Open Access
Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst.
Number 405, 2012
Article Number 06
Number of page(s) 17
Published online 13 June 2012
  • Appelberg M., Berger H.M., Hesthagen T., Kleiven E., Kurkilahti M., Raitaniemi J. andRask M., 1995. Development and intercalibration of methods of Nordic freshwater fish monitoring. Water Air Soil Pollut., 85, 883–888. [CrossRef]
  • Balk H., 2001. Development of hydroacoustic methods for fish detection in shallow water, Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Oslo, Norway.
  • Balk H. and Lindem T., 2007. Sonar4 and Sonar5-Pro Post Processing Systems, Operator Manual, Version 5.9.7. Balk and Lindem Data Acquisition, Oslo, Norway.
  • Bíró P., 1997. Temporal variation in Lake Balaton and its fish populations. Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 6, 196–216. [CrossRef]
  • Boswell K.M., Wilson M.P. andWilson C.A., 2007. Hydroacoustics as a tool for assessing fish biomass and size distribution associated with discrete shallow water estuarine habitats in Louisiana. Estuar. Coast., 30, 607–617.
  • Boswell K.M., Kaller M.D., Cowan Jr.J.H. andWilson C.A., 2008. Evaluation of target strength-fish length equation choices for estimating estuarine fish biomass. Hydrobiologia, 610, 113–123. [CrossRef]
  • Boswell K.M., Wilson M.P., MacRae P.S.D., Wilson C.A. andCowan Jr.J.H., 2010. Seasonal estimates of fish biomass and length distributions using acoustics and traditional nets to identify estuarine habitat preferences in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Marine & Coastal Fisheries, 2, 83–97. [CrossRef]
  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization), 2005. Water quality – Sampling of fish with multi-mesh gillnets (14757 :2005), CEN, Brussels.
  • Deceliere-Vergés C., Argillier C., Lanoiselée C., De Bortoli J. andGuillard J., 2009. Stability and precision of the metrics obtained using CEN multi-mesh gillnets in natural and artificial lakes in France. Fish. Res., 99, 17–25. [CrossRef]
  • Dennerline D.E., Jennings C.A. andDegan D.J., 2012. Relationships between hydroacoustic derived density and gill net catch : Implication for fish assessments. Fish. Res., 123-124, 78–89. [CrossRef]
  • Didrikas T. andHansson S., 2004. In situ target strength of the Baltic Sea herring and sprat. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 61, 378–382. [CrossRef]
  • Draštík V. andKubečka J., 2005. Fish avoidance of acoustic survey boat in shallow waters. Fish. Res., 72, 219–228. [CrossRef]
  • Draštík V., Kubečka J., Čech M., Frouzová J., Říha M., Jůza T., Tušer M., Jarolím O., Prchalová M., Peterka J., Vašek M., Kratochvíl M., Matĕna J. and Mrkvička T., 2009. Hydroacoustic estimates of fish stocks in temperate reservoirs : day or night surveys? Aquat. Living Resour., 22, 69–77. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Elliott J.M. andFletcher J.M., 2001. A comparison of three methods for assessing the abundance of Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus, in Windermere (northwest England). Fish. Res., 53, 39–46. [CrossRef]
  • Emmrich M., Helland L.P., Busch S., Schiller S. andMehner T., 2010. Hydroacoustic estimates of fish densities in comparison with stratified pelagic trawl sampling in two deep, coregonid-dominated lakes. Fish. Res., 105, 178-186. [CrossRef]
  • Erős T., Heino J., Schmera D. andRask M., 2009a. Characterising functional trait diversity and trait-environment relationships in fish assemblages of boreal lakes. Freshw. Biol., 54, 1788–1803. [CrossRef]
  • Erős T., Specziár A. andBíró P., 2009b. Assessing fish assemblages in reed habitats of a large shallow lake – A comparison between gillnetting and electric fishing. Fish. Res., 96, 70–76. [CrossRef]
  • Frouzová J., Kubečka J., Balk H. andFrouz J., 2005. Target strength of some European fish species and its dependence on fish body parameters. Fish. Res., 75, 86–96. [CrossRef]
  • Gjelland K.Ø., Bøhn T., Knudsen F.R. andAmundsen P.A., 2004. Influence of light on the swimming speed of coregonids in subarctic lakes. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 41, 137–146.
  • Godlewska M., Długoszewski B. andDoroszczyk L., 2009. Day/night effects of passing boat on fish distribution in the shallow Malta Reservoir. Hydroacoustics, 12, 61–68.
  • Godlewska M., Colon M., Jóźwik A. andGuillard J., 2011. How pulse lengths impact fish stock estimations during hydroacoustic measurements at 70 kHz. Aquat. Living Resour., 24, 71–78. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Godlewska M., Frouzova J., Kubečka J., Winiewolski W. andSzlakowski J., 2012. Comparison of hydroacoustic estimates with fish census in shallow Malta Reservoir – which TS/L regression to use in horizontal beam applications? Fish. Res., 123–124, 90–97. [CrossRef]
  • Guillard J. andVergès C., 2007. The repeatability of fish biomass and size distribution estimates obtained by hydroacoustic surveys using various sampling strategies and statistical analyses. Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol., 92, 605–617. [CrossRef]
  • Hamley J.M., 1975. Review of gillnet selectivity. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 32, 1943–1969. [CrossRef]
  • Hansson S. andRudstam L.G., 1995. Gillnet catches as an estimate of fish abundance : a comparison between vertical gillnet catches and hydroacoustic abundances of Baltic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52, 75–83. [CrossRef]
  • Herodek S., Laczkó L. and Virág Á., 1988. Lake Balaton : Research and Management, Nexus, Budapest.
  • Holmgren K. andAppelberg M., 2000. Size structure of benthic freshwater fish communities in relation to environmental gradients. J. Fish Biol., 57, 1312–1330. [CrossRef]
  • Istvánovics V., Clement A., Somlyódy L., Specziár A., Tóth L.G. andPadisák J., 2007. Updating water quality targets for shallow Lake Balaton (Hungary), recovering from eutrophication. Hydrobiologia, 581, 305–318. [CrossRef]
  • Jackson D.A. andHarvey H.H., 1997. Qualitative and quantitative sampling of lake fish communities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54, 2807–2813. [CrossRef]
  • Janáč M. andJurajda P., 2005. Inter-calibration of three electric fishing techniques to estimate 0 + juvenile fish densities on sandy river beaches. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 12, 161–167. [CrossRef]
  • Knudsen F.R. andSægrov H., 2002. Benefits from horizontal beaming during acoustic survey : application to three Norwegian lakes. Fish. Res., 56, 205–211. [CrossRef]
  • Kubečka J. andWittingerova M., 1998. Horizontal beaming as a crucial component of acoustic fish stock assessment in freshwater reservoirs. Fish. Res., 35, 99–106. [CrossRef]
  • Kubečka J., Duncan A., Duncan W.M., Sinclair D. andButterworth A.J., 1994. Brown trout populations of three Scottish lochs estimated by horizontal sonar and multi-mesh gillnets. Fish. Res., 20, 29–48. [CrossRef]
  • Kubečka J., Frouzová J., Balk H., Čech M., Draštík V. and Prchalová M., 2009. Regressions for conversion between target strength and fish length in horizontal acoustic surveys. In : Papadakis J.S. and Bjorno L. (eds.), Underwater acoustic measurements, Technologies & Results, Foundation for Research & Technology, Heraklion, Greece, 1039–1044.
  • Lauridsen T.L., Landkildehus F., Jeppesen E., Jørgensen T.B. andSøndergaard M., 2008. A comparison of methods for calculating Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) of gill net catches in lakes. Fish. Res., 93, 204–211. [CrossRef]
  • Linløkken A. andHaugen T.O., 2006. Density and temperature dependence of gill net catch per unit effort for perch, Perca fluviatilis, and roach, Rutilus rutilus. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 13, 261–269. [CrossRef]
  • Mehner T. andSchulz M., 2002. Monthly variability of hydroacoustic fish stock estimates in a deep lake and its correlation to gillnet catches. J. Fish Biol., 61, 1109–1121. [CrossRef]
  • Mehner T., Diekmann M., Brämic U. andLemcke R., 2005. Comparison of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human use intensity. Freshw. Biol., 50, 70–85. [CrossRef]
  • Millar R.B., 2000. Untangling the confusion surrounding the estimation of gill net selectivity. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57, 507–511. [CrossRef]
  • Mous P.J., van Densen W.L.T. andMachiels M.A.M., 2004. Vertical distribution patterns of zooplanktivorous fish in shallow, eutrophic lake, mediated by water transparency. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish., 13, 61–69. [CrossRef]
  • Murphy B. and Willis D. (eds.), 1996. Fisheries Techniques, 2nd edition, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Olin M. andMalinen T., 2003. Comparison of gillnet and trawl in diurnal fish community sampling. Hydrobiologia, 506–509, 443–449. [CrossRef]
  • Olin M., Kurkilahti M., Peitola P. andRuuhijärvi J., 2004. The effects of fish accumulation on the catchability of multimesh gillnet. Fish. Res., 68, 135–147. [CrossRef]
  • Peltonen H., Ruuhijärvi J., Malinen T. andHorppila J., 1999. Estimation of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) and smelt (Osmerus eperlanus (L.)) stocks with virtual population analysis, hydroacoustics and gillnet CPUE. Fish. Res., 44, 25–36. [CrossRef]
  • Pierce R.B., Tomcko C.M., Pereira D.L and Staples D.F., 2010. Differing catchability among lakes : influences of lake basin morphology and other factors on gill-net catchability of northern pike. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 139, 1109–1120. [CrossRef]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Říha M., Mrkvička T., Vašek M., Jůza T., Kratochvíl M., Peterka J., Draštík V. andKřížek J., 2009. Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species. Fish. Res., 96, 51–57. [CrossRef]
  • Prchalová M., Mrkvičká T., Kubečka J., Peterka J., Čech M., Muška M., Kratochvíl M. andVašek M., 2010. Fish activity as determined by gillnet catch : A comparison of two reservoir of different turbidity. Fish. Res., 102, 291–296. [CrossRef]
  • Prchalová M., Mrkvičká T., Peterka J., Čech M., Berec L. andKubečka J., 2011. A model of gillnet catch in relation to the catchable biomass, saturation, soak time and sampling period. Fish. Res., 107, 201–209. [CrossRef]
  • Rakowitz G., Kubečka J., Fesl C. andKeckeis H., 2009. Intercalibration of hydroacoustic and mark-recapture methods for assessing the spawning population size of a threatened fish species. J. Fish Biol., 75, 1356–1370. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Simmonds J. and MacLennan D., 2005. Fisheries Acoustics : Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Specziár A., 2010. Fish fauna of Lake Balaton : stock composition, living conditions of fish and directives of the modern utilization of the fish stock. Acta Biol. Debr. Suppl. Oecol. Hung., 23 (Hydrobiol. Monogr. 2), 7–185 (in Hungarian with an English summary).
  • Specziár A., Erős T., György Á.I., Tátrai I. andBíró P., 2009. A comparison between the Nordic gillnet and whole water column gillnet for characterizing fish assemblages in the shallow Lake Balaton. Ann. Limnol., 45, 171–180. [CrossRef]
  • Tátrai I., Specziár A., György Á.I. andBíró P., 2008. Comparison of fish size distribution and fish abundance estimates obtained with hydroacoustics and gill netting in the open water of a large shallow lake. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Lim., 44, 231–240. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Tušer M., Kubečka J., Frouzová J. andJarolíma O., 2009. Fish orientation along the longitudinal profile of the Římov reservoir during daytime : Consequences for horizontal acoustic surveys. Fish. Res., 96, 23–29. [CrossRef]
  • Vašek M., Kubečka J., Čech M., Draštík V., Matĕna J., Mrkvičká T., Peterka J. andPrchalová M., 2009. Diel variation in gillnet catches and vertical distribution of pelagic fishes in a stratified European reservoir. Fish. Res., 96, 64–69. [CrossRef]
  • Winfield I.J., Fletcher J.M., James J.B. andBean C.W., 2009. Assessment of fish populations in still waters using hydroacoustics and survey gill netting : Experiences with Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) in the UK. Fish. Res., 96, 30–38. [CrossRef]