Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Open Access
Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst.
Number 417, 2016
Topical Issue on Fish Ecology
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 18 January 2016
  • Abbe T.B. and Montgomery D.R., 1996. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers: Res. Manag., 12, 201–221. [CrossRef]
  • Anderson R.V., Gutierrez M.L. and Romana M.A., 2002. Turtle habitat use in a reach of the upper Mississippi River. J. Freshw. Ecol., 17, 171–177. [CrossRef]
  • Angermeier P.L. and Karr J.R., 1984. Relationships between debris and fish habitat in a small warm water stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 113, 716–726. [CrossRef]
  • Barko V.A. and Briggler J.T., 2006. Midland smooth softshell (Apalone mutica) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtles in the middle Mississippi River: Habitat associations, population structure, and implications for conservation. Chelonian Conserv. Biol., 5, 225–231. [CrossRef]
  • Barko V.A., Briggler J.T. and Ostendorf D.E., 2004. Passive fishing techniques: A cause of turtle mortality in the Mississippi River. J. Wildl. Manag., 68, 1145–1150. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Bayley P.B., 1995. Understanding large river floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience, 45, 153–158. [CrossRef]
  • Bodie R.J. and Semlitsch R.D., 2000. Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles. Oecologia, 122, 138–146. [CrossRef]
  • Bodie R.J., Semlitsch R.D. and Renken R.B., 2000. Diversity and structure of turtle assemblages: associations with wetland characters across a flood plain landscape. Ecography, 23, 444–456. [CrossRef]
  • Brooks A.P., Gehrke P.C., Jansen J.D. and Abbe T.B., 2004. Experimental reintroduction of woody debris on the Williams River, NSW: geomorphic and ecological responses. River Res. Appl., 20, 513–536. [CrossRef]
  • Buhlmann K.A., Akre T.S.B.Iverson J.B., Karapatakis D., Mittermeier R.A., Georges A., Rhodin A.G.J., Van Dijk P.P. and Gibbons J.W., 2009. A global analysis of tortoise and freshwater turtle distributions with identification of priority conservation areas. Chelonian Conserv. Biol., 8, 116–149. [CrossRef]
  • Chaney A. and Smith C.L., 1950. Methods for collecting map turtles. Copeia, 1950, 323–333 [CrossRef]
  • Congdon J.D., Greene J.L. and Gibbons J.W., 1986. Biomass of freshwater turtles: a geographic comparison. Am. Midl. Nat. 115, 165–173. [CrossRef]
  • Connor E.F. and Simberloff D., 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition. Ecology, 60, 1132–1140. [CrossRef]
  • Diamond J.M., 1975. Assembly of species communities. In: Cody M.L. and Diamond J.M. (eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 342–444.
  • Dreslik M.J. and Phillips C.A., 2005. Turtle communities in the Upper Midwest, USA. J. Freshw. Ecol., 20, 149–164. [CrossRef]
  • Dunning J.B., Danielson B.J. and Pulliam H.R., 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65, 169–175. [CrossRef]
  • Echelle A.A. and Riggs C.D., 1972. Aspects of the early life histories of gars (Lepisosteus) in Lake Texoma. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 101, 106–112. [CrossRef]
  • Edds D.R., 1993. Fish assemblage structure and environmental correlates in Nepal’s Gandaki River. Copeia, 1993, 48–60. [CrossRef]
  • Ernest S.K., Brown J.H., Thibault K.M., White E.P. and Goheen J.R., 2008. Zero sum, the niche, and metacommunities: long-term dynamics of community assembly. Am. Nat., 172, 257–269. [CrossRef]
  • Ernst C.H. and Lovich J.E., 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA, 840 p.
  • Etnier D.A., and Starnes W.C., 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, 696 p.
  • Everett R.A. and Ruiz G.M., 1993. Coarse woody debris as a refuge from predation in aquatic communities. Oecologia, 93, 475–486. [CrossRef]
  • Fuasch K.D., Torgersen C.E., Baxter C.V. and Hiram W.L., 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience, 52, 483–498. [CrossRef]
  • Fuselier L., and Edds D., 1994. Habitat partitioning among three sympatric species of map turtles, genus Graptemys. J. Herpetol., 28, 154–158. [CrossRef]
  • Galat D.L., Fredrickson L.H., Humburg D.D., Bataille K.J., Bodie J.R., Dohrenwend J., Gelwicks G.T., Havel J.E., Helmers D.L., Hooker J.B., Jones J.R., Knowlton M.F., Kubisiak J., Mazourek J., Mccolpin A.C., Renken R.B. and Semlitsch R.D., 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large river wetlands. Bioscience, 48, 721–733. [CrossRef]
  • Gibbons J.W. and Lovich J.E., 1990. Sexual dimorphism in turtles with emphasis on the slider turtle (Trachemys scripta). Herpetol. Monogr., 1990, 1–29. [CrossRef]
  • Grossman G.D., Moyle P.B. and Whitaker Jr. J.O., 1982. Stochasity in structural and functional characteristics of an Indiana stream fish assemblage: A test of community theory. Am. Nat., 120, 423–454. [CrossRef]
  • Iverson J.B., 1982. Biomass in turtle populations: a neglected subject. Oecologia, 55, 69–76. [CrossRef]
  • Iverson J.B., 1992. Global correlates of species richness in turtles. Herpetolog. J., 2, 77–81.
  • Jackson D.A., Peres-Neto P.R. and Olden J.D., 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities – the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58, 157–170.
  • Johansen K., Hanson D., Lenfant C., 1970. Respiration in a primitive air breather, Amia calva. Respir. Physiol., 9, 162–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. and Sparks R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept in river- floodplain systems. In: Dodge D.P. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publications in Fishery and Aquatic Science 106, 110–127.
  • Lawton J.H., 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 60, 177–192. [CrossRef]
  • Lemmon P.E., 1957. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density. J. Forestry, 55, 667–668.
  • Lindeman P.V., 1999. Surveys of basking map turtles Graptemys spp. In three river drainages and the importance of deadwood abundance. Biol. Conserv., 88, 33-42. [CrossRef]
  • Lindeman P.V., 2000. Resource use of five sympatric turtle species: effects of competition, phylogeny, and morphology. Can. J. Zool., 78, 992–1008. [CrossRef]
  • Lovich J., 1988. Aggressive basking behavior in eastern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta picta). Herpetologica, 44, 197–202.
  • Matthews W.J. and Hill L.G., 1980. Habitat partitioning in the fish community of a southwestern river. The Southwest. Nat., 25, 51–66. [CrossRef]
  • Matthews W.J. and Styron Jr. J.T., 1981. Tolerance of headwater vs. mainstream fishes for abrupt physiochemical changes. Am. Midl. Nat., 105, 149–158. [CrossRef]
  • Meffe G.K. and Sheldon A.L., 1988. The influence of habitat structure on fish assemblage composition in southeastern blackwater streams. Am. Midl. Nat., 120, 225–240. [CrossRef]
  • Michener W.K. and Haeuber R.A., 1998. Flooding: Natural and managed disturbances. Bioscience, 48, 677–680. [CrossRef]
  • Moll D., 1976. Food and feeding strategies of the Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica ouachitensis). Am. Midl. Nat., 96, 478–482. [CrossRef]
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service., 2003. Fish assemblages as indicators of the biological condition of streams and watersheds. Wetland Science Institute Technical Note. Laurel, MD, USA, 50 p.
  • Palmer M.W., 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology, 74, 2215–2230. [CrossRef]
  • Prentice H.C. and Cramer W., 1990. The plant community as a niche bioassay: environmental correlates of local variation in Gypsophila fastigiata. J. Ecol., 78, 313–325. [CrossRef]
  • Pressey R.L., Cabeza M.Watts M.E.Cowling R.M. and Wilson K.A., 2007. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 583–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pringle C.M., Naiman R.J., Bretschko G., Karr J.R., Oswood M.W., Webster J.R., Welcomme R.L. and Winterbourn M.J., 1988. Patch dynamics in lotic systems: the stream as a mosaic. J. N. Am. Bentholog. Soc., 7, 503–524. [CrossRef]
  • Riedle J.D. 2014. Aquatic vertebrate assemblages in the Middle Trinity River Basin with an emphasis on turtles. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA. 118 p.
  • Riedle J.D., Kazmaier R.T., Killian J. and Littrell W.B., 2015. Assemblage structure of an eastern Texas aquatic turtle community. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., 10, 695–702.
  • Riedle J.D., Shipman P.A., Fox S.F. and Leslie D.M., 2006. Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma. Southwest. Nat., 51, 35–40. [CrossRef]
  • Robertson A.I. and Crook D.A., 1999. Relationships between riverine fish and woody debris: implications for lowland rivers. Mar. Freshw. Res., 50, 941–953. [CrossRef]
  • Robison H.W. and Buchanan T.M., 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, 536 p.
  • Schlosser I.J., 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. Bioscience, 41, 704–712. [CrossRef]
  • Schlosser I.J., 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiol., 303, 71–81. [CrossRef]
  • Semlitsch R.D. and Bodie J.R., 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv. Biol., 17, 1219–1228. [CrossRef]
  • Shipman P.A. and Riedle J.D., 2008. Status and distribution of the alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) in southeastern Missouri. Southeast. Nat., 7, 331–338. [CrossRef]
  • Subalusky A.L., Fitzgerald L.A. and Smith L.L., 2009. Ontogenetic niche shifts in the American alligator establish functional connectivity between aquatic systems. Biol. Conserv., 142, 1507–1514. [CrossRef]
  • Taylor C.M., 1997. Fish species richness and incidence patterns in isolated and connected stream pools: effects of pool volume and spatial position. Oecologia, 110, 560–566. [CrossRef]
  • Taylor C.M. and Warren M.L., 2001. Dynamics in species composition of stream fish assemblages: environmental variability and nested subsets. Ecology, 82, 2320–2330. [CrossRef]
  • Telfair R.C., 1988. Conservation of the Catfish Creek ecosystem: a national natural landmark in eastern Texas. Tex. J. Sci., 40, 11–23.
  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Schaffers A.P., 2004. Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology, 85, 834–846. [CrossRef]
  • terBraak C.J.F. and Verdonschot P.F.M., 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci., 57, 255–289. [CrossRef]
  • Townsend C.R., 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream ecology. J. N. Am. Bentholog. Soc., 8, 36–50. [CrossRef]
  • Vellend M., 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol., 85, 183–205. [CrossRef]
  • Welcomme R.L., 1979. Fisheries ecology of floodplain rivers. Longman Group, New York, 240 p.
  • Welty J.J., Beechie T., Sullivan K., Hyink D.M., Bilby R.E., Andrus C. and Press G., 2002. Riparian aquatic interaction simulator (RAIS): a model of riparian forest dynamics for the generation of large woody debris and shade. For. Ecol. Manag., 162, 299–318. [CrossRef]
  • Winemiller K.O., Tarim S., Shormann D. and Cotner J.B., 2000. Fish assemblage structure in relation to environmental variation among Brazos River oxbow lakes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 129, 451–468. [CrossRef]