m grids united states [dataset]. https://doi.org/10.18113/S1KW2H [Google Scholar]
  • Nori J, Rojas-Soto O. 2019. On the environmental background of aquatic organisms for ecological niche modeling: a call for caution. Aquat Ecol 53: 595–605. [Google Scholar]
  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 333–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl 19: 181–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2025. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • Ross MRV, Topp SN, Appling AP, Yang X, Kuhn C, Butman D, Simard M, Pavelsky TM. 2019. AquaSat: a data set to enable remote sensing of water quality for inland waters. Water Resour Res 55: 10012–10025. [Google Scholar]
  • Seaber PR, Kapinos FP, Knapp GL. 1987. Hydrologic unit maps. https://doi.org/10.3133/WSP2294 [Google Scholar]
  • Senay GB, Bohms S, Singh RK, Gowda PH, Velpuri NM, Alemu H, Verdin JP. 2013. Operational evapotranspiration mapping using remote sensing and weather datasets: a new parameterization for the SSEB approach. J Am Water Resour Assoc 49: 577–591. [Google Scholar]
  • Sofaer HR, Barsugli JJ, Jarnevich CS, Abatzoglou JT, Talbert MK, Miller BW, Morisette JT. 2017. Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers. Glob Change Biol 23: 2537–2553. [Google Scholar]
  • Sofaer HR, Jarnevich CS, Pearse IS, Smyth RL, Auer S, Cook GL, Edwards TC, Jr, Guala GF, Howard TG, Morisette JT, Hamilton H. 2019. Development and delivery of species distribution models to inform decision-making. BioScience 69: 544–557. [Google Scholar]
  • Sohl TL, Sayler KL, Bouchard MA, Reker RR, Friesz AM, Bennett SL, Sleeter BM, Sleeter RR, Wilson T, Knuppe M, Van Hofwegen T. 2018. Conterminous United States land cover projections—1992 to 2100 [Dataset]. USGS. https://doi.org/10.5066/P95AK9HP [Google Scholar]
  • Sohl TL, Sayler KL, Bouchard MA, Reker RR, Friesz AM, Bennett SL, Sleeter BM, Sleeter RR, Wilson T, Soulard C, Knuppe M, Van Hofwegen T. 2014. Spatially explicit modeling of 1992–2100 land cover and forest stand age for the conterminous United States. Ecol Appl 24: 1015–1036. [Google Scholar]
  • Thayer DD, Pfingsten IA. 2025. Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.: U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL, https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=227, Revision Date: 12/5/2024, Peer Review Date: 4/4/2016 [Google Scholar]
  • Theobald DM, Harrison-Atlas D, Monahan WB, Albano CM. 2015. Ecologically-relevant maps of landforms and physiographic diversity for climate adaptation planning. PLOS ONE 10: e0143619. [Google Scholar]
  • Theobald DM, Kennedy C, Chen B, Oakleaf J, Baruch-Mordo S, Kiesecker J. 2020. Earth transformed: detailed mapping of global human modification from 1990 to 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data 12: 1953–1972. [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. NARS Lake and Stream Predictor Dataset, V1 [Dataset]. U.S. EPA ORD. https://doi.org/10.23719/1528186 [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2019. National Hydrography Dataset (ver. USGS National Hydrography Dataset Best Resolution (NHD) for Hydrologic Unit (HU) 4 - 2001 (published 20191002)), accessed 2024 at URL https://www.usgs.gov/national-hydrography/access-national-hydrography-products [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2022. USGS National Hydrography Dataset Plus High Resolution National Release 1 FileGDB [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WFOBQI [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2024. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL. http://nas.er.usgs.gov, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • USDA Forest Service. 2022. Flow Metrics for the Contiguous United States (Absolute Change by Mid-Century) [Dataset]. Accessed 8 July 2024 from https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=hydro+flow+metric [Google Scholar]
  • Wang L, Riseng CM, Mason LA, Wehrly KE, Rutherford ES, McKenna JE, Castiglione C, Johnson LB, Infante DM, Sowa S, Robertson M, Schaeffer J, Khoury M, Gaiot J, Hollenhorst T, Brooks C, Coscarelli M. 2015. A spatial classification and database for management, research, and policy making: The Great Lakes aquatic habitat framework. J Great Lakes Res 41: 584–596. [Google Scholar]
  • Wenger SJ, Luce CH, Hamlet AF, Isaak DJ, Neville HM. 2010. Macroscale hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics. Water Resour Res 46. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiens JA. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47: 501–515. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y, Leng Z, Wu Y, Jia H, Yan C, Wang X, Ren G, Wu G, Li J. 2022. Interaction between Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Invasive Alien Plants. Sustainability 14: Article 2. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.