Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 406, 2012
Article Number 01
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 25 July 2012
  • Afnor, 2000. Norme Française NF T 90-354 : Qualité de l’eau – Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Afnor, 1–53.
  • Afnor, 2003. NF EN 13946 : Qualité de l’eau – Guide pour l’échantillonnage en routine et le prétraitement des diatomées benthiques de rivières. Afnor, 1–18.
  • Afnor, 2004. NF EN 14407 : Qualité de l’eau – Guide pour l’identification et le dénombrement des échantillons de diatomées benthiques de rivières, et leur interprétation. Afnor, 1–13.
  • Afnor, 2007. NF T90-354 : Qualité de l’eau – Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Afnor, 1–79.
  • Bahls L.L., 1993. Periphyton bioassessment methods for Montana streams. Water Quality Bureau, 1–23.
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers : periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, 2nd edition, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, 1 p.
  • Battegazzore M., Morosi A., Gallino B. andFenoglio S., 2004. Environmental quality evaluation of Alpine springs in NW Italy using benthic diatoms. Diatom Res., 19, 149–165. [CrossRef]
  • Berthon V., Bouchez A. andRimet F., 2011. Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pollution in rivers : case study of south-eastern french rivers. Hydrobiologia, 673, 259–271. [CrossRef]
  • Butcher R. W., 1947. Studies in the ecology of rivers. IV. The algae of organically enriched water. J. Ecol., 35, 186–191. [CrossRef]
  • Carrère P. and Bloor J.M.G., 2009. Lexique thématique à l’usage des techniciens en écologie, INRA, EFPA, Unité de Recherche sur l’Ecosystème Prairial, 234 av. du Brezet, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France, 7 p.
  • Chessman B., Growns I., Currey J. andPlunkett-Cole N., 1999. Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers. Freshwater Biol., 41, 317–331. [CrossRef]
  • Coste M., Bosca C. and Dauta A., 1991. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in France. In : Whitton B.A., Rott E. and Fridriech G. (eds.), Institut für Botanik, Universitat Innsbruck, 75–83.
  • Druart J.C. andStraub F., 1988. Description de deux nouvelles Cyclotelles (Bacillariophyceae) de milieux alcalins et eutrophes : Cyclotella costei nov. sp. et Cyclotella wuetrichiana nov. sp. Schweizererische Zeitschrift für Hydrobiologie, 50, 182–188.
  • Evans K.M., Wortley A.H., Simpson G.E., Chepurnov V.A. andMann D.G., 2008. A molecular systematic approach to explore diversity within the Sellaphora pupula species complex (bacillariophyta). J. Phycol., 44, 215–231. [CrossRef]
  • Finkel Z.V., Vaillancourt C.J., Irwin A.J., Reavie E.D. andSmol J.P., 2009. Environmental control of diatom community size structure varies across aquatic ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B, 276, 1627–1634. [CrossRef]
  • Fjerdingstad E., 1950. The microflora of the river Molleaa with special reference to the relation of benthic algae to pollution. Folia Limnol. Scand., 5, 1–123.
  • Fore L.S., 2002. Evaluating the biological condition of Bellevue streams using invertebrates and diatoms, Statistical Design, 1–21.
  • Fore L.S. andGrafe C., 2002. Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (USA). Freshwater Biol., 47, 2015–2037. [CrossRef]
  • Guiry M.D. and Guiry G.M., 2012. AlgaeBase, World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway,; searched on 29 March 2012.
  • Hakansson, H. and Carter K.B., 1990. An interpretation of Hustedt’s terms “Schattenlinie”, “Perlenreihe” and “Höcker” Using Specimens of the Cyclotella radiosa-complex, C. distinguenda Hust., and C. cyclopuncta nov. sp. J. Iowa Acad. Sci., 97, 153–156.
  • Hillebrand H., Durselen C.D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. andZohary T., 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol., 35, 403–424. [CrossRef]
  • Hoagland K.D., Roemer S.C. andRosowski J.R., 1982. Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages, with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Am. J. Bot., 69, 188–213. [CrossRef]
  • Hustedt F., 1957. Die Diatomeenflora des Flusssystems der Weser im Gebiet der Hansestadt Bremen. Abhandlungen naturwissenschaftlichen Verein zu Bremen, 34, 181–440.
  • Jones F.C., 2008. Taxonomic sufficiency : The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ. Rev., 16, 45–69. [CrossRef]
  • Julius M.L. and Theriot E.C., 2010. The Diatoms : a primer. In : Smol J.P. and Stoermer E.F. (eds.), The diatoms : applications for the environmental and earth sciences, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 8–22.
  • Kelly M.G., Cazaubon A., Coring E., Dell’Uomo A., Ector L., Goldsmith B., Guasch H., Hürlimann J., Jarlman A., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Laugaste R., Lindstrom E.A., Leitao M., Marvan P., Padisak J., Pipp E., Prygiel J., Rott E., Sabater S., Van Dam H. andVizinet J., 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water qualtiy assessments in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol., 10, 215–224. [CrossRef]
  • Kermarrec L., Bouchez A., Rimet F. and Humbert J.F., 2012. Using a polyphasic approach to explore the diversity and geographical distribution of the Gomphonema parvulum (Kützing) Kützing complex (Bacillariophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 44, 567–577.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil : Naviculaceae. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 876 p.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil : Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H., and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 610 p.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil : Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 598 p.
  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H., 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil : Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 4. In : Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhauer D. (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 437 p.
  • Lange-Bertalot H., 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwig., 64, 285–304.
  • Lavoie I., Lento J. andMorin A., 2010. Inadequacy of size distributions of stream benthic diatoms for environmental monitoring. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29, 586–601. [CrossRef]
  • Lecointe C., Coste M. and Prygiel J., 1993. “Omnidia” : software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories managment. Hydrobiologia, 269/270, 509–513. [CrossRef]
  • Leira M., Chen G., Dalton C., Irvine K.N. andTaylor D.H., 2009. Patterns in freshwater diatom taxonomic distinctness along an eutrophication gradient. Freshwater Biol., 54, 1–14. [CrossRef]
  • Lobo E., Katoh K. andAruga Y., 1995. Response of epilithic diatom assemblages to water pollution in rivers in the Tokyo Metropolitan area, Japan. Freshwater Biol., 34, 191–204. [CrossRef]
  • Mann D.G. andDroop S.J.M., 1996. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 336, 19-32. [CrossRef]
  • Mann D.G., McDonald S.M., Bayer M.M., Droop S.J.M., Chepurnov V.A., Loke R.E., Ciobanu A. and du Buf J.M.H., 2004. The Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyceae) : morphometric analysis, ultrastructure and mating data provide evidence for five new species. Phycologia, 43, 459–482. [CrossRef]
  • Padisak J., Crossetti L.O. andNaselli-Flores L., 2009. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification : a critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia, 621, 1–19. [CrossRef]
  • Passy S.I., 2007a. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquat. Bot., 86, 171–178. [CrossRef]
  • Passy S.I., 2007b. Differential cell size optimization strategies produce distinct diatom richness-body size relationships in stream benthos and plankton. J. Ecol., 95, 745–754. [CrossRef]
  • Passy S.I. andLarson C.A., 2011. Succession in stream biofilms is an environmentally driven gradient of stress tolerance. Microb. Ecol., 62, 414–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Patrick R., 1961. A study of the number and kinds of species found in rivers of the Eastern Unisted States. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. Phila., 113, 215–258.
  • Ponader K.C. andPotapova M.G., 2007. Diatoms from the genus Achnanthidium in flowing waters of the Appalachian Mountains (North America) : Ecology, distribution and taxonomic notes. Limnologica, 37, 227–241. [CrossRef]
  • Potapova M.G., Charles D.F., Ponader K.C. andWinter D.M., 2004. Quantifying species indicator values for trophic diatom indices : a comparison of approaches. Hydrobiologia, 517, 25–41. [CrossRef]
  • Poulickova A., Vesela J., Neustupa J. andSkaloud P., 2010. Pseudocryptic Diversity versus Cosmopolitanism in Diatoms : a Case Study on Navicula cryptocephala Kutz. (Bacillariophyceae) and Morphologically Similar Taxa. Protist, 161, 353–369. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pringle C.M., 1990. Nutrient spatial heterogeneity : effects on community structure, physiognomy, and diversity of stream algae. Ecology, 71, 905–920. [CrossRef]
  • Rimet F., 2012. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 683, 1–24. [CrossRef]
  • Rimet F. andBouchez A., 2011. Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers : lotic mesocosm approaches. Ecol. Indic., 11, 489–499. [CrossRef]
  • Rimet F. andBouchez A., 2012. Biomonitoring River Diatoms : Implications of Taxonomic Resolution. Ecol. Indic., 15, 92–99. [CrossRef]
  • Round F.E., Crawford R.M. and Mann D.G., 1990. The diatoms, Biology, morphology of the genera, Cambridge University Press, 747 p.
  • Rumeau, A. and Coste M., 1988. Initiation à la systematique des diatomées d’eau douce pour l’utilisation pratique d’un indice diatomique générique. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 309, 1–69. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Smol J.P. and Stoermer E.F., 2010. Applications and uses of diatoms : prologue. In : Smol J.P. and Stoermer E.F. (eds.), The diatoms : applications for the environmental and earth sciences, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 3–7.
  • Trobajo R., Clavero E., Chepurnov V., Sabbe K., Mann D.G., Ishihara S. andCox E.J., 2009. Morphological, genetic and mating diversity within the widespread bioindicator Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia, 48, 443–459. [CrossRef]
  • Tudesque L., Grenouillet G., Gevrey M., Khazraie K. andBrosse S., 2012. Influence of small-scale gold mining on French Guiana streams : Are diatom assemblages valid disturbance sensors? Ecol. Indic., 14, 100–106. [CrossRef]
  • Tuji A., 2000. Observation of developmental processes in loosely attached diatom (Bacillariophyceae) communities. Phycol. Res., 48, 75–84. [CrossRef]
  • Van Heurck H., 1882. Synopsis des diatomées de Belgique, Anvers 1885.
  • Vanelslander B., Creach V., Vanormelingen P., Ernst A., Chepurnov V.A., Sahan E., Muyzer G., Stal L.J., Vyverman W. andSabbe K., 2009. Ecological differentiation between sympatric pseudocryptic species in the estuarine benthic diatom Navicula Phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae) 1. J. Phycol., 45, 1278–1289. [CrossRef]
  • Weaver W. and Shannon C.E., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  • Zampella R.A., Laidig K.J. andLowe R.L., 2007. Distribution of the diatoms in relation to land use and pH in blackwater coastal plain streams. Environ. Mange., 39, 369–384.
  • Zelinka M. andMarvan P., 1961. Zur Prazisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewasser. Arch. Hydrobiol., 57, 389–407.